Smart video colÂlecÂtions keep appearÂing on YouTube. But rather antiÂthetÂiÂcal to the ethos of its parÂent comÂpaÂny (Google), YouTube unforÂtuÂnateÂly makes these colÂlecÂtions difÂfiÂcult to find. So we’ve decidÂed to do the job for them. These enriching/educational videos come from media outÂlets, culÂturÂal instiÂtuÂtions, uniÂverÂsiÂties and non-profÂits. There are about 70 colÂlecÂtions in total, and the list will grow over time. If we’re missÂing anyÂthing good, feel free to let us know, and we’ll hapÂpiÂly add them. You can find the comÂplete list below the jump.
Also, feel free to check out our YouTube playlist.
GenÂerÂal
I like re-postÂing this from time to time, espeÂcialÂly around comÂmenceÂment time: Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple ComÂputÂer, delivÂered this speech at StanÂford’s comÂmenceÂment cerÂeÂmoÂny in June 2005, offerÂing some simÂple guideÂlines for livÂing a meanÂingÂful life. SomeÂwhat ironÂiÂcalÂly, Jobs nevÂer gradÂuÂatÂed from colÂlege. But no matÂter, there’s lots of good thinkÂing here, and the speech is well worth a lisÂten. We’ve postÂed the video below (and it’s added to our YouTube playlist), but you could also catch it on iTunes: video here, or audio here.
Today, we have a guest feaÂture by AlexanÂdra Juhasz, ProÂfesÂsor of Media StudÂies at Pitzer ColÂlege, in ClareÂmont, CA. This piece conÂsolÂiÂdates lengthÂiÂer blog entries about a course she ran on YouTube, called “LearnÂing from YouTube,” in Fall 2007. The whole goal was to betÂter underÂstand this new media/cultural pheÂnomÂeÂnon, and how it can be used in the classÂroom. How did she set up this class? And what did she learn? Find out below. Take it away AlexanÂdra (and feel free to check out our YouTube playlist as well as our piece, 60 Smart Video ColÂlecÂtions on YouTube) .…
I decidÂed to teach a course about YouTube to betÂter underÂstand this recent and masÂsive media/cultural pheÂnomÂeÂnon, givÂen that I had been stuÂdiousÂly ignorÂing it (even as I recÂogÂnized its sigÂnifÂiÂcance) because every time I went there, I was seriÂousÂly underÂwhelmed by what I saw: interÂchangeÂable, bite-sized, forÂmuÂlaÂic videos referÂring either to popÂuÂlar culÂture or perÂsonÂal pain/pleasure. I called them video sloÂgans: pithy, preÂcise, rousÂing calls to action or conÂsumpÂtion, or action as conÂsumpÂtion. I was cerÂtain, howÂevÂer, that there must be video, in this vast sea, that would satÂisÂfy even my lofty stanÂdards, and figÂured my stuÂdents (givÂen their greater facilÂiÂty with a life-on-line) probÂaÂbly knew betÂter than I how to navÂiÂgate the site.
LearnÂing From YouTube was my first truÂly “stuÂdent led” course: we would deterÂmine the imporÂtant themes and relÂeÂvant methÂods togethÂer. I had decidÂed that I wantÂed the course to priÂmarÂiÂly conÂsidÂer how web 2.0 (in this case, specifÂiÂcalÂly YouTube) is radÂiÂcalÂly alterÂing the conÂdiÂtions of learnÂing (what, where, when, how we have access to inforÂmaÂtion). GivÂen that colÂlege stuÂdents are rarely asked to conÂsidÂer the meta-quesÂtions of how they learn, on top of what they are learnÂing, I thought it would be pedÂaÂgogÂiÂcalÂly useÂful for the form of the course to mirÂror YouTube’s strucÂtures for learnÂing, like its amaÂteur-led pedÂaÂgogy. Yes, on YouTube there is a great deal of user conÂtrol, but this is withÂin a limÂitÂed and also highÂly limÂitÂing set of tools. So, I did set forth the rule that all the learnÂing for the course had to be on and about YouTube. While this conÂstraint was clearÂly artiÂfiÂcial, and perÂhaps misÂleadÂing about how YouTube is used in conÂnecÂtion with a host of othÂer media platÂforms which comÂpleÂment its funcÂtionÂalÂiÂty, it did allow us to become critÂiÂcalÂly aware of the conÂstraints of its archiÂtecÂture for our atypÂiÂcal goals of highÂer eduÂcaÂtion. Thus, all assignÂments had to be proÂduced as YouTube comÂments or videos, all research had to be conÂductÂed withÂin its pages, and all classÂes were taped and put on to YouTube. This gimÂmick, plus a press release, made the course sexy enough to catch the eye of the media, mainÂstream and othÂerÂwise, allowÂing for an exhaustÂing, but self-reflexÂive lesÂson in the role and valÂue of media attenÂtion withÂin social netÂworkÂing. Beyond this, stuÂdents quickÂly realÂized how well trained they actuÂalÂly are to do acaÂdÂeÂmÂic work with the word—their expertise—and how poor is their media-proÂducÂtion litÂerÂaÂcy (there were no media proÂducÂtion skills required for the course as there are not on YouTube). (more…)
Read More...As I write, the most emailed artiÂcle from today’s New York Times is this piece, which talks about the revival of phiÂlosÂoÂphy on AmerÂiÂcan colÂlege camÂpusÂes. The reaÂsons for this revival are varÂied — Some see phiÂlosÂoÂphy offerÂing “good trainÂing for lookÂing at largÂer sociÂetal quesÂtions, like globÂalÂizaÂtion and techÂnolÂoÂgy.” OthÂers see it buildÂing skills valÂued by law schools (arguÂmenÂtaÂtion and reaÂsonÂing). Still othÂers believe that phiÂlosÂoÂphy and exisÂtenÂtial angst can be good for “good for getÂting girlÂfriends.” MeanÂwhile, all seem to agree that philoÂsophÂiÂcal thinkÂing is not simÂply for “frou-frou” intelÂlecÂtuÂals. The net result: the numÂber of phiÂlosÂoÂphy majors is up, with some schools seeÂing increasÂes of 50–100% over the past 5–6 years.
Read More...EinÂstein’s TheÂoÂry of RelÂaÂtivÂiÂty needs no introÂducÂtion. ActuÂalÂly maybe it does since we’re not dealÂing with light conÂcepts here.
RelÂaÂtivÂiÂty in a NutÂshell (MP3) offers a free, 30-minute introÂducÂtion to EinÂstein’s theÂoÂretÂiÂcal work. The lecÂture was preÂsentÂed by Richard WolfÂson of MidÂdleÂbury ColÂlege. And it’s couÂpled with a secÂond free lecÂture called EinÂstein’s MiracÂuÂlous Year. Both lecÂtures were proÂduced by The TeachÂing ComÂpaÂny to comÂmemÂoÂrate the 100th anniverÂsary of EinÂstein’s work on relÂaÂtivÂiÂty (1905), and they tie into a largÂer comÂmerÂcial course taught by WolfÂson: EinÂstein’s RelÂaÂtivÂiÂty and the QuanÂtum RevÂoÂluÂtion: ModÂern Physics for Non-SciÂenÂtists. The TeachÂing ComÂpaÂny coursÂes are not free, but they’re well done. And if you buy the mp3 verÂsions when they’re on sale, you can often get the coursÂes at a good price. Also, you can freÂquentÂly find DVD verÂsions disÂcountÂed on AmaÂzon (see, for examÂple, here). And, even betÂter, you can someÂtimes rent them for free from your local library.
In the meanÂtime, if you’re lookÂing for a good selecÂtion of free uniÂverÂsiÂty coursÂes, visÂit our meta list of Free Online CoursÂes from Great UniÂverÂsiÂties. Also see our SciÂence PodÂcast ColÂlecÂtion.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Read More...LibÂerÂals outÂnumÂber conÂserÂvÂaÂtives in the acadÂeÂmy. That’s a known fact. What explains this diverÂgence? Some have attribÂuted it to libÂerÂals creÂatÂing a hosÂtile enviÂronÂment for conÂserÂvÂaÂtives. But new research calls that view into quesÂtion and offers an intriguÂing alterÂnaÂtive explaÂnaÂtion.
As described in The ChronÂiÂcle of HighÂer EduÂcaÂtion, Matthew WoessÂner (a conÂserÂvÂaÂtive acaÂdÂeÂmÂic) and April KelÂly-WoessÂner (a libÂerÂal acaÂdÂeÂmÂic) looked at surÂveys comÂpletÂed by 15,569 colÂlege seniors, and what an analyÂsis of the data sugÂgests is that “the perÂsonÂal priÂorÂiÂties of those on the left are more comÂpatÂiÂble with purÂsuÂing a Ph.D.” “LibÂerÂalÂism is more closeÂly assoÂciÂatÂed with a desire for exciteÂment, an interÂest in creÂative outÂlets, and an averÂsion to a strucÂtured work enviÂronÂment. ConÂserÂvÂaÂtives express greater interÂest in finanÂcial sucÂcess and stronger desires to raise famÂiÂlies. From this perÂspecÂtive, the ideÂoÂlogÂiÂcal imbalÂance that perÂmeÂates much of acadÂeÂmia may be someÂwhat intractable.” Or, put difÂferÂentÂly, this imbalÂance may not be going away any time soon.
To delve furÂther into their research, you can read their report online here.
Read More...There is a lot of pubÂlicÂiÂty this week around Susan Jacoby’s new book, The Age of AmerÂiÂcan UnreaÂson. The new work fits into the traÂdiÂtion of Richard HofÂsÂtadter’s 1963 clasÂsic, Anti-IntelÂlecÂtuÂalÂism in AmerÂiÂcan Life. And it seemÂingÂly moves in the same orbit as Al Gore’s The Assault on ReaÂson (2007). The upshot of Jacoby’s arguÂment is that “AmerÂiÂcans are in seriÂous intelÂlecÂtuÂal trouÂble — in danÂger of losÂing our hard-won culÂturÂal capÂiÂtal to a virÂuÂlent mixÂture of anti-intelÂlecÂtuÂalÂism, anti-ratioÂnalÂism and low expecÂtaÂtions.” As she goes on to say in this op-ed appearÂing in The WashÂingÂton Post, we’re now livÂing in a moment when AmerÂiÂcans are readÂing fewÂer books than ever, and they know stagÂgerÂingÂly litÂtle about the world: Only 23 perÂcent of AmerÂiÂcans with some colÂlege eduÂcaÂtion can idenÂtiÂfy Iraq, Iran, SauÂdi AraÂbia and Israel on a map, even though the US has a tremenÂdous amount at stake there. (Source: NY Times book review.) And one fifth of AmerÂiÂcan adults think that the sun revolves around the Earth. This is all pretÂty bad. But what makes matÂters worse is the “alarmÂing numÂber of AmerÂiÂcans who have smugÂly conÂcludÂed that they do not need to know such things in the first place.” IgnoÂrance has someÂhow strangeÂly gone from vice to virtue.
What are the soluÂtions? I guess you’ll have to get the book, or get milÂlions of your friends to read Open CulÂture (wink).
UPDATE: You can catch Bill MoyÂers’ interÂview with Susan JacoÂby here: video — mp3 — iTunes — feed. This will let you take a closÂer look at Jacoby’s arguÂment. Thanks Muriel for the tip!
RelatÂed Piece:
AmerÂiÂca’s PhilosoÂpher PresÂiÂdent
Ideas & CulÂture PodÂcast ColÂlecÂtion
Read More...SpeakÂing of psyÂcheÂdelics, we’ve postÂed a docÂuÂmenÂtary below (yet anothÂer BBC proÂducÂtion) that takes a not entireÂly flatÂterÂing look at the life of TimÂoÂthy Leary, the HarÂvard psyÂcholÂoÂgy proÂfesÂsor who went counÂterÂculÂture in 1960s and advoÂcatÂed the therÂaÂpeuÂtic and spirÂiÂtuÂal benÂeÂfits of LSD. I rememÂber seeÂing him years latÂer when I was in colÂlege. My memÂoÂry of the man: Spunky and about as nonÂlinÂear as you could get.
Read More...I like re-postÂing this from time to time.
Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple ComÂputÂer, delivÂered this speech at StanÂford’s comÂmenceÂment cerÂeÂmoÂny in June 2005. I someÂhow doubt that the gradÂuÂatÂing class could have truÂly appreÂciÂatÂed what Jobs is sayÂing here. (At that age, I couldÂn’t have.) But if you’re a litÂtle furÂther down the road, you’ll underÂstand that Jobs (who ironÂiÂcalÂly nevÂer gradÂuÂatÂed from colÂlege) points to a simÂple set of guideÂlines that can make the difÂferÂence between livÂing a fasÂciÂnatÂing and so-so life. SadÂly, these prinÂciÂples get lost all too often in the noise, inerÂtia and blur of everyÂday life.
By the way, the podÂcast verÂsion of this speech conÂsisÂtentÂly remains the numÂber #1 podÂcast on StanÂford’s iTunes site. You can downÂload it in video here, or audio here.
An orgaÂniÂzaÂtion called ColÂlege ScholÂarÂships is offerÂing a $10,000 scholÂarÂship this year for a colÂlege stuÂdent who blogs about “unique and interÂestÂing inforÂmaÂtion about you and/or things you are pasÂsionÂate about.” We’re not shilling for a nomÂiÂnaÂtion here, but perÂhaps you know an aspirÂing blogÂger someÂwhere who could use the extra cash.
This conÂtest raisÂes an interÂestÂing quesÂtion: are there any colÂlege stuÂdents out there who supÂport their eduÂcaÂtion through blogÂging? It’s not a far stretch from workÂing part-time (or full-time) to help pay the bills, but blogÂging seems like an unlikeÂly way to earn enough monÂey to buy books, let alone pay tuition.
Read More...