Classic Ray Charles Performance: ‘What’d I Say’ Live in Paris, 1968

Late one night in 1958, Ray Charles and his band were near­ing the end of a very long per­for­mance at a dance some­where in the Mid­west when they found them­selves in a jam. They were out of mate­r­i­al. What Charles came up with that night to kill a lit­tle time would wind up mak­ing music his­to­ry.

In his mem­oir Broth­er Ray: Ray Charles’ Own Sto­ry, co-writ­ten with David Ritz, Charles describes the scene:

It was near­ly 1:00 A.M., I remem­ber, and we had played our whole book. There was noth­ing left that I could think of, so I final­ly said to the band and the Raeletts, “Lis­ten, I’m going to fool around and y’all just fol­low me.”

So I began noodling. Just a lit­tle riff which float­ed up into my head. It felt good and I kept on going. One thing led to anoth­er, and sud­den­ly I found myself singing and want­i­ng the girls to repeat after me. So I told ’em, “Now!”

Then I could feel the whole room bounc­ing and shak­ing and car­ry­ing on some­thing fierce. So I kept the thing going, tight­en­ing it up a lit­tle here, adding a dash of Latin rhythm there. When I got through, folk came up and asked where they could buy the record. “Ain’t no record,” I said, “just some­thing I made up to kill a lit­tle time.”

The song, “What’d I Say,” became a hit not only on the rhythm and blues charts, where Charles had already had some suc­cess, but on the pop charts as well. It was Charles’s first cross-over hit, and his first gold record. It was wide­ly cov­ered by oth­er artists and became Charles’s sig­na­ture song, the one he end­ed his con­certs with.

The video above was made almost exact­ly ten years after “What’d I Say” was writ­ten. It’s from one of a pair of con­certs Charles gave on Octo­ber 8 and 9, 1968, at the Salle Pleyel in Paris. The orches­tra was led by Wal­lace Dav­en­port, and the back-up singers, the Raeletts, were: Susaye Greene, Ver­lyn Fle­naugh, Bar­bara Ann Lesure, and Bar­bara Nell Ter­rault.

Despite the even­tu­al tri­umph of “What’d I Say,” the song encoun­tered strong resis­tance when it was first released by Atlantic Records in 1959. Some radio sta­tions banned it. “They said it was sug­ges­tive,” writes Charles. “Well, I agreed. I’m not one to inter­pret my own songs, but if you can’t fig­ure out ‘What I Say,’ then some­thing’s wrong. Either that, or you’re not accus­tomed to the sweet sounds of love.”

Relat­ed con­tent:

‘Willie and the Hand Jive,’ by the Late Great John­ny Otis

The Queen of Soul Con­quers Europe: Aretha Franklin in Ams­ter­dam, 1968

Goodnight Keith Moon: “The Most Inappropriate Bedtime Story Ever”

Lit­tle known fact. My first adven­ture in pub­lish­ing began as a 16 year old, when I teamed up with my best friend, anoth­er ardent fan of The Who, and togeth­er we pub­lished a fanzine ded­i­cat­ed to the British rock band. We called it Tales from The Who, a name tak­en from a boot­leg con­cert album record­ed in our native Philadel­phia dur­ing the ’70s. To get the zine going, we bor­rowed an elec­tric type­writer, cut out pic­tures, col­laged it all togeth­er, made copies on a pho­to­copy machine, then start­ed mar­ket­ing the pub­li­ca­tion in Rolling Stone mag­a­zine. When actu­al sub­scrip­tions rolled into our P.O. Box, we could­n’t believe it.

Alas, Tales from the Who did­n’t enjoy a long run. We maybe pub­lished three edi­tions, if that. But it did teach me the val­ue of Ray Brad­bury’s say­ing — “The things that you love should be things that you do.” And, years lat­er, I still get pangs of nos­tal­gia when­ev­er I encounter Who mem­o­ra­bil­ia on the web, whether it’s footage of Kei­th Moon pass­ing out at a 1973 con­cert and a fan tak­ing over, or videos that iso­late the great drum, bass, gui­tar, and vocal tracks of The Who’s anthem, “Won’t Get Fooled Again.” And you should­n’t begrudge me when I give you this: Good­night Kei­th Moon: A Par­o­dy.

If you liked Adam Mans­bach’s Go the F**k to Sleep, you’ll like­ly enjoy Clare Cross and Bruce Wor­den’s par­o­dy of the chil­dren’s clas­sic Good­night Moon. This twist­ed lit­tle rock tale can be pur­chased on Ama­zon. But it also lives freely on the web, just as it ought to. It begins:

In the great green room / There was a tele­phone / And a dead Kei­th Moon.

And Tow­shend jump­ing over the moon.

And there were four lit­tle gents piss­ing on cement.

And two bro­ken sticks and a pile of sick.

Find the rest here, and, don’t be the “cool” par­ent who actu­al­ly reads this to your kids. It is, after all, “the most inap­pro­pri­ate bed­time sto­ry ever,” accord­ing to The New York­er.

via Coudal

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Wern­er Her­zog Reads “Go the F**k to Sleep” in NYC (NSFW)

Leonard Cohen’s 1983 Musical for Canadian Television: I Am a Hotel

One of the more curi­ous pieces in Leonard Cohen’s illus­tri­ous cat­a­logue is his roman­tic half-hour musi­cal, I Am a Hotel, made for Cana­di­an tele­vi­sion in 1983. The film is essen­tial­ly a long-form music video. It was inspired by his song “The Guests,” which begins:

One by one, the guests arrive
The guests are com­ing through
The open-heart­ed many
The bro­ken-heart­ed few

The film tells the sto­ry, through music and dance, of the roman­tic yearn­ings of the hotel’s staff and guests, with Cohen appear­ing through­out the film as the detached but sym­pa­thet­ic sto­ry­teller. “It’s light enter­tain­ment,” Cohen told the Tole­do Blade in 1985. “It uses songs from my first record up through recent songs.” Those songs are:

  1. “The Guests” from the 1979 album Recent Songs.
  2. “Mem­o­ries” from the 1977 album Death of a Ladies’ Man.
  3. “The Gyp­sy’s Wife” from Recent Songs.
  4. “Chelsea Hotel #2” from the 1974 album New Skin for the Old Cer­e­mo­ny.
  5. “Suzanne” from his 1967 debut album Songs of Leonard Cohen.

I Am a Hotel was filmed at the King Edward Hotel in Toron­to over a six-day peri­od in April of 1983. It was direct­ed by Allan F. Nicholls and writ­ten by Cohen and Mark Shek­ter. The cast includ­ed ice skat­ing cham­pi­on Toller Cranston as “The Man­ag­er,” dancer and chore­o­g­ra­ph­er Anne Ditch­burn as “The Gyp­sy Wife,” and Celia Fran­ca, founder of the Nation­al Bal­let of Cana­da, as “The Diva.” The film was first broad­cast in Cana­da on May 7, 1984, and although it went on to win a Gold­en Rose at the Mon­treux Inter­na­tion­al Tele­vi­sion Fes­ti­val, it has rarely been shown since. The ver­sion above is from Dutch tele­vi­sion.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Leonard Cohen Reads “The Future”

The 2005 Doc­u­men­tary, Leonard Cohen: I’m Your Man

The 1965 Doc­u­men­tary, Ladies and Gentlemen…Mr. Leonard Cohen

The Story of Ziggy Stardust: How David Bowie Created the Character that Made Him Famous

In 1973, leg­endary direc­tor D.A. Pen­nebak­er decid­ed to film the Lon­don leg of David Bowie’s tour of Britain in sup­port of Aladdin Sane. Lit­tle did Pen­nebak­er know that Bowie, in his most famous incar­na­tion as Zig­gy Star­dust, would announce his retire­ment after the final encore. What Bowie retired, of course, was the Zig­gy persona—fans of that incar­na­tion are indebt­ed to Pen­nebak­er for catch­ing the final act in his film Zig­gy Star­dust and the Spi­ders from Mars.

