As we’ve disÂcussed before on this blog, one of the major casuÂalÂties in the shiftÂing new media landÂscape is the traÂdiÂtionÂal invesÂtigaÂtive journalist–someone with the time and resources to research in-depth stoÂries. In response to this probÂlem a new group called Pro PubÂliÂca is proposÂing a novÂel ecoÂnomÂic modÂel: hire the jourÂnalÂists into a founÂdaÂtion and give their work away to the pubÂliÂcaÂtions where it will make the biggest impact.
The new iniÂtiaÂtive, headÂed up by Paul Steiger, head ediÂtor at the Wall Street JourÂnal for 16 years, will spend $10 milÂlion annuÂalÂly to supÂport a newsÂroom of 24 jourÂnalÂists and 12 othÂer staff in New York City. The monÂey comes from HerÂbert and MarÂiÂon SanÂdler, forÂmer heads of GoldÂen West FinanÂcial CorÂpoÂraÂtion, a big playÂer in mortÂgages and savÂings.
It seems likeÂly to me that Pro PubÂliÂca will sucÂceed in attractÂing some high-levÂel talÂent, both because of Steiger and because many jourÂnalÂists have come to fear for their jobs in the shrinkÂing newsÂrooms of traÂdiÂtionÂal papers. The real quesÂtion is how well this sysÂtem will work in digÂging up and delivÂerÂing qualÂiÂty reportÂing. What do you lose, and what do you gain, when your employÂer is no longer a “paper of record” but a priÂvate founÂdaÂtion fundÂed by peoÂple with their own politÂiÂcal agenÂdas? On the othÂer hand, it’s easy to argue that every newsÂpaÂper already has some kind of politÂiÂcal posiÂtion, so maybe Pro PubÂliÂca will be no difÂferÂent.
I just heard JimÂmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, speakÂing at StanÂford Law School today. Wales is workÂing on some new projects that he hopes will harÂness the comÂmuÂniÂty-driÂven colÂlabÂoÂraÂtion of Wikipedia. He’s already had some sucÂcess in branchÂing out from the encyÂcloÂpeÂdia idea with Wikia, which is a “wiki farm” comÂpilÂing inforÂmaÂtion on a variÂety of difÂferÂent subÂjects (some of the most sucÂcessÂful so far relate to video games).
What Wales spoke about today, howÂevÂer, is a new colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive search project. The conÂcept is still in its earÂly stages, it seems, but the idea would be to harÂness the intelÂliÂgence and dedÂiÂcaÂtion of human beings to proÂduce search results sigÂnifÂiÂcantÂly betÂter than Google’s. This raisÂes a few quesÂtions:
Is Google broÂken? It’s amazÂing what Google pulls up, but maybe we’ve all gotÂten so good at workÂing with an imperÂfect sysÂtem that we just tune out the spam and misÂinÂterÂpreÂtaÂtions that still crop up.
Is a colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive social modÂel the approÂpriÂate soluÂtion to this probÂlem? PeoÂple are good at comÂpilÂing encyÂcloÂpeÂdias, but they may not be good at emuÂlatÂing search rank algoÂrithms. Also, Google is powÂered by milÂlions of servers in dozens of data cenÂters over the world manÂagÂing petabytes of inforÂmaÂtion. In othÂer words, this may be a technology+money busiÂness, not a people+transparency busiÂness.
These issues aside, Wikipedia is one of the most amazÂing things to come out of the whole InterÂnet experÂiÂment, so I’m excitÂed to see what Wales comes up with. Has search become a basic serÂvice? Would it work betÂter as an open-source sysÂtem?
The satirists are getÂting a lot mileage out of MahÂmoud AhmadineÂjad’s decÂlaÂraÂtion that Iran is gay-free. Last week, SatÂurÂday Night Live spoofed AhmadineÂjad, as we notÂed. Then, The New YorkÂer parÂoÂdied AhmadineÂjad on the magÂaÂzine’s covÂer with one of its famed carÂtoons. (The image includÂed a not-so-oblique refÂerÂence to LarÂry Craig, the conÂserÂvÂaÂtive US SenÂaÂtor who recentÂly got caught up in some mens’ room high jinks. UnfaÂmilÂiar readÂers can get the scoop on Craig here.) Of all the inane comÂments AhmadineÂjad has made, and there are many, it’s interÂestÂing that the satirists have choÂsen to focus on this one. DenyÂing the exisÂtence of gays in Iran is no more empirÂiÂcalÂly absurd than denyÂing the HoloÂcaust. So why the emphaÂsis on the sexÂuÂalÂiÂty comÂment? Because AhmadineÂjad has been playÂing the anti-semiÂtism card for some time, but the homoÂphoÂbia card is relÂaÂtiveÂly new, hence makÂing it worÂthy of attenÂtion? Or is it because sexÂuÂalÂiÂty offers an always conÂveÂnient way to take a politÂiÂcal eneÂmy down a peg? Or since there’s no good way to satÂiÂrize a genoÂcide, perÂhaps sexÂuÂalÂiÂty becomes a good default. Ok, I’m stumped. Note to self: think twice next time before over-anaÂlyzÂing jokes. SpeakÂing of jokes, make you check out the footage we postÂed of Woody Allen doing standup in 1965.
The New YorkÂer has rolled out a series of aniÂmatÂed carÂtoons, which puts in motion its famous carÂtoons. They can be watched as video podÂcasts or as streamed videos. You should defÂiÂniteÂly head over to The New YorkÂer web site to view the largÂer colÂlecÂtion. But, if you want a litÂtle taste, take a look below:
EarÂliÂer this week I spoke on the phone with Alan WeisÂman, the author of The World WithÂout Us. (See our iniÂtial piece on his book.) Alan was graÂcious enough to take some time out of his pubÂlicÂiÂty schedÂule to share his thoughts on the book, the world, his writÂing process, and more. What folÂlows is an editÂed tranÂscript of our conÂverÂsaÂtion.
Ed: This book addressÂes what on the surÂface seems to be a pretÂty far-fetched hypoÂthetÂiÂcal: that humanÂiÂty might sudÂdenÂly disÂapÂpear. What drew you to this premise in the first place?
Alan: Well, preÂciseÂly that. Most great enviÂronÂmenÂtal writÂing does not get read by a lot of the peoÂple who ought to be learnÂing about it because the nearÂer-term posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties just seem someÂtimes so frightÂenÂing, or so depressÂing, that nobody realÂly wants to pick up a book to read it.
By strucÂturÂing the book the way that I did, I disÂarm the autoÂmatÂic fear that repels a lot of peoÂple from readÂing about the enviÂronÂment. PeoÂple don’t want to read someÂthing that seems too threatÂenÂing. On a subÂconÂscious or even a conÂscious levÂel, they don’t want to be worÂried we’re all going to die. In my book, killing us off in the first couÂple of pages means peoÂple don’t have to worÂry about dying because we’re already dead, and that’s a relief in a sense. The idea of glimpsÂing the future is irreÂsistible to all of us and I estabÂlish pretÂty quickÂly that is not going to just be me specÂuÂlatÂing, it’s going to be some hard sciÂence writÂing based on a lot of reportÂing, of talkÂing to experts or eyeÂwitÂnessÂes whose guessÂes will be far more interÂestÂing than most peoÂples’.
The fact that it is far-fetched is realÂly useÂful because on the one hand realÂly it’s a remote posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty that we would leave, that we would disÂapÂpear tomorÂrow. So peoÂple don’t go into a panÂic over this book, and it realÂly gives peoÂple enough time to think about these things withÂout panÂickÂing about it. So that’s how this device works, and I think it’s been proven to be very effecÂtive. I’m getÂting a lot more peoÂple to read it than just peoÂple who are hung up on the enviÂronÂment.
EffecÂtive at midÂnight, The New York Times will make the “TimesÂSÂeÂlect” secÂtion of its webÂsite entireÂly free. (It used to cost subÂscribers $49.95 a year.) And it will also free up “its archives from 1987 to the present … , as well as those from 1851 to 1922, which are in the pubÂlic domain.”
In makÂing this move, the paper will be givÂing up $10 milÂlion in annuÂal subÂscripÂtion revÂenue. But it will likeÂly make up that monÂey (and then some) by using ads to monÂeÂtize those pages. For more info, read the full artiÂcle here. And click here to see what forÂmerÂly closed-off conÂtent will now become freely availÂable.
Update: Have a look at DeeplinkÂing’s piece called MinÂing the New York Times Archive. It pulls out of the archive some interÂestÂing finds, includÂing reviews of James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922) and Oscar Wilde’s DisÂgrace (1895), plus artiÂcles that surÂvey the dynamÂic art scene of the earÂly 20th cenÂtuÂry.
HBO just startÂed airÂing the sixth seaÂson of Curb Your EnthuÂsiÂasm, so it seemed fitÂting to serve up this lengthy interÂview with LarÂry David. The talk is very funÂny. No shock there. But it also gets into some good subÂstance. How LarÂry got into comÂeÂdy; how he strugÂgled durÂing his earÂly standup years and had to scratch togethÂer monÂey for a can of Chef Boyardee; how he approachÂes writÂing comÂeÂdy; how he has genÂerÂatÂed ideas for the most memÂoÂrable episodes of “Curb” and SeinÂfeld — it all gets touched on here.
We have includÂed the first part below, plus links to the othÂer sevÂen segÂments. For more LarÂry David interÂviews, check out the 60 MinÂutes piece on LarÂry from this past weekÂend. You can watch it online here.
PubÂlishÂer’s WeekÂly announced last week that Lars BrownÂworth, a New York high school teacher, will pubÂlish with Crown (a RanÂdom House diviÂsion) a new book that covÂers “1,200 years of ByzanÂtine hisÂtoÂry, examÂinÂing the culture’s forÂgotÂten role in preÂservÂing clasÂsiÂcal thought, conÂnectÂing East and West, and buildÂing modÂern WestÂern sociÂety.” It’s expectÂed to hit the bookÂstores in earÂly 2009.
There’s lots to say about this deal, but we wantÂed to delve a litÂtle into the backÂstoÂry, and parÂticÂuÂlarÂly how an unexÂpectÂed chain of events, all built into Web 2.0, made this deal posÂsiÂble. (And, yes, we’ll also touch briefly on where Open CulÂture fits into the picÂture.)
The stoÂry begins in March 2005, back when BrownÂworth startÂed disÂtribÂutÂing on iTunes an eduÂcaÂtionÂal podÂcast called 12 ByzanÂtine Rulers: The HisÂtoÂry of the ByzanÂtine Empire (iTunes — Feed — Site). Released in installÂments, the podÂcasts gave users the rare abilÂiÂty to downÂload a comÂplete acaÂdÂeÂmÂic course to their MP3 playÂer, anyÂtime, anyÂwhere, for free. BrownÂworth was a pioÂneer, and by late 2006, peoÂple startÂed takÂing notice. In DecemÂber, Wired menÂtioned 12 ByzanÂtine Rulers in a short web feaÂture, which netÂted the podÂcast a small uptick in downÂloads. Then, days latÂer, our fledgÂling blog folÂlowed up with a short piece —The Hottest Course on iTunes (and the Future of DigÂiÂtal EduÂcaÂtion). From there, things got interÂestÂing. Our post got almost immeÂdiÂateÂly picked up on Digg.com, a masÂsiveÂly popÂuÂlar webÂsite, and its users catÂaÂpultÂed the stoÂry to DigÂg’s homeÂpage. DownÂloads of BrownÂworth’s podÂcasts surged; the powÂer of Web 2.0 was kickÂing in. BrownÂworth specÂuÂlatÂed durÂing an interÂview last week that the “Digg effect” wideÂly broadÂened the expoÂsure of his podÂcast, and, soon enough, The New York Times was knockÂing on his door. By late JanÂuÂary, the pilÂlar of AmerÂiÂcan jourÂnalÂism pubÂlished a flatÂterÂing feaÂture: HisÂtoÂry Teacher Becomes PodÂcast CelebriÂty. Then, it all startÂed again. PodÂcast downÂloads spiked highÂer, far exceedÂing the preÂviÂous wave from Digg. More artiÂcles and an NPR interÂview folÂlowed. Next came the book agents’ calls. … That’s, in short, how we got to last week’s announceÂment.
BrownÂworth’s stoÂry, although unusuÂal, is part of a growÂing trend. Book pubÂlishÂers seem increasÂingÂly willÂing to let the wisÂdom of crowds idenÂtiÂfy podÂcasts that transÂlate into marÂketable books, and then let the podÂcasts stimÂuÂlate book sales. This year, Mignon FogÂaÂrÂty notably inked deals to release spinÂoff books and audioÂbooks of her popÂuÂlar GramÂmar Girl podÂcast (iTunes — Feed — Web Site). And givÂen that 12 ByzanÂtine Rulers has been downÂloaded 735,000 times just this year, BrownÂworth and his new pubÂlishÂer felt rightÂly jusÂtiÂfied in takÂing a simÂiÂlar approach.
We’ll gradÂuÂalÂly find out whether this develÂopÂing modÂel proÂvides a way for innoÂvÂaÂtive podÂcastÂers to monÂeÂtize their sucÂcessÂful conÂtent. In the meanÂtime, Lars is givÂing it all a good go. He recentÂly gave up his New York teachÂing job, reloÂcatÂed to North CarÂoliÂna (where his brothÂer Anders proÂvides techÂnolÂoÂgy and busiÂness supÂport), and is now dedÂiÂcatÂing himÂself full-time to podÂcastÂing and writÂing. It’s a big change, but a change worth makÂing. “Web 2.0 has enabled me,” BrownÂworth says, “to do things that I nevÂer would have been able to do othÂerÂwise. It’s a bit humÂbling to find myself on the ground floor of a revÂoÂluÂtion, but this move is undoubtÂedÂly the most excitÂing opporÂtuÂniÂty I’ve ever had.”
We’re pleased to have played even a bit part in BrownÂworth’s sucÂcess. Keep an eye out for his book and, until then, give his podÂcast a good lisÂten: 12 ByzanÂtine Rulers: The HisÂtoÂry of the ByzanÂtine Empire (iTunes — Feed — Site).
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.