InterÂviewed over at Edge.org, JonÂah Lehrer (ConÂtributÂing EdiÂtor at Wired and the author of the new book How We Decide) begins:
How do you take [the brain], this piece of meat that runs on 10 watts of elecÂtricÂiÂty, and how do you study it in its actuÂal conÂtext, which is that it’s not a brain in a vat. It’s a brain interÂactÂing with othÂer brains. How do you study things like social netÂworks and human interÂacÂtions?
Just think, for instance, about what’s now the hottest method in cogÂniÂtive neuÂroÂscience: The fMRI machine, the brain scan. Think about the funÂdaÂmenÂtal limÂiÂtaÂtion of this machine, which is that it’s one perÂson by himÂself in what’s essenÂtialÂly a noisy cofÂfin. So you give him the stimÂuÂlus. He’s going through the experÂiÂmenÂtal task, whatÂevÂer it is. ChoosÂing whether or not to buy someÂthing, doing a visuÂal memÂoÂry task. WhatÂevÂer the proÂtoÂcol is, you’re in essence lookÂing at a brain in a vacÂuÂum. You’re lookÂing at a brain by itself, and we don’t think enough about how proÂfoundÂly abstract that is, and what an abstracÂtion that is on the realÂiÂty we actuÂalÂly inhabÂit, the realÂiÂty of being a human and what human nature is all about.
The quesÂtion now, and this is a fasÂciÂnatÂing quesÂtion to think about, is how can we take this research, which is so rigÂorÂous, and how can we make it more realÂisÂtic.
NeuÂroÂscience has conÂtributed so much in just a few decades to how we think about human nature and how we know ourÂselves. But how can we take that same rigÂor, which has made this research so valuÂable and, at the same time, make it a more realÂisÂtic repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtion of what it’s actuÂalÂly like to be a human. After all, we’re a brain embedÂded in this largÂer set of strucÂtures.
You can watch the rest of the interÂview here. But make sure you scroll down a litÂtle.