John Rawls’ 1971 book A TheÂoÂry of JusÂtice—with its famous illusÂtraÂtion of “the veil of ignoÂrance”—is a rigÂorÂous attempt to make egalÂiÂtarÂiÂan prinÂciÂples norÂmaÂtive in politÂiÂcal phiÂlosÂoÂphy. The work remains a high waterÂmark for libÂerÂalÂism and a meanÂingÂful chalÂlenge to right-libÂerÂtarÂiÂans, meanÂing that it’s genÂerÂalÂly takÂen seriÂousÂly by critÂics and admirÂers alike. Well, almost…. One cadre of admirÂers, the writÂers and proÂducÂers of A TheÂoÂry of JusÂtice, the MusiÂcal (trailÂer above), decidÂed to have a litÂtle fun with the very pubÂlicÂiÂty-shy Rawls (who died in 2002), imagÂinÂing him on a time-travÂelÂing advenÂture where he meets with PlaÂto, Locke, Rousseau, Mill and othÂers to draw inspiÂraÂtion for his magÂnum opus. Along the way, Rawls must dodge the “evil designs” of his libÂerÂtarÂiÂan antagÂoÂnist Robert NozÂick and “his objecÂtivist lover, Ayn Rand” (Rand and NozÂick were, to my knowlÂedge, nevÂer so involved, but the idea is amusÂing).
The farÂciÂcal proÂducÂtion promisÂes “a musiÂcal score that covÂers everyÂthing from rap batÂtles to powÂer balÂlads.” I would imagÂine that the appeal of Rawls, The MusiÂcal might be rather limÂitÂed to a speÂcial subÂset of peoÂple who get the bookÂish refÂerÂences and love musiÂcal theÂater. But maybe that group is largÂer than I think. Since the JanÂuÂary 30th preÂmier in Oxford this year, A TheÂoÂry of JusÂtice, the MusiÂcal—praised by philosoÂpher Nigel WarÂburÂton as “brilÂliant: hilarÂiÂous witÂty and proÂfound”—received sevÂerÂal five star reviews and the iniÂtial theÂater run sold out a week before openÂing. But of course, that was Oxford, not New York. The show’s proÂducÂers do plan to take the show on the road—to LonÂdon, ScotÂland, and the U.S. (and they are activeÂly fundraisÂing; a comÂplete viewÂing of an Oxford perÂforÂmance will cost you $9.99, and othÂer groups wishÂing to perÂform the show must purÂchase a license).
The wideÂspread appeal of Rawls is underÂstandÂable givÂen that he best articÂuÂlates the idea of equalÂiÂty as an inherÂentÂly ethÂiÂcal valÂue in politÂiÂcal life. His is a posiÂtion that revisÂes so much clasÂsiÂcal politÂiÂcal theÂoÂry and informs or infuÂriÂates so many curÂrent politÂiÂcal comÂbatÂants. While oppoÂnents of disÂtribÂuÂtive jusÂtice will no doubt find reaÂsons to disÂagree with Rawls on prinÂciÂple, careÂful critÂiÂcal thinkers will at least conÂsidÂer the arguÂments before makÂing objecÂtions. But if you don’t have time to read all five-hunÂdred plus pages of Rawls’ masÂterÂwork, you could cerÂtainÂly do worse than watch Harvard’s Michael Sandel explain Rawls’ theÂoÂries in his lecÂture above (feaÂturÂing some smart stuÂdent critÂics of Rawls). The lecÂture is eighth in a course called “JusÂtice: What’s the Right Thing To Do,” which was released by edX as a MOOC this past March.
Below you can find the soundÂtrack for the LonÂdon proÂducÂtion.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Michael Sandel’s Famous HarÂvard Course on JusÂtice LaunchÂes as a MOOC on TuesÂday
Alain de BotÂton ProÂposÂes a Kinder, GenÂtler PhiÂlosÂoÂphy of SucÂcess
Mike WalÂlace InterÂviews Ayn Rand (1959)
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in WashÂingÂton, DC. FolÂlow him @jdmagness


