Woe to the famous actor who dares to write a novÂel or start a band or design a line of clothÂing. The pubÂlic can be awfulÂly snobÂby about such extracurÂricÂuÂlar purÂsuits. We reward our chilÂdren for culÂtiÂvatÂing a wide range of interÂests, but heavÂen forÂfend a celebriÂty who wanÂders away from the acceptÂed script.
Hacks! Poseurs! Wannabes!
There are excepÂtions, of course. I don’t see too many peoÂple takÂing potÂshots at Leonard Nimoy’s pasÂsion for phoÂtogÂraÂphy, Ed BegÂley Jr.’s comÂmitÂment to the enviÂronÂment, or the WonÂder Years’ DanÂiÂca McKelÂlar’s devoÂtion to math.
(PerÂsonÂalÂly, I will brook no unkind words toward aniÂmal lovÂing TV dad Dick Van PatÂten, not after he fathered the only cat food the small mamÂmal with whom I live a lie will deign to eat.)
If there’s a forÂmuÂla to be gleaned from these examÂples, it’s likeÂly a synÂtheÂsis of iconÂic role, numÂber of years spent on the pasÂtime of choice, and a rabid curiosÂiÂty of the sort that driÂves ordiÂnary morÂtals to become eduÂcaÂtors. Once a pubÂlic figÂure is in posÂsesÂsion of that forÂmuÂla, the pubÂlic he or she serves will grant a pass to purÂsue a side interÂest.
I’m not sure that sciÂence could be called a side interÂest of Alan Alda’s.
Not when he ranks hostÂing SciÂenÂtifÂic AmerÂiÂcan FronÂtiers as the pinÂnaÂcle of his TV career.
He played physiÂcist Richard FeynÂman onstage, and has writÂten plays about Albert EinÂstein and Marie Curie. He’s one of the annuÂal World SciÂence FesÂtiÂval’s MVPs. At this rate, his love of sciÂence seems desÂtined to carÂry him from craÂdle to grave.
By now, he’s probÂaÂbly met more sciÂenÂtists than M*A*S*H fans—enough to sugÂgest a trouÂbling gap between the sciÂenÂtifÂic mesÂsage and the manÂner in which it’s delivÂered. To put it anothÂer way, if you think sciÂence is borÂing, perÂhaps the trouÂble is with the sciÂenÂtist.
The soluÂtion? Improv trainÂing.
Uh oh. Is there a danÂger this knife could cut both ways? Will some emiÂnent biolÂoÂgist or astronomer be pilÂloÂried for playÂing freeze tag a bit too zestÂfulÂly or joinÂing a levÂel 1 team at the AnnoyÂance or UCB East? Like, how dare Stephen HawkÂing think he can make a machine?
It’s worth the risk (techÂniÂcalÂly, Alda espousÂes VioÂla Spolin’s exploratoÂry improÂviÂsaÂtion form over the kind with a strictÂly comedic goal, but c’mon. I know a gateÂway drug when I see one…)
His belief is that sciÂenÂtists who study improv are betÂter equipped to comÂmuÂniÂcate the comÂpliÂcatÂed nature of their work to pubÂlic offiÂcials, the media, and forÂmer theÂater majors such as myself. The levÂel of engageÂment, flexÂiÂbilÂiÂty, and awareÂness that improÂviÂsaÂtion requires of its pracÂtiÂtionÂers are also the stuff of good TED talks.
Watch the “before and after” preÂsenÂtaÂtions of parÂticÂiÂpants in his improv workÂshop at the Alan Alda CenÂter for ComÂmuÂniÂcatÂing SciÂence at Stony Brook UniÂverÂsiÂty, above. His theÂsis holds water, it would seem. Improv hones the sensÂes and helps one to clarÂiÂfy what is essenÂtial in any scene. Even the solo scene whereÂin one explains wave parÂtiÂcle dualÂiÂty or speÂcialÂized leaf forms to one’s felÂlow adults.
I’ll bet those same improv-based skills could help a TV star to perÂsuade his stuÂdents that he’s just as approachÂable and supÂportÂive as any old teacher. (Maybe even more so, to judge by his hanÂdling of an invisÂiÂble jar of jelÂlyÂfish that slips through one sciÂenÂtist’s finÂgers.)
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
What Is a Flame?: The First Prize-WinÂner at Alan Alda’s SciÂence Video ComÂpeÂtiÂtion
Ayun HalÂlÂiÂday is an author and illusÂtraÂtor who teachÂes improv to teenage girls. FolÂlow her @AyunHalliday






