What is fasÂcism? FasÂcism is an ideÂolÂoÂgy develÂoped and elabÂoÂratÂed in earÂly 20th-cenÂtuÂry WestÂern Europe and enabled by techÂnolÂoÂgy, mass media, and weapons of war. Most of us learned the basics of that develÂopÂment from grade school hisÂtoÂry textÂbooks. We genÂerÂalÂly came to appreÂciÂate to some degree — though we may have forÂgotÂten the lesÂson — that the phrase “creepÂing fasÂcism” is redunÂdant. FasÂcism stomped around in jackÂboots, smashed winÂdows and burned ReichÂstags before it fulÂly seized powÂer, but its most imporÂtant action was the creepÂing: into lanÂguage, media, eduÂcaÂtion, and reliÂgious instiÂtuÂtions. None of these moveÂments arose, after all, withÂout the supÂport (or at least acquiÂesÂcence) of those in powÂer.
There are difÂferÂences between ItalÂian FasÂcism, GerÂman Nazism, and their varÂiÂous nationÂalÂist descenÂdents. MusÂsoliÂni secured powÂer chiefly through intimÂiÂdaÂtion. But once he was appointÂed prime minÂisÂter by the King in 1922 he began conÂsolÂiÂdatÂing his dicÂtaÂtorÂship, a process that took sevÂerÂal years and required such dealÂings as the creÂation of VatÂiÂcan City in 1929 to secure the Church’s goodÂwill. Some latÂer fasÂcist leadÂers, like AugusÂto Pinochet, came to powÂer in coups (with the supÂport of the CIA). OthÂers, like Hitler, won elecÂtions, after a decade of “creepÂing” into the culÂture by norÂmalÂizÂing nationÂalÂist pride based on racial hierÂarÂchies and nursÂing a sense of aggrievÂed perÂseÂcuÂtion among the GerÂman peoÂple over perÂceived humilÂiÂaÂtions of the past.
In every case, leadÂers exploitÂed local hatreds and inflamed ordiÂnary peoÂple against their neighÂbors with the conÂstant repÂeÂtiÂtion of an alarmÂing “Big Lie” and the promisÂes of a strongÂman for salÂvaÂtion. Every simÂiÂlar moveÂment that has arisen since the end of WWII, says Yale UniÂverÂsiÂty ProÂfesÂsor of PhiÂlosÂoÂphy Jason StanÂley in the video above, has shared these charÂacÂterÂisÂtics: using proÂpaÂganÂda to creÂate an alterÂnate realÂiÂty and payÂing obeiÂsance to a “cult of the leader,” no matÂter how repugÂnant his tacÂtics, behavÂior, or perÂsonÂalÂiÂty. “Right wing by nature,” fasÂcisÂm’s patriÂarÂchal strucÂture appeals to conÂserÂvÂaÂtives. While it mobiÂlizes vioÂlence against minoriÂties and leftÂists, it seduces those on the right by promisÂing a share of the spoils and valÂiÂdatÂing conÂserÂvÂaÂtive desires for a sinÂgle, uniÂfyÂing nationÂal narÂraÂtive:
FasÂcism is a cult of the leader. It involves the leader setÂting the rules about what’s true and false. So any kind of experÂtise, realÂiÂty, all of that is a chalÂlenge to the authorÂiÂty of the leader. If sciÂence would help him, then he can say, “Okay, I’ll use it.” InstiÂtuÂtions that teach mulÂtiÂple perÂspecÂtives on hisÂtoÂry in all its comÂplexÂiÂty are always a threat to the fasÂcist leader.
Rather than simÂply destroyÂing instiÂtuÂtions, fasÂcists twist them to their own ends. The arts, sciÂences, and humanÂiÂties must be purged of corÂruptÂing eleÂments. Those who resist face job loss, exile or worse. The imporÂtant thing, says StanÂley, is the sortÂing into classÂes of those who deserve life and propÂerÂty and those who don’t.
[O]nce you have hierÂarÂchies set up, you can make peoÂple very nerÂvous and frightÂened about losÂing their posiÂtion on that hierÂarÂchy. HierÂarÂchy goes right into vicÂtimÂhood because once you conÂvince peoÂple that they’re jusÂtiÂfiÂable highÂer on the hierÂarÂchy, then you can tell them that they’re vicÂtims of equalÂiÂty. GerÂman ChrisÂtians are vicÂtims of Jews. White AmerÂiÂcans are vicÂtims of Black AmerÂiÂcan equalÂiÂty. Men are vicÂtims of femÂiÂnism.
The appeal to “law and order,” to police state levÂels of conÂtrol, only applies to cerÂtain threatÂenÂing classÂes who need to be put back in their place or elimÂiÂnatÂed. It does not apply to those at the top of the hierÂarÂchy, who recÂogÂnize no conÂstraints on their actions because they perÂceive themÂselves as threatÂened and in a state of emerÂgency. It’s realÂly the immiÂgrants, leftÂists, and othÂer minoriÂties who have takÂen over, “and that’s why you need a realÂly macho, powÂerÂful, vioÂlent response”:
Law and order strucÂtures who’s legitÂiÂmate and who’s not. EveryÂwhere around the world, no matÂter what the sitÂuÂaÂtion is, in very difÂferÂent socioeÂcoÂnomÂic conÂdiÂtions, the fasÂcist leader comes and tells you, “Your women and chilÂdren are under threat. You need a strong man to proÂtect your famÂiÂlies.” They make conÂserÂvÂaÂtives hysÂterÂiÂcalÂly afraid of transÂgenÂder rights or homoÂsexÂuÂalÂiÂty, othÂer ways of livÂing. These are not peoÂple tryÂing to live their own lives. They’re tryÂing to destroy your life, and they’re comÂing after your chilÂdren. What the fasÂcist politiÂcian does is they take conÂserÂvÂaÂtives who aren’t fasÂcist at all, and they say, “Look, I know you might not like my ways. You might think I’m a womÂanÂizÂer. You might think I’m vioÂlent in my rhetoric. But you need someÂone like me now. You need someÂone like me ’cause homoÂsexÂuÂalÂiÂty, it isn’t just tryÂing for equalÂiÂty. It’s comÂing after your famÂiÂly.”
StanÂley offers sevÂerÂal hisÂtorÂiÂcal examÂples for his assessÂment of what he breaks down into a total of 10 tacÂtics of fasÂcism. (See an earÂliÂer video here in which he disÂcussÂes 3 charÂacÂterÂisÂtics of the ideÂolÂoÂgy.) Like UmberÂto Eco, who idenÂtiÂfied 14 charÂacÂterÂisÂtics of what he called “ur-fasÂcism” in a 1995 essay, StanÂley notes that “not all terÂriÂble things are fasÂcist. FasÂcism is a very parÂticÂuÂlar ideÂoÂlogÂiÂcal strucÂture” that arose in a parÂticÂuÂlar time and place. But while its statÂed aims and docÂtrines are subÂject to change accordÂing to the psyÂcholÂoÂgy of the leader and the nationÂal culÂture, it always shares a cerÂtain groupÂing, or “bunÂdle,” of feaÂtures.
Each of these indiÂvidÂual eleÂments is not in and of itself fasÂcist, but you have to worÂry when they’re all grouped togethÂer, when honÂest conÂserÂvÂaÂtives are lured into fasÂcism by peoÂple who tell them, “Look, it’s an exisÂtenÂtial fight. I know you don’t accept everyÂthing we do. You don’t accept every docÂtrine. But your famÂiÂly is under threat. Your famÂiÂly is at risk. So withÂout us, you’re in perÂil.” Those moments are the times when we need to worÂry about fasÂcism.
Below we’re adding StanÂley’s recent interÂview where he explains how AmerÂiÂca has now entered fascism’s legal phase. You can read his relatÂed artiÂcle in The Guardian.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Yale ProÂfesÂsor Jason StanÂley IdenÂtiÂfies Three EssenÂtial FeaÂtures of FasÂcism: InvokÂing a MythÂic Past, SowÂing DiviÂsion & AttackÂing Truth
UmberÂto Eco Makes a List of the 14 ComÂmon FeaÂtures of FasÂcism
The StoÂry of FasÂcism: Rick Steves’ DocÂuÂmenÂtary Helps Us Learn from the Hard Lessons of the 20th CenÂtuÂry
20,000 AmerÂiÂcans Hold a Pro-Nazi RalÂly in MadiÂson Square GarÂden in 1939: ChillÂing Video Re-CapÂtures a Lost ChapÂter in US HisÂtoÂry
The Nazis’ 10 ConÂtrol-Freak Rules for Jazz PerÂformÂers: A Strange List from World War II
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness