The Most Controversial Ancient Philosophy: Epicureanism

Over the years, you’ve prob­a­bly heard at least a few peo­ple casu­al­ly describe them­selves as Epi­cure­ans. As used today, the label can refer to as lit­tle as enjoy­ing the occa­sion­al expen­sive restau­rant meal. The bar was a bit high­er in the sec­ond cen­tu­ry, as explained by ancient-his­to­ry YouTu­ber Gar­rett Ryan in the new video above from his chan­nel Told in Stone. But there is, at least, one major aspect of the orig­i­nal doc­trine laid out by Epi­cu­rus (341–270 BC) with which most any of his self-styled fol­low­ers in our time would agree: that plea­sure is the great­est good. Whether they would fol­low that premise all the way to the con­clu­sions Epi­cu­rus did is anoth­er mat­ter.

For that ancient Greek philoso­pher, Ryan explains, “hap­pi­ness was the sole legit­i­mate goal of human exis­tence. The essence of hap­pi­ness is free­dom from anx­i­ety. Since the great­est source of men­tal dis­tur­bance is fear about death and the after­life, it is nec­es­sary to under­stand the true nature of the uni­verse.”

There­after come the prin­ci­ples about atoms drift­ing through the infi­nite void, a sub­ject of less inter­est to many twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry “Epi­cure­ans” than the mechan­ics of the Williams-Sono­ma rewards pro­gram. Still, they would do well to learn at least one rel­e­vant Greek term: atarax­ia, or the “tran­quil­i­ty that comes from being suf­fi­cient in one­self.”

Achiev­ing atarax­ia is not a mat­ter of mere­ly indulging the sens­es. Rather, “all sources of unnec­es­sary men­tal dis­tur­bance should be removed.” That means no pol­i­tics and prob­a­bly no mar­riage, though friend­ship is accept­able. Though fair­ly ascetic in its orig­i­nal form, Epi­cure­anism drew quite a few high-pro­file Romans as adher­ents — and as detrac­tors. No less a fig­ure than Cicero, for exam­ple, attacked both its oppo­si­tion to tra­di­tion­al Roman reli­gion and, per­haps pre­dictably, its iso­la­tion from pub­lic life. Plutarch went so far as to write anti-Epi­cure­an trea­tis­es, includ­ing one titled “It Is Not Pos­si­ble to Live Plea­sur­ably Accord­ing to the Doc­trines of Epi­cu­rus.” That may or may not be true by our mod­ern stan­dards, but the ques­tion is worth con­tem­plat­ing over a good din­ner.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Alain de Botton’s School of Life Presents Ani­mat­ed Intro­duc­tions to Hei­deg­ger, The Sto­ics & Epi­cu­rus

A Guide to Hap­pi­ness: Alain de Botton’s Doc­u­men­tary Shows How Niet­zsche, Socrates & 4 Oth­er Philoso­phers Can Change Your Life

An Ani­mat­ed Intro­duc­tion to Sto­icism, the Ancient Greek Phi­los­o­phy That Lets You Lead a Hap­py, Ful­fill­ing Life

An Entire Ancient Greek Philo­soph­i­cal Trea­tise Burned by Mount Vesu­vius Has Been Deci­phered with X‑Ray and AI Tech­nolo­gies

Memen­to Mori: How Smil­ing Skele­tons Have Remind­ed Us to Live Ful­ly Since Ancient Times

How 99% of Ancient Lit­er­a­ture Was Lost

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.


by | Permalink | Comments (0) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Leave a Reply

Quantcast