100 Lectures from the World’s Top Scientists

The title says it all. Lots of sci­ence lec­tures from lead­ing thinkers. Some sci­en­tists (Dawkins, Hawk­ing, etc.) list­ed here are house­hold names. Oth­ers are not. Note that most lec­tures come from broad­er video col­lec­tions that we were men­tioned in our pop­u­lar piece: Intel­li­gent Video: The Top Cul­tur­al & Edu­ca­tion­al Video Sites.

via @acourosa. Also check out @openculture

Angels & Demons: The Science Revealed

Back when I was at the now defunct Alliance for Life­long Learn­ing (an e‑learning ven­ture put togeth­er by Stan­ford, Oxford and Yale), we did a reli­gion course that keyed off of Dan Brown’s Da Vin­ci Code. No one thought high­ly of the book, but the dean of the Yale Divin­i­ty School believed that the book’s pop­u­lar­i­ty (and the ques­tions it raised about reli­gion) cre­at­ed a good teach­ing oppor­tu­ni­ty. And he was right. Fast for­ward sev­er­al years, and we now have Dan Brown’s oth­er book, Angels & Demons, get­ting released as a major film too. So, why not use this as an occa­sion to talk about the sci­ence invoked by the film? UC Berke­ley has done just that. (Watch here). And so has Carnegie Mel­lon. CM pref­aces the video fea­tured above as fol­lows: 

Could you real­ly destroy the Vat­i­can using a small amount of anti­mat­ter made in the Large Hadron Col­lid­er? Thats the ques­tion Carnegie Mel­lons Man­fred Pauli­ni seeks to answer in the lec­ture Angels and Demons: The Sci­ence Revealed. Dr. Pauli­ni, an exper­i­men­tal par­ti­cle physi­cist and mem­ber of the CMS exper­i­ment at CERNs Large Hadron Col­lid­er, dis­cuss­es the sci­ence facts and fic­tion in the movie Angels and Demons, based on Dan Browns best-sell­ing nov­el.

Dr. Pauli­ni talks about the physics at the heart of Angels and Demons, which focus­es on what hap­pens when mat­ter and anti­mat­ter meet. The absence of prac­ti­cal­ly any anti­mat­ter in the uni­verse is cru­cial to our exis­tence, and under­stand­ing that absence is one of the big chal­lenges of par­ti­cle physics.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Jonah Lehrer on the Brain (Video)

Inter­viewed over at Edge.org, Jon­ah Lehrer (Con­tribut­ing Edi­tor at Wired and the author of the new book How We Decide) begins:

How do you take [the brain], this piece of meat that runs on 10 watts of elec­tric­i­ty, and how do you study it in its actu­al con­text, which is that it’s not a brain in a vat. It’s a brain inter­act­ing with oth­er brains. How do you study things like social net­works and human inter­ac­tions?

Just think, for instance, about what’s now the hottest method in cog­ni­tive neu­ro­science: The fMRI machine, the brain scan. Think about the fun­da­men­tal lim­i­ta­tion of this machine, which is that it’s one per­son by him­self in what’s essen­tial­ly a noisy cof­fin. So you give him the stim­u­lus. He’s going through the exper­i­men­tal task, what­ev­er it is. Choos­ing whether or not to buy some­thing, doing a visu­al mem­o­ry task. What­ev­er the pro­to­col is, you’re in essence look­ing at a brain in a vac­u­um. You’re look­ing at a brain by itself, and we don’t think enough about how pro­found­ly abstract that is, and what an abstrac­tion that is on the real­i­ty we actu­al­ly inhab­it, the real­i­ty of being a human and what human nature is all about.

The ques­tion now, and this is a fas­ci­nat­ing ques­tion to think about, is how can we take this research, which is so rig­or­ous, and how can we make it more real­is­tic.

Neu­ro­science has con­tributed so much in just a few decades to how we think about human nature and how we know our­selves. But how can we take that same rig­or, which has made this research so valu­able and, at the same time, make it a more real­is­tic rep­re­sen­ta­tion of what it’s actu­al­ly like to be a human. After all, we’re a brain embed­ded in this larg­er set of struc­tures.

You can watch the rest of the inter­view here. But make sure you scroll down a lit­tle.

Ecological Intelligence

Daniel Gole­man has fol­lowed up his pre­vi­ous best­sellers, Emo­tion­al Intel­li­gence and Social Intel­li­gence, with a new one — Eco­log­i­cal Intel­li­gence: How Know­ing the Hid­den Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Every­thing. Eco­log­i­cal intel­li­gence is a way for us to avert envi­ron­men­tal cat­a­stro­phe, and it depends on our know­ing whether prod­ucts are tru­ly envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly or not. These days many prod­ucts look “green” — or they’re mar­ket­ed that way — but when you scratch the sur­face, you real­ize that these new prod­ucts are often more dam­ag­ing than the “non-green” prod­ucts they’re meant to replace. This week, Gole­man was inter­viewed by Bill Moy­ers. With this 17 minute video, you’ll get a quick intro­duc­tion to what “eco­log­i­cal intel­li­gence” means, and how you can become a smarter con­sumer. Along the way, Gole­man rec­om­mends two handy web sites that will let you assess the envi­ron­men­tal friend­li­ness of prod­ucts. One is called GoodGuide (which is also avail­able as a free iPhone app). The oth­er is SkinDeep.

Relat­ed Video:

The Sto­ry of Stuff in 20 Ani­mat­ed Min­utes

When Galaxies Collide

What will hap­pen 3 to 5 bil­lion years from now, when our galaxy will like­ly merge with the Androm­e­da galaxy? The (sound­less) video above will give you a quick pre­view. This footage from the Hub­ble Space Tele­scope offers mul­ti­ple views of recent galaxy col­li­sions. It’s worth not­ing that when galax­ies “col­lide,” they don’t lit­er­al­ly hit one anoth­er. Rather they pull on one anoth­er, as the New Sci­en­tist explains. And the grav­i­ta­tion­al force is enough to do some seri­ous vio­lence — the kind cap­tured in the footage above.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

The Hubble Space Telescope’s Greatest Images

In April 1990, The Hub­ble Space Tele­scope was launched into space and has since sent beau­ti­ful images back to earth. The Tele­graph in the UK has gath­ered togeth­er some of the most spec­tac­u­lar ones. Click here to see some of the best. (And look to the top right for the “Next” but­ton to see more.)

Jupiter Slips Behind the Sun

“NASA’s STEREO space­craft sees Jupiter move behind the Sun in this 30 hour ani­ma­tion com­pressed into just 11 sec­onds. Mean­while, you can see Jupiter’s moons orbit­ing it.” Get more on this cool footage from Dis­cov­er Mag­a­zine and be sure to check out the Bad Astronomer Chan­nel on YouTube, which fea­tures more videos along these lines.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Funny, Fascinating, Educational Lecture on Primate Sexuality

This is Part 1 of a fun­ny but also sub­stan­tive talk about pri­mate sex­u­al­i­ty giv­en by Robert Sapol­sky to his Human Behav­ioral Biol­o­gy class at Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty. As Cory Doc­torow not­ed when fea­tur­ing this video over at Boing Boing, Sapol­sky (author of Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers) does a great job of lec­tur­ing on biol­o­gy, and this talk is â€śfilled with aha moments that’ll have you rethink­ing your rela­tion­ship to your naughty parts.”

via Boing­Bo­ing

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast