Remembering J.J. Cale, Virtuoso Guitarist and Author of ‘Cocaine’ and ‘After Midnight,’ with a 1979 Concert

J.J. Cale died on Fri­day. Cale was one of the great­est and most influ­en­tial gui­tar play­ers of the rock and roll era. “Of all the play­ers I ever heard,” said Neil Young, “it’s got­ta be Hen­drix and J.J. Cale who are the best elec­tric gui­tar play­ers.”

It’s hard to imag­ine a musi­cian more dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed to Jimi Hen­drix than Cale, who was the mas­ter of nuance and under­state­ment. Per­haps the best word to describe his coun­try swing-inflect­ed gui­tar play­ing would be “cool.” The restrained dynam­ics, the del­i­cate touch — Cale’s play­ing demand­ed close atten­tion and sen­si­tiv­i­ty in a lis­ten­er. His vocals, too, were kept way down in the mix, a reflec­tion of his intro­vert­ed per­son­al­i­ty. “The effort­less­ness, that restraint and under­play­ing, under-singing — it was just very pow­er­ful,” said pop musi­cian Beck to the Los Ange­les Times in 2009. “The pow­er of doing less and hold­ing back in a song, I’ve tak­en a lot of influ­ence from that.”

Per­haps the great­est exem­plar of Cale’s wide influ­ence was Eric Clap­ton, who made hits out of two pre­vi­ous­ly obscure songs writ­ten by Cale — “After Mid­night” and “Cocaine” — and pat­terned much of his ’70s music after the Tul­sa Sound Cale helped cre­ate. When asked by Van­i­ty Fair to name the liv­ing per­son he most admired, Clap­ton was unequiv­o­cal: J.J. Cale. “In my hum­ble opin­ion,” Clap­ton wrote in his 2007 auto­bi­og­ra­phy, “he is one of the most impor­tant artists in the his­to­ry of rock, qui­et­ly rep­re­sent­ing the great­est asset his coun­try has ever had.”

To remem­ber Cale and his artistry, we bring you a 1979 video (above) of Cale and his band play­ing live at Rain­bow Stu­dios in Los Ange­les with his old friend and fel­low Okla­homan Leon Rus­sell. Here’s the set list:

  1. “T‑Bone Shuf­fle” (pro­logue)
  2. “Nowhere to Run”
  3. “Cocaine”
  4. “Ten Easy Lessons”
  5. “Sen­si­tive kind”
  6. “Hands Off Her”
  7. “Lou-Easy-Ann”
  8. “Going Down”
  9. “Cori­na Cori­na”
  10. “Roll On”
  11. “No Sweat”
  12. “Crazy Mama”
  13. “Fate of a Fool”
  14. “Boilin’ Pot”
  15. “After Mid­night”
  16. “T‑Bone Shuf­fle”
  17. “T‑Bone Back­wards”
  18. “Same Old Blues”
  19. “Don’t Cry Sis­ter”
  20. “Set Your Soul Free (Tell Me Who You Care)”
  21. “24 Hours a Day”

Björk and Sir David Attenborough Team Up in a New Documentary About Music and Technology

There’s a long and com­pan­ion­able his­to­ry between music and math­e­mat­ics. While it is often said that every cul­ture has its own form of music, it’s also near­ly just as true that most ancient cul­tures explored the math­e­mat­i­cal prin­ci­ples of sound. Leave it to the Pythagore­ans of Ancient Greece to notice the rela­tion­ship between musi­cal scales and math­e­mat­i­cal ratios.

How music and sci­ence inter­sect is a more mod­ern inquiry. Fields like neu­ro­science and mod­ern med­i­cine and tech­nol­o­gy make both the roots of music and cog­ni­tion, as well as how sci­ence can inspire music, a crack­ling fron­tier.

Chan­nel 4 in Eng­land aired a new doc­u­men­tary When Björk Met Atten­bor­ough on July 27th with—who better?—naturalist David Atten­bor­ough as host. Atten­bor­ough, who was famous­ly grant­ed priv­i­leged access to film Dian Fossey’s research on moun­tain goril­las, teams up with a less elu­sive but fas­ci­nat­ing fig­ure this time around. Atten­bor­ough actu­al­ly co-hosts the pro­gram with Björk.

Björk’s album Bio­phil­ia is the launch­ing-off point for the doc­u­men­tary. It’s an apt choice. Björk has called live per­for­mances of music on the album a “med­i­ta­tion on the rela­tion­ship between music, nature, and tech­nol­o­gy.”

