Venice is made up of 124 islands, 183 canals and 438 bridges, with water constantly flowing in and around it. As the video below explains, the city has historically developed an elaborate way of defending itself against the seas. But occasionally mother nature wins out, and floods take their toll on the city. This year it’s particularly bad. Heavy rains and strong winds have left Venice 70% submerged, with water levels reaching 60 inches. It marks the sixth worst flood recorded in the past 150 years. You can find footage above, and a pretty remarkable photo gallery over at The Atlantic. And then another compelling set at Boston.com.
via @eugenephoto
Read More...
Beware the Jubjub bird…
Beware post-70s theatrical experimentation…
Beware a children’s classic — Alice in Wonderland, in a modern musical update …
Beware a grown woman cast as a little girl…
On the other hand, what if we’re talking about Meryl Streep? Specifically the Deer Hunter / Kramer vs. Kramer-era Streep, starring in Alice in Concert, playwright Elizabeth Swados and director Joe Papp’s 1981 adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s original trippy tale. If Alice at the Palace, a slightly restaged for television version, is any evidence, America’s Most Serious Actress had a blast, bounding around in baggy overalls, doing everything in her considerable power to upend the prissy pinafore-sporting Disney standard. She jigged. She pouted. She slew the Jabberwock and almost immediately regretted it.
Not surprisingly, given the context, she also got to play stoned. Her spacey meanderings ushered in the most fantastically paranoid interpretation of the Jabberwocky you’re ever likely to hear, courtesy of a supporting ensemble that included Mark Linn-Baker and the late Michael Jeter. Suddenly, that which has long proved maddening starts to make sense.
It’s a feat all around.
Related Content:
Photo: The Real Alice in Wonderland Circa 1862
Alice in Wonderland: The 1903 Original Film
Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland available in our Free Audio Books and Free eBooks collections.
Read More...In 1997 David Sedaris published a funny story called “Front Row Center with Thaddeus Bristol,” narrated by a merciless drama critic who takes it upon himself to expose the appallingly low theatrical standards of elementary and middle school Christmas plays. The story is subtitled “Trite Christmas: Scottsfield’s young hams offer the blandest of holiday fare,” and it goes like this:
In the role of Mary, six-year-old Shannon Burke just barely manages to pass herself off as a virgin. A cloying, preening stage presence, her performance seemed based on nothing but an annoying proclivity toward lifting her skirt and, on rare occasions, opening her eyes. As Joseph, second-grade student Douglas Trazzare needed to be reminded that, although his character did not technically impregnate the virgin mother, he should behave as though he were capable of doing so. Thrown into the mix were a handful of inattentive shepherds and a trio of gift-bearing seven-year-olds who could probably give the Three Stooges a run for their money. As for the lighting, Sacred Heart Elementary chose to rely on nothing more than the flashbulbs ignited by the obnoxious stage mothers and fathers who had created those zombies staggering back and forth across the linoleum-floored dining hall. Under certain circumstances parental pride is understandable but it has no place in the theater, where it tends to encourage a child to believe in a talent that, more often than not, simply fails to exist.
In the same spirit of uncompromising service to the sanctity of the dramatic arts, Funny Or Die introduces Arthur H. Cartwright, Children’s Theatre Critic. (See above.) Alfred Molina plays the perpetually scowling Cartwright, who bullies a cast of prepubescent mediocrities. “The direction was staid, the sets ramshackle and the costumes unremarkable–hardly worth the free admission,” he says. “But we tried hard,” says a cute little girl. “Try telling that to the spirits of Ibsen and Brecht,” says Cartwright, “because you’ve just trampled all over them!”
Speaking of Brecht, don’t miss our post from earlier today: Bertolt Brecht Testifies Before the House Un-American Activities Committee (1947)
via GalleyCat
Read More...
German poet, playwright, and theoretician, Bertolt Brecht—author of such famous works as The Threepenny Opera (1928) and Mother Courage and Her Children (1938)—was a committed Marxist who proposed a new theater to shatter what he saw as the comfortable middle-class conventions of both tragic and realist drama. His theory of “epic theater” underlay his practice, an attempt to shock audiences out of complacency through what he called Verfremdungseffekt (“defamiliarization” or “distancing effect”).
Brecht’s enormous influence was felt not only throughout Europe, but also in the United States, where he settled for a short time along with many other German artists and intellectuals fleeing Nazi persecution. In 1943, Brecht collaborated with fellow exiles Fritz Lang and composer Hanns Eisler on the film Hangmen Also Die!, his only Hollywood script, loosely based on the assassination of number-two leader of the SS, Reinhard Heydrich.
Despite Brecht’s anti-Nazi activities, in 1947 he was nonetheless called before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and accused of writing “a number of very revolutionary poems, plays, and other writings.” HUAC, fueled by postwar Communist and subversive paranoia, investigated dozens of artists and provided the model for Senator Joseph McCarthy’s witch hunts of the 1950s. Brecht’s friend Eisler was also called to testify, having been denounced by his own sister. Brecht was criticized by many for his appearance. As part of the “Hollywood Nineteen,” a group of screenwriters subpoenaed by HUAC, he was one of eleven who actually appeared, and the only member of the group who chose to answer questions. The remaining ten, including eventually blacklisted writers Dalton Trumbo and Ring Lardner, invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. But Brecht was also the only foreigner in the group, as he put it, a “guest” in the country, and feared that his return trip to Europe would be delayed if he didn’t cooperate. After his testimony, Brecht wrote in a letter to Eisler:
“I see from some newspaper clippings that certain journalists thought I behaved arrogantly in Washington; the truth is that I simply had to obey my six lawyers, who advised me to tell the truth and nothing else. Not being a citizen either, I could no more refuse to testify than you could.”
Brecht’s testimony (excerpt above) has become somewhat legendary. The man who invented the theater of alienation turns this hearing into something of a piece of theater. Brecht did not lie to the committee; he denied official membership of any Communist Party, which was true. But his politics were decidedly problematic for HUAC. Instead of discussing them directly, Brecht gave answers that were often equivocal, ironic, or seemingly evasive, turning (like Bill Clinton’s post-Lewinsky testimony) on small matters of definition, or making use of the ambiguities of translation. For example, Chief Investigator Robert Stripling asks Brecht about a song entitled “Forward We’ve Not Forgotten” (from his play, The Decision) then reads an English translation of the song. Asked if he had written it, Brecht responds, “No, I wrote a German poem, but that is very different from this thing,” provoking laughter among the audience. In response to the question about his “revolutionary” writings, Brecht cleverly responds: “I have written a number of poems and songs and plays in the fight against Hitler, and of course they can be considered therefore as revolutionary, ‘cause I of course was for the overthrow of that government.”
The complete transcript of Brecht’s testimony is available here, and an audio excerpt is online here. Brecht’s testimony is a fascinating historical document of a time when censorship and political persecution were very much American activities.
Josh Jones is a doctoral candidate in English at Fordham University and a co-founder and former managing editor of Guernica / A Magazine of Arts and Politics.
Read More...
Here’s one thing you can look forward to early next year. Dan Ariely, a well-known professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University, will present A Beginner’s Guide to Irrational Behavior as a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). If you’ve been with us for a while, you’re already familiar with Ariely’s work. You’ve seen his videos explaining why well-intentioned people lie, or why CEOs repeatedly get outsized bonuses that defy logic. And you know that economics, when looked at closely, is a much messier affair than many rational choice theorists might care to admit.
Now is your chance to delve into Ariely’s research and discover precisely how emotion shapes economic decisions in financial and labor markets, and in our everyday lives. The six-week course (described in more detail here) doesn’t begin until March 25th, but you can reserve your seat today. It’s all free. And keep in mind that students who master the materials covered in the class will receive a certificate at the end of the course.
Other potentially interesting MOOCs coming early next year include:
Our list of 175 Massive Open Online Courses has now been updated to include all courses starting in January, February and March of next year.
Read More...
NASA writes: “Did you know you can see the International Space Station from your house? As the third brightest object in the sky, after the sun and moon, the space station is easy to see if you know where and when to look for it.”
And now, it turns out, there’s a service that will help you do just that: It’s called Spot the Station, and it’s provided free by NASA.
Simply head here and provide NASA with your location and email/text address. They’ll then ping you when the space station next passes over your home.
Happily, NASA will only notify you of “good” sighting opportunities — that is, “sightings that are high enough in the sky (40 degrees or more) and last long enough to give you the best view of the orbiting laboratory.”
On a related note, don’t miss our post from Friday:
Read More...
“Who did not know Rachmaninoff intimately, did not know him at all.” So begins this recorded remembrance of the great Russian composer by Alexander “Sascha” Greiner, who knew him well.
Grenier was the manager of the concert and artist department at Steinway & Sons from 1928–about a decade after Sergei Rachmaninoff’s emigration to America in the wake of the Russian Revolution–until 1958. As the company’s main liaison with the major musicians who played its pianos, Grenier became friends with many of the great pianists of the era. “His friendship with the great Russian artists was personal as well as professional,” according to People and Pianos: A Pictorial History of Steinway & Sons. “If Rachmaninoff had a birthday party, Greiner would be there. If Hofmann needed him, there woud be a telegram sent instantly to soothe him.”
The recording was apparently made a few years before Grenier’s death in 1958. As he speaks, home movie footage reveals Rachmaninoff, who died in 1943, as an imposing yet sociable man. “Behind an austere, perhaps even severe, countenance,” says Grenier, “there was a most warm-hearted lovable man with a wonderful sense of humor. Yes, a wonderful sense of humor. Rachmaninoff thoroughly enjoyed a good story, and no one who hasn’t seen him laugh with the tears running down his cheeks would believe it possible.” Just before the two-minute mark, Rachmaninoff’s own voice can be heard very briefly speaking in Russian. He is playing the popular Russian song “Bublichki” on the piano as a group of friends sing along. In the end Rachmaninoff breaks off playing and jokes to his companions, “Vy ne znaete slova” (вы не знаете слова), which translates as: “You don’t know the words!”
Related content:
Tchaikovsky’s Voice Captured on an Edison Cylinder (1890)
Rare 1946 Film: Sergei Prokofiev Plays Piano, Discusses His Music
Read More...
Long before iPhones, Garmins, and Google Maps conspired to make cartographic sheep of us all, Chevrolet had a vested interest in glamorizing anything to do with four wheels, including the process that put maps in a supposedly adventurous, car-buying public’s hands. Caught Mapping (1940), like so many of the short, informative films the automotive giant engineered with director Jam Handy and “the cooperation of State Highway Departments,” has all the earmarks of its time:
Gorgeous black and white cinematography? Check.
Fetishistic regard for anything that might possibly be described as “the latest technology” (including a big sheet of acetate and a really big camera)? Check.
Jaunty male narrator sucking all the nonchalance out of period slang? Say, fella, what are you “driving” at? Check.
Of particular interest to those accustomed to navigating digitally is the sheer grittiness of the endeavor. Compare the early European explorer shown ponderously wielding a sextant to the perspiring road scouts (or “map detectives”) crisscrossing Death Valley in an un-airconditioned vehicle, chasing down the sort of construction-related detours or topographical developments that could render a paper map obsolete. One steers; the other updates the most recently published edition in ink, impervious to such hazards as car sickness and bumps in the road. Eventually, the eggheads in the lab take over, translating the intrepid road scouts’ fieldwork into a series of symbols and signifiers as mysterious as hieroglyphs to the modern viewer.
Technological advancements aside, it’s the hands-on aspect that proves most thrilling. Someone should make a movie about these guys for real.
If you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best free cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, and Venmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Read More...
“Yasujiro Ozu, the man whom his kinsmen consider the most Japanese of all film directors, had but one major subject, the Japanese family, and but one major theme, its dissolution.” So writes Donald Richie in Ozu: His Life and His Films, still the definitive English-language study of this thoroughly Japanese filmmaker. (Richie, perhaps the most astute and experienced living critic of Japanese film, tells more of Ozu in the relevant segment of Mark Cousins’ series The Story of Film.) Despite his Japaneseness, or indeed because of it, Ozu continues, nearly fifty years after his passing, to enthrall generation after generation of western cinephiles. Yesterday we featured a clip from Tokyo-Ga, the documentary wherein Wim Wenders makes a Tokyo journey out of sheer need to seek out the spirit of Ozu. Critically acclaimed French filmmaker Claire Denis has also paid tribute, and above you’ll find a salute to Ozu as inspiration from equally lauded but resolutely deadpan Finnish auteur Aki Kaurismäki. “Ozu-san, I’m Aki Kaurismäki from Finland,” the Le Havre director explains, readying a cigarette. “I’ve made eleven lousy films, and it’s all your fault.”
What is it about Ozu? The disciplined economy of his stories, dialogue and images accounts for some of it. But he also delivers something less obvious. “Just as there are no heroes in Ozu’s pictures,” writes Richie, “so there are no villains. [ … ] In basic Zen texts one accepts and transcends the world, and in traditional Japanese narrative art one celebrates and relinquishes it. The aesthetic term mono no aware is often used nowadays to describe this state of mind.” And, whether in those words or not, Ozu’s followers savor the expression of mono no aware in his many films, such as An Autumn Afternoon, Tokyo Story, Late Spring, and Good Morning. This sort of thing being better experienced than described, why not watch Ozu’s 1952 picture The Flavor of Green Tea Over Rice? (Or 1941’s The Brothers and Sisters of the Toda Family, 1948’s A Hen in the Wind, 1950’s The Murekata Sisters?) To my mind, nothing sums up Ozu’s appeal quite so well as his use of “pillow shots” — simple, static compositions placed in his films for purely rhythmic, non-narrative purposes — of which you can watch one fan-made compilation below. How many filmmakers, Japanese or otherwise, could pull those off?
Related content:
Watch Kurosawa’s Rashomon Free Online, the Film That Introduced Japanese Cinema to the West
Wim Wenders Visits, Marvels at a Japanese Fake Food Workshop
Colin Marshall hosts and produces Notebook on Cities and Culture. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Over the years, we’ve shown you Don Pettit’s work — his many timelapse videos taken from the International Space Station. (Find some below.) By now, we take these videos almost for granted. We watch the breathtaking scenery flow by, and we shrug our shoulders a bit. Rarely do we step back and think: holy mackerel, this cat is taking artful videos in space. Nor do we wonder: how does one take pictures in zero gravity anyhow?
It’s fascinating when you think about it. And, now Don Pettit gives you a glimpse inside his creative process. Speaking at the Luminance 2012 conference in New York City, Pettit explains the challenges of photographing on the ISS — the equipment required, the quick decisions you need to make, the obstacles that get in the way, the aesthetic choices you need to consider, etc. And then he gets into some intriguing questions. Like how do you capture the colors of the aurora borealis? or what fabulous photographs can infrared photography yield?
His talk runs 30 minutes, and it will interest the casual observer or the all-out photography geek.
Don Pettit Videos from the ISS:
Animated Aurora Borealis from Orbit
Great Cities at Night: Views from the International Space Station
What It Feels Like to Fly Over Planet Earth
Star Gazing from the International Space Station (and Free Astronomy Courses Online)
via Metafilter
Read More...