Even if you don’t like comÂic books, think of names like SuperÂman, BatÂman, and WonÂder Woman, and you get a very clear menÂtal picÂture indeed. ClasÂsic superÂheroes live, breathe, batÂtle supervilÂlians, and even die and return to life across decades upon decades of stoÂryÂlines (and often more than one at once), but we all know them because, just like the most endurÂing corÂpoÂrate logos, they also stand as surÂpassÂingÂly effecÂtive works of comÂmerÂcial art. But givÂen that countÂless difÂferÂent artists in varÂiÂous media have had to renÂder these superÂheroes over those decades, how have their images remained so utterÂly conÂsisÂtent?
Being 33 years old, this parÂticÂuÂlar style guide doesÂn’t perÂfectÂly reflect the way all of DC’s superÂheroes look today, what with the aesÂthetÂic changes made to keep them hip year on year. But you’ll notice that, while fashÂions tend to have their way with the more minor charÂacÂters (longÂtime DC fans espeÂcialÂly lament the headÂband and big hair this style guide inflictÂed upon SuperÂgirl), the major ones still look, on the whole, pretÂty much the same. Sure, SuperÂman has the strength and the flight, BatÂman has the wealth and the vast armory of high-tech crime-fightÂing tools, and WonÂder Woman can do pretÂty much anyÂthing, but all those abilÂiÂties pale in comÂparÂiÂson to the sheer powÂer of their design. You can flip through the rest of the Style Guide here.
It is surÂprisÂing to me, but a few peoÂple I’ve come across don’t know the name of carÂtoonÂist Robert Crumb, cult hero of underÂground comics and obscure AmerÂiÂcana record colÂlectÂing. On secÂond thought, maybe this shouldÂn’t come as such a surÂprise. These are some pretÂty small worlds, after all, popÂuÂlatÂed by obsesÂsive fans and archivists and not always parÂticÂuÂlarÂly welÂcomÂing to outÂsiders. But Crumb is difÂferÂent. For all his social awkÂwardÂness and hyper-obsesÂsiveÂness, he seems strangeÂly accesÂsiÂble to me. The easÂiÂest refÂerÂence for those who’ve nevÂer heard of him is Steve Buscemi’s SeyÂmour in TerÂry ZwigofÂf’s Ghost World. There’s an obviÂous tribÂute to Crumb in the charÂacÂter (Zwigoff preÂviÂousÂly made an R. Crumb docÂuÂmenÂtary), though it’s cerÂtainÂly not a one-to-one relaÂtion (the film adapts Daniel Clowe’s comÂic of the same name.)
Whether or not Ghost World (or ZwigofÂf’s Crumb) rings a bell, there’s still the matÂter of how to comÂmuÂniÂcate the lovÂable lewdÂness and aggresÂsive anachroÂnism that is CrumÂb’s art. For that one may only need to menÂtion Big BrothÂer & the HoldÂing ComÂpaÂny’s 1968 clasÂsic Cheap Thrills (top), the first album covÂer Crumb designed—and which Janis Joplin insistÂed upon over the record comÂpaÂny’s objecÂtions. With its focus on musiÂcians, and its approÂpriÂaÂtion of hipÂpie weirdÂness, racist AmerÂiÂcan imagery, and an obsesÂsion with female posÂteÂriÂors that rivals Sir-Mix-a-Lot’s, the covÂer pretÂty much spans the specÂtrum of perenÂniÂal Crumb styles and themes. Above, see anothÂer of CrumÂb’s covÂers, for a comÂpiÂlaÂtion called The Music NevÂer Stopped: Roots of the GrateÂful Dead, which colÂlects such roots and old-school rock and roll artists as MerÂle HagÂgard, Chuck Berry, Bob Dylan, RevÂerend Gary Davis, HowlÂin’ Wolf, and more.
Though he objectÂed to the 1995 assignment—saying to Shanachie Records, “You want all these peoÂple on a CD covÂer? What are they, like, five inchÂes across?”—Crumb must have relÂished the subÂject. (And he was paid, as per usuÂal, in vinÂtage 78s.) Next to those posÂteÂriÂors, CrumÂb’s true love has always been AmerÂiÂcan roots music—ragtime, swing, old counÂtry and blueÂgrass, Delta counÂtry blues—and he has spent a good part of his career illusÂtratÂing artists he loves, and those he doesÂn’t. From famous names like Joplin, Dylan, and B.B. King (above, whose music Crumb said he “didÂn’t care for, but I don’t find it that objecÂtionÂable either”), to much more obscure artists, like Bo Carter, known for his “Please Warm My Wiener,” on the 1974 comÂpiÂlaÂtion album below.
CrumÂb’s use of racialÂly quesÂtionÂable and sexÂist imagery—however satirical—has perÂhaps renÂdered him untouchÂable in some cirÂcles, and it’s hard to imagÂine many of his album covÂers passÂing corÂpoÂrate muster these days. His recent work has moved toward more straightÂforÂward, respectÂful porÂtraiÂture, like that of King and of Skip James on the best-of below, from a series called “Heroes of the Blues.” (Crumb also illusÂtratÂed “Heroes of Jazz” and “Heroes of CounÂtry,” as we feaÂtured in this post.) See CrumÂb’s inimÂitable, loosÂer porÂtrait style again furÂther down in 2002 album art for a group called Hawks and Eagles.
Crumb may have shed some of his more unpalatÂable tenÂdenÂcies, but he hasÂn’t lost his lasÂcivÂiÂous edge. HowÂevÂer, his work has matured over the years, takÂing on seriÂous subÂjects like the book of GenÂeÂsis and the CharÂlie HebÂdo masÂsacre. For an artist with such pecuÂliar perÂsonÂal focus, Crumb is surÂprisÂingÂly verÂsaÂtile, but it’s his album covÂers that comÂbine his two greatÂest loves. “What makes CrumÂb’s art so approÂpriÂate for the album sleeve,” writes The Guardian’s LauÂra BarÂton, “is its vividÂness, and its cerÂtain oomph; it’s in the minÂgling of sex and joy and comÂpulÂsion, and the vibranÂcy and moveÂment of his illusÂtraÂtions.”
Crumb hasÂn’t only comÂbined his art with music fanÂdom, but also with his own musiÂcianÂship, illusÂtratÂing covÂers for sevÂerÂal of his own albums by his ragÂtime band Cheap Suit SerÂeÂnaders. And he even proÂvidÂed the illusÂtraÂtion for the soundÂtrack to his own docÂuÂmenÂtary, as you can see above—an extreme examÂple of the many self-abasÂing porÂtraits Crumb has drawn of himÂself over the years. CrumÂb’s album covÂer art has been colÂlectÂed in a book, and you can see many more of his covÂers at Rolling Stone and on this list here.
AbidÂing by the strong rules he estabÂlished for the charÂacÂters in the Looney Tunes staÂble was critÂiÂcal to his comÂic approach, as Jones explains in the above video essay, a bit of a deparÂture for Tony Zhou’s celÂeÂbratÂed cinÂeÂma series, Every Frame a PicÂture. Rather than examÂine the framÂing and timÂing of “one of the all-time masÂters of visuÂal comÂeÂdy,” this time Zhou delves into the evoÂluÂtion of his subject’s artisÂtic senÂsiÂbilÂiÂties.
Jones teased out the desires that became the priÂmaÂry engines for those charÂacÂters’ physÂiÂcalÂiÂty as well as their behavÂior. Daffy comes off as an unhinged lunatic in his earÂly appearÂances. His comÂic potenÂtial grew once Jones reframed him as a conÂnivÂer who’d do anyÂthing in purÂsuit of wealth and gloÂry.
Zhou also draws attenÂtion to the evoÂluÂtion of the charÂacÂters’ expresÂsions, from the antic to the ecoÂnomÂiÂcal. John Belushi was not the only comÂic genius to underÂstand the powÂer of a raised eyeÂbrow.
Like many chilÂdren of the 70s, I was wild for Charles Schulz’s Peanuts, and had the merÂchanÂdise to prove it. I was a Snoopy girl, for the most part, but not averse to receivÂing items feaÂturÂing othÂer characters—Linus, SchroedÂer, the causÂtic Lucy, PigÂPen, and, of course, CharÂlie Brown. My father was a suckÂer for the comÂparÂaÂtiveÂly butch PepÂperÂmint PatÂty, and MarÂcie, the bespecÂtaÂcled hangÂer-on who referred to PatÂty as “Sir.”
But there was one charÂacÂter I don’t rememÂber seeÂing on any Peanuts swag in 1970s IndiÂana…. ActuÂalÂly, that’s not accuÂrate. I don’t rememÂber any Shermy sweatÂshirts. Female secÂond bananas like VioÂlet, the origÂiÂnal, i.e. non-PepÂperÂmint PatÂty, and FrieÂda were also underÂrepÂreÂsentÂed, despite the latter’s oft-menÂtioned natÂuÂralÂly curly hair.
The charÂacÂter I’m thinkÂing of nevÂer became a major playÂer, but he was notable. Ground-breakÂing even. Can you guess?
Thats right: Franklin, the only African-AmerÂiÂcan memÂber of the Peanuts gang.
(An African-AmerÂiÂcan todÂdler, Milo, below, had a 17-strip run in 1977 when CharÂlie Brown had to skip town after exactÂing his revenge on the kite-eatÂing tree… That’s it. Poor Franklin.)
Franklin owes his exisÂtence, in large part, to HarÂriÂet GlickÂman, a white teacher from LA, who found letÂter writÂing one of the few forms of activism in which a mothÂer of three children—all squareÂly withÂin the Peanuts demographic—could fulÂly parÂticÂiÂpate. Raised by libÂerÂal parÂents to conÂsidÂer herÂself a globÂal citÂiÂzen, and to speak out against injusÂtice, she wrote the authors of sevÂerÂal leadÂing comÂic strips in the wake of Dr. MarÂtin Luther King’s assasÂsiÂnaÂtion in April, 1968. Would the creÂators of Peanuts and Mary Worth conÂsidÂer introÂducÂing a black charÂacÂter into the mix, as a first step on what GlickÂman foreÂsaw as a “long and torÂtuÂous road” toward a future cliÂmate of “open friendÂship, trust and mobilÂiÂty” between the races?
Mary Worth’sAllen SaunÂders declined, apparÂentÂly sayÂing that he shared GlickÂman’s senÂtiÂments but feared the synÂdiÂcate would drop his strip if he folÂlowed her sugÂgesÂtion.
Schulz didn’t exactÂly leap at the chance, either, sayÂing that he was in the same boat as the othÂer symÂpaÂthetÂic carÂtoonÂists who’d begged off. What he feared wasn’t so much the syndicate’s response, as the susÂpiÂcion that he might be seen as “patronÂizÂing our Negro friends.”
GlickÂman perÂsistÂed, askÂing his perÂmisÂsion to share his letÂter with some of her “Negro friends,” all parÂents. PerÂhaps they could offer some thoughts that might induce the carÂtoonÂist to say yes.
I’d like to express an opinÂion as a Negro father of two young boys. We have a sitÂuÂaÂtion in AmerÂiÂca in which racial enmiÂty is conÂstantÂly porÂtrayed.
Like GlickÂman, he felt that a “casuÂal day-to-day scene” feaÂturÂing a non-white charÂacÂter would give his sons and othÂer chilÂdren of colÂor a chance to see themÂselves reflectÂed in the strip, while proÂmotÂing “racial amiÂty” to readÂers of all races.
GlickÂman expressed hope that Peanuts would evenÂtuÂalÂly grow to include more than one black child:
Let them be as adorable as the others…but please…allow them a Lucy!
WithÂin weeks of receivÂing Kelly’s letÂter, and just over two months into Glickman’s letÂter-writÂing camÂpaign, Schulz reached a deciÂsion. He wrote GlickÂman that she should check the paper the week of July 29, 1968.
Franklin, his skin tone indiÂcatÂed by closeÂly set diagÂoÂnal lines, made his debut in a bathing suit, returnÂing CharÂlie Brown’s runÂaway beach ball. The encounter took three days to play out, durÂing which Franklin and CharÂlie Brown form an alliance of vacaÂtionÂing chilÂdren whose usuÂal playÂmates are elseÂwhere. It would seem that the major difÂferÂence between them is that Franklin’s dad is in VietÂnam. ObviÂousÂly, a lot of thought went into their casuÂal diaÂlogue.
Benign as Franklin was, his presÂence sparked outÂrage. Some SouthÂern readÂers cried foul when he showed up in the same classÂroom as MarÂcie and PepÂperÂmint PatÂty. OthÂers felt Franklin wasn’t black enough.
UltiÂmateÂly Franklin nevÂer achieved A‑list staÂtus, but he did resÂonate with cerÂtain readÂers, notably William Bell, a diverÂsiÂty offiÂcer workÂing with the CincinÂnati Police DepartÂment.
VisÂit MashÂable to see reproÂducÂtions of GlickÂman and Schulz’s corÂreÂsponÂdence. And watch the video above to hear more about her upbringÂing and anothÂer comÂic that feaÂtured black charÂacÂters, DateÂline: DanÂger!, a colÂlabÂoÂraÂtion between SaunÂders’ son John and artist Al McWilliams.
My cirÂcle of friends includes more than a few grad stuÂdents, but few of them seem very hapÂpy, espeÂcialÂly those who’ve already put every part of the process behind them except their disÂserÂtaÂtion. As they strugÂgle to wresÂtle that dauntÂing beast to the ground, I — as a non-acaÂdÂeÂmÂic — try to proÂvide whatÂevÂer perÂspecÂtive I can. To my mind, a disÂserÂtaÂtion, just like any othÂer major task, demands that you break it down into small pieces and frame each piece in your mind just right, so I natÂuÂralÂly think Nick SouÂsaÂnis made the right choice by writÂing his disÂserÂtaÂtion, panÂel by panÂel, frame by frame, as a graphÂic novÂel.
Boing Boing’s Cory DocÂtorow recentÂly wrote about UnflatÂtenÂing, SouÂsaÂnis’ “graphÂic novÂel about the relaÂtionÂship between words and picÂtures in litÂerÂaÂture” that douÂbled as SouÂsaÂnis’ disÂserÂtaÂtion in eduÂcaÂtion at ColumÂbia UniÂverÂsiÂty. DocÂtorow quotes Comics Grid’s Matt Finch, who describes the work as one that “defies conÂvenÂtionÂal forms of scholÂarÂly disÂcourse to offer readÂers both a stunÂning work of graphÂic art and a seriÂous inquiry into the ways humans conÂstruct knowlÂedge.” UnitÂing the perÂspecÂtives of “sciÂence, phiÂlosÂoÂphy, art, litÂerÂaÂture, and mytholÂoÂgy, it uses the colÂlage-like capacÂiÂty of comics to show that perÂcepÂtion is always an active process of incorÂpoÂratÂing and reevalÂuÂatÂing difÂferÂent vanÂtage points.”
The UniÂverÂsiÂty of the Arts’ most recent grads are lucky ducks to have had a speakÂer as engagÂing as carÂtoonÂist and eduÂcaÂtor LynÂda BarÂry delivÂerÂing their commencement’s keynote address.
BarÂry kept things liveÂly by mixÂing in some tried and true mateÂrÂiÂal from othÂer pubÂlic appearÂances, includÂing her FilÂipino grandmother’s belief in the aswang, a poem set to music (here “CotÂton Song” by Harlem RenaisÂsance poet, Jean Toomer) and the stoÂry of the colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive carÂtoon, “ChickÂen Attack by Jack.”
This last anecÂdote conÂtains a strong indictÂment of conÂtemÂpoÂrary society’s screen addicÂtion, and it is heartÂenÂing to see the graduates—members of the last genÂerÂaÂtion to pre-date the Internet—listening so attenÂtiveÂly, no one texÂting or tweetÂing as the camÂera pans the crowd.
When BarÂry exhortÂed them to shout out the names of their three most inspirÂing teachÂers on the count of three, most did!
For me, this was the most thrilling moment, though I also appreÂciÂatÂed the advice on the best time to schedÂule oral surgery, and a blissÂful untruth about EverÂgreen State ColÂlege’s appliÂcaÂtion process cirÂca the mid-70s.
Not your typÂiÂcal comÂmenceÂment speech… those lucky, lucky ducks!
ReadÂers, we invite you to get in the spirÂit and celÂeÂbrate the Class of 2015 by “shoutÂing” the names of your most inspiÂraÂtional teachÂers in the comÂment secÂtion below.
Is Samuel BeckÂetÂt’s WaitÂing for Godot funÂny?
Yes. It’s a comÂeÂdy about life’s tragedies, great and small.
Are carÂtoons inspired by WaitÂing for Godot funÂny?
…mostÂly not. EspeÂcialÂly when they’re set in waitÂing rooms (or airÂport arrivals areas).
Godot’s a hard trope for a carÂtoonÂist on the prowl for someÂthing fresh. Dogs, psyÂchiÂaÂtrists, castÂaways on desert islands are more elasÂtic subÂjects, uniÂverÂsal, but capaÂble of being spun any numÂber of ways.
To wring a comÂic worÂthy ofTheNew YorkÂer out of Godot, you probÂaÂbly have to be an actuÂal New YorkÂer carÂtoonÂist, like Roz Chast, whose instantÂly recÂogÂnizÂable work can be seen above.
CarÂtoonÂist Richard ThompÂson sumÂmoned Godot for a strip withÂin a strip installÂment of his popÂuÂlar synÂdiÂcatÂed Cul de Sac. (Click the image above to view it in a largÂer forÂmat.) Will readÂers get the refÂerÂence? Alice, his preschool-aged heroÂine, seems to, astuteÂly echoÂing critÂic Vivian Mercier’s assessÂment of Godot as a play where “nothÂing happens…twice”.
Man’s nature, man’s digÂniÂty, is that he acts, lives, loves, and finalÂly destroys himÂself seekÂing to penÂeÂtrate the mysÂtery of exisÂtence, and unless we parÂtake in some way, as some part of this human exploÂration… then we are no more than the pimps of sociÂety and the betrayÂers of our Self.
There is a David Bowie for every seaÂson. A ChristÂmas David Bowie, a HalÂloween David Bowie, even a David Bowie EastÂer celÂeÂbraÂtion. But much more than that, there may be a David Bowie for every Bowie fan, espeÂcialÂly for artists influÂenced by his chameleonÂic career. See for yourÂself how a whopÂping 96 Bowie-lovÂing artists—in this case mainÂly what Bowie himÂself calls the “World’s Best ComÂic Artists”—see the changling rock star/actor/space alien.
“See my life in a comÂic… The litÂtle details in colour,” writes Bowie on his site of a web gallery of porÂtraits comÂpiled by “comÂic artist, writer and critÂic, not to menÂtion huge Bowie fan, Sean T. Collins.” It’s called The Thin White SketchÂbook—a clever title that alludes to just one of the myrÂiÂad Bowie perÂsonÂae repÂreÂsentÂed in the sizeÂable colÂlecÂtion of 96 drawÂings (see a nosÂtalÂgic one by proÂlifÂic illusÂtraÂtor Paul Pope at the top—the book’s first sketch).
Collins’ impresÂsive colÂlecÂtion includes work from Michel Gondry (EterÂnal SunÂshine of the SpotÂless Mind), whose conÂtriÂbuÂtion the ediÂtor calls “pretÂty godÂdamn wonÂderÂful if you ask me.” See it above. And below, Kate BeatÂon, creÂator of web comÂic Hark, A Vagrant, gives us Bowie as a dandy, a charÂacÂter with whom, writes Collins, she has a “rich hisÂtoÂry.”
Collins offers brief comÂmenÂtary beneath each image in the colÂlecÂtion, which also gives us the strange interÂpreÂtaÂtion below by Bowie-inspired underÂground comics legÂend Charles Burns; the intense and Archie-esque conÂtriÂbuÂtions furÂther down by BrothÂers Jaime and Gilbert HerÂnanÂdez, creÂators of the 80s New Wave clasÂsic comÂic Love and RockÂets; and the outÂer space-proÂporÂtioned Bowie at the botÂtom of the post, from vocalÂist Tunde AdeÂbimpe of TV on the Radio, a band that has both covÂered and recordÂed with Bowie.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.