New instru­ments were spe­cial­ly designed for the album and the songs are con­cep­tu­al­ly wed­ded to nat­ur­al phe­nom­e­na. “Moon” fea­tures musi­cal repeat­ing musi­cal cycles; “Thun­der­bolt” includes arpeg­gios inspired by the time between the moment when light­en­ing is seen and thun­der is heard.

In the doc­u­men­tary, Atten­bor­ough explores how music exists in the nat­ur­al world, tak­ing view­ers through the film­ing of the Reed War­bler and Blue Whales. For her part, Björk argues that cut­ting-edge tech­nol­o­gy keeps music intu­itive and acces­si­ble. Fea­tured are the instru­ments Björk devel­oped for Bio­phil­ia: the “pen­du­lum harp,” the “sharp­si­chord” and the “game­leste,” a com­bi­na­tion game­lan and celes­ta pro­grammed to be played remote­ly on an iPad.

You can watch the doc­u­men­tary above.

via io9

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Philip Glass Remix His Own Music—Then Try it Your­self With a New App

Day of Light: A Crowd­sourced Film by Mul­ti­me­dia Genius Bri­an Eno

Kate Rix writes about dig­i­tal media and edu­ca­tion. Fol­low her on Twit­ter @mskaterix and learn more about her work by vis­it­ing .

Mick Jagger Defends the Rights of the Individual After His Legendary 1967 Drug Bust

Mick Jag­ger turns 70 today, and I think we can safe­ly say at this point that he’s going to stick with this rock star thing. But if at some point in his youth he had decid­ed on a dif­fer­ent career, he might have gone with “post-drug bust inter­view sub­ject” (or civ­il lib­er­tar­i­an activist). It’s a skill he prac­ticed often. Take the clip above, filmed after the leg­endary 1967 Stones’ drug bust after a News of the World arti­cle exposed the band’s recre­ation­al use, along with that of the Moody Blues and The Who. The bust, it turns out, was an L.A. Con­fi­den­tial-style frame-up between the tabloid and the police, and includ­ed the col­lab­o­ra­tion of a deal­er known appro­pri­ate­ly as “Acid King,” real name David Schnei­der­man. Accord­ing to Simon Wells’ exhaus­tive But­ter­fly on a Wheel: The Great Rolling Stones Drug Bust, Schnei­der­man “remains prob­a­bly the most enig­mat­ic fig­ure in rock and roll folk­lore” and claimed to work for the CIA, MI5, and oth­er secret agen­cies (turns out this may have been true).

So the Stones were set up, which doesn’t mean they weren’t also real­ly high (hear Wells tell the sto­ry in detail in an author inter­view above). But they took it in stride, using the pub­lic­i­ty to sub­stan­ti­ate their image as rock and roll’s bad boys and send­ing the suave, vol­u­ble Jag­ger out on press jags, like the very strange pan­el inter­view with the show World in Action, from which the above excerpt comes, where Mick sits down with a cou­ple chap­lains and a cou­ple suits and defends the rights of the indi­vid­ual. Jag­ger proves him­self a very able spokesman for his generation—intelligent, poised, and yes, ridicu­lous­ly hand­some. He not only stood up to defend him­self in inter­views through­out the Stones’ tur­bu­lent drug-fueled hey­days, but he stood by his man Kei­th as well. Check him out below field­ing press ques­tions with aplomb for a slight­ly addled Richards after one of Keith’s drug tri­als.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mick Jag­ger Tells the Sto­ry Behind ‘Gimme Shel­ter’ and Mer­ry Clayton’s Haunt­ing Back­ground Vocals

Mick Jag­ger, 15 Years Old, Shows Off His Rock Climb­ing Shoes on British TV (1959)

The Rolling Stones at 50: Mick, Kei­th, Char­lie & Ron­nie Revis­it Their Favorite Songs

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Wash­ing­ton, DC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Video: Bob Marley Plays a Soccer Match in Brazil, 1980

“Foot­ball is a whole skill to itself. A whole world. A whole uni­verse to itself. Me love it because you have to be skill­ful to play it! Free­dom! Foot­ball is free­dom.”

Bob Mar­ley spoke those lines in 1979, two years before his life was cut short by melanoma, reveal­ing his pas­sion for the world’s game, or what we call “soc­cer” here in Amer­i­ca. Casu­al fans might not know this, but Mar­ley fol­lowed Brazil­ian foot­ball close­ly, revered Pele, made the sport part of his dai­ly rou­tine, and when he trav­eled to Rio de Janeiro in 1980, he took part in a now leg­endary match on musi­cian Chico Buarque’s pri­vate pitch. Team A con­sist­ed of Mar­ley, Junior Mar­vin (mem­ber of the Wail­ers), Paulo César Caju (mem­ber of the Brazil 1970 squad), Toquin­ho (Brazil­ian musi­cian), Chico Buar­que and Jacob Miller (lead singer of Inner Cir­cle). Team B fea­tured Alceu Valença (Brazil­ian musi­cian), Chicão (mem­ber of Jorge Ben’s band) and four staff mem­bers from Island Records, recalls Russ Slater in Sounds and Colours. The short clip above shows Mar­ley scor­ing a goal, despite being well into his bat­tle with melanoma.

In the sec­ond clip above, you can watch footage of Mar­ley drib­bling the ball a lit­tle more. At Retro­naut, you’ll find umpteen pho­tos of Mar­ley in his foot­ball glo­ry.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch “The Secret Tour­na­ment” & “The Rematch,” Ter­ry Gilliam’s Star-Stud­ded Soc­cer Ads for Nike

The Mon­ty Python Phi­los­o­phy Foot­ball Match: The Greeks v. the Ger­mans

Amaz­ing Flip­book Ani­ma­tion Shows Off the Skills of Ronald­in­ho

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

The Way Too Philosophical Pop Song

Sec­ond City has giv­en us many great improv com­e­dy sketch­es and come­di­ans over the decades … and now com­ic videos on YouTube too. From this video col­lec­tion comes the “Too Philo­soph­i­cal Pop Song,” whose open­ing lines resem­ble the hack­neyed lyrics of so many con­tem­po­rary pop tunes.

We’ve got to be young while we live, and live while we are young.
We’ve got to live for tonight because tomor­row won’t come.

We’ve all heard these exis­ten­tial clichés before, right? But then, the “Too Philo­soph­i­cal Pop Song” gets, well, too philo­soph­i­cal, swerv­ing dark­ly of course.

We have to par­ty like we’ll nev­er see tomor­row, there­by destroy­ing the intrin­sic val­ue of this moment and our­selves.
The cer­tain­ty of death inval­i­dates our actions tonight.
We’re thrown into this uni­verse with no pur­pose, com­pelled to fab­ri­cate mean­ing.
There is no good, there is no right, and our morals are craft­ed out of rea­son.

Makes it a lit­tle hard to get your groove on … unless you’re a UVA grad stu­dent or one of those heady guys at Par­tial­lyEx­am­inedLife. Don’t miss their pod­cast.

via Leit­er Reports

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Phi­los­o­phy Cours­es from Great Uni­ver­si­ties

Rap­ping About Sci­ence: Watch High School Senior Jabari John­son Talk Physics with Poet­ic Lyrics

A Song of Our Warm­ing Plan­et: Cel­list Turns 130 Years of Cli­mate Change Data into Music

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Musical Comedian Reggie Watts Reinvents Van Halen’s Classic, “Panama”

Jump back, what’s that sound? Oh, it’s just Reg­gie Watts cov­er­ing Van Halen’s 1984 cock rock anthem, Pana­ma, in a crazy-ass golf sweater. Car­ry on.

On the invi­ta­tion of The Onion’s AV Club, the musi­cal come­di­an pro­cured an ear­ly demo from the band, and used it as the inspi­ra­tion for this per­for­mance, an unrec­og­niz­able fugue of live looped vocals.

Um, it’s still about a car, right?

The unlike­ly pair­ing came about as part of the AV Club’s Under­cov­er series, a delight­ful par­lor game where­in each act to play in the tiny round office at Onion HQ gets to pick a tune from a dwin­dling annu­al list of 25. The last act to vis­it gets stuck with the cut nobody else want­ed. (Reg­gie arrived close to the mid­dle of this clam­bake, and was ranked a respectable 5th by read­ers who went on to award self-pro­claimed sick­est band in met­al his­to­ry GWAR top hon­ors for their twist on Kansas’ clas­sic “Car­ry On Way­ward Son.”)

For com­par­ison’s sake, here’s Pana­ma in its orig­i­nal form:

Relat­ed Con­tent:

OK Go Cov­ers The Mup­pet Show Theme Song (Stream New Album Online)

Watch Jimi Hendrix’s ‘Voodoo Chile’ Per­formed on a Gayageum, a Tra­di­tion­al Kore­an Instru­ment

The 15 Worst Cov­ers of Bea­t­les Songs: William Shat­ner, Bill Cos­by, Tiny Tim, Sean Con­nery & Your Excel­lent Picks

Ayun Hal­l­i­day came of age sur­round­ed by Van Halen con­cert t‑shirts. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