Pulling footage from Pennebaker’s con­cert film, and a great deal of rare footage, and nar­rat­ed by Jarvis Cock­er, the BBC doc­u­men­tary David Bowie: The Sto­ry of Zig­gy Star­dust (above) does what Pennebaker’s film refused to; it tells a sto­ry, in typ­i­cal TV doc­u­men­tary fash­ion, of the rise of Zig­gy. And it’s not a sto­ry that many fans know. The first part of the film address­es Cocker’s ques­tion: “What made this mys­te­ri­ous extra-ter­res­tri­al one of the most influ­en­tial cul­tur­al icons of the 20th cen­tu­ry?” It turns out, quite a lot went into the mak­ing of Bowie’s 1973 break­through as Zig­gy Star­dust. In fact, says Cock­er, “at that time,” when Bowie emerged as this seem­ing­ly ful­ly-formed char­ac­ter, “we didn’t real­ize that he’d been try­ing to be suc­cess­ful for 10 years.”

Bowie had front­ed a num­ber of deriv­a­tive R&B groups in the ear­ly six­ties under his giv­en name Davy (or Davie) Jones. Since his name invit­ed con­fu­sion with the then-famous Mon­kee, he changed it in 1967 and released his first sin­gle as David Bowie, a creepy nov­el­ty record called The Laugh­ing Gnome, which was includ­ed on his first self-titled album. The album, “a strange mix of musi­cal and pop,” was inspired by light com­ic enter­tain­er Antho­ny New­ley–whose “sur­re­al com­e­dy paved the way for Mon­ty Python”–and it was a fail­ure. But, Cock­er informs us, Bowie was learn­ing from his mis­takes: “Newley’s quirky ver­sa­til­i­ty would inform the the­atri­cal DNA of Zig­gy Star­dust.” Bowie was cast­ing around, try­ing to find a per­sona to suit the latent tal­ent it seemed only he believed in. His long­time drum­mer Woody Wood­mansey says above, “he was going through a tri­al and error peri­od, and there was a lot of error.”

One break­through came when he met dancer Lind­say Kemp, who taught him mime and with whom Bowie toured in a the­ater pro­duc­tion and had an affair. Dur­ing these years of seem­ing fail­ure, Bowie learned all of the skills that he would use to con­struct Zig­gy: dance, mime, stage and tele­vi­sion act­ing, and sex­u­al expres­sion. As Kemp tells it, “he had an enor­mous sex­u­al appetite”—a cen­tral part of Zig­gy, and Bowie’s, pull. Anoth­er break­through came with 1970’s “Space Odd­i­ty, which hit #5 on the UK charts. But the album of the same name did not fare well. Filled with mean­der­ing psych-folk bal­lads more Dono­van than Queen Bitch, Space Odd­i­ty dis­ap­point­ed. Bowie had not yet found his voice, nor his muse, and he would not until he met his first wife Ang­ie, who “made him brave” and helped him put togeth­er his first glam-rock project The Hype, with gui­tarist Mick Ron­son. The hype went nowhere, but Ron­son and Bowie col­lab­o­rat­ed on his next album, The Man Who Sold the World.

Final­ly, says Bowie, after those years of near-obscu­ri­ty, “some­body did come along and grab me by the emp­ty wal­let and said, I’m Tony Defries and I’m going to make you a star.” Defries intro­duced him to Andy Warhol’s New York scene and he became some­thing of a scen­ester him­self, but he was still too shy to ful­ly inhab­it Zig­gy Star­dust, so he used a surrogate—a fash­ion design­er named Fred­die Bur­ret­ti. Bur­ret­ti was to serve as the face, while Bowie wrote and sang the songs. He called the project “Arnold Corns.” Bowie pro­duced the Arnold Corns record with many of the songs that would even­tu­al­ly make it to the Zig­gy Star­dust album—including “Moon­age Daydream”—but they were rudi­men­ta­ry and flat and the project was a fail­ure, though the idea lived on while Bowie wrote and record­ed Hunky Dory with Ron­son, Woody Wood­mansey, and Trevor Bold­er, the line­up of Zig­gy’s future Spi­ders From Mars. Just two weeks after the 1972 wrap of Hunky Dory, the ses­sions for Zig­gy Star­dust and the Spi­ders from Mars began.

Though Bowie seemed to come out of nowhere in the ear­ly 70s as an androg­y­nous young har­bin­ger of rock and roll to come, those ten years he spent work­ing to find the per­fect for­mu­la for fame had made him reflec­tive. A 2002 New York Times review­er of Pen­nebak­er’s film writes that in 1973, Bowie’s, “lyrics often find Mr. Bowie wrestling with the threats of time and aging, as if he were already, at age 26, star­ing decrepi­tude in the face. Mr. Bowie is now 55 and, super­fi­cial­ly at least, seems none the worse for wear.”

Josh Jones is a doc­tor­al can­di­date in Eng­lish at Ford­ham Uni­ver­si­ty and a co-founder and for­mer man­ag­ing edi­tor of Guer­ni­ca / A Mag­a­zine of Arts and Pol­i­tics.

Jimi Hendrix Wreaks Havoc on the Lulu Show, Gets Banned From the BBC (1969)

Can you imag­ine Jimi Hen­drix singing a duet with Lulu? Well, nei­ther could Hen­drix. So when the icon­o­clas­tic gui­tar play­er showed up with his band at the BBC stu­dios in Lon­don on Jan­u­ary 4, 1969 to appear on Hap­pen­ing for Lulu, he was hor­ri­fied to learn that the show’s pro­duc­er want­ed him to sing with the win­some star of To Sir, With Love. The plan called for The Jimi Hen­drix Expe­ri­ence to open their set with “Voodoo Child (Slight Return)” and then play their ear­ly hit “Hey Joe,” with Lulu join­ing Hen­drix onstage at the end to sing the final bars with him before segue­ing into her reg­u­lar show-clos­ing num­ber. “We cringed,” writes bassist Noel Red­ding in his mem­oir, Are You Expe­ri­enced? The Inside Sto­ry of The Jimi Hen­drix Expe­ri­ence.

Red­ding describes the scene that he, Hen­drix, and drum­mer Mitch Mitchell walked into that day as being “so straight it was only nat­ur­al that we would try to com­bat that atmos­phere by hav­ing a smoke in our dress­ing room.” He con­tin­ues:

In our haste, the lump of hash got away and slipped down the sink drain­pipe. Pan­ic! We just could­n’t do this show straight–Lulu did­n’t approve of smok­ing! She was then mar­ried to Mau­rice Gibb of the Bee Gees, whom I’d vis­it­ed and shared a smoke with. I could always tell Lulu was due home when Mau­rice start­ed throw­ing open all the win­dows. Any­way, I found a main­te­nance man and begged tools from him with the sto­ry of a lost ring. He was too help­ful, offer­ing to dis­man­tle the drain for us. It took ages to dis­suade him, but we suc­ceed­ed in our task and had a great smoke.

When it was time for The Jimi Hen­drix Expe­ri­ence to go on cam­era, they were feel­ing fair­ly loose. They tore through “Voodoo Child” and then the pro­gram cut to Lulu, who was squeezed awk­ward­ly into a chair next to an audi­ence mem­ber in the front row. “That was real­ly hot,” she said. “Yeah. Well ladies and gen­tle­men, in case you did­n’t know, Jimi and the boys won in a big Amer­i­can mag­a­zine called Bill­board the group of the year.” As Lulu spoke a loud shriek of feed­back threw her off bal­ance. Was it an acci­dent? Hen­drix, of course, was a pio­neer in the inten­tion­al use of feed­back. A bit flus­tered, she con­tin­ued: “And they’re gonna sing for you now the song that absolute­ly made them in this coun­try, and I’d love to hear them sing it: ‘Hey Joe.’ ”

The band launched into the song, but mid­way through–before Lulu had a chance to join them onstage–Hendrix sig­naled to the oth­ers to quit play­ing. “We’d like to stop play­ing this rub­bish,” he said, “and ded­i­cate a song to the Cream, regard­less of what kind of group they may be in. We ded­i­cate this to Eric Clap­ton, Gin­ger Bak­er and Jack Bruce.” With that the band veered off into an instru­men­tal ver­sion of “Sun­shine of Your Love” by the recent­ly dis­band­ed Cream. Noel Red­ding con­tin­ues the sto­ry:

This was fun for us, but pro­duc­er Stan­ley Dorf­man did­n’t take it at all well as the min­utes ticked by on his live show. Short of run­ning onto the set to stop us or pulling the plug, there was noth­ing he could do. We played past the point where Lulu might have joined us, played through the time for talk­ing at the end, played through Stan­ley tear­ing his hair, point­ing to his watch and silent­ly scream­ing at us. We played out the show. After­wards, Dorf­man refused to speak to us but the result is one of the most wide­ly used bits of film we ever did. Cer­tain­ly, it’s the most relaxed.

The stunt report­ed­ly got Hen­drix banned from the BBC–but it made rock and roll his­to­ry. Years lat­er, Elvis Costel­lo paid homage to Hen­drix’s antics when he per­formed on Sat­ur­day Night Live. You can watch The Stunt That Got Elvis Costel­lo Banned From SNL here.

Relat­ed con­tent:

‘Elec­tric Church’: The Jimi Hen­drix Expe­ri­ence Live in Stock­holm, 1969

Listen to the New David Byrne/St. Vincent Album, Love This Giant. Free for a Limited Time

Over twen­ty years after the Talk­ing Heads, the band’s for­mer front­man David Byrne seems more cre­ative than ever. Even aside from his numer­ous solo albums, he’s late­ly writ­ten books on cycling and the nature of music, advo­cat­ed for cycling itself, and craft­ed an intri­cate dis­co opera with Fat­boy Slim about Imel­da Mar­cos, for­mer first lady of the Philip­pines. (Less recent­ly, but still a per­son­al favorite of mine, was his “I ♥ Pow­er­Point” tour.) Now we have Love This Giant, a new musi­cal col­lab­o­ra­tion between Byrne and singer-song­writer Annie Clark, bet­ter known as St. Vin­cent. Hav­ing orig­i­nal­ly joined forces on a ben­e­fit for the AIDS and home­less­ness char­i­ty Hous­ing Works, the two decid­ed to go ahead and cre­ate an entire album togeth­er, engag­ing a brass band and craft­ing a dozen songs well up to Byrne’s eclec­tic, cere­bral, and sur­pris­ing­ly funky stan­dard (even if those three descrip­tors, though appro­pri­ate, have become clichés regard­ing any music in the sphere of the Talk­ing Heads).

At the top of this post, you’ll find embed­ded the video for “Who,” one of the tracks which fea­tures the vocals of both Byrne and Clark but on which Byrne takes the lead. Just above, you’ll find “Week­end in the Dust,” with Clark at the top of the mix. But why set­tle for YouTube videos when, at least for a lit­tle while, you can stream the entire album at NPR.org?

For a record­ing artist of long stand­ing, Byrne has dis­played an unusu­al­ly clear head about the changes under­way in the com­merce of music: “The ‘indus­try’ had a nice 50-year ride,” he once blogged, “but it’s time to move on.” With that in mind, he and Clark will launch a 24-date tour lat­er this month which promis­es many things, includ­ing but not limt­ed to “com­plex chore­og­ra­phy.” Still, no mat­ter the state of sales and dis­tri­b­u­tion, it always comes back to how strong­ly the music com­pels. “A lot of peo­ple, hear­ing a descrip­tion of this project, assumed that it might be an art­sy indul­gence,” Byrne writes on Love This Giant’s site. “But some­how it did­n’t turn out that way. It’s a pop record—well, in my book any­way.”

Relat­ed con­tent:

How David Byrne and Bri­an Eno Make Music Togeth­er: A Short Doc­u­men­tary

David Byrne: From Talk­ing Heads Front­man to Lead­ing Urban Cyclist

David Byrne: How Archi­tec­ture Helped Music Evolve

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The BBC Symphony Orchestra Performs 4′33,″ the Controversial Composition by John Cage, Born 100 Years Ago Today

100 years ago today John Cage start­ed leav­ing his mark on our cul­tur­al land­scape. And, by the time he was all done, says The New York­er’s res­i­dent music crit­ic Alex Ross, “he may have sur­passed Stravin­sky as the most wide­ly cit­ed, the most famous and/or noto­ri­ous, of twen­ti­eth-cen­tu­ry com­posers,” with his influ­ence extend­ing “far out­side clas­si­cal music, into con­tem­po­rary art and pop cul­ture.”

We could­n’t let the cen­te­nary cel­e­bra­tion of Cage’s birth pass by with­out revis­it­ing 4′33,″ his most famous and con­tro­ver­sial com­po­si­tion from 1952. Depend­ing on how you inter­pret it, the exper­i­men­tal com­po­si­tion offers a reflec­tion on the sound of silence, or per­haps the sounds you hear when the music goes silent and the atten­tion shifts to the audi­ence in the con­cert hall. This per­for­mance comes to us cour­tesy of the BBC Sym­pho­ny Orches­tra. And now we leave you with some bonus mate­r­i­al.

John Cage Per­forms Water Walk on “I’ve Got a Secret” (1960)

Cage’s Nor­ton Lec­tures Pre­sent­ed at Har­vard (1988–89)

John Cage Unbound: A New Dig­i­tal Archive Pre­sent­ed by The New York Pub­lic Library

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Le Ballet Mécanique: The Historic Cinematic Collaboration Between Fernand Legér and George Antheil

Film is by nature a col­lab­o­ra­tive medi­um, and cer­tain­ly one of the strangest and most inter­est­ing cin­e­mat­ic col­lab­o­ra­tions of all time has to be the 1924 avant-garde film Bal­let Mécanique, which brought togeth­er the mod­ernist lumi­nar­ies Fer­nand Léger, Ezra Pound, Man Ray and George Antheil.

The glue that actu­al­ly held the whole project togeth­er was an unknown young Amer­i­can film­mak­er named Dud­ley Mur­phy, who was liv­ing in Paris and saw Man Ray’s exper­i­men­tal film Le Retour à la Rai­son when it came out in 1923. Mur­phy was so impressed that he sought Man Ray out and sug­gest­ed they work togeth­er on a project. Mur­phy was a tech­ni­cal­ly skilled and well-equipped cin­e­matog­ra­ph­er with sev­er­al films under his belt, so the offer intrigued Man Ray. He said he would do it as long as Mur­phy agreed to work by the Dadaist prin­ci­ple of spon­ta­neous, irra­tional exper­i­men­ta­tion. Mur­phy agreed, and the two men began film­ing scenes togeth­er

Mur­phy also sought help from the poet Ezra Pound. As Susan B. Del­son doc­u­ments in her book, Dud­ley Mur­phy, Hol­ly­wood Wild Card, Pound wrote a let­ter to his father in 1923, say­ing, “Dud­ley Mur­phy, whom I met in Venice in 1908, he being then eleven, turned up a few days ago. His dad is a painter, he is try­ing to make cin­e­ma into art.” Pound was famous­ly gen­er­ous when it came to help­ing oth­er artists, and he agreed to help Mur­phy and Man Ray. “I knew him as a kind­heart­ed man, always ready to help oth­ers,” Man Ray lat­er said of Pound, yet “dom­i­nat­ing­ly arro­gant where lit­er­a­ture was con­cerned.”

The extent of Pound’s direct involve­ment in the mak­ing of Bal­let Mécanique is an open ques­tion, but it’s gen­er­al­ly believed that he exert­ed some aes­thet­ic influ­ence, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the pris­mat­ic mul­ti­ple image shots that call to mind some of the ear­li­er exper­i­ments of Vor­ti­cism, a move­ment Pound was close­ly con­nect­ed with. “The vor­tex,” Pound once wrote, “is the point of max­i­mum ener­gy. It rep­re­sents, in mechan­ics, the great­est effi­cien­cy. We use the words ‘great­est effi­cien­cy’ in the pre­cise sense–as they would be used in a text book of Mechan­ics.” The title of the film was actu­al­ly tak­en from a 1917 piece by Man Ray’s friend, the Dadaist painter Fran­cis Picabia.

In the fall of 1923 Mur­phy began edit­ing the scenes he had shot with Man Ray, but by then they were run­ning out of mon­ey. Pound sug­gest­ed that his friend the cubist painter Fer­nand Léger might agree to see the project through to com­ple­tion. Man Ray knew of Léger’s dom­i­neer­ing per­son­al­i­ty and want­ed no part of it. He left the project and asked Mur­phy (with whom he was still on friend­ly terms) to make sure his name was left out of the cred­its. Pound also arranged for the wealthy Amer­i­can writer and art patron Natal­ie Bar­ney to com­mis­sion a musi­cal score to accom­pa­ny the film. Pound chose a young Amer­i­can com­pos­er he had met ear­li­er in the year named George Antheil, who lived above Sylvia Beach’s Shake­speare and Com­pa­ny book­store.

Antheil accept­ed the com­mis­sion but went his own way, show­ing no inter­est in even see­ing the film while he was work­ing on the music. “From the out­set,” writes Del­son in her biog­ra­phy of Mur­phy, “the film and the score led remark­ably sep­a­rate lives. In his let­ters to Pound dur­ing this peri­od, Antheil made lit­tle or no men­tion of the film.” Not sur­pris­ing­ly, the film and music did not match. The music was twice as long as the com­plet­ed film. In fact the film would even­tu­al­ly be released with­out the music, and the two have only rarely been exhib­it­ed togeth­er.

Although Antheil even­tu­al­ly com­posed sev­er­al vari­a­tions of his score, the ver­sion he fin­ished in 1924 calls for a bizarre group of mech­a­nis­tic or indus­tri­al-sound­ing instru­ments, includ­ing 16 play­er pianos, sev­en elec­tric bells, three air­plane pro­pellers of vary­ing sizes, and a siren. In his man­i­festo “My Bal­let Mécanique: What it Means,” Antheil describes his accom­plish­ment in words that are per­haps more bizarre than the air­plane pro­pellers and siren:

My Bal­let Mécanique is a new FOURTH DIMENSION of music. My Bal­let Mécanique is the first piece of music that has been com­posed OUT OF and FOR machines, ON EARTH. My Bal­let Mécanique is the first piece of music that has found the best forms and mate­ri­als lying inert in a medi­um that AS A MEDIUM is math­e­mat­i­cal­ly cer­tain of becom­ing the great­est mov­ing fac­tor of the music of future gen­er­a­tions.

Math­e­mat­i­cal­ly cer­tain or not, Antheil’s score did go on to exert con­sid­er­able influ­ence. “The tex­tures and effects in this work are,” accord­ing to musi­cian and schol­ar Mark Fend­er­son, “direct pre­de­ces­sors to those used in the music of John Cage, Ter­ry Riley, Philip Glass and John Adams.” Although the music for Bal­let Mécanique would always remain Antheil’s most famous accom­plish­ment, the film itself was some­thing of a foot­note to Fer­nand Léger’s career.

The film begins and ends with Léger’s play­ful image of a cubist Char­lie Chap­lin, along with shots of Mur­phy’s wife Kather­ine relax­ing in a bucol­ic set­ting.  In between it moves fran­ti­cal­ly from image to image, with indus­tri­al engines, man­nequin parts, kitchen­ware, clock pen­du­lums and shapes of pure abstrac­tion appear­ing and reap­pear­ing with machine-like reg­u­lar­i­ty. In one sequence a wash­er­woman climbs a steep stair­way only to keep reap­pear­ing again, like Sisy­phus, at the bot­tom.

The close-ups of a wom­an’s eyes and lips are of Man Ray’s lover and mod­el, Kiki of Mont­par­nasse. In the orig­i­nal ver­sion of the film, Mur­phy had report­ed­ly includ­ed some erot­ic nude images of Man Ray and Kiki embrac­ing, but Léger had them edit­ed out. As a mat­ter of fact, when the film was released the auto­crat­ic Léger arranged to have Mur­phy edit­ed out of the cred­its, despite the fact that Mur­phy was the one who basi­cal­ly made the film–much of it before Léger was even involved. All sur­viv­ing ver­sions of the film, includ­ing the one above, say sim­ply “un film de Fer­nand Léger.”

The sto­ry behind the mak­ing of Bal­let Mécanique reveals a great deal about the per­son­al­i­ties involved: about Pound’s gen­eros­i­ty, Léger’s ruth­less­ness, Man Ray’s wari­ness, Mur­phy’s naiveté, Antheil’s ego­ma­nia. The film itself, accord­ing to the Cir­cu­lat­ing Film Library Cat­a­logue at the Muse­um of Mod­ern Art, “remains one of the most influ­en­tial exper­i­men­tal works in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma.”

Le Bal­let Mécanique has been added to our meta col­lec­tion of 500 Free Movies Online. You can find it in the sec­tion that includes Silent films.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Anémic Ciné­ma: Mar­cel Ducham­p’s Whirling Avante-Garde Film

Man Ray and the Ciné­ma Pur: Four Sur­re­al­ist Films from the 1920s

 

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast