Hear What Hamlet, Richard III & King Lear Sounded Like in Shakespeare’s Original Pronunciation

As we high­light­ed a few days ago, recent find­ings by South African sci­en­tists sug­gest that William Shake­speare may have smoked pot, pos­si­bly com­pos­ing some of his cel­e­brat­ed plays while under the influ­ence. Their research is sure to spark con­tro­ver­sy among Shake­speare schol­ars and his­to­ri­ans alike, but it’s cer­tain­ly a more inter­est­ing con­tro­ver­sy than the tired debate about whether Shake­speare wrote his plays at all. Per­haps even more inter­est­ing than Shake­speare’s drug of choice for lovers of his lan­guage are debates about what Shake­speare’s plays might have sound­ed like to his orig­i­nal audi­ences. In oth­er words, high or not, what might Shake­speare, his actors, and his audi­ence have sound­ed like when they spoke the lan­guage we call Eng­lish.

Of course they called the lan­guage Eng­lish as well, but we might not rec­og­nize some words as such when hear­ing Shake­speare’s accent aloud. On the oth­er hand, it might be sur­pris­ing just how much the Bard’s orig­i­nal pro­nun­ci­a­tion sounds like so many oth­er kinds of Eng­lish we know today.

In a post two years ago, we quot­ed Shake­speare­an actor, direc­tor, and writer Ben Crys­tal on Shake­speare’s orig­i­nal pro­nun­ci­a­tion, which, he says, “has flecks of near­ly every region­al U.K. Eng­lish accent, and indeed Amer­i­can and in fact Aus­tralian, too.” Hear­ing Shake­speare’s Eng­lish spo­ken aloud, Crys­tal remarks, is hear­ing a sound that “reminds peo­ple of the accent of their home.” You can test this the­o­ry, and hear for your­self the sound of Shake­speare’s Eng­lish with the video and audio high­light­ed here, show­cas­ing Crys­tal’s per­for­mance of the plays in orig­i­nal pro­nun­ci­a­tion (OP).

At the top, see Crys­tal recite an excerpt of Ham­let’s “to be or not to be” speech in a video pro­mo­tion for a 2011 Kick­starter cam­paign to fund a film ver­sion of Ham­let in OP. And above, we have two audio clips of Richard III and King Lear, respec­tive­ly, both from an OP Shake­speare CD Crys­tal record­ed with sev­er­al oth­er actors. Crys­tal came by his ver­sion of orig­i­nal pro­nun­ci­a­tion hon­est­ly, and from a very rep­utable source, who also hap­pens to be his father, David. The elder Crys­tal is per­haps the most high­ly-regard­ed lin­guist and schol­ar of the Eng­lish lan­guage alive today, and in addi­tion to pub­lish­ing sev­er­al books both schol­ar­ly and pop­u­lar, he has worked with the Globe The­atre on pro­duc­ing plays in OP since 1994. Learn more about Crys­tal’s process at our pre­vi­ous post on his work.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

What Shake­speare Sound­ed Like to Shake­speare: Recon­struct­ing the Bard’s Orig­i­nal Pro­nun­ci­a­tion

Dis­cov­er What Shakespeare’s Hand­writ­ing Looked Like, and How It Solved a Mys­tery of Author­ship

A 68 Hour Playlist of Shakespeare’s Plays Being Per­formed by Great Actors: Giel­gud, McK­ellen & More

Free Online Shake­speare Cours­es: Primers on the Bard from Oxford, Har­vard, Berke­ley & More

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Arthur C. Clarke Reads His Classic Sci-Fi Works: Childhood’s End and “The Star”

Sir Arthur C. Clarke, the sci­ence fic­tion author best known for 2001: A Space Odyssey, start­ed writ­ing at the end of World War II and the begin­ning of the nuclear age, a time when tech­nol­o­gy promised to bring untold ben­e­fit to human­i­ty and had the poten­tial to utter­ly destroy it. So he wrote sci­ence fic­tion with some actu­al sci­ence in it, tales about space trav­el, alien encoun­ters and human evo­lu­tion.

The future was a con­tin­u­ing object of fas­ci­na­tion for Clarke. He proved to be uncan­ni­ly accu­rate at mak­ing div­ina­tions about the course of tech­nol­o­gy. Back in 1964, he pre­dict­ed vir­tu­al surgery, 3D print­ers and the inter­net. Of course, he also pre­dict­ed that we would have an army of mon­key ser­vants to cater to our every whim. You can’t always be right.

But thanks to the mag­ic of one of his pre­dic­tions – the inter­net – you can lis­ten to Clarke read two of his most acclaimed works – Childhood’s End and “The Star.”


The for­mer tale, writ­ten in 1953, is about a mys­te­ri­ous alien race that brings the Cold War to a screech­ing halt and kick starts human evo­lu­tion. But at what cost? Stan­ley Kubrick was report­ed­ly inter­est­ed in devel­op­ing the book until he set­tled on 2001. Lis­ten to Clarke read long excerpts from Childhood’s End at the top of this post.

The lat­ter sto­ry, pub­lished in 1955, might very well be the best sci-fi Christ­mas sto­ry ever. It was adapt­ed into a Twi­light Zone episode that thor­ough­ly freaked me out as a kid. Lis­ten to “The Star just above.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Arthur C. Clarke Nar­rates Film on Mandelbrot’s Frac­tals; David Gilmour Pro­vides the Sound­track

Isaac Asi­mov Pre­dicts in 1964 What the World Will Look Like Today — in 2014

Free Sci­ence Fic­tion Clas­sics on the Web: Hux­ley, Orwell, Asi­mov, Gaiman & Beyond

1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing lots of pic­tures of vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

 

Theodor Adorno’s Critical Theory Text Minima Moralia Sung as Hardcore Punk Songs

Image of Theodor Adorno (right) by Jere­my J. Shapiro, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

With the pos­si­ble excep­tion of John Gray’s Straw Dogs, few works of phi­los­o­phy con­front the bar­ren­ness of human life in the mod­ern world in bleak­er terms than Theodor Adorno’s Min­i­ma Moralia. Tak­ing its title from Aristotle’s Magna Moralia, or “The Great Ethics,” Adorno’s book sub­verts the clas­si­cal idea of the good life as a real­is­tic aspi­ra­tion in a world dom­i­nat­ed by total­i­tar­i­an sys­tems of con­trol and inex­orable, grind­ing log­ics of pro­duc­tion and con­sump­tion. “Our per­spec­tive of life has passed into an ide­ol­o­gy which con­ceals the fact that there is life no longer,” writes Adorno in his Ded­i­ca­tion. The indi­vid­ual has been “reduced and degrad­ed” by cap­i­tal­ism and fas­cism, flat­tened to mere appear­ance in the “sphere of con­sump­tion.”

Adorno’s book—a philo­soph­i­cal mem­oir of his expe­ri­ence as an “intel­lec­tu­al in emigration”—reflects his pes­simism not only in its title but also in its sub­ti­tle: Reflec­tions from Dam­aged Life. How lit­tle he could have suspected—and how much he like­ly would have despised—the kin­ship between his own post­war angst and the neu­rot­ic anger of the Amer­i­can hard­core punk gen­er­a­tion to come some thir­ty-five years lat­er.

Take, for exam­ple these lyrics to Black Flag’s “Dam­aged,” from their 1981 album of the same name:

Right now look at me now
Look at me now
Just shad­ows
I’m just shad­ows of what I was
I just want anoth­er thing
I don’t even get by for that

One might make the case that Black Flag lyrics—and those of so many sim­i­lar bands—play out Adorno’s the­sis over and over: to quote a much less angry pop band from a lat­er gen­er­a­tion: “Mod­ern Life is Rub­bish.”

Seiz­ing on these pes­simistic par­al­lels between punk rock and crit­i­cal the­o­ry, film­mak­er and artist Bri­an J. Davis record­ed an EP of read­ings from five chap­ters of Adorno’s book, set to blis­ter­ing hard­core drums and gui­tars. (Any­one hap­pen to know who is on vocals?) Above, hear “They, The Peo­ple,” and “This Side of the Plea­sure Prin­ci­ple” and below, we have “UNmea­sure for UNmea­sure,” “John­ny Head-in-the-Air,” and “Every Work is an Uncom­mit­ted Crime.”

As you’ll note, Adorno’s titles allude to well-known works of art, pol­i­tics, folk song, and the­o­ry and—as the publisher’s note in my Ver­so edi­tion puts it— “involve irony or inver­sion,” pri­ma­ry rhetor­i­cal meth­ods of his “neg­a­tive dialec­tic.” The hard­core punks who picked up, how­ev­er uncon­scious­ly, on Adorno’s dis­af­fect­ed cri­tique may have eschewed his self-con­scious­ly lit­er­ary approach, but they were no less mas­ters of irony, even if their tar­gets hap­pened to be much more pop-cul­tur­al.

Punk rock Adorno comes to us from WFMU’s Ken­neth S as exam­ples of “aca­d­e­m­ic the­o­ry… sung by peo­ple who can’t sing.” As Col­in Mar­shall point­ed out in a post yes­ter­day, Gold­smith has made his own con­tri­bu­tion to the genre, singing writ­ings by Wal­ter Ben­jamin, Lud­wig Wittgen­stein, and Sig­mund Freud. And to even more humor­ous effect, we’ve pre­vi­ous­ly brought you the work of M.A. Num­mi­nen, Finnish per­for­mance artist who turned Wittgenstein’s Trac­ta­tus into a bizarre com­ic opera.

For a much more seri­ous look at Adorno and music—a sub­ject he wrote pas­sion­ate­ly and con­tro­ver­sial­ly about—check out this post on his own avant-garde com­po­si­tions, which turn out to be much less punk rock than one might expect giv­en his social alien­ation and despon­den­cy.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The The­o­ry of Wal­ter Ben­jamin, Lud­wig Wittgen­stein & Sig­mund Freud Sung by Ken­neth Gold­smith

Lud­wig Wittgenstein’s Trac­ta­tus Gets Adapt­ed Into an Avant-Garde Com­ic Opera

Hear Theodor Adorno’s Avant-Garde Musi­cal Com­po­si­tions

Theodor Adorno’s Rad­i­cal Cri­tique of Joan Baez and the Music of the Viet­nam War Protest Move­ment

Theodor Adorno’s Phi­los­o­phy of Punc­tu­a­tion

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness.

Learn to Speak 48 Languages for Free: Everything from Arabic to Indonesian to Yiddish on One Page

Even by the stan­dards of Unit­ed States Pres­i­dents, Barack Oba­ma has led a pret­ty unusu­al life. His ear­ly expe­ri­ences includ­ed a child­hood plunge into inter­na­tion­al­ism in the form of not just his Kenyan father but his Indone­sian step­fa­ther, to whose home­land the fam­i­ly moved when Oba­ma was six years old. For the next four years, the young future Com­man­der in Chief attend­ed local schools in Jakar­ta, and the lan­guage he picked up then has stuck with him today. It cer­tain­ly served him well when he returned to Indone­sia as Pres­i­dent to give the speech above, in which he talks about his love for that coun­try and his belief in its impor­tance to the future, speak­ing bits and pieces in Indone­sian through­out — and draw­ing great applause each time.

If you want to be like Bar­ry and meet with a sim­i­lar­ly rap­tur­ous recep­tion when next you give a pub­lic address in the Emer­ald of the Equa­tor, start by learn­ing the basics of the Indone­sian lan­guage at our Free For­eign Lan­guage Lessons page. There, you’ll find a wealth of pod­casts like Learn­ing Indone­sian (iTunes), Indonesianpod101 (iTunes), and Indone­sian Sur­vival Phras­es (iTunes). [Advanced learn­ers might pre­fer tun­ing in to news-in-Indone­sian pod­casts from SBS (iTunes) and NHK World (iTunes) radio.] Indonesianpod101 even has a Youtube page with video lessons like the one just above.

Even if you don’t plan on becom­ing Pres­i­dent, you may still have plen­ty of rea­sons to learn Indone­sian. With its famil­iar alpha­bet and sim­ple gram­mar with­out tens­es, gen­der forms, noun cas­es, and the like, it ranks as one of the very eas­i­est lan­guages in which to attain flu­en­cy. I know an Amer­i­can col­lege pro­fes­sor in South Korea who con­stant­ly urges his stu­dents to study Indone­sian, since it offers the “gold­en tip” of a wedge into the rest of Asia: mas­ter it, and you’ll have built up momen­tum to learn the oth­er, more com­pli­cat­ed lan­guages of the region, from Man­darin to Can­tonese to Japan­ese and beyond — all of which you can also begin study­ing at, of course, our Free Lan­guage Lessons page.

If your lin­guis­tic inter­ests slant toward Europe rather than Asia, don’t wor­ry, we’ve still got your back: our lists include learn­ing resources for lan­guages of that con­ti­nent as major as Span­ish, French, Ital­ian, Russ­ian, Eng­lish, and Ger­man to niche lan­guages like Cata­lan, Finnish, Hun­gar­i­an, and Ser­bo-Croa­t­ian. If you notice we’ve missed any lan­guage you’ve har­bored a burn­ing desire to learn, drop us a line so we can start gath­er­ing pod­casts, videos, and PDFs on it. In the mean­time, sure­ly the Free Lan­guage Lessons page offers you some­thing to start on and get that incom­pa­ra­ble feel­ing of break­ing into a new lan­guage for the first time. Semoga berun­tung, as we say in Jakar­ta!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Learn 48 Lan­guages Online for Free: Span­ish, Chi­nese, Eng­lish & More

Study 40+ Lan­guages with Free Lessons from the U.S. For­eign Ser­vice Insti­tute

Let’s Learn Japan­ese: Two Clas­sic Video Series to Get You Start­ed in the Lan­guage

Learn Latin, Old Eng­lish, San­skrit, Clas­si­cal Greek & Oth­er Ancient Lan­guages in 10 Lessons

Col­in Mar­shall writes on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, and the video series The City in Cin­e­ma. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

A Vintage Infographic of the Human Brain: The Wonders Within Your Head (1938)

wonders within your head

Click here to view the info­graph­ic in a larg­er for­mat.

From the Decem­ber 6, 1938 issue of LOOK mag­a­zine comes this vin­tage “info­graph­ic” show­ing “The Won­ders With­in Your Head.” It takes the human brain/head and presents it as a series of rooms, each car­ry­ing out a dif­fer­ent func­tion. Drawn a lit­tle more than a decade after Calvin Coolidge famous­ly declared “The busi­ness of Amer­i­ca is busi­ness,” it’s not sur­pris­ing that the cog­ni­tive func­tions are depict­ed in cor­po­rate or indus­tri­al terms.

Besides for this visu­al­iza­tion, the same edi­tion of LOOK fea­tured arti­cles on Jean Har­low, Joan Craw­ford, Pres­i­dent Roo­sevelt, and the Tragedy of the Euro­pean Jews. Kristall­nacht, or the “Night of Bro­ken Glass,” had tak­en place a month before in Nazi Ger­many — anoth­er sign that the world was about to become a very, very dark place.

Fol­low us on Face­book, Twit­ter, Google Plus and LinkedIn and share intel­li­gent media with your friends. And if you want to make sure that our posts def­i­nite­ly appear in your Face­book news­feed, just fol­low these sim­ple steps.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Tree of Lan­guages Illus­trat­ed in a Big, Beau­ti­ful Info­graph­ic

Down­load 78 Free Online His­to­ry Cours­es: From Ancient Greece to The Mod­ern World

4000 Years of His­to­ry Dis­played in a 5‑Foot-Long “His­tom­ap” (Ear­ly Info­graph­ic) From 1931

Free Online Biol­o­gy Cours­es

The Neuroscience of Drumming: Researchers Discover the Secrets of Drumming & The Human Brain

An old musician’s joke goes “there are three kinds of drum­mers in the world—those who can count and those who can’t.” But per­haps there is an even more glob­al divide. Per­haps there are three kinds of peo­ple in the world—those who can drum and those who can’t. Per­haps, as the pro­mo­tion­al video above from GE sug­gests, drum­mers have fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fer­ent brains than the rest of us. Today we high­light the sci­en­tif­ic research into drum­mers’ brains, an expand­ing area of neu­ro­science and psy­chol­o­gy that dis­proves a host of dumb drum­mer jokes.

“Drum­mers,” writes Jor­dan Tay­lor Sloan at Mic, “can actu­al­ly be smarter than their less rhyth­mi­cal­ly-focused band­mates.” This accord­ing to the find­ings of a Swedish study (Karolin­s­ka Insti­tutet in Stock­holm) which shows “a link between intel­li­gence, good tim­ing and the part of the brain used for prob­lem-solv­ing.” As Gary Cle­land puts it in The Tele­graph, drum­mers “might actu­al­ly be nat­ur­al intel­lec­tu­als.”

Neu­ro­sci­en­tist David Eagle­man, a renais­sance researcher The New York­er calls “a man obsessed with time,” found this out in an exper­i­ment he con­duct­ed with var­i­ous pro­fes­sion­al drum­mers at Bri­an Eno’s stu­dio. It was Eno who the­o­rized that drum­mers have a unique men­tal make­up, and it turns out “Eno was right: drum­mers do have dif­fer­ent brains from the rest.” Eagle­man’s test showed “a huge sta­tis­ti­cal dif­fer­ence between the drum­mers’ tim­ing and that of test sub­jects.” Says Eagle­man, “Now we know that there is some­thing anatom­i­cal­ly dif­fer­ent about them.” Their abil­i­ty to keep time gives them an intu­itive under­stand­ing of the rhyth­mic pat­terns they per­ceive all around them.

That dif­fer­ence can be annoying—like the pain of hav­ing per­fect pitch in a per­pet­u­al­ly off-key world. But drum­ming ulti­mate­ly has ther­a­peu­tic val­ue, pro­vid­ing the emo­tion­al and phys­i­cal ben­e­fits col­lec­tive­ly known as “drum­mer’s high,” an endor­phin rush that can only be stim­u­lat­ed by play­ing music, not sim­ply lis­ten­ing to it. In addi­tion to increas­ing peo­ple’s pain thresh­olds, Oxford psy­chol­o­gists found, the endor­phin-filled act of drum­ming increas­es pos­i­tive emo­tions and leads peo­ple to work togeth­er in a more coop­er­a­tive fash­ion.

Clash drum­mer Top­per Head­on dis­cuss­es the ther­a­peu­tic aspect of drum­ming in a short BBC inter­view above. He also calls drum­ming a “primeval” and dis­tinct­ly, uni­ver­sal­ly human activ­i­ty. For­mer Grate­ful Dead drum­mer Mick­ey Hart and neu­ro­sci­en­tist Adam Gaz­za­ley have high hopes for the sci­ence of rhythm. Hart, who has pow­ered a light show with his brain­waves in con­certs with his own band, dis­cuss­es the “pow­er” of rhythm to move crowds and bring Alzheimer’s patients back into the present moment.

Whether we can train our­selves to think and feel like drum­mers may be debat­able. But as for whether drum­mers real­ly do think in ways non-drum­mers can’t, con­sid­er the neu­ro­science of Stew­art Copeland’s polyrhyth­mic beats, and the work of Ter­ry Bozzio (below) play­ing the largest drumk­it you’ve ever seen.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Play­ing an Instru­ment Is a Great Work­out For Your Brain: New Ani­ma­tion Explains Why

Iso­lat­ed Drum Tracks From Six of Rock’s Great­est: Bon­ham, Moon, Peart, Copeland, Grohl & Starr

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness.

The Theory of Walter Benjamin, Ludwig Wittgenstein & Sigmund Freud Sung by Kenneth Goldsmith

Goldsmith Benjamin_0

Wal­ter Ben­jamin, Lud­wig Wittgen­stein, and Sig­mund Freud: if these the­o­rists share any qual­i­ty at all, they share a rep­u­ta­tion for not going easy on their read­ers. Each of them wrote in a way that exudes a dif­fer­ent kind of intel­lec­tu­al dif­fi­cul­ty — Ben­jam­in’s sud­den swerves into the zone where high rel­e­vance meets high irrel­e­vance, Wittgen­stein’s aus­tere cer­tain­ty, Freud’s elab­o­rate flights into the near-fan­tas­ti­cal  — but all of their work pos­es a chal­lenge to read­ers approach­ing it for the first time. And so Ken­neth Gold­smith Sings The­o­ry address­es the obvi­ous ques­tion: what if you did­n’t read it, but heard it sung instead?

“What is it about aca­d­e­m­ic the­o­ry that begs to be, well, sung by peo­ple who can’t sing?” asks Gold­smith, poet, prof, UBUweb cre­ator, and WFMU radio host, on the sta­tion’s blog. He cites exam­ples from a punk-rock­i­fied Theodor Adorno to a Finnish eccen­tric’s con­ver­sion of the Trac­ta­tus Logi­co-Philo­soph­i­cus into a song­book, even­tu­al­ly com­ing to his own “adven­tures into the field,” which you can hear in the Pennsound archive. Just above, we have have Gold­smith singing Ben­jam­in’s “Unpack­ing my Library” to music by exper­i­men­tal vio­lin­ist Eyvind Kang [MP3]. “Just as Ben­jamin lists copies of oth­er books and the asso­ci­a­tions they bring,” writes Jacob Edmond at Jacket2, “so Gold­smith copies Ben­jamin, cre­at­ing an idio­syn­crat­ic audio book ver­sion. ”

Wittgen­stein Part 1

Wittgen­stein Part 2

“In his per­for­mance of the text, Gold­smith fus­es pre­cise­ly delin­eat­ed musi­cal sec­tions, or move­ments, with the chaot­ic, shift­ing pitch and tone of his voice, par­al­lel­ing Benjamin’s obser­va­tion in the essay that ‘if there is a coun­ter­part to the con­fu­sion of a library, it is the order of its cat­a­logue.’ ” Can you find sim­i­lar par­al­lels between Gold­smith’s man­ner of singing and the the­o­ry he deliv­ers with it when he per­forms Wittgen­stein’s Philo­soph­i­cal Inves­ti­ga­tions to Igor Stravin­sky [MP3 part one, MP3 part two]? Or below, where he sings Sig­mund Freud’s The Psy­chopathol­o­gy of Every­day Life, start­ing on the pas­sage of the “slips of the tongue” which have pop­u­lar­ly come to bear Freud’s name, to The Who [MP3]? After all, style does­n’t count for much, as such a strik­ing­ly dressed char­ac­ter as Gold­smith knows full well, unless it aligns with sub­stance.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Wal­ter Benjamin’s Mys­ti­cal Thought Pre­sent­ed by Two Exper­i­men­tal Films

Wal­ter Benjamin’s Radio Plays for Kids (1929–1932)

Wittgenstein’s Mas­ter­piece, the Trac­ta­tus Logi­co-Philo­soph­i­cus, Gets Turned into Beau­ti­ful, Med­i­ta­tive Music

Lud­wig Wittgenstein’s Trac­ta­tus Gets Adapt­ed Into an Avant-Garde Com­ic Opera

Sig­mund Freud Speaks: The Only Known Record­ing of His Voice, 1938

Col­in Mar­shall writes on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, and the video series The City in Cin­e­ma. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Hours of Edgar Allan Poe Stories Read by Vincent Price & Basil Rathbone

price reads poe
Record label Caed­mon Audio spe­cial­ized in spo­ken-word record­ings, pair­ing great lit­er­ary works with great actors. They got James Mason to read the poet­ry of Robert Brown­ing, mul­ti-Oscar win­ner Wal­ter Bren­nan to read the works of Mark Twain and Sir Lau­rence Olivi­er to read Win­ston Churchill.

But there were a cou­ple releas­es, lat­er com­piled into one glo­ri­ous CD set, that is so head-slap­ping­ly per­fect that it requires spe­cial atten­tion: Basil Rath­bone and Vin­cent Price read the works of Edgar Allan Poe over the course of 5 hours. Rath­bone was, of course, a South African-born Shake­speare­an actor who is most famous for play­ing Sher­lock Holmes in a string of films (watch one here) and radio plays, though he was also a vet­er­an star of low-bud­get hor­ror films like The Black Sheep and Tales of Ter­ror. Vin­cent Price was, well, Vin­cent Price – the icon­ic cack­ling vil­lain in dozens of hor­ror flicks includ­ing Roger Corman’s campy cin­e­mat­ic adap­ta­tions of Poe – The House of Ush­er, The Raven and The Masque of the Red Death.

The Caed­mon record­ings, which are now avail­able on Spo­ti­fy (down­load the soft­ware here) and can be heard below, are pret­ty much Poe’s great­est hits – from “The Tell-Tale Heart” to “The Pit and Pen­du­lum.” Poe’s goth­ic gloomi­ness pairs bril­liant­ly with Rath­bone and Price’s sin­is­ter bari­tone.

So get into your favorite smok­ing jack­et, get a fire start­ed, pour your­self a stiff glass of absinthe, set aside a good block of time, and have a lis­ten.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Raven,” Read by Christo­pher Walken, Vin­cent Price, and Christo­pher Lee

Watch the 1953 Ani­ma­tion of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart,” Nar­rat­ed by James Mason

Edgar Allan Poe Ani­mat­ed: Watch Four Ani­ma­tions of Clas­sic Poe Sto­ries

Down­load The Com­plete Works of Edgar Allan Poe on His Birth­day

1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing lots of pic­tures of vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

Pipes with Cannabis Traces Found in Shakespeare’s Garden, Suggesting the Bard Enjoyed a “Noted Weed”

William-Shakespeare-68 Hours

Not more than 10 days ago, Jonathan Crow high­light­ed for you Adam Bertocci’s Two Gen­tle­men of Lebows­ki, a book that asks you to sus­pend dis­be­lief and imag­ine, What if…William Shake­speare had writ­ten The Big Lebows­ki?

Now comes news that makes the col­li­sion of the Bard’s and Lebowski’s worlds some­what more plau­si­ble. Accord­ing to The Tele­graph, “South African sci­en­tists have dis­cov­ered that 400-year-old tobac­co pipes exca­vat­ed from the gar­den of William Shake­speare con­tained cannabis, sug­gest­ing the play­wright might have writ­ten some of his famous works while high.” Lebows­ki could relate.

If you want to get into the specifics, you can read the pré­cis pub­lished in The South African Jour­nal of Sci­ence called “Shake­speare, plants, and chem­i­cal analy­sis of ear­ly
17th cen­tu­ry clay ‘tobac­co’ pipes from Europe.” It details how a team, led by anthro­pol­o­gist Fran­cis Thack­er­ay at the Uni­ver­si­ty of the Wit­wa­ter­srand in Johan­nes­burg, used a “sophis­ti­cat­ed tech­nique called gas chro­matog­ra­phy mass spec­trom­e­try (GCMS)” to ana­lyze “pipes [that] had been exca­vat­ed from the gar­den of William Shake­speare.” The results of their study? They “indi­cat­ed Cannabis in eight sam­ples, nico­tine (from tobac­co leaves of the kind asso­ci­at­ed with Raleigh) in at least one sam­ple, and (in two sam­ples) def­i­nite evi­dence for Peru­vian cocaine from coca leaves of the kind which Thack­er­ay et al. asso­ci­at­ed with Drake who had him­self been to Peru before 1597.”

Thack­er­ay also finds lit­er­ary sup­port for the idea that Shake­speare had a taste for Cannabis, not­ing that in “Son­net 76 Shake­speare writes about ‘inven­tion in a not­ed weed’. This can be inter­pret­ed to mean that Shake­speare was will­ing to use ‘weed’ … for cre­ative writ­ing (‘inven­tion’).” The pré­cis goes on to add: “In the same son­net it appears that [Shake­speare] would pre­fer not to be asso­ci­at­ed with ‘com­pounds strange’, which can be inter­pret­ed, at least poten­tial­ly, to mean ’strange drugs’ (pos­si­bly cocaine).” You can read Son­net 76 in full here:

Why is my verse so bar­ren of new pride,
So far from vari­a­tion or quick change?
Why with the time do I not glance aside
To new-found meth­ods and to com­pounds strange?
Why write I still all one, ever the same,
And keep inven­tion in a not­ed weed,
That every word doth almost tell my name,
Show­ing their birth and where they did pro­ceed?
O, know, sweet love, I always write of you,
And you and love are still my argu­ment;
So all my best is dress­ing old words new,
Spend­ing again what is already spent:
For as the sun is dai­ly new and old,
So is my love still telling what is told.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Online Shake­speare Cours­es: Primers on the Bard from Oxford, Har­vard, Berke­ley & More

Read All of Shakespeare’s Plays Free Online, Cour­tesy of the Fol­ger Shake­speare Library

What Shake­speare Sound­ed Like to Shake­speare: Recon­struct­ing the Bard’s Orig­i­nal Pro­nun­ci­a­tion

Take a Vir­tu­al Tour of Shakespeare’s Globe The­atre

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Read Arthur C. Clarke’s Super Short, 31-Word Sci-Fi Story, “siseneG”

clarke 31 word story

As brevi­ty in fic­tion goes, who can top “For sale: baby shoes, nev­er worn”? That much-ref­er­enced six-word sto­ry, often attrib­uted to Ernest Hem­ing­way, cer­tain­ly packs an impres­sive amount of human dra­ma into its short length. But what about oth­er gen­res? What would a six-word sci­ence- fic­tion sto­ry look like? i09 crowd­sourced count­less such works in 2014: respons­es, which tend­ed toward the escha­to­log­i­cal, includ­ed “The Uni­verse died. He did not,” “New world. Cryo­genic fail­ure. Seeds dead,” and “Final­ly sen­tient, it switched itself off.”

Not bad, but what would we get if we went to the pro­fes­sion­als? Alas, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, pro­lif­ic author of such respect­ed sci-fi nov­els as 2001: A Space Odyssey and Ren­dezvous with Rama, passed away just five years before i09 issued its chal­lenge. Still, we have an idea of the direc­tion his entry might have gone in from of “siseneG,” a sto­ry sto­ry — a very short sto­ry indeed — Clarke sent in to Ana­log mag­a­zine in 1984:

And God said: DELETE lines One to Aleph. LOAD. RUN.
And the Uni­verse ceased to exist.

Then he pon­dered for a few aeons, sighed, and added: ERASE.
It nev­er had exist­ed.

“This is the only short sto­ry I’ve writ­ten in ten years or so,” Clarke wrote in the accom­pa­ny­ing note. “I think you’ll agree that they don’t come much short­er.” We now know that they can come some­what short­er, at least 25 words short­er than “siseneG,” but sure­ly we can all agree that Clarke set a high stan­dard for sci­en­tif­ic (or per­haps tech­no­log­i­cal-exis­ten­tial) flash fic­tion decades before the coinage of the term. But then, we always knew the man had a knack for look­ing ahead.

via Let­ters of Note

Relat­ed Con­tent:

In 1964, Arthur C. Clarke Pre­dicts the Inter­net, 3D Print­ers and Trained Mon­key Ser­vants

Arthur C. Clarke Pre­dicts in 2001 What the World Will Look By Decem­ber 31, 2100

Arthur C. Clarke Nar­rates Film on Mandelbrot’s Frac­tals; David Gilmour Pro­vides the Sound­track

Free Sci­ence Fic­tion Clas­sics on the Web: Hux­ley, Orwell, Asi­mov, Gaiman & Beyond

Col­in Mar­shall writes on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, and the video series The City in Cin­e­ma. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Sarcasm Can Boost Creativity According to Research From Harvard & Columbia Business Schools

bill murray sarcasm

Under­ly­ing image by Gage Skid­more.

Echo­ing Bill Mur­ray, the Urban Dic­tio­nary defines sar­casm as “your body’s nat­ur­al defense against stu­pid,” not­ing that it’s “the high­est form of wit” in coun­tries like the UK, but the low­est in Amer­i­ca, owing to the population’s inabil­i­ty to detect whether or not one is being sar­cas­tic.

Exam­ple:
Idiot: I beat up a ten-year-old today.

You: (with a hint of sar­casm) That’s impres­sive!

Idiot: I know, right!

A new study by Francesca GinoAdam Galin­sky, and Li Huang, of Har­vard, Colum­bia and INSEAD busi­ness schools, respec­tive­ly, sug­gests that the use of sar­casm pro­motes cre­ativ­i­ty for those on the giv­ing and receiv­ing end of sar­cas­tic exchanges.

Gino told the Har­vard Gazette, “To cre­ate or decode sar­casm, both the expressers and recip­i­ents of sar­casm need to over­come the con­tra­dic­tion (i.e., psy­cho­log­i­cal dis­tance) between the lit­er­al and actu­al mean­ings of the sar­cas­tic expres­sions. This is a process that acti­vates and is facil­i­tat­ed by abstrac­tion, which in turn pro­motes cre­ative think­ing.”

Galin­sky added, the givers and receivers in sar­cas­tic exchanges “sub­se­quent­ly per­formed bet­ter on cre­ativ­i­ty tasks than those in the sin­cere con­di­tions or the con­trol con­di­tion. This sug­gests that sar­casm has the poten­tial to cat­alyze cre­ativ­i­ty in every­one.” “That being said, although not the focus of our research, it is pos­si­ble that nat­u­ral­ly cre­ative peo­ple are also more like­ly to use sar­casm, mak­ing it an out­come instead of [a] cause in this rela­tion­ship.”

The evi­dence cer­tain­ly seems sol­id in the hands of mas­ter prac­ti­tion­ers such as Louis CK, Sarah Sil­ver­man, and the staff of The Onion, not to men­tion new­com­er Shirley Jester, an ani­mat­ed Sar­cas­tic Foul-Mouthed Teenage Come­di­an Girl from the Renais­sance.

Things get a bit murki­er when ama­teurs attempt to adopt their idols’ caus­tic pos­es. Tone and intent are eas­i­ly mis­con­strued. Feel­ings get hurt.

Is sar­casm best left to the pro­fes­sion­als?

Not nec­es­sar­i­ly. Gino and Galinksy found that the degree of trust between express­er and recip­i­ent deter­mines how sar­casm is received. In oth­er words, know your audi­ence.

Even at its mean­est, sarcasm—from the Greek and Latin for “to tear flesh”—involves abstrac­tion, a hall­mark of cre­ative think­ing.

Mean­while, you can review Clin­i­cal Psy­chol­o­gist Chris Ful­ton’s “Try that again method,” below, one of many strate­gies for han­dling “sar­cas­tic and sassy teenagers.” Cre­ativ­i­ty be squelched.

Cue a mil­lion teenage eye rolls, and check out Gino and Galinksy’s find­ings here.

via the Har­vard Gazette

Relat­ed Con­tent:

John Cleese’s Phi­los­o­phy of Cre­ativ­i­ty: Cre­at­ing Oases for Child­like Play

The Psy­chol­o­gy of Messi­ness & Cre­ativ­i­ty: Research Shows How a Messy Desk and Cre­ative Work Go Hand in Hand

The Most “Intel­lec­tu­al Jokes”: Our Favorite Open Cul­ture Read­er Sub­mis­sions


  • Great Lectures

  • Sign up for Newsletter

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast