Late last week, The NationÂal JourÂnal pubÂlished a stoÂry called The InequalÂiÂty Speech That TED Won’t Show You, along with a relatÂed stoÂry explainÂing the conÂtroÂverÂsy, which boils down to this:
TED orgaÂnizÂers invitÂed a mulÂtiÂmilÂlionÂaire SeatÂtle venÂture capÂiÂtalÂist named Nick Hanauer – the first nonÂfamÂiÂly investor in Amazon.com – to give a speech on March 1 at their TED UniÂverÂsiÂty conÂferÂence. InequalÂiÂty was the topÂic – specifÂiÂcalÂly, Hanauer’s conÂtention that the midÂdle class, and not wealthy innoÂvaÂtors like himÂself, are America’s true “job creÂators.”…
You can’t find that speech online. [Note: it has now been indeÂpenÂdentÂly pubÂlished on YouTube.] TED offiÂcials told Hanauer iniÂtialÂly they were eager to disÂtribÂute it. “I want to put this talk out into the world!” one of them wrote him in an e‑mail in late April. But earÂly this month they changed course, telling Hanauer that his remarks were too “politÂiÂcal” and too conÂtroÂverÂsial for postÂing.
The NationÂal JourÂnal and Hanauer present it as a case of cenÂsorÂship. But TED’s lead curaÂtor Chris AnderÂson respondÂed in a blog post, sayÂing: “Our polÂiÂcy is to post only talks that are truÂly speÂcial. And we try to steer clear of talks that are bound to descend into the same disÂmal parÂtiÂsan head-butting peoÂple can find every day elseÂwhere in the media.” He went on to offer this analÂoÂgy: SomeÂtimes you send an op-ed to The New York Times and they don’t pubÂlish it. Does that mean your ideas are being cenÂsored? Or does it maybe mean your ideas aren’t very well put? Or did someÂone else do a betÂter job of framÂing the arguÂment?
One way or anothÂer, TED didÂn’t see Hanauer’s ideas as being “worth spreadÂing.” The video now appears on YouTube. You can watch it above and decide what you think: CenÂsorÂship or selecÂtivÂiÂty? Or, let me add a third option: a desire to please anyÂone and everyÂone at the expense of openÂing deeply-held beliefs and oft-statÂed mantras to real debate?
