When the Nazis came to powÂer in 1933, they declared the beginÂning of a “ThouÂsand-Year Reich” that ultiÂmateÂly came up about 988 years short. FasÂcism in Italy manÂaged to hold on to powÂer for a couÂple of decades, which was preÂsumÂably still much less time than BenÂiÂto MusÂsoliÂni imagÂined he’d get on the throne. HisÂtoÂry shows us that regimes of this kind sufÂfered a fairÂly severe staÂbilÂiÂty probÂlem, which is perÂhaps why they needÂed to put forth such a solÂid, forÂmiÂdaÂble image. The IMPERIAL video above explores “the evil genius of fasÂcist design,” focusÂing on how Hitler and MusÂsoliÂni renÂdered their ideÂoloÂgies in art and the built enviÂronÂment, but many of its obserÂvaÂtions can be genÂerÂalÂized to any politÂiÂcal moveÂment that seeks total conÂtrol of a sociÂety, espeÂcialÂly if that sociÂety has a sufÂfiÂcientÂly gloÂriÂous-seemÂing past.
FasÂcisÂm’s visuÂal lanÂguage has many inspiÂraÂtions, two of the most imporÂtant citÂed in the video being RomanÂtiÂcism and FuturÂism. The forÂmer offered “a longÂing for the past, an obsesÂsion with nature, and a focus on the subÂlime”; the latÂter “worÂshiped speed, machines, and vioÂlence.” Despite their apparÂent conÂtraÂdicÂtion, these dual curÂrents allowed fasÂcism “a pecuÂliar abilÂiÂty to look both backÂward and forÂward, to sumÂmon the gloÂry of past empires while promisÂing a radÂiÂcal new future.”
In Italy, such an empire may have been disÂtant in time, but it was nevÂerÂtheÂless close at hand. “We dream of a Roman Italy that is wise and strong, disÂciÂplined and ImpeÂrÂiÂal.” Even Hitler drew from the gloÂries of ancient Rome and Greece to shape his own aspiÂraÂtional vision of an all-powÂerÂful GerÂman civÂiÂlizaÂtion.
Hence both of those dicÂtaÂtors underÂtakÂing large-scale NeoÂclasÂsiÂcal-style archiÂtecÂturÂal projects “to bring the aesÂthetÂics of ancient Rome to their city streets,” includÂing even musÂcuÂlar statÂues meant to embody the offiÂcialÂly sancÂtioned human ideÂal. Of course, the builders of the UnitÂed States of AmerÂiÂca had also looked to Roman forms, but they did so at a smallÂer, more humane scale. FasÂcist strucÂtures were designed not just to be eterÂnal symÂbols but overÂwhelmÂing presÂences, intendÂed “not to eleÂvate the soul, but to crush the indiÂvidÂual into the crowd and proÂmote conÂforÂmiÂty.” This, in theÂoÂry, would make the citÂiÂzen feel small and powÂerÂless, but with an accomÂpaÂnyÂing quaÂsi-reliÂgious longÂing to be part of a largÂer project: that of fasÂcism, which subÂorÂdiÂnates everyÂthing to the state. For the likes of MusÂsoliÂni and Hitler (an artist-turned-politiÂcian, as one can hardÂly fail to note), aesÂthetÂics was powÂer — albeit not quite enough, in the event, to ensure their own surÂvival.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
UmberÂto Eco’s List of the 14 ComÂmon FeaÂtures of FasÂcism
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Leave a Reply