The great artists are often the ones who are best at recÂogÂnizÂing and exploitÂing the unique charÂacÂter of their mediÂum.
In the earÂly 20th cenÂtuÂry, phoÂtogÂraÂphy was mired in an intenÂtionÂalÂly fuzzy PicÂtoÂriÂalÂism. The preÂvailÂing view was that phoÂtogÂraÂphy had to imiÂtate paintÂing, or it wasÂn’t “art.” So in the earÂly 1930s Edward WestÂon, Ansel Adams and a few othÂers on the West Coast formed Group f/64 in protest. They embraced their mediÂum’s inherÂent strength by placÂing large forÂmat camÂeras on tripods and stopÂping the lensÂes way down (all the way to f/64) to capÂture scenes with a levÂel of detail and clarÂiÂty that a painter could only dream of achievÂing.
Across the Atlantic an even greater revÂoÂluÂtion was takÂing place. With the introÂducÂtion of the 35mm Leica camÂera and fast films, EuroÂpean phoÂtogÂraÂphers in the late 1920s and earÂly 1930s were beginÂning to explore the mediÂum’s astonÂishÂing abilÂiÂty to freeze time. Not only could phoÂtogÂraÂphy renÂder a staÂtÂic scene with more detail than paintÂing, it could isoÂlate and preÂserve an othÂerÂwise tranÂsiÂtoÂry moment from the flux of life. No artist seized upon this essenÂtial aspect of phoÂtogÂraÂphy with greater brilÂliance and conÂsisÂtenÂcy than the FrenchÂman HenÂri CartiÂer-BresÂson.
“In phoÂtogÂraÂphy,” wrote CartiÂer-BresÂson, “there is a new kind of plasÂticÂiÂty, the prodÂuct of instanÂtaÂneous lines made by moveÂments of the subÂject. We work in uniÂson with moveÂment as though it were a preÂsenÂtiÂment of the way in which life itself unfolds. But inside moveÂment there is one moment at which the eleÂments in motion are in balÂance. PhoÂtogÂraÂphy must seize upon this moment and hold immoÂbile the equiÂlibÂriÂum of it.”
CartiÂer-BresÂson would often say that his greatÂest joy was geomÂeÂtry. When he was 20 years old he studÂied paintÂing under the cubist AndrĂ© Lhote, who adoptÂed for his school the motÂto of PlaÂto’s AcadÂeÂmy: “Let no one ignoÂrant of geomÂeÂtry enter.” CartiÂer-BresÂson took an earÂly interÂest in mathÂeÂmatÂiÂcalÂly sophisÂtiÂcatÂed painters. “He loved PaoÂlo UccelÂlo and Piero delÂla Francesca because they were the painters of divine proÂporÂtions,” writes Pierre Assouline in his book, HenÂri CartiÂer-BresÂson: A BiogÂraÂphy. “CartiÂer-BresÂson was so immersed in their works that his mind filled with proÂtracÂtors and plumb lines. Like them, he dreamed of diagÂoÂnals and proÂporÂtions, and became obsessed with the mysÂtique of meaÂsureÂments, as if the world was simÂply the prodÂuct of numerÂiÂcal comÂbiÂnaÂtions.”
At the same time the young artist fell under the sway of a teacher whose approach was decidÂedÂly less ratioÂnal. While still in his teens, CartiÂer-BresÂson began sitÂting in on AndrĂ© BreÂton’s legÂendary SurÂreÂalÂist gathÂerÂings at the CafĂ© de la Place Blanche. He had litÂtle regard for SurÂreÂalÂist paintÂing, but was intoxÂiÂcatÂed with the SurÂreÂalÂist phiÂlosÂoÂphy of life: the emphaÂsis on chance and intuÂition, the role of sponÂtaÂneous expresÂsion, the all-encomÂpassÂing attiÂtude of revolt. It made a proÂfound impresÂsion. In HenÂri CartiÂer-BresÂson: The EarÂly Work, Peter GalasÂsi describes the SurÂreÂalÂist approach to life in a way that also neatÂly capÂtures CartiÂer-BresÂson’s evenÂtuÂal modus operanÂdi as a phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer: “Alone, the SurÂreÂalÂist wanÂders the streets withÂout desÂtiÂnaÂtion but with a preÂmedÂiÂtatÂed alertÂness for the unexÂpectÂed detail that will release a marÂvelous and comÂpelling realÂiÂty just beneath the banal surÂface of ordiÂnary exisÂtence.”
The geoÂmetÂric forÂmalÂism of RenaisÂsance paintÂing and the serendipÂiÂty of SurÂreÂalÂism were two key influÂences on CartiÂer-BresÂson’s phoÂtogÂraÂphy. A third came as an epiphany when he stumÂbled upon a reproÂducÂtion of MarÂtin MunkácÂsi’s “Three Boys at Lake TanÂganyiÂka.” The picÂture showed a group of African boys frolÂickÂing in the water. If the phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer had pressed the shutÂter a milÂlisecÂond earÂliÂer or latÂer, the beauÂtiÂfulÂly balÂanced, interÂlockÂing comÂpoÂsiÂtion would not have existÂed. “I sudÂdenÂly underÂstood that phoÂtogÂraÂphy can fix eterÂniÂty in a moment,” CartiÂer-BresÂson latÂer said. He gave up paintÂing and bought his first Leica.
Over the next half cenÂtuÂry CartiÂer-BresÂson would travÂel the world with a Leica in one hand, the strap twistÂed around his wrist, ready to raise it to his eye and fix eterÂniÂty at any moment. InwardÂly he held onto the spirÂit of SurÂreÂalÂism while outÂwardÂly callÂing himÂself a phoÂtoÂjourÂnalÂist. As a phoÂtoÂjourÂnalÂist he witÂnessed some of the biggest events of the 20th cenÂtuÂry. He was with GandÂhi a few minÂutes before he was assasÂsiÂnatÂed in 1948. He was in ChiÂna when the comÂmuÂnists took over in 1949. “He was the TolÂstoy of phoÂtogÂraÂphy,” said Richard AveÂdon shortÂly after CartiÂer-BresÂson’s death in 2004 at the age of 95. “With proÂfound humanÂiÂty, he was the witÂness of the 20th CenÂtuÂry.”
“To take phoÂtographs,” CartiÂer-BresÂson once said, “is to hold one’s breath when all facÂulÂties conÂverge in the face of fleeÂing realÂiÂty. It is at that moment that masÂterÂing an image becomes a great physÂiÂcal and intelÂlecÂtuÂal joy.”
HenÂri CartiÂer-BresÂson: The DeciÂsive Moment (above) is an 18-minute film proÂduced in 1973 by ScholasÂtic MagÂaÂzines, Inc. and the InterÂnaÂtionÂal CenÂter of PhoÂtogÂraÂphy. It feaÂtures a selecÂtion of CartiÂer-BresÂson’s iconÂic phoÂtographs, along with rare comÂmenÂtary by the phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer himÂself.