Louis Armstrong Plays Trumpet at the Egyptian Pyramids; Dizzy Gillespie Charms a Snake in Pakistan

armstrong at the pyramids

Dur­ing the Cold War, the Unit­ed States made the case for the Amer­i­can way of life by send­ing its best ambas­sadors abroad — jazz musi­cians. “Music that was unique to Amer­i­ca and rep­re­sent­ed a fusion of African and African-Amer­i­can cul­tures with oth­er tra­di­tions was a demo­c­ra­t­ic art form that helped oth­ers to under­stand the open-mind­ed and cre­ative sen­si­bil­i­ty of our coun­try,” writes the Jam Ses­sion web site. There, you can see pho­tos of Duke Elling­ton, Dizzy Gille­spie and Dave Brubeck in coun­tries like Syr­ia, Jor­dan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Japan, Sin­ga­pore, South Korea, and Hong Kong. As part of this cul­tur­al diplo­ma­cy, the great Louis Arm­strong went to Egypt in 1961 where, in this icon­ic pho­to, he played trum­pet for his wife, Lucille, at the foot of the Great Sphinx and the pyra­mids in Giza.

duke snake

A 2008 New York Times arti­cle high­lights oth­er images from these good­will tours — there’s Dizzy Gille­spie charm­ing a snake with his trum­pet in Karachi (1956), Ben­ny Good­man play­ing his clar­inet in the Red Square (1962) and Duke Elling­ton smok­ing a hookah in Iraq (1963). In a pre­vi­ous post, we also have Dave Brubeck talk­ing about his Cold War adven­tures in Poland. Watch here.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

Louis Arm­strong Plays His­toric Cold War Con­certs in East Berlin & Budapest (1965)

Stan­ley Kubrick’s Jazz Pho­tog­ra­phy and The Film He Almost Made About Jazz Under Nazi Rule

Watch Lam­beth Walk—Nazi Style: The Ear­ly Pro­pa­gan­da Mash Up That Enraged Joseph Goebbels

Jazz ‘Hot’: The Rare 1938 Short Film With Jazz Leg­end Djan­go Rein­hardt

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Charles Mingus Explains in His Grammy-Winning Essay “What is a Jazz Composer?”

I remem­ber the first time I heard Charles Min­gus. My senior year of high school, a friend who, at the time, was study­ing elec­tric bass at Boston’s Berklee Col­lege of Music, intro­duced me by putting on 1956’s Pithecan­thro­pus Erec­tus and say­ing “you have to hear this.” I knew jazz in a pass­ing way—some Elling­ton, some Miles Davis… not enough to make many dis­tinc­tions. But I knew right away Min­gus was some­thing spe­cial. His com­po­si­tions were so cool, so dynam­ic and angu­lar and thought­ful, with the push-pull of his mea­sured dou­ble bass against the occa­sion­al cacoph­o­ny of piano and sax. Entranced, I sought out more, and dis­cov­ered favorites like the bluesy “Good­bye Pork Pie Hat”—live at Mon­treux in 1975 above—from Mingus’s 1959 water­shed Min­gus Ah Um, a record that shared the spot­light with oth­er instant clas­sics that year, includ­ing Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue, John Coltrane’s Giant Steps, and Ornette Coleman’s The Shape of Jazz to Come. (On that note, don’t miss the doc­u­men­tary, 1959: The Year That Changed Jazz.)

Min­gus stood among giants, and was a giant him­self. But odd­ly enough, while all of the artists on this list won, often mul­ti­ple, Gram­my awards, Min­gus received no nods from the Record­ing Acad­e­my for any of his sev­er­al dozen orig­i­nal albums. The snubs—if that’s what they were—may have been due to his famous­ly iras­ci­ble per­son­al­i­ty, or to the fact that Min­gus elud­ed clas­si­fi­ca­tion. As his friend Nat Hentoff wrote of him in 1999, jazz crit­ics could not “find a cat­e­go­ry, a con­ve­nient term, to describe him.” Min­gus him­self told Hentoff, “I am try­ing to play the truth of what I am. The rea­son it’s dif­fi­cult is because I’m chang­ing all the time.” But while the bassist’s musi­cal com­po­si­tions were ignored, he did receive one nom­i­na­tion, in 1971, for anoth­er kind of writing—the lin­er notes to his 1971 album Let My Chil­dren Hear Music, a record he called “the best album I have ever made” (hear it in full below). Mingus’s lin­er-notes essay—a lost art these days—is titled “What is a Jazz Com­pos­er?,” and it’s an insight­ful explo­ration of the artist’s own his­to­ry and com­po­si­tion­al tech­nique.

Elo­quent, but loose, Mingus’s prose wan­ders from per­son­al anec­dotes to philo­soph­i­cal rumi­na­tions. On the role  of jazz soloists as com­posers, he writes,

Each jazz musi­cian when he takes a horn in his hand- trum­pet, bass, sax­o­phone, drums-what­ev­er instru­ment he plays—each soloist, that is, when he begins to ad lib on a giv­en com­po­si­tion with a title and impro­vise a new cre­ative melody, this man is tak­ing the place of a com­pos­er.

Lat­er, how­ev­er, Min­gus seems skep­ti­cal of this idea: “each jazz musi­cian is sup­posed to be a com­pos­er. Whether he is or not, I don’t know.” Although Min­gus strug­gled as a child to read music—and faced racial bar­ri­ers to a clas­si­cal career—he trained first on the cel­lo and incor­po­rat­ed many ele­ments of clas­si­cal music, as well as gospel and big band, into his com­po­si­tions. When the bop era of impro­vi­sa­tion came along, Min­gus rolled with it, but found him­self look­ing crit­i­cal­ly at the new wave rep­re­sent­ed by, for exam­ple, Ornette Coleman’s showy solos. The essay, even so many years after the bop rev­o­lu­tion, reflects his ambiva­lence. He writes:

Today, things are at the oth­er extreme. Every­thing is sup­posed to be invent­ed, the guys nev­er repeat any­thing at all and prob­a­bly couldn’t. They don’t even write down their own tunes, they just make them up as they sit on the band­stand. It’s all right, I don’t ques­tion it. I know and hear what they are doing. But the valid­i­ty remains to be seen—what comes, what is left, after you hear the melody and after you hear the solo. Unless you just want to hear the feel­ing, as they say.

Min­gus was an odd­i­ty in the post-bop world; he gen­er­al­ly eschewed the soloist approach. Instead, he seems to see him­self oper­at­ing in a clas­si­cal, or at least more for­mal, tra­di­tion, draw­ing as much from Stravin­sky as from Elling­ton. As one writer puts it, his music was “schiz­o­phrenic in that it both harked back to the New Orleans roots of jazz and looked for­ward to pro­gres­sive cham­ber jazz and ‘third stream’ jazz. His com­po­si­tions ranged wild­ly in mood and dynam­ics, from pun­til­lis­tic coun­ter­point to mas­sive Wag­n­er-ian explo­sions.” In his lin­er notes, he laments the lim­it­ed instru­men­ta­tion of jazz, which he finds “sti­fling.” Min­gus makes it clear that as a com­pos­er, he strives for high­brow respectabil­i­ty, while also stress­ing that he thinks the vir­tu­os­i­ty of jazz has pushed all forms for­ward, includ­ing clas­si­cal. Bequeath­ing his album to his suc­ces­sors, his musi­cal “chil­dren,” Min­gus urges future jazz com­posers to expand their range into sym­phon­ic ter­ri­to­ry:

I think it is time our chil­dren were raised to think they can play bas­soon, oboe, Eng­lish horn, French horn, lull per­cus­sion, vio­lin, cel­lo. The results would be-well the Phil­har­mon­ic would not be the only answer for us then. If we so-called jazz musi­cians who are the com­posers, the spon­ta­neous com­posers, start­ed includ­ing these instru­ments in our music, it would open every­thing up, it would get rid of prej­u­dice because the musi­cian­ship would be so high in cal­iber that the sym­pho­ny couldn’t refuse us.

Some of Min­gus’s con­tem­po­raries found his clas­si­cal aspi­ra­tions cold and off­putting. For exam­ple, Min­gus describes in an inter­view how Fats Navar­ro—who said he “always played with hate”—chided the bassist by say­ing, “Min­gus, you just played the the­o­ry. you did­n’t tell me how you felt. You did­n’t say, ‘Hel­lo, Fats, I love you.’ You did­n’t play noth­ing beau­ti­ful” (an obser­va­tion Min­gus says “woke him up”).

The lin­er notes essay is replete with oth­er rem­i­nisces of Min­gus’s musi­cal com­ing-of-age, from his love for Debussy, Stravin­sky, and Strauss, to his tute­lage under “mas­ter musi­cian” Lloyd Reese. You can read the whole thing here at the offi­cial Min­gus site, which fea­tures more of his writ­ing, such as “An Open Let­ter to Miles Davis,” orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished in Down Beat Mag­a­zine in 1955.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

1959: The Year that Changed Jazz

How to Pot­ty Train Your Cat: A Handy Man­u­al by Charles Min­gus

Rare Miles Davis Live Record­ings Cap­ture the Jazz Musi­cian at the Height of His Pow­ers

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Wash­ing­ton, DC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast