The Vatican Digitizes a 1,600-Year-Old Illuminated Manuscript of the Aeneid

It’s fair to say that every peri­od which has cel­e­brat­ed the lit­er­a­ture of antiq­ui­ty has held epic Roman poet Vir­gil in extreme­ly high regard, and that was nev­er more the case than dur­ing the ear­ly Chris­t­ian and medieval eras. Born in 70 B.C.—writes Clyde Pharr in the intro­duc­tion to his schol­ar­ly Latin text—“Vergil was ardent­ly admired even in his own day, and his fame con­tin­ued to increase with the pass­ing cen­turies. Under the lat­er Roman Empire the rev­er­ence for his works reached the point where the Sortes Vir­gilianae came into vogue; that is, the Aeneid was opened at ran­dom, and the first line on which the eyes fell was tak­en as an omen of good or evil.”

This cult of Vir­gil only grew until “a great cir­cle of leg­ends and sto­ries of mir­a­cles gath­ered around his name, and the Vergil of his­to­ry was trans­formed into the Vergil of mag­ic.” The spelling of his name also trans­formed from Vergil to Vir­gil, “thus asso­ci­at­ing the great poet with the mag­ic or prophet­ic wand, vir­go.” Pharr quotes from J.S. Tunison’s Mas­ter Vir­gil, a study of the poet “as he seemed in the Mid­dle Ages”:

The medieval world looked upon him as a poet of prophet­ic insight, who con­tained with­in him­self all the poten­tial­i­ties of wis­dom. He was called the Poet, as if no oth­er exist­ed; the Roman, as if the ide­al of the com­mon­wealth were embod­ied in him; the Per­fect in Style, with whom no oth­er writer could be com­pared; the Philoso­pher, who grasped the ideas of all things…

Vir­gil, after all, act­ed as the wise guide through the Infer­no for late medieval poet Dante, who was accord­ed a sim­i­lar degree of rev­er­ence in the ear­ly mod­ern peri­od.

We should keep the cult of Vir­gil, and of his epic poem The Aeneid, in mind as we sur­vey the text you see rep­re­sent­ed here—an illu­mi­nat­ed man­u­script from Rome cre­at­ed some­time around the year 400 (view the full, dig­i­tized man­u­script here). Begin­ning at the end of anoth­er great epic—The Ili­ad—Virgil’s long poem con­nects the world of Homer to his own through Aeneas and his com­pan­ions, Tro­jan refugees and myth­i­cal founders of Rome. It is some­what iron­ic that the Chris­t­ian world came to ven­er­ate the poem for centuries—claiming that Vir­gil pre­dict­ed the birth of Christ—since the Roman poet’s pur­pose, writes Pharr, was “to see effect­ed… a revival of faith in the old-time religion”—the old-time pagan reli­gion, that is.

But the care­ful preser­va­tion of this ancient man­u­script, some 1,600 years old, tes­ti­fies to the Catholic church’s pro­found respect for Vir­gil. “Known as the Vergilius Vat­i­canus,” writes Hyper­al­ler­gic, it’s one of the world’s old­est ver­sions of the Latin epic poem, and you can browse it for free online” at Digi­ta Vat­i­ca, a non­prof­it affil­i­at­ed with the Vat­i­can Library.

Writ­ten by a sin­gle mas­ter scribe in rus­tic cap­i­tals, an ancient Roman cal­li­graph­ic script, and illus­trat­ed by three dif­fer­ent painters, Vergilius Vat­i­canus is one of only three illu­mi­nat­ed man­u­scripts of clas­sic lit­er­a­ture. Gran­u­lat­ed gold, applied with a brush, high­lights metic­u­lous­ly col­ored images of famous scenes from the poem: Creusa as she tries to keep her hus­band Aeneas from going into bat­tle; the islands of the Cyclades and the city of Pergamea destroyed by pesti­lence and drought; Dido on her funer­al pyre, speak­ing her final solil­o­quy.

Hyper­al­ler­gic describes the painstak­ing care a Tokyo-based firm took in dig­i­tiz­ing the frag­ile text. Digi­ta Vat­i­cana is cur­rent­ly in the midst of scan­ning its entire col­lec­tion of 80,000 del­i­cate, ancient man­u­scripts, a process expect­ed to take 15 years and cost 50 mil­lion euros.

Should you wish to con­tribute to the effort, you can make a dona­tion to the project. The first 200 donors will­ing and able to fork over at least 500 euros (cur­rent­ly about $533), will receive a print­ed repro­duc­tion of the Vergilius Vat­i­canus, sure to impress the clas­sics lovers in your life. Should you wish to read the Aeneid in its orig­i­nal lan­guage, a true under­tak­ing of love, you can’t go wrong with Pharr’s excel­lent schol­ar­ly text of the first six books (or see an online Latin text here). If you’d rather skip the gen­uine­ly dif­fi­cult and labo­ri­ous trans­la­tion, you can always read John Dryden’s trans­la­tion free online.

You can vis­it the illu­mi­nat­ed man­u­script online here.

via Hyper­al­ler­gic

Relat­ed Con­tent:

1,000-Year-Old Man­u­script of Beowulf Dig­i­tized and Now Online

Hear Homer’s Ili­ad Read in the Orig­i­nal Ancient Greek

Learn Latin, Old Eng­lish, San­skrit, Clas­si­cal Greek & Oth­er Ancient Lan­guages in 10 Lessons

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

See How The Gutenberg Press Worked: Demonstration Shows the Oldest Functioning Gutenberg Press in Action

Peo­ple have spo­ken for decades, and with great cer­tain­ty, of the impend­ing death of print. But even here into the 21st cen­tu­ry, press­es con­tin­ue to run around the world, putting out books and peri­od­i­cals of all dif­fer­ent shapes, sizes, and print runs. The tech­nol­o­gy has endured so well in part because it has had so long to evolve. Every­one knows that print­ing began with some­thing called the Guten­berg Press, and many know that Guten­berg him­self (Johannes, a Ger­man black­smith) unveiled his inven­tion in 1440, intro­duc­ing mov­able type to the world. Ten years lat­er came the Guten­berg Bible, the first major book print­ed using it, still con­sid­ered among the most beau­ti­ful books ever mass-pro­duced.

But how did the Guten­berg press actu­al­ly work? In the video above, you can watch a demon­stra­tion of “the most com­plete and func­tion­ing Guten­berg Press in the world” at the Cran­dall His­tor­i­cal Print­ing Muse­um in Pro­vo, Utah. While it cer­tain­ly marked a vast improve­ment in effi­cien­cy over the hand-copy­ing used to make books before, it still required no small amount of labor on the part of an entire staff spe­cial­ly trained to apply the ink, square up the paper, and turn a not-that-easy-to-turn lever. The guide, who’s clear­ly put in the years mas­ter­ing his rou­tine, has both clear expla­na­tions and plen­ty of corny jokes at hand through­out the process.

One can hard­ly over­state the impor­tance of the machine we see in action here, which facil­i­tat­ed the spread of ideas all around Europe and the world and turned the book into what no less a technophile than Stephen Fry calls “the build­ing block of our civ­i­liza­tion.” He says that in an episode of the BBC series The Medieval Mind in which he explores the world of Guten­berg print­ing in even greater depth. We’ve grown so accus­tomed to the near-instan­ta­neous trans­fer of infor­ma­tion over the inter­net that deal­ing with print can feel like a has­sle. I myself just recent­ly resent­ed hav­ing to buy a print­er for work rea­sons, even though its sheer speed and clar­i­ty would have seemed like a mir­a­cle to Guten­berg, whose inven­tion — and the labor of the count­less skilled work­ers who oper­at­ed it — set in motion the devel­op­ments that let us spread ideas so impos­si­bly fast on sites like this today.

via Kot­tke

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty Presents the 550-Year-Old Guten­berg Bible in Spec­tac­u­lar, High-Res Detail

How Ink is Made: A Volup­tuous Process Revealed in a Mouth-Water­ing Video

The Art of Col­lo­type: See a Near Extinct Print­ing Tech­nique, as Lov­ing­ly Prac­ticed by a Japan­ese Mas­ter Crafts­man

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

New Web Comic Revisits the Artists & Writers at the Bloody ’68 Convention: Jean Genet, William S. Burroughs & More

chicago-68-burroughs

Draw­ing of William S. Bur­roughs by Nathan Gelgud/The Paris Review

Amer­i­ca’s polit­i­cal cir­cus will soon roll through Cleve­land and then Philadelphia–the sites of the Repub­li­can and Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tions. And, not with­out some mer­it, there’s con­cern that the car­ni­vals could turn vio­lent, as hap­pened in 1968, when Chicago’s may­or Richard Daley, backed by 23,000 police and Nation­al Guards­men, assault­ed pro­test­ers in the streets. A fed­er­al report lat­er called it a dis­play of “unre­strained and indis­crim­i­nate police vio­lence.”

This week, that tumul­tuous ’68 con­ven­tion is being com­mem­o­rat­ed in a com­ic over at The Paris Review. Issued in dai­ly install­ments by illus­tra­tor Nathan Gel­gud, the comic–simply titled “Uncon­ven­tion­al”–looks at the writ­ers, artists, and demon­stra­tors who attend­ed the con­ven­tion. Part 1 fea­tures poet, singer, activist Ed Sanders. Part 2 puts Jean Genet cen­ter stage (who knew he was there?). Part 3 focus­es on Nor­man Mail­er, who was always ready for a fight. Part 4 gives us the inim­itable William S. Bur­roughs, and Part 5, Ter­ry South­ern. You can fol­low the series here.

To learn more about what hap­pened at that his­toric con­ven­tion, you can read Bat­tle­ground Chica­go: The Police and the 1968 Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

The Soviets Who Bootlegged Western Music on X‑Rays: Their Story Told in New Video & Audio Documentaries

When you learn that Sovi­et music-lovers bootleged West­ern rock, pop, jazz, and more on the sur­faces of dis­card­ed x‑ray plates, you can’t help but want to learn a bit about it. We post­ed about that curi­ous Cold War phe­nom­e­non back in 2014, but much more mate­r­i­al on this cul­ture of “bone music” has emerged in the years since, includ­ing Stephen Coates and Paul Heart­field­’s book X‑Ray Audio: The Strange Sto­ry of Sovi­et Music on the Bone. They also put togeth­er the four­teen-minute com­pan­ion doc­u­men­tary above, fea­tur­ing con­ver­sa­tions with some of the actu­al par­tic­i­pants in this for­bid­den musi­cal scene which last­ed rough­ly from the late 1940s to the mid-1960s, when tape recorders came around and the cen­sors loos­ened up.

“This is a tru­ly fas­ci­nat­ing sub­ject that seems to cap­ti­vate peo­ple by com­bin­ing pain and suf­fer­ing reflect­ed in the X‑rays with the plea­sure of lis­ten­ing to music,” writes film­mak­er and pho­tog­ra­ph­er Michael Dzierza, who pro­duced the short video above on Coates and Hart­field­’s work with x‑ray audio in which they dis­cuss the ori­gins of their fas­ci­na­tion with this illic­it medi­um and how that fas­ci­na­tion turned into a sub­ject for a long-term mul­ti­me­dia research project.

The world of bone music also became the high­ly suit­able sub­ject for an episode of Fugi­tive Waves, the pod­cast by radio pro­duc­ers the Kitchen Sis­ters on “lost record­ings and shards of sound, along with new tales from remark­able peo­ple around the world — peo­ple with a mis­sion, a pur­pose, a sto­ry to tell”:

The Sovi­ets who made it pos­si­ble for their fel­low cit­i­zens to enjoy the sounds they craved — whether music for­bid­den for its for­eign ori­gin or music per­formed by musi­cians hail­ing from U.S.S.R. coun­tries but deemed insuf­fi­cient­ly loy­al to the regime — cer­tain­ly had a mis­sion, pur­pose, and sto­ry to tell, and their efforts have left as cul­tur­al arti­facts some of the more fas­ci­nat­ing lost record­ings and shards of sound in recent his­to­ry. Now that almost every­one in the devel­oped world takes for grant­ed their 21st-cen­tu­ry abil­i­ty to share high-fideli­ty music more or less instant­ly, it can restore a mea­sure of grat­i­tude to learn more about these med­ical records turned musi­cal records, passed in dark alleys between one trench­coat to anoth­er under the ever-present threat of impris­on­ment. The vinyl revival has hap­pened; could an x‑ray audio revival be on its way?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Sovi­ets Boot­legged West­ern Pop Music on Dis­card­ed X‑Rays: Hear Orig­i­nal Audio Sam­ples

“Glo­ry to the Con­querors of the Uni­verse!”: Pro­pa­gan­da Posters from the Sovi­et Space Race (1958–1963)

How to Spot a Com­mu­nist Using Lit­er­ary Crit­i­cism: A 1955 Man­u­al from the U.S. Mil­i­tary

Louis Arm­strong Plays His­toric Cold War Con­certs in East Berlin & Budapest (1965)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Jane Austen’s Music Collection, Now Digitized and Available Online

Austen Music 1

“What real­ly mat­ters is what you like, not what you are like,” says the nar­ra­tor of Nick Horn­by’s High Fideli­ty. “It’s no good pre­tend­ing that any rela­tion­ship has a future if your record col­lec­tions dis­agree vio­lent­ly.” That mas­ter Eng­lish social nov­el­ist of the late 20th cen­tu­ry made a point with which Jane Austen, the mas­ter Eng­lish social nov­el­ist in the ear­ly 19th cen­tu­ry, may well have agreed. Horn­by, like his char­ac­ter, loves and col­lects music, even into this 21st cen­tu­ry when the very def­i­n­i­tion of a music col­lec­tion has expand­ed into unrec­og­niz­abil­i­ty. Jane Austen did as well, though col­lect­ing music in her day meant some­thing else again: col­lect­ing sheet music.

“The Pride and Prej­u­dice author, who also played piano and sang, copied music by hand into per­son­al albums and col­lect­ed sheet music,” says the BBC about Austen’s per­son­al music col­lec­tion, part of the Austen fam­i­ly music library now dig­i­tized by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Southamp­ton’s Hart­ley Library and made avail­able at the Inter­net Archive. The arti­cle quotes project leader and pro­fes­sor of music Jean­ice Brooks as say­ing these 18 albums of music (the bound kind, not the kind over which High Fideli­ty’s Lon­don thir­tysome­things obsess) could not just help explain the “musi­cal envi­ron­ment that fed the nov­el­ist’s imag­i­na­tion” and led to nov­els “full of musi­cal scenes,” but pro­vide a “unique glimpse of the musi­cal life of an extend­ed gen­try fam­i­ly in the years around 1800.”

Austen Music 2

If, as a uni­ver­si­ty spokesman says, a 19th-cen­tu­ry sheet music col­lec­tion reflects the per­son­al­i­ty of its own­er “just as a dig­i­tal music col­lec­tion on a mobile phone or MP3 device would today,” what does Jane Austen’s say about her? The items in the col­lec­tion iden­ti­fied as belong­ing to Austen her­self include one vol­ume con­tain­ing “two songs from Dalayrac’s Les deux Savo­yards, one song, and the ‘Sav­age Dance,’ ” anoth­er con­tain­ing “Juve­nile Songs & Lessons” for “for young begin­ners who don’t know enough to prac­tise,” and anoth­er, accord­ing to the BBC, con­tain­ing “the tra­di­tion­al Welsh song Nos Galan, bet­ter known today as Christ­mas song ‘Deck the Halls.’ ”

Not quite a does-she-like-the-Bea­t­les-or-does-she-like-the-Stones sit­u­a­tion, cer­tain­ly. But Inter­net Archive allows you to flip at your leisure through these albums, all of them once kept in the Austen fam­i­ly home and some or all once han­dled by Austen her­self, which ought to pro­vide a sat­is­fac­tion for many of the count­less fans always seek­ing to get a lit­tle clos­er to the writer whose books they’ve read and reread so enjoy­ably. Some of them have no doubt drawn the inspi­ra­tion from her work to start writ­ing them­selves, com­pos­ing sto­ries in her style. Those who go so far as to copy out pieces of her beloved prose in their own hand, can now try not just writ­ing the words she wrote, but play­ing the notes she played as well.

via Austin Kleon

Relat­ed Con­tent:

An Ani­mat­ed Intro­duc­tion to Jane Austen

15-Year-Old Jane Austen Writes a Satir­i­cal His­to­ry Of Eng­land: Read the Hand­writ­ten Man­u­script Online (1791)

Jane Austen Used Pins to Edit Her Aban­doned Man­u­script, The Wat­sons

Jane Austen Writes a Let­ter to Her Sis­ter While Hung Over: “I Believe I Drank Too Much Wine Last Night”

Down­load the Major Works of Jane Austen as Free eBooks & Audio Books

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

How Jazz-Loving Teenagers–the Swingjugend–Fought the Hitler Youth and Resisted Conformity in Nazi Germany

Near­ly every West­ern youth sub­cul­ture in exis­tence even­tu­al­ly gets its own Hol­ly­wood film. Like most such films, 1993’s Swing Kids—which tells the sto­ry of jazz-lov­ing Ger­man youth dur­ing the rise of the Third Reich—managed to be both inac­cu­rate and crit­i­cal­ly reviled. Roger Ebert hat­ed the film’s cel­e­bra­tion of “a very small foot­note to a very large his­tor­i­cal event,” and com­pared the Swing Kids to “Nero, who fid­dled while Rome burned.” Ebert’s reac­tion is unchar­ac­ter­is­tic of him; he writes crit­i­cal­ly of the film, but he also seemed to find its subject—the kids themselves—repellant.

The review prompts us to ask: Were these kids—dubbed Swingju­gend by the Nazis—participating in a rev­o­lu­tion­ary act of cul­tur­al resis­tance, or were they no more than typ­i­cal, naive teenagers who pre­ferred to “lis­ten to big bands than enlist in the mil­i­tary”? (After all, writes Ebert, “who wouldn’t?”) But the ques­tion about the Swing Kids’ polit­i­cal moti­va­tions may be less rel­e­vant than one about whether their pur­suit of a care­free, jazz-scored lifestyle under Nazism con­sti­tutes a “small foot­note” in his­to­ry. Should we know and care about the Swing Kids, and if so, why?

A Ger­man site called Swingstyle com­piles infor­ma­tion about the sub­cul­ture and admits that “the real Swing Kids were polit­i­cal­ly unso­phis­ti­cat­ed.” Despite being seen as a “youth prob­lem” by Nazi author­i­ties, they “actu­al­ly cared lit­tle for con­test­ing offi­cial poli­cies toward Jews or oth­er mat­ters. They just want­ed to have fun at a dark time in their country’s his­to­ry, and avoid the war if pos­si­ble.” Or, rather, most of them want­ed to avoid join­ing the Hitler Youth, man­dat­ed for all young peo­ple in 1939: “We must remem­ber the age of most swing kids was between 12 and 16 or 17.”

But as you can see in the short doc­u­men­tary clip at the top, the Swing Kids’ resis­tance to the by-now famil­iar­ly dis­turb­ing, para­mil­i­tary reg­i­men­ta­tion of Ger­man young peo­ple (see above), was in its way a rad­i­cal act. “Their casu­al, fun-lov­ing atti­tude made a mock­ery of Nazi con­trol,” the doc­u­men­tary nar­ra­tor says. They embraced what was “con­sid­ered ‘degen­er­ate music’ by Nazi ide­ol­o­gy,” writes Mes­syNChic, “because it was often per­formed by black and Jew­ish musi­cians and pro­mot­ed free love.”

We can­not assume the Swing Kids’ love of the music extend­ed to a love for the peo­ple who made it. It’s more so the case that the Swing Kids “admired the British and Amer­i­can way of life,” and the free-spirit­ed­ness uni­ver­sal­ly rep­re­sent­ed at the time by jazz in Amer­i­can and British films and records, to which Ger­man youth had some lim­it­ed access. But in their bat­tle for “self-deter­mi­na­tion and free­dom,” infor­mal groups like the Edel­weiss Pirates, the Trav­el­ing Dudes, and the Nava­jos resist­ed sub­or­di­na­tion into a homog­e­nized Aryan mass—the mech­a­nism by which Hitler turned ordi­nary Ger­mans into loy­al abet­tors of mass mur­der.

Through fash­ion and music, the Swing Kid clubs—like the rock­ers or punks of the U.S. and U.K. in lat­er decades—formed in con­scious resis­tance to social and polit­i­cal con­for­mi­ty. The Nava­jos wrote the fol­low­ing song, for exam­ple:

Hitler’s dic­tates make us small,
we’re yet bound in chains.
But one day we’ll again walk tall,
no chain can us restrain.
For hard are our fists,
Yes! And knives at our wrists,
for youth to be free,
Nava­jos lay siege.

The ref­er­ences to vio­lence weren’t pure­ly sym­bol­ic. Swing Kid gangs fought Hitler Youth in the streets. Some Swing Kids, writes Mes­syNChic, became known for “tag­ging pub­lic walls with anti-Nazi slo­gans like ‘Down with Hitler!’ and ‘Medals for Mur­der!’. Throw­ing bricks through win­dows and sab­o­tag­ing cars of Nazi offi­cials… raid­ing mil­i­tary bases… derail­ing trains… even plan­ning to blow up the Gestapo HQ in Cologne.” And as the edu­ca­tion­al site Music and the Holo­caust doc­u­ments, the Gestapo fought back “with spe­cial cru­el­ty” against Swing Boys and Swing Girls.

edelweiss2-1

In Ham­burg, Swing Kids “had to endure dis­crim­i­nat­ing inter­ro­ga­tions, tor­ture and deten­tion.” They land­ed in youth con­cen­tra­tion camps, and adult and Jew­ish “swing mem­bers… were deport­ed” to death camps in Bergen-Bel­son, Buchen­wald, Auschwitz, and else­where. Mes­syNChic claims that “a file com­piled by the Gestapo is said to have con­tained more than 3,000 names [of Swing Kids] already by the end of the 1930’s in Cologne alone. In terms of num­bers, that would mean these youths rep­re­sent­ed a much larg­er resis­tance poten­tial than any oth­er oppo­si­tion group in Ger­many made up by adults.”

Again, none of this orga­nized resis­tance con­sti­tut­ed an explic­it polit­i­cal pro­gram. “The Swing Kids them­selves nev­er intend­ed to have any polit­i­cal effects,” writes Swingstyle, “they did not under­stand pol­i­tics” and “they turned their backs on the real­i­ty around them: the Jew­ish roundups, the death camps and the steady stream of man­pow­er reserves dis­ap­pear­ing into the caul­drons of Rus­sia and France.” Swing was a means of escapism and iden­ti­fi­ca­tion with the more relaxed, per­mis­sive “par­adis­es” of Amer­i­ca and Britain.

elderweiss10

Like teenagers liv­ing under any regime, Swing Kids were main­ly moti­vat­ed by sex and the search for a good time. But per­haps the anar­chic strength of their most pri­mal instincts made these young peo­ple some of the most effec­tive resis­tance fight­ers against the Nazi obses­sion with puri­ty and order. Their lives—choreographed to the tunes of Count Basie and Ben­ny Goodman—were “in com­plete oppo­si­tion to the per­ceived Nation­al Social­ist con­cept of youth,” con­cludes Swingstyle: “To the extent that the Swing Kids assumed Amer­i­can ideals of per­son­al free­dom, relaxed liv­ing, and appre­ci­a­tion of the ‘low­er races’… they were a grave threat to the upside-down phi­los­o­phy of Nazism that sought to insu­late Ger­many from the rest of the world.”

Their embrace of an inter­na­tion­al, racial­ly-mixed culture—jazz—was itself a rad­i­cal polit­i­cal act in Nazi Ger­many, even if they had no the­o­ret­i­cal con­cepts of what that embrace meant for the future of their coun­try. And their vio­lent rejec­tion of the Hitler Youth makes them even more com­pelling. It seems to me that the Swing Kids do indeed deserve a cel­e­bra­to­ry place in history—and maybe they deserve a bet­ter film as well.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hear the Nazi’s Biz­zaro Pro­pa­gan­da Jazz Band, “Char­lie and His Orches­tra” (1940–1943)

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

Watch Lam­beth Walk—Nazi Style: The Ear­ly Pro­pa­gan­da Mash Up That Enraged Joseph Goebbels

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Elie Wiesel (RIP) Talks About What Happens When We Die

Elie Wiesel not only sur­vived the Holo­caust but went on to live a full life with a pro­lif­ic career, the fruits of which includ­ed 57 books, most famous­ly 1960’s Night, a short and for­mal­ly dis­tinc­tive work drawn from his expe­ri­ence in the con­cen­tra­tion camps. “The only role I sought was that of wit­ness,” he wrote in 1978. “I believed that hav­ing sur­vived by chance, I was duty-bound to give mean­ing to my sur­vival, to jus­ti­fy each moment of my life.” And even before his death this past Sat­ur­day at age 87, the Nobel Peace Prize win­ner had learned much about what it means to come to life’s end.

“The body is not eter­nal, but the idea of the soul is,” Wiesel writes in Open Heart, the 2012 mem­oir he wrote after under­go­ing anoth­er brush with death, late in life, which neces­si­tat­ed emer­gency open-heart surgery. “The brain will be buried, but mem­o­ry will sur­vive it.” Oprah Win­frey reads those words back to him in an inter­view from that same year, a clip from which you can see above. “Now that you’ve had all this time to think about it,” she asks, “what do you think hap­pens when we die?”

“Some­how,” he replies, “I will become a child. Child­hood, for me, is a theme in all my work. Will I meet my par­ents again? I want to know that.” Win­frey express­es spe­cial inter­est in the visions of his own fam­i­ly he had in the hos­pi­tal, such as that of his father who had died at Buchen­wald, just weeks before the cam­p’s lib­er­a­tion, and the sight of whose face he had pre­vi­ous­ly glimpsed, just for a moment, dur­ing his Nobel award cer­e­mo­ny in 1986. His father’s sec­ond posthu­mous appear­ance made him think death might not be so bad after all, but “that is the dan­ger. You feel it’s so good to be with the dead, then why not join them?”

But Wiesel, who had done so much already, felt he “had more and more things to do. I haven’t even begun.” Indeed, con­tin­u­ing in his capac­i­ty as the “Con­science of the World,” he received four more awards and hon­ors between 2012 and 2014, made many appear­ances, and sure­ly wrote pages that will see pub­li­ca­tion in the years, or even decades, to come. But for all his accom­plish­ments, he him­self found noth­ing more unusu­al, as he said to Win­frey in a pre­vi­ous talk six­teen years ago, than his own nor­mal­i­ty, “that I sur­vived the Holo­caust and went on to love beau­ti­ful girls, to talk, to write, to have toast and tea and live my life — that is what is abnor­mal.”

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mem­o­ry of the Camps (1985): The Holo­caust Doc­u­men­tary that Trau­ma­tized Alfred Hitch­cock, and Remained Unseen for 40 Years

Alice Herz-Som­mer, the Old­est Holo­caust Sur­vivor (Thanks to the Pow­er of Music), Dies at 110

Bertrand Rus­sell on the Exis­tence of God & the After­life (1959)

Is There an After­life? Christo­pher Hitchens Spec­u­lates in an Ani­mat­ed Video

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Watch “Don’t Be a Sucker!,” the 1947 US Government Anti-Hatred Film That’s Relevant All Over Again

If you aren’t seri­ous­ly dis­turbed, even alarmed, that we in the U.S. have a pres­i­den­tial can­di­date from a major polit­i­cal par­ty who suc­ceeds by whip­ping up xeno­pho­bic fer­vor and telling us the coun­try must not only rein­sti­tute tor­ture, but must do “the unthink­able”… well…. I don’t real­ly know what to say to you. Per­haps more symp­tom than cause of a glob­al turn toward trib­al hatred, the GOP can­di­date has lent his name to a phe­nom­e­non char­ac­ter­ized by cultish devo­tion to an author­i­tar­i­an strong­man, ser­i­al false­hood, and easy, uncrit­i­cal scape­goat­ing. We needn’t look far back in time to see the his­tor­i­cal ana­logues, whether in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, at the end of the 19th, or dur­ing any num­ber of his­tor­i­cal moments before and after.

We also needn’t look very far back to find a his­to­ry of resis­tance to author­i­tar­i­an big­otry, and not only from Civ­il Rights cam­paign­ers and left­ists, but also, as you can see above, from the U.S. War Depart­ment. In 1947, the Depart­ment released the short pro­pa­gan­da film, “Don’t Be a Suck­er!”, aimed at mid­dle-class Amer­i­can Joes. Shot at Warn­er Stu­dios, the film opens with some typ­i­cal noirish crime sce­nar­ios, com­plete with con­vinc­ing­ly noir light­ing and cam­era angles, to visu­al­ly set up the char­ac­ter of the “suck­er” who gets tak­en in by sin­is­ter but seduc­tive characters—“people who stay up nights try­ing to fig­ure out how to take away” what the every­man has. What do naïve poten­tial marks in this anal­o­gy have to lose? Amer­i­can plen­ty: “plen­ty of food, big fac­to­ries to make things a man can use, big cities to do the busi­ness of a big coun­try, and peo­ple, lots of peo­ple.”

“Peo­ple,” the nar­ra­tor says, work­ing the farms and fac­to­ries, dig­ging the mines and run­ning the busi­ness­es: “all kinds of peo­ple. Peo­ple from dif­fer­ent coun­tries with dif­fer­ent reli­gions, dif­fer­ent col­ored skins. Free peo­ple.” Is this disin­gen­u­ous? You bet. We’re told this aggre­gate of peo­ple is “free to vote”—and we know this to be large­ly untrue in prac­tice for many, neces­si­tat­ing the Vot­ing Rights Act almost twen­ty years lat­er. Free to “pick their own jobs”? Employ­ment dis­crim­i­na­tion, seg­re­ga­tion, and sex­ism effec­tive­ly pre­vent­ed that for mil­lions. But the sen­ti­ments are noble, even if the facts don’t ful­ly fit. As our aver­age Joe wan­ders along, con­tem­plat­ing his advan­tages, he hap­pens upon a reac­tionary street­corner demogague harangu­ing against for­eign­ers, African-Amer­i­cans, Catholics, and Freema­sons (?) on behalf of “real Amer­i­cans.” Sounds plen­ty famil­iar.

The voice of rea­son comes from a nat­u­ral­ized Hun­gar­i­an pro­fes­sor who wit­nessed the rise of Nazism in Berlin and who explains to our every­man the strat­e­gy of fanat­ics and fascists—divide and rule. “We human beings are not born with prej­u­dices,” says the wise pro­fes­sor, “always they are made for us. Made by some­one who wants some­thing. Remem­ber that when you hear this kind of talk. Somebody’s going to get some­thing out of it. And it isn’t going to be you.” The remain­der of the film most­ly con­sists of the Hun­gar­i­an pro­fes­sor’s rec­ol­lec­tions of how the Nazis won over ordi­nary Ger­mans.

all american superman

“Don’t Be a Suck­er!” uses a clever rhetor­i­cal strat­e­gy, appeal­ing to the self-inter­est and van­i­ty of the every­man while couch­ing that appeal in egal­i­tar­i­an val­ues. The very recent his­tor­i­cal exam­ple of fas­cist Europe car­ries sig­nif­i­cant weight, where too often today that his­to­ry gets treat­ed like a joke, turned into crude and mud­dled memes. This film would have had real impact on the view­ing audi­ence, who would have seen it before their fea­ture in the­aters across the coun­try.

It’s worth not­ing that this film came out dur­ing a peri­od of increas­ing Amer­i­can pros­per­i­ty and com­par­a­tive eco­nom­ic equi­ty. The jobs “Don’t Be a Suck­er!” lists with pride have dis­ap­peared. Today’s every­man, we might say, has even more rea­son for sus­cep­ti­bil­i­ty to the dem­a­gogue’s appeals. The Inter­net Archive notes an irony here “in the light of Cold War anti-Com­mu­nist pol­i­tics, which real­ly came into their own in the year this film was made.” The street­corner pop­ulist calls to mind peo­ple like Joseph McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover (and he looks like George Wallace)—powerful gov­ern­ment author­i­ties who cast sus­pi­cion on every move­ment for Civ­il Rights and social equal­i­ty.

“Don’t Be a Suck­er!” may seem like an out­lier, but it’s rem­i­nis­cent of anoth­er piece of patri­ot­ic, anti-racist-and-reli­gious-big­otry propaganda—the Super­man car­toon above, which first appeared in 1949, dis­trib­uted to school chil­dren as a book cov­er by some­thing called The Insti­tute for Amer­i­can Democ­ra­cy. You may have seen ver­sions of a full-col­or poster, reprint­ed in sub­se­quent years. Here, Super­man express­es the same egal­i­tar­i­an val­ues as “Don’t Be a Suck­er!” only instead of call­ing racism a con-job, he calls it “Un-Amer­i­can,” using the favorite denun­ci­a­tion of HUAC and oth­er anti-Com­mu­nist groups.

His­to­ry and the present moment may often prove otherwise—showing us just how very Amer­i­can racism and big­otry can be, but so too are numer­ous counter-move­ments on the left and, as these exam­ples show, from more con­ser­v­a­tive, estab­lish­ment cor­ners as well.

“Don’t Be a Suck­er!” will be added to our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

h/t Daniel Buk

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Redis­cov­ered: The First Amer­i­can Anti-Nazi Film, Banned by U.S. Cen­sors and For­got­ten for 80 Years

Bertolt Brecht Tes­ti­fies Before the House Un-Amer­i­can Activ­i­ties Com­mit­tee (1947)

Did Hol­ly­wood Movies Stu­dios “Col­lab­o­rate” with Hitler Dur­ing WW II? His­to­ri­an Makes the Case

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast