Gun Nut William S. Burroughs & Gonzo Illustrator Ralph Steadman Make Polaroid Portraits Together

Burroughs Steadman pics

Ralph Stead­man is best known as the artist who real­ized the gonzo vision of Hunter S. Thomp­son in illus­tra­tions for the latter’s books and arti­cles (and more recent­ly, per­haps, for the labels on Colorado’s Fly­ing Dog brew). His work has famous­ly appeared over the past sev­er­al decades in Punch, Pri­vate Eye, The New York Times, and Rolling Stone, and he pro­duced a bril­liant­ly illus­trat­ed edi­tion of Alice in Won­der­land. Like his friend Ger­ald Scarfe, anoth­er wicked­ly satir­i­cal car­toon­ist who cre­at­ed the look of Pink Floyd’s The Wall, Stead­man has made sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tions to the look of the coun­ter­cul­ture.

WSB_Paranoid

But while Steadman’s work with Hunter Thomp­son may large­ly define his career, anoth­er notable col­lab­o­ra­tion with a lit­er­ary fig­ure, William S. Bur­roughs, also proved fruit­ful many years lat­er. In 1995, Stead­man brought togeth­er his own illus­tra­tions with Bur­roughs love of guns, ask­ing the octo­ge­nar­i­an writer to blast holes in orig­i­nal Stead­man cre­ations.

Some of these paint­ings fea­ture the Polaroid por­traits of Bur­roughs above and at the top of the post (see a result­ing Steadman/Burroughs silkscreen print, with gun­shot holes, here). Just above, you can see Stead­man tak­ing the pho­tos. First, he makes some test shots with an assis­tant, then, at 2:50, we see him with Bur­roughs and an entourage. As The Inde­pen­dent described the meet­ing at Bur­roughs’ house in Lawrence, Kansas, it was some­thing of a “con­trived event,” with “swarms of assis­tants” and “acolytes” in atten­dance, “tap­ing the whole thing on video.”

Luck­i­ly for us, I’d say. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, we don’t seem to have video from lat­er in the day, when the group drove “out to Burrough’s friends place out­side town, where he does his shoot­ing.” Once there, “Bur­roughs, Stead­man and his wife Anna and Bur­roughs’ entourage take turns blaz­ing away with .33s, .45s, pump-action shot­guns and Sat­ur­day-night spe­cials at a vari­ety of tar­gets,” includ­ing Steadman’s art. That would be some­thing to see. We’ll have to set­tle for the art itself, and Steadman’s fas­ci­nat­ing demon­stra­tion below of his approach to por­trai­ture.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How Hunter S. Thomp­son — and Psilo­cy­bin — Influ­enced the Art of Ralph Stead­man, Cre­at­ing the “Gonzo” Style

Break­ing Bad Illus­trat­ed by Gonzo Artist Ralph Stead­man

William S. Bur­roughs Shows You How to Make “Shot­gun Art”

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Designer Reimagines Iconic Movie Posters With Minimalist Designs: Reservoir Dogs, The Matrix & More

reservoir dogs poster

While watch­ing Inter­stel­lar and hat­ing it, design­er Nick Bar­clay came up with a project for him­self — tak­ing the posters of famous films and reimag­in­ing them with a min­i­mal­ist design that uses only cir­cles. Above, you can see his clever take on Taran­ti­no’s Reser­voir Dogs. It’s a far cry, to be sure, from the orig­i­nal movie poster found below.

Over at My Mod­ern Met, you’ll find oth­er min­i­mal­ist designs for The Matrix, The Lord of the Rings, Bram Stok­er’s Drac­u­la, For­rest Gump, Har­ry Pot­ter, Pulp Fic­tion, Trainspot­ting, 101 Dal­ma­tions, Léon: The Pro­fes­sion­al, The Deer Hunter, Total Recall, Mon­sters Inc., and, of course, 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Prints can be pur­chased on Bar­clay’s web­site.

2.-Reservoir-Dogs-Original

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Gaze at Glob­al Movie Posters for Hitchcock’s Ver­ti­go: U.S., Japan, Italy, Poland & Beyond

Down­load Vin­tage Film Posters in High-Res: From The Philadel­phia Sto­ry to Attack of the Crab Mon­sters

50 Film Posters From Poland: From The Empire Strikes Back to Raiders of the Lost Ark

New Video Shows What May Be Michelangelo’s Lost & Now Found Bronze Sculptures

We all know that Michelan­ge­lo sculpt­ed in mar­ble. What’s less well known is that he worked in bronze too. The his­tor­i­cal record shows that Michelan­ge­lo once made a David in bronze for a French aris­to­crat, and a bronze stat­ue of Pope Julius II. But the David dis­ap­peared dur­ing the French Rev­o­lu­tion, and the Julius was lat­er melt­ed down for mil­i­tary pur­pos­es in Italy. For years, schol­ars thought that Michelan­gelo’s bronze cre­ations were all irre­triev­ably lost to his­to­ry. And then came the big dis­cov­ery.

A team of inter­na­tion­al experts (from Cam­bridge, the Rijksmu­se­um and the Uni­ver­si­ty of War­wick) recent­ly gath­ered evi­dence sug­gest­ing that two bronze male nudes “are ear­ly works by Michelan­ge­lo, made just after he com­plet­ed the mar­ble David and as he was about to embark on the Sis­tine Chapel ceil­ing,” reports a Cam­bridge blog post. Although the stat­ues aren’t signed by Michelan­ge­lo, *****@****ac.uk”>Prof Paul Joan­nides (Emer­i­tus Pro­fes­sor of Art His­to­ry at Cam­bridge) “con­nect­ed them to a draw­ing by one of Michelangelo’s appren­tices now in the Musée Fab­re, Mont­pel­li­er, France,” and it turns out that the draw­ing con­tains fig­ures that close­ly resem­ble the stat­ues. What’s more, Cam­bridge reports, the “bronzes were com­pared with oth­er works by Michelan­ge­lo and found to be very sim­i­lar in style and anato­my to his works of 1500–1510.” The Cam­bridge video above gives you a fur­ther intro­duc­tion to this impor­tant dis­cov­ery.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Michelangelo’s Hand­writ­ten 16th-Cen­tu­ry Gro­cery List

Take a 3D Vir­tu­al Tour of the Sis­tine Chapel, St. Peter’s Basil­i­ca and Oth­er Art-Adorned Vat­i­can Spaces

Leonar­do da Vinci’s Hand­writ­ten Resume (1482)

Invisible Cities Illustrated: Three Artists Paint Every City in Italo Calvino’s Classic Novel

Cities-Thekla

The medieval trav­el­ogue presents present-day writ­ers and artists with an abun­dance of mate­r­i­al. Writ­ing in an age when the bound­aries between fic­tion and non- were not so sharply drawn, ear­ly explor­ers and sailors had lit­tle com­punc­tion about embell­ish­ing their tales with exag­ger­a­tions and out­right lies. Trav­el­ers cir­cu­lat­ed sto­ries of giants and mon­sters and cred­u­lous read­ers back home swal­lowed them whole. Well, some­times. In the case of the most famed medieval trav­el­er, Mar­co Polo, schol­ars have debat­ed whether Il Mil­ione—one of the titles of a nar­ra­tive based on his accounts—refers to a fam­i­ly nick­name or to Polo’s rep­u­ta­tion for telling “a mil­lion lies.” But whether Polo told the truth or not hard­ly mat­tered to Ita­lo Calvi­no, who found in the explorer’s col­or­ful tales just the inspi­ra­tion he need­ed for his 1972 nov­el Invis­i­ble Cities.

Cities-Irene Kuth

More a series of vignettes than a nar­ra­tive, the book con­sists of chap­ter after chap­ter of Polo describ­ing for Kublai Khan the var­i­ous cities he encoun­tered on his trav­els, each one more fan­tas­tic and mag­i­cal than the last. “Kublai Khan does not nec­es­sar­i­ly believe every­thing Mar­co Polo says,” Calvi­no tells us in his intro­duc­tion, “but the emper­or of the Tar­tars does con­tin­ue lis­ten­ing to the young Venet­ian with greater atten­tion and curios­i­ty than he shows any oth­er mes­sen­ger or explor­er of his.” As read­ers, we too lis­ten with rapt atten­tion to curi­ous sto­ries of cities like Olin­da, which “grows in con­cen­tric cir­cles, like tree trunks which each year add one more ring” and Eusapia, where “the inhab­i­tants have con­struct­ed an iden­ti­cal copy of their city, under­ground,” so that the dead can “con­tin­ue their for­mer activ­i­ties.”

Cities-Beersheba Connor

Play­ing on the bizarre nature of trav­el­ers’ tales and the imag­i­na­tive excess­es of exot­ic romances, Calvino’s nov­el abounds in delight­ful archi­tec­tur­al absur­di­ties and puz­zling alle­gories, almost demand­ing to be illu­mi­nat­ed like a medieval man­u­script. Decid­ing to meet the chal­lenge, artists Matt Kish, Leighton Con­nor, Joe Kuth began illus­trat­ing Invis­i­ble Cities in April of 2014. Their tum­blr, See­ing Calvi­no, updates every Wednes­day with a new inter­pre­ta­tion of the novel’s many strange cities. At the top of the post, see “Thekla,” the “city for­ev­er under con­struc­tion,” by Kish. Below it, Kuth’s imag­in­ing of “Irene,” the “name for a city in the dis­tance, and if you approach it, it changes.” And just above, Connor’s inter­pre­ta­tion of “Beer­she­ba,” in which it is believed that “sus­pend­ed in the heav­ens, there exists anoth­er Beer­she­ba … They also believe, these inhab­i­tants, that anoth­er Beer­she­ba exists under­ground.”

Cities-Adelma Kish

See­ing Calvi­no isn’t Kish’s first for­ay into lit­er­ary illus­tra­tion. Pre­vi­ous­ly, he under­took an illus­tra­tion of every page of Melville’s Moby Dick, an impres­sive effort we fea­tured last week. (Above, see anoth­er of his Invis­i­ble Cities pieces, “Adel­ma.”) Of the new, col­lab­o­ra­tive Calvi­no project, Kish tells us, “the episod­ic struc­ture real­ly appealed to us and we thought it was the per­fect kind of thing to build a tum­blr around and share with peo­ple.”

Invis­i­ble Cities has been fas­ci­nat­ing to cre­ate… each of us brings a very dif­fer­ent approach to the work. Joe’s Cities tend to be far more lit­er­al, real­is­tic and rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al, which I find kind of stag­ger­ing because that is so dif­fi­cult to do with Calvi­no. My illus­tra­tions are far more abstract and con­cep­tu­al, try­ing to show in sym­bol­ic ways the ideas behind each chap­ter. Leighton falls some­where between us on that spec­trum, and his work has ele­ments of real­ism and abstrac­tion. None of us even talked about this before we start­ed, we sim­ply began inde­pen­dent­ly (after set­tling on a rota­tion) and watched each oth­er’s work evolve.

The three artists of See­ing Calvi­no have to date paint­ed 45 of the 56 cities in Calvino’s nov­el. Kish has also illus­trat­ed Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Dark­ness, and his blog fea­tures many oth­er graph­ic inter­pre­ta­tions of lit­er­ary and cin­e­mat­ic works. The Moby Dick project saw pub­li­ca­tion as a book in 2011. We can only hope that Calvino’s pub­lish­er sees the val­ue of an Invis­i­ble Cities edi­tion incor­po­rat­ing Kish, Kuth, and Connor’s illus­tra­tions.

You can vis­it See­ing Calvi­no here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

An Illus­tra­tion of Every Page of Her­man Melville’s Moby Dick

Hear Ita­lo Calvi­no Read Selec­tions From Invis­i­ble Cities, Mr. Palo­mar & Oth­er Enchant­i­ng Fic­tions

Expe­ri­ence Invis­i­ble Cities, an Inno­v­a­tive, Ita­lo Calvi­no-Inspired Opera Staged in LA’s Union Sta­tion

Watch a Whim­si­cal Ani­ma­tion of Ita­lo Calvino’s Short Sto­ry “The Dis­tance of the Moon”

Ita­lo Calvi­no Offers 14 Rea­sons We Should Read the Clas­sics

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Watch Artist Shepard Fairey Pretend to Work in an Art Supply Store

Atten­tion sulky art school stu­dents! Next time you’re stock­ing up on pre-smashed TVs, baby doll parts, riot cop sten­cils and man­nequins, be sure to say hel­lo to Shep­ard Fairey.

The artist is cur­rent­ly sport­ing a provoca­tive T‑shirt of his own design and pos­ing as an employ­ee of Shock­ing Art Sup­ply and Craft.

D’oh! We’ve been punked again!

Fairey’s real, but the store, a bright­ly lit empo­ri­um cater­ing to those seek­ing to make sub­ver­sive state­ments with their art, is the inven­tion of Fred Armisen and Car­rie Brownstein’s Port­landia. (The full episode aired last week on IFC.)

Armisen and Brown­stein ham things up in ill-fit­ting wigs as Gigi and Phil, char­ac­ters pre­vi­ous­ly known for run­ning a com­pa­ny that pro­vid­ed bad art for cof­fee shop walls.

Mean­while, Fairey wins laughs by leav­ing the com­e­dy to the come­di­ans. Though I wouldn’t be sur­prised to learn that Shock­ing Art Sup­ply employ­ee Shep­ard F is an admir­er of Hen­ry Rollins. You can read all sorts of things into a per­for­mance that dead­pan.

The seg­ment was filmed in a Port­land store where Fairey remem­bered pur­chas­ing art sup­plies a few years back. As he notes on his web­site:

I’m no actor, but this part, along with maybe “jad­ed art stu­dent” or “jad­ed skate shop employ­ee,” are the clos­est I’ll ever get to method act­ing.

 

- Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author whose last sting in Port­land involved mak­ing final edits to the Zinester’s Guide to NYC in a bro­ken down vin­tage camper infest­ed with fly­ing ants. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

 

The Origins of Pleasure: Paul Bloom Explains Why We Like Expensive Wines & Original Paintings

Let’s say you spend a con­sid­er­able amount of mon­ey for a paint­ing by a not­ed artist. Or maybe you get it for a steal. Either way, the paint­ing hangs promi­nent­ly in your home, where it is admired by guests and brings you plea­sure every time you look at it, which is often. Years lat­er, you acci­den­tal­ly dis­cov­er that your paint­ing is not the work of the artist whose sig­na­ture graces the low­er right hand cor­ner of the can­vas, but rather a hereto­fore anony­mous forg­er.  How do you react?

Do you laugh and say, “When I think of all the hap­pi­ness that liv­ing with this beau­ti­ful image has brought me over the years, I feel I have got­ten my money’s worth many times over. I don’t care who paint­ed it!”

Or do you look as though you’ve just real­ized that evil exists in the world, which is how Hitler’s right hand man, Her­mann Göring, reput­ed­ly looked when, as a pris­on­er at Nurem­berg, he was informed that his beloved Ver­meer, ”Christ with the Woman Tak­en in Adul­tery” (below), was actu­al­ly the work of the Dutch deal­er who had sold it to him.

vermeer

Göring’s reac­tion may have been the most human thing about him. Accord­ing to Yale psy­chol­o­gist Paul Bloom, the plea­sure we take in the things we love is deeply informed by their per­ceived ori­gins. For­get mon­e­tary val­ue. For­get brag­ging rights. We need to believe that our paint­ing was not just paint­ed by Ver­meer, but han­dled by him, breathed upon him. If only that Ver­meer of mine could talk…I bet it could set­tle once and for all the exact nature of his rela­tion­ship with that lit­tle serv­ing girl. Remem­ber? The one with the pearl ear­ring?

Oh, wait. She was fic­tion­al. I for­got.

But that’s the sort of prove­nance we crave. The kind that comes with a sto­ry we can sink our teeth into.

The sto­ry must also fit the cir­cum­stances, as Bloom makes plain in his won­der­ful­ly enter­tain­ing TED talk on the Ori­gins of Plea­sure.

Unknow­ing­ly hop­ping in the sack with a blood rel­a­tive or eat­ing rat meat are intrigu­ing nar­ra­tives, pro­vid­ed they hap­pen to some­one else. Knowl­edge of such sto­ries could deep­en your con­nec­tion to a par­tic­u­lar piece of art.

(Can’t you feel the sex­u­al anguish ooz­ing out of my Ver­meer? Did you know he had to choose between buy­ing brush­es and buy­ing food?)

Not the sort of ori­gin sto­ry you’d want to find at the bot­tom of your own per­son­al soup bowl, how­ev­er.

Ergo, let us say that when it comes to plea­sure ema­nat­ing from food, we savor tastes we per­ceive as com­ing from whole­some organ­ic farms, arti­sanal oper­a­tions, restau­rants that are known to have passed the Board of Health’s san­i­tary inspec­tion with fly­ing col­ors. 

And when it comes to drink, we will will­ing­ly believe in the supe­ri­or fla­vor of any­thing poured under the aus­pices of an acclaimed label. Sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence con­firms this.

(On a relat­ed note, I once hung on to a bot­tle after drink­ing the lux­u­ry vod­ka it once con­tained, think­ing I’d refill it with a cheap liquor hack I had read about. The exper­i­ment end­ed when my hus­band com­plained that the water in our Bri­ta pitch­er tast­ed fun­ny.)

Speak­ing of roman­tic part­ners, it turns out that beau­ty tru­ly is not so much in the eye, but the brain of the behold­er. And it’s prob­a­bly not a bad idea to make sure you’ve got the facts regard­ing a poten­tial lover’s age, gen­der, and blood­lines. Caveat emp­tor, as any­one who’s ever seen the Cry­ing Game  will attest.

Note: Paul Bloom has taught a free course through Yale called “Intro­duc­tion to Psy­chol­o­gy,”. It’s avail­able in our col­lec­tion of Free Online Psy­chol­o­gy Cours­es, part of our larg­er col­lec­tion, 1,700 Free Online Cours­es from Top Uni­ver­si­ties.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Why We Love Rep­e­ti­tion in Music: Explained in a New TED-Ed Ani­ma­tion

A Dar­win­ian The­o­ry of Beau­ty, or TED Does Its Best RSA

1756 TED Talks List­ed in a Neat Spread­sheet

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, home­school­er, and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

The Paintings of Filmmaker/Visual Artist David Lynch

I Burn Pinecone and throw it in your house

David Lynch

It was 1967, and David Lynch, a stu­dent at the Penn­syl­va­nia Acad­e­my of the Fine Arts, was up late in his stu­dio when he had a vision. The plants in the paint­ing he was work­ing on seemed to be mov­ing. “I’m look­ing at this and hear­ing this,” he recalled, “and I say, ‘Oh, a mov­ing paint­ing.’ And that was it.”

That thun­der­bolt of an idea put him on the road towards cre­at­ing some of the most unset­tling and sur­re­al images in cin­e­ma from the danc­ing dream dwarf in Twin Peaks to those freaky lit­tle peo­ple in Mul­hol­land Dri­ve. His first step was the mul­ti­me­dia work “Six Men Get­ting Sick” – a large-scale work con­sist­ing of paint­ing, sculp­ture and a one-minute film loop, Lynch’s first for­ay into film. His sub­se­quent ear­ly film work, from The Grand­moth­er to Eraser­head, feels like an exten­sion of his fine art work. “As a painter, you do every­thing your­self, and I thought cin­e­ma was that way,” Lynch said, “like a paint­ing, but you have peo­ple help­ing you.” Of course, by the time he made his big bud­get dud Dune, he was thor­ough­ly dis­abused of that notion.

Yet while becom­ing one of Hollywood’s most influ­en­tial direc­tors, he con­tin­ued to paint. Last year his alma mater unveiled a ret­ro­spec­tive of his art­work from 1965 to the present called “David Lynch: The Uni­fied Field.” Much of the work is from the late-90s on, a time when Lynch found him­self detach­ing more and more from Hol­ly­wood. His last fea­ture film, Inland Empire, came out in 2006. Appar­ent­ly, he was spend­ing much of his free time in the stu­dio.

At 3 A.M. I Am Here With The Red Dream

David Lynch

His work dur­ing this peri­od is inten­tion­al­ly crude and child­like, com­bin­ing car­toon­ish images with preg­nant, semi-intel­li­gi­ble text. Sure, his paint­ings don’t have the pri­mal, psy­cho­sex­u­al pow­er of his movies, but there is still some­thing com­pelling about them. Take, for insis­tence, the mul­ti­me­dia work “I Burn Pinecone and throw it in your house” (top). It looks like a dement­ed children’s book nar­rat­ed by a crazed moun­tain man.

“At 3 A.M. I Am Here With The Red Dream” (mid­dle) looks like the prod­uct of a men­tal patient, com­plete with smudged out text and Hen­ry Darg­er-esque girl legs.

Grim Augury

David Lynch

Of course, Lynch didn’t restrict him­self to paint­ing. He has also worked in dig­i­tal pho­tog­ra­phy. In his 2009 work, Unti­tled (Grim Augury #1), (bot­tom) Lynch depicts a Sun­day din­ner gone hor­ri­bly, inex­plic­a­bly, wrong.

You can watch a video of the exhib­it below. Find an online gallery of Lynch’s artis­tic works here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Lynch’s Unlike­ly Com­mer­cial for a Home Preg­nan­cy Test (1997)

David Lynch Teach­es You to Cook His Quinoa Recipe in a Weird, Sur­re­al­ist Video

What David Lynch Can Do With a 100-Year-Old Cam­era and 52 Sec­onds of Film

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing lots of pic­tures of bad­gers and even more pic­tures of vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

An Illustration of Every Page of Herman Melville’s Moby Dick

md489_12112010

Her­man Melville’s Moby Dick, the work he is most known for in death, had the effect in life of ruin­ing his lit­er­ary rep­u­ta­tion and dri­ving him into obscu­ri­ty. This is but one of many ironies attend­ing the mas­sive nov­el, first pub­lished in Britain in three vol­umes on Octo­ber 18, 1851. At that time, it was sim­ply called The Whale, and as Melville.org informs us, was “expur­gat­ed to avoid offend­ing del­i­cate polit­i­cal and moral sen­si­bil­i­ties.” One month lat­er, the first Amer­i­can edi­tion appeared, now titled Moby Dick; Or, The Whale, com­piled into one huge vol­ume, and with its cen­sored pas­sages, includ­ing the Epi­logue, restored. In both print­ings, the book sold poor­ly, and the reviews—save those from a hand­ful of Amer­i­can crit­ics, includ­ing Melville’s fel­low Great Amer­i­can nov­el­ist Nathaniel Hawthorne—were large­ly neg­a­tive.

"God keep me! — keep us all!" murmured Starbuck, lowly.

Anoth­er irony sur­round­ing the nov­el is one near­ly every­one who’s read it, or tried to read it, will know well. We’re social­ized through visu­al media to approach the sto­ry as great, trag­ic action/adventure. As Melville’s friend, pub­lish­er Evert Augus­tus Duy­ck­inck, described it, the nov­el is osten­si­bly “a roman­tic, fan­ci­ful & lit­er­al & most enjoy­able pre­sent­ment of the Whale Fish­ery,” dri­ven by the revenge plot of mad old Cap­tain Ahab. And yet, it is not that at all, or not sim­ply that. Despite the fact that it lends itself so well to adven­tur­ous retelling, the nov­el itself can seem very obscure, pon­der­ous, and digres­sive to a mad­den­ing degree. The so-called “whal­ing chap­ters,” notably “Cetol­ogy,” delve deeply into the lore and tech­nique of whal­ing, the anato­my and phys­i­ol­o­gy of var­i­ous whale species, and the his­to­ry and pol­i­tics of the ven­ture.

Through­out the nov­el, ordi­nary objects and events—especially, of course, the whale itself—acquire such sym­bol­ic weight that they become almost car­toon­ish tal­is­mans and leap bewil­der­ing­ly out of the nar­ra­tive, forc­ing the read­er to con­tem­plate their significance—no easy task. Depend­ing on your sen­si­bil­i­ties and tol­er­ance for Melville’s labyrinthine prose, these very strange fea­tures of the nov­el are either indis­pens­ably fas­ci­nat­ing or just plain excess bag­gage. Since many edi­tions are pub­lished with the whal­ing chap­ters excised, many read­ers clear­ly feel they are the lat­ter. That is unfor­tu­nate, I think. It’s one of my favorite nov­els, in all its baroque over­stuffed­ness and philo­soph­i­cal den­si­ty. But there’s no deny­ing that it works, as they say, “on many lev­els.” Depend­ing on how you expe­ri­ence the book—it’s either an incred­i­bly grip­ping adven­ture tale, or a very dense and puz­zling work of his­to­ry, phi­los­o­phy, pol­i­tics, and zool­o­gy… or both, and more besides….

md001_08052009

Rec­og­niz­ing the pow­er of Melville’s arrest­ing imagery, artist and librar­i­an Matt Kish decid­ed that he would illus­trate all 552 pages of the Signet Clas­sic paper­back edi­tion of Moby Dick, a book he con­sid­ers “to be the great­est nov­el ever writ­ten.” He began the project in August of 2009 with the first page, illus­trat­ing those famous first words—“Call me Ishmael”—above. (At the top, see page 489, below it page 158, and direct­ly below, page 116). Kish com­plet­ed his epic project at the end of 2010. He used a vari­ety of media—ink, water­col­or, acrylic paint—and incor­po­rat­ed a num­ber of dif­fer­ent graph­ic art styles. As he explains in the com­ments under the first illus­tra­tion, he chose “draw­ing and paint­ing over pages from old books and dia­grams because the pres­ence of visu­al infor­ma­tion on those pages would in some ways inter­fere with, and clut­ter up, my own obses­sive con­trol over my marks.” All in all, it’s a very admirable under­tak­ing, and you can see each indi­vid­ual illus­tra­tion, and many of the stages of draft­ing and com­po­si­tion, at Kish’s blog or on this list we’ve com­piled. (You can also find links to the first 25 pages at bot­tom of this post.) The entire project has also been pub­lished as a book, Moby-Dick in Pic­tures: One Draw­ing for Every Page, a fur­ther irony giv­en the obses­sive lit­er­ari­ness of Melville’s nov­el, a work as obsessed with lan­guage as Cap­tain Ahab is with his great white neme­sis.

md116_12282009

Nonethe­less, what Kish’s project fur­ther demon­strates is the seem­ing­ly inex­haustible trea­sure house that is Moby Dick, a book that so rich­ly appeals to all the sens­es as it also cease­less­ly engages the intel­lect. Kish has gone on to apply his won­der­ful inter­pre­tive tech­nique to oth­er clas­sic lit­er­ary works, includ­ing Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Dark­ness and Ita­lo Calvino’s Invis­i­ble Cities. These projects are equal­ly strik­ing, but it’s Moby Dick, “the great unread Amer­i­can nov­el,” that most inspired Kish, as it has so many oth­er artists and read­ers.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Moby Dick Big Read: Celebri­ties and Every­day Folk Read a Chap­ter a Day from the Great Amer­i­can Nov­el

A View From the Room Where Melville Wrote Moby Dick (Plus a Free Celebri­ty Read­ing of the Nov­el)

How Ray Brad­bury Wrote the Script for John Huston’s Moby Dick (1956)

Orson Welles Reads Moby Dick

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast