The Complete Beatles in One Hour (and The Sopranos in Seven Minutes)

in Music, Television | October 10th, 2007

WFMU’s Beware of the Blog has no short­age of good mp3s for music fans. This one is a lit­tle dif­fer­ent: Here, in a clip called Run For Your Life, all of The Bea­t­les’ UK albums are com­pressed at 800% into a one-hour MP3. It’s rather unlis­ten­able, but nonethe­less con­cep­tu­al­ly inter­est­ing. As for speed sum­maries, the one I like most is the video called The Sev­en Minute Sopra­nos. It gives you the first six sea­sons of the HBO series in sev­en snap­py min­utes. Watch below.

“One of The Supreme Creations of Documentary Filmmaking” Airs Tonight

in Film | October 9th, 2007

A.O. Scott (The New York Times) calls it “One of the most remark­able exper­i­ments in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma.” Roger Ebert says it “is on my list of the ten great­est films of all time.” The film is 49 UP, and it airs tonight on PBS.

The film is the sev­enth film in a long-run­ning series of doc­u­men­taries that has traced the lives of 14 Brits, start­ing when they were 7 years old in 1964. The direc­tor, Michael Apt­ed, has revis­it­ed these chil­dren every sev­en years (they are now 49 years old), watch­ing how their lives have changed over the years. Talk about ambi­tious. You can watch a trail­er for the film here, and lis­ten to an inter­view with the direc­tor here.

P.S. The quote in the title comes from Salon.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

Satirizing Ahmadinejad: The New Yorker Picks Up Where SNL Left Off

in Current Affairs, Media | October 8th, 2007

The satirists are get­ting a lot mileage out of Mah­moud Ahmadine­jad’s dec­la­ra­tion that Iran is gay-free. Last week, Sat­ur­day Night Live spoofed Ahmadine­jad, as we not­ed. Then, The New York­er par­o­died Ahmadine­jad on the mag­a­zine’s cov­er with one of its famed car­toons. (The image includ­ed a not-so-oblique ref­er­ence to Lar­ry Craig, the con­ser­v­a­tive US Sen­a­tor who recent­ly got caught up in some mens’ room high jinks. Unfa­mil­iar read­ers can get the scoop on Craig here.) Of all the inane com­ments Ahmadine­jad has made, and there are many, it’s inter­est­ing that the satirists have cho­sen to focus on this one. Deny­ing the exis­tence of gays in Iran is no more empir­i­cal­ly absurd than deny­ing the Holo­caust. So why the empha­sis on the sex­u­al­i­ty com­ment? Because Ahmadine­jad has been play­ing the anti-semi­tism card for some time, but the homo­pho­bia card is rel­a­tive­ly new, hence mak­ing it wor­thy of atten­tion? Or is it because sex­u­al­i­ty offers an always con­ve­nient way to take a polit­i­cal ene­my down a peg? Or since there’s no good way to sat­i­rize a geno­cide, per­haps sex­u­al­i­ty becomes a good default. Ok, I’m stumped. Note to self: think twice next time before over-ana­lyz­ing jokes. Speak­ing of jokes, make you check out the footage we post­ed of Woody Allen doing standup in 1965.

Vintage Woody Allen (From His Stand Up Days)

in Comedy, Film, Video - Arts & Culture | October 7th, 2007

I’ve heard this joke many times before on audio, but nev­er seen it on video. Here it goes. The Moose Joke appar­ent­ly from 1965.

Stephen Colbert’s New Book Released Early as Audiobook

in Audio Books, Books | October 5th, 2007

Here’s a quick heads up: Stephen Col­bert’s new book — I Am Amer­i­ca (And So Can You!) — will hit the streets on Octo­ber 9. How­ev­er, if you’re real­ly champ­ing at the bit, you can down­load the book ear­ly, start­ing today, in audio­book for­mat. The book is nar­rat­ed by Col­bert him­self, which is a perk, and you can down­load it from Audi­ble here.

To round things out, let us refer you to this video where Col­bert, speak­ing at Book Expo Amer­i­ca, pumps his new book, spars with Khaled Hos­sei­ni (author of The Kite Run­ner and A Thou­sand Splen­did Suns), and trash­es Cor­mac McCarthy. Have fun.

Animated New Yorker Cartoons: A Funny Twist on Einstein’s Relativity

in Media, Video - Arts & Culture | October 5th, 2007

The New York­er has rolled out a series of ani­mat­ed car­toons, which puts in motion its famous car­toons. They can be watched as video pod­casts or as streamed videos. You should def­i­nite­ly head over to The New York­er web site to view the larg­er col­lec­tion. But, if you want a lit­tle taste, take a look below:

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

YouTube Gets Smart: The Launch of New University Channels

in Google, UC Berkeley, Video - Arts & Culture | October 5th, 2007

Updat­ed: See full col­lec­tion of Uni­ver­si­ty Video Col­lec­tions on YouTube.

I heard rumors some­thing like this was com­ing, and now it’s here. YouTube has struck deals with major uni­ver­si­ties, cre­at­ing ded­i­cat­ed chan­nels from which schools can dis­trib­ute their media con­tent. Not sur­pris­ing­ly UC Berke­ley, always at the dig­i­tal fore­front, has tak­en the lead and launched an ambi­tious chan­nel with over 300 hours of video­taped cours­es and events. You can check out their chan­nel here. The oth­er major uni­ver­si­ty to sign on is USC (Uni­ver­si­ty of South­ern Cal­i­for­nia).

Back in March, we lament­ed the sheer dearth of cul­tur­al con­tent on YouTube. (Lis­ten to our radio inter­view here and also see our relat­ed blog post.) Since its incep­tion, the now Google-owned video ser­vice has been awash with home-brewed videos of gui­tar riffs, dorm­room lip sync ses­sions, and pet tricks. Mean­while, videos of greater cul­tur­al sub­stance have been hard­er to come by (and that’s why we’ve tried to flag the good ones for you. See here, here & here.) YouTube’s new uni­ver­si­ty ini­tia­tive begins to rem­e­dy that prob­lem. It shows a per­haps bur­geon­ing com­mit­ment to high­er-mind­ed media. But let’s not get too car­ried away. When you go to YouTube, it’s not clear how users will find/navigate to these chan­nels. If you look under Cat­e­gories, “edu­ca­tion” is not an option (although I think it used to be). Per­haps YouTube has plans to tweak its nav­i­ga­tion. Or is this just a case of let­ting a tree fall in the woods? Let’s stay opti­mistic and we’ll check back soon.

Please vis­it our col­lec­tion of 250 Free Online Cours­es

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

Ahmadinejad Spoofed on Saturday Night Live

in Current Affairs, Video - Politics/Society | October 4th, 2007

Ahmadine­jad’s recent appear­ance at Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty gen­er­at­ed a lot of seri­ous press (watch his speech here), and, quite right­ly, jour­nal­ists and com­men­ta­tors seized on his more out­landish asser­tions — that the Holo­caust is not a his­tor­i­cal giv­en, and that homo­sex­u­als actu­al­ly don’t exist in Iran. After all of the seri­ous report­ing was done, Sat­ur­day Night Live got to work and aired this clip that con­tin­ued its tra­di­tion of bit­ing polit­i­cal satire. Here it goes:

The World Without Us: Author Interview

in Books, Current Affairs, Media, Science | October 3rd, 2007

Ear­li­er this week I spoke on the phone with Alan Weis­man, the author of The World With­out Us. (See our ini­tial piece on his book.) Alan was gra­cious enough to take some time out of his pub­lic­i­ty sched­ule to share his thoughts on the book, the world, his writ­ing process, and more. What fol­lows is an edit­ed tran­script of our con­ver­sa­tion.

Ed: This book address­es what on the sur­face seems to be a pret­ty far-fetched hypo­thet­i­cal: that human­i­ty might sud­den­ly dis­ap­pear. What drew you to this premise in the first place?

Alan: Well, pre­cise­ly that. Most great envi­ron­men­tal writ­ing does not get read by a lot of the peo­ple who ought to be learn­ing about it because the near­er-term pos­si­bil­i­ties just seem some­times so fright­en­ing, or so depress­ing, that nobody real­ly wants to pick up a book to read it.

By struc­tur­ing the book the way that I did, I dis­arm the auto­mat­ic fear that repels a lot of peo­ple from read­ing about the envi­ron­ment. Peo­ple don’t want to read some­thing that seems too threat­en­ing. On a sub­con­scious or even a con­scious lev­el, they don’t want to be wor­ried we’re all going to die. In my book, killing us off in the first cou­ple of pages means peo­ple don’t have to wor­ry about dying because we’re already dead, and that’s a relief in a sense. The idea of glimps­ing the future is irre­sistible to all of us and I estab­lish pret­ty quick­ly that is not going to just be me spec­u­lat­ing, it’s going to be some hard sci­ence writ­ing based on a lot of report­ing, of talk­ing to experts or eye­wit­ness­es whose guess­es will be far more inter­est­ing than most peo­ples’.

The fact that it is far-fetched is real­ly use­ful because on the one hand real­ly it’s a remote pos­si­bil­i­ty that we would leave, that we would dis­ap­pear tomor­row. So peo­ple don’t go into a pan­ic over this book, and it real­ly gives peo­ple enough time to think about these things with­out pan­ick­ing about it. So that’s how this device works, and I think it’s been proven to be very effec­tive. I’m get­ting a lot more peo­ple to read it than just peo­ple who are hung up on the envi­ron­ment.

(more…)

Kasparov, The Chess Master, Takes on Putin: A New Yorker Podcast

in Current Affairs | October 2nd, 2007

David Rem­nick, the edi­tor of the New York­er and author of the Pulitzer Prize-win­ning book, Lenin’s Tomb, has recent­ly revis­it­ed the coun­try he knows so well. And what he has to show for it is an exten­sive piece on Gar­ry Kas­parov, arguably the best chess play­er in his­to­ry, and his dan­ger­ous move into the polit­i­cal are­na. In Vladimir Putin’s Rus­sia, nei­ther polit­i­cal dis­sent nor polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion goes over ter­ri­bly well. Since he took the reins of pow­er in 2000, more than a dozen jour­nal­ists crit­i­cal of Putin have turned up dead. So have some politi­cians. Then there was the dra­mat­ic case of Alexan­der Litvi­nenko, the for­mer KGB agent turned Putin crit­ic, who died of radi­a­tion poi­son­ing in Lon­don last fall. All of the cas­es remain “unre­solved.”

At great per­son­al and finan­cial cost, Kas­parov is try­ing to lay the foun­da­tion for a legit­i­mate polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion. Get­ting there, how­ev­er, won’t be easy. For one, Putin, hav­ing shored up Rus­si­a’s econ­o­my and nation­al psy­che, is immense­ly pop­u­lar, hav­ing upwards to an 80% pop­u­lar­i­ty rat­ing. Even the old dis­si­dent Alek­san­dr Solzhen­it­syn likes him. Then, there’s the fact that Putin has almost a tsarist, “L’État, c’est moi” kind of grip on pow­er. In a pod­cast­ed inter­view (iTunes — Feed — Web Site) that grew out of Rem­nick­’s arti­cle, Kas­parov talks about his expec­ta­tions for the next pres­i­den­tial elec­tion in Rus­sia, when Putin is con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly required to cede pres­i­den­tial pow­ers to anoth­er politi­cian. Here, he tells Rem­nick that Putin will con­tin­ue call­ing the shots because, as he puts it, Rus­si­a’s polit­i­cal elite is so feck­less that they would “vote to make Putin’s dog the prime min­is­ter.” This strikes the lis­ten­er as a strange but time­ly com­ment, espe­cial­ly in light of Putin’s announce­ment yes­ter­day that he may seek to become Rus­si­a’s prime min­is­ter, which would essen­tial­ly give him the chance to con­tin­ue exer­cis­ing pow­er from what one diplo­mat has called “a par­al­lel struc­ture.” That’s a move that should prove hard for Kas­parov or any oth­er Putin oppo­nent to par­ry.