Way back when, we feaÂtured an aniÂmaÂtion that docÂuÂmentÂed the first acid trip of novÂelÂist Ken Kesey. In Kesey’s case, it all hapÂpened in a careÂful, calÂcuÂlatÂed way in 1959, under the care and conÂtrol of the U.S. govÂernÂment. Six years latÂer and 5,000+ miles away, John Lennon’s maidÂen voyÂage went down in a very difÂferÂent way. A dentist–yes, a denÂtist of all people–slipped LSD into John and George’s cofÂfee, unbeÂknownst to them. Next thing they knew buildÂings were burstÂing into fire, and rooms morÂphÂing into subÂmarines. So began the BeaÂtÂles’ experÂiÂmenÂtaÂtion with psyÂcheÂdelics and new musiÂcal sounds, which, togethÂer, shaped their 1965 masÂterÂpiece, Revolver(stream it free on SpoÂtiÂfy).
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
“We can say of ShakeÂspeare,” wrote T.S. Eliot—in what may sound like the most backÂhandÂed of comÂpliÂments from one writer to another—“that nevÂer has a man turned so litÂtle knowlÂedge to such great account.” Eliot, it’s true, was not overÂawed by the ShakeÂspeareÂan canon; he proÂnouncedHamÂlet “most cerÂtainÂly an artisÂtic failÂure,” though he did love CoriÂolanus. WhatÂevÂer we make of his ambivaÂlent, conÂtrarÂiÂan opinÂions of the most famous author in the EngÂlish lanÂguage, we can credÂit Eliot for keen obserÂvaÂtion: Shakespeare’s uniÂverse, which can seem so sprawlÂingÂly vast, is actuÂalÂly surÂprisÂingÂly spare givÂen the kinds of things it mostÂly conÂtains.
This is due in large part to the visuÂal limÂiÂtaÂtions of the stage, but perÂhaps it also points toward an author who made great works of art from humÂble mateÂriÂals. Look, for examÂple, at a search cloud of the Bard’s plays.
You’ll find one the front page of the VicÂtoÂriÂan IllusÂtratÂed ShakeÂspeare Archive, the PhD project of Michael GoodÂman, docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in DigÂiÂtal HumanÂiÂties at Cardiff UniÂverÂsiÂty. The cloud on the left feaÂtures a galaxy comÂposed mainÂly of eleÂmenÂtal and archeÂtypÂal beings: “AniÂmals,” “CasÂtles and Palaces,” “Crowns,” “FloÂra and FauÂna,” “Swords,” “Spears,” “Trees,” “Water,” “Woods,” “Death.” One thinks of the ZodiÂac or Tarot.
This parÂticÂuÂlar search cloud, howÂevÂer, does not repÂreÂsent the most promiÂnent terms in the text, but rather the most promiÂnent images in four colÂlecÂtions of illusÂtratÂed ShakeÂspeare plays from the VicÂtoÂriÂan periÂod. Goodman’s site hosts over 3000 of these illusÂtraÂtions, takÂen from four major UK ediÂtions of ShakeÂspeare’s ComÂplete Works pubÂlished in the mid-19th cenÂtuÂry. The first, pubÂlished by ediÂtor Charles Knight, appeared in sevÂerÂal volÂumes between 1838 and 1841, illusÂtratÂed with conÂserÂvÂaÂtive engravÂings by varÂiÂous artists. Knight’s ediÂtion introÂduced the trend of spelling Shakespeare’s name as “Shakspere,” as you can see in the title page to the “ComeÂdies, VolÂume I,” at the top of the post. FurÂther down, see two repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive illusÂtraÂtions from the plays, the first of HamÂlet’s OpheÂlia and secÂond CoriÂolanus’ Roman Forum, above.
Part of a wave of “earÂly VicÂtoÂriÂan popÂulism” in ShakeÂspeare pubÂlishÂing, Knight’s ediÂtion is joined by one from KenÂny MeadÂows, who conÂtributed some very difÂferÂent illusÂtraÂtions to an 1854 ediÂtion. Just above, see a Goya-like illusÂtraÂtion from The TemÂpest. LatÂer came an ediÂtion illusÂtratÂed by H.C. Selous in 1864, which returned to the forÂmal, faithÂful realÂism of the Knight ediÂtion (see a renÂderÂing of HenÂry V, below), and includes phoÂtograuÂvure plates of famed actors of the time in cosÂtume and an appenÂdix of “SpeÂcial Wood Engraved IllusÂtraÂtions by VarÂiÂous Artists.”
The final ediÂtion whose illusÂtraÂtions GoodÂman has digÂiÂtized and catÂaÂlogued on his site feaÂtures engravÂings by artist John Gilbert. Also pubÂlished in 1864, the Gilbert may be the most expresÂsive of the four, retainÂing realÂist proÂporÂtions and mise-en-scène, yet also renÂderÂing the charÂacÂters with a psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal realÂism that is at times unsettling—as in his fierce porÂtrait of Lear, below. Gilbert’s illusÂtraÂtion of The TamÂing of the Shrew’s KatheÂriÂna and PetruÂchio, furÂther down, shows his skill for creÂatÂing believÂable indiÂvidÂuÂals, rather than broad archeÂtypes. The same skill for which the playÂwright has so often been givÂen credÂit.
But ShakeÂspeare worked both with rich, indiÂvidÂual charÂacÂter studÂies and broadÂer, archeÂtypÂal, mateÂrÂiÂal: psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal realÂism and mythoÂlogÂiÂcal clasÂsiÂcism. What I think these illusÂtratÂed ediÂtions show us is that ShakeÂspeare, whoÂevÂer he (or she) may have been, did indeed have a keen sense of what Eliot called the “objecÂtive corÂrelÂaÂtive,” able to comÂmuÂniÂcate comÂplex emoÂtions through “a skillÂful accuÂmuÂlaÂtion of imagÂined senÂsoÂry impresÂsions” that have impressed us as much on the canÂvas, stage, and screen as they do on the page. The emoÂtionÂal expresÂsiveÂness of Shakespeare’s plays comes to us not only through eloÂquent verse speechÂes, but through images of both the starkÂly eleÂmenÂtal and the uniqueÂly perÂsonÂal.
Spend some time with the illusÂtratÂed ediÂtions on Goodman’s site, and you will develÂop an appreÂciÂaÂtion for how the plays comÂmuÂniÂcate difÂferÂentÂly to the difÂferÂent artists. In addiÂtion to the search clouds, the site has a headÂer at the top for each of the four ediÂtions. Click on the name and you will see front and back matÂter and title pages. In the pull-down menus, you can access each indiÂvidÂual play’s digÂiÂtized illusÂtraÂtions by type—“Histories,” “ComeÂdies,” and “Tragedies.” All of the conÂtent on the site, GoodÂman writes, “is free through a CC license: users can share on social media, remix, research, creÂate and just do whatÂevÂer they want realÂly!”
It’s hard to imagÂine a time when Nirvana’s “Smells Like Teen SpirÂit” didn’t belong to all of us. One day it didn’t exist. And then one day it did, and for so many of us who heard that churnÂing openÂing chord, that was it. Maybe it took one lisÂten, or five, but it was clear this song was going to mean someÂthing. And as the autumn of 1991 wore on, it would take on the weight of many things—expectations of a new genÂerÂaÂtion, a new decade, the end of hair metÂal, the beginÂning of grunge, the return of rock, or just as corÂrectÂly, rock’s last gasp.
The song was released to radio staÂtions in August, issued as a sinÂgle on SepÂtemÂber 10, 1991, and then offiÂcialÂly released on SepÂtemÂber 24, 1991. But “Smells Like Teen SpirÂit” realÂly broke a month latÂer, when MTV preÂmiered it on 120 MinÂutes. Then the band watched as it became a dayÂtime MTV hit, then a hit on every rock radio playlist, from “modÂern rock” to “colÂlege rock” and all the marÂketÂing diviÂsions in between.
The above video shows the band playÂing the song before any of this hapÂpened, just two days after the release of NevÂerÂmind. As Jason KotÂtke said on his site when he postÂed this, “There’s a freight train bearÂing down on those boys and they don’t even know it.”
The perÂforÂmance comes from a gig at The Moon in New Haven, ConÂnectiÂcut (see it all above), the band playÂing on a small stage, with such a low ceilÂing that bassist Krist NovoselÂic looks like he’s going to bang his head on the ceilÂing. The audiÂence is one huge mosh pit, all male, it seems, and you can smell the sweat and stale beer through the screen. Did the crowd know they were seeÂing a band on the cusp? Is it too much to read into that yelp from the audiÂence, durÂing the secÂond quiÂet pasÂsage, that they’re witÂnessÂing a fineÂly conÂstructÂed hit, the kind of loud-soft dynamÂic that would be copied and echoed through the nineties.
By April of the folÂlowÂing year the song would be so popÂuÂlar Weird Al Yankovic would have made his parÂoÂdy verÂsion (one of his best). And soon Kurt Cobain would be swalÂlowed by fame, seeÂing only a few ways out of his predicaÂment. But here they are for a brief moment in time, perÂhaps thinkÂing that there would be more clubs like The Moon, just a bit bigÂger, maybe just a bit smallÂer, on the horiÂzon.
Ted Mills is a freeÂlance writer on the arts who curÂrentÂly hosts the FunkZone PodÂcast. You can also folÂlow him on TwitÂter at @tedmills, read his othÂer arts writÂing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.