TryÂing to make heads or tails of WikÂiLeaks, which just released 250,000 US diploÂmatÂic cables this week? Then you may want to spend some time with one artiÂcle and one video. First, The New YorkÂer pubÂlished this sumÂmer an extenÂsive proÂfile of Julian Assange, the driÂving force behind WikÂiLeaks. A key pasÂsage explainÂing Assange’s world view appears below, and you can get the full proÂfile right here. Next up, we have Chris AnderÂson, the head of TED, in conÂverÂsaÂtion Assange. The interÂview, runÂning 20 minÂutes, tells you essenÂtialÂly “Why the World Needs WikÂiLeaks.” And then why not add to the list Forbes’ lengthy interÂview with Assange, pubÂlished earÂliÂer this week. (Thanks Avi for that.)
He had come to underÂstand the definÂing human strugÂgle not as left verÂsus right, or faith verÂsus reaÂson, but as indiÂvidÂual verÂsus instiÂtuÂtion. As a stuÂdent of KafÂka, Koestler, and SolzhenÂitÂsyn, he believed that truth, creÂativÂiÂty, love, and comÂpasÂsion are corÂruptÂed by instiÂtuÂtionÂal hierÂarÂchies, and by “patronÂage networks”—one of his favorite expressions—that conÂtort the human spirÂit. He sketched out a manÂiÂfesto of sorts, titled “ConÂspirÂaÂcy as GovÂerÂnance,” which sought to apply graph theÂoÂry to polÂiÂtics. Assange wrote that illeÂgitÂiÂmate govÂerÂnance was by defÂiÂnÂiÂtion conspiratorial—the prodÂuct of funcÂtionarÂies in “colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive secreÂcy, workÂing to the detriÂment of a popÂuÂlaÂtion.” He argued that, when a regime’s lines of interÂnal comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion are disÂruptÂed, the inforÂmaÂtion flow among conÂspirÂaÂtors must dwinÂdle, and that, as the flow approachÂes zero, the conÂspirÂaÂcy disÂsolves. Leaks were an instruÂment of inforÂmaÂtion warÂfare.