Next MonÂday, the long-runÂning AmerÂiÂcan game show, JeopÂardy!, will air a tourÂnaÂment of chamÂpiÂons, pitÂting its two biggest winÂners, Ken JenÂnings and Brad RutÂter, against WatÂson, IBM’s newest superÂcomÂputÂer. And it will proÂvide an occaÂsion to answer an imporÂtant quesÂtion: Can comÂputÂers underÂstand the subÂtleties of lanÂguage? Can they answer quesÂtions when they’re posed in less than straightÂforÂward ways? When, for examÂple, the quesÂtions use wordÂplay and puns? IBM worked on the project for four years, and the earÂly indiÂcaÂtions sugÂgest that comÂputÂers can undoubtÂedÂly masÂter these subÂtleties. (Just watch this WatÂson match against less accomÂplished JeopÂardy! playÂers.) This artiÂcle does a good job of explainÂing the fairÂly stagÂgerÂing things hapÂpenÂing on the backÂend of the new IBM comÂputÂer, and how this research might shape the future of comÂputÂing. The Watson/human faceÂoff begins next MonÂday, with two matchÂes takÂing place over three days. Once video becomes availÂable, as it inevitably will, we will tweet it on our ever-flowÂing TwitÂter stream.
PS NOVA aired a proÂgram last week dedÂiÂcatÂed to the Watson/Jeopardy! chalÂlenge. If it’s not geoblocked, you can watch it right here. H/T to @eugenephoto for flagÂging the proÂgram.

When Sir Arthur Conan Doyle first conÂceived of SherÂlock Holmes in 1887, he probÂaÂbly didÂn’t anticÂiÂpate that the “conÂsultÂing detecÂtive” would become the world’s favorite ficÂtionÂal invesÂtigaÂtive logiÂcian and evenÂtuÂalÂly infilÂtrate everyÂthing from acaÂdÂeÂmÂic curÂricÂuÂla to HolÂlyÂwood. Just last year, the BBC proÂduced a fanÂtasÂtic