News of the new, long-awaitÂed but hardÂly expectÂed HarpÂer Lee novÂel, Go Set a WatchÂman—a sequel to the 1960’s To Kill a MockÂingÂbird—has been met with varyÂing degrees of skepÂtiÂcism, sureÂly warÂrantÂed givÂen her late sisÂter Alice and othÂers’ charÂacÂterÂiÂzaÂtion of Lee’s physÂiÂcal and menÂtal decline. On the othÂer hand, the novÂelÂist, it’s been reportÂed, is “extremeÂly hurt” by alleÂgaÂtions that she has been presÂsured to pubÂlish. It would be a shame if the conÂtroÂverÂsy over the pubÂliÂcaÂtion of the novÂel eclipsed the novÂel itself. While it had become someÂthing of a truÂism that HarpÂer Lee would only pubÂlish the one, great novÂel and nevÂer anothÂer, I for one greet this latÂest news with joy.
For one thing, cirÂcumÂstances aside, the new HarpÂer Lee novÂel has the mass media doing someÂthing it rarely does anymore—talking about litÂerÂary ficÂtion. And for the thouÂsands of school kids required to read To Kill a MockÂingÂbird and wonÂderÂing why they should bothÂer, the conÂverÂsaÂtion hopeÂfulÂly comÂmuÂniÂcates that books still matÂter, and not just dystopiÂan YA sci-fi and mass-marÂket trade books about BDSM fanÂtasies, but books about ordiÂnary peoÂple in ordiÂnary times and places. It’s a lesÂson Lee learned earÂly. In a 2006 letÂter to Oprah WinÂfrey, pubÂlished in O magÂaÂzine, Lee wrote about her childÂhood expeÂriÂences with readÂing, and being read to. She recalls arrivÂing “in the first grade, litÂerÂate,” because of her upbringÂing. She also acknowlÂedges that “books were scarce”; her and her sibÂlings earÂly litÂerÂaÂcy meant they were “privÂiÂleged” comÂpared to othÂer chilÂdren, “mostÂly from rurÂal areas,” and the “chilÂdren of our African-AmerÂiÂcan serÂvants.”
While we may disÂmiss Lee’s conÂtention that in “an abunÂdant sociÂety where peoÂple have lapÂtops, cell phones” and “iPods” they also have “minds like empÂty rooms” as the kvetchÂing of a senior citÂiÂzen, I doubt most peoÂple who respect Lee’s wisÂdom and good humor would do so lightÂly. Her poetÂic evoÂcaÂtion of the tacÂtile difÂferÂences between books and gadÂgets alone should give us pause: “some things should only hapÂpen on soft pages, not cold metÂal.”
Read the full letÂter below.
May 7, 2006
Dear Oprah,
Do you rememÂber when you learned to read, or like me, can you not even rememÂber a time when you didÂn’t know how? I must have learned from havÂing been read to by my famÂiÂly. My sisÂters and brothÂer, much oldÂer, read aloud to keep me from pesÂterÂing them; my mothÂer read me a stoÂry every day, usuÂalÂly a chilÂdren’s clasÂsic, and my father read from the four newsÂpaÂpers he got through every evening. Then, of course, it was Uncle WigÂgiÂly at bedÂtime.
So I arrived in the first grade, litÂerÂate, with a curiÂous culÂturÂal assimÂiÂlaÂtion of AmerÂiÂcan hisÂtoÂry, romance, the Rover Boys, RapunÂzel, and The Mobile Press. EarÂly signs of genius? Far from it. ReadÂing was an accomÂplishÂment I shared with sevÂerÂal local conÂtemÂpoÂraries. Why this endemÂic preÂcocÂiÂty? Because in my homeÂtown, a remote vilÂlage in the earÂly 1930s, youngÂsters had litÂtle to do but read. A movie? Not often — movies weren’t for small chilÂdren. A park for games? Not a hope. We’re talkÂing unpaved streets here, and the DepresÂsion.
Books were scarce. There was nothÂing you could call a pubÂlic library, we were a hunÂdred miles away from a departÂment store’s books secÂtion, so we chilÂdren began to cirÂcuÂlate readÂing mateÂrÂiÂal among ourÂselves until each child had read anothÂer’s entire stock. There were long dry spells broÂken by the new ChristÂmas books, which startÂed the rounds again.
As we grew oldÂer, we began to realÂize what our books were worth: Anne of Green Gables was worth two BobbÂsey Twins; two Rover Boys were an even swap for two Tom Swifts. AesÂthetÂic frisÂsons ran a poor secÂond to the thrills of acquiÂsiÂtion. The goal, a full set of a series, was attained only once by an indiÂvidÂual of excepÂtionÂal greed — he swapped his sisÂter’s doll bugÂgy.
We were privÂiÂleged. There were chilÂdren, mostÂly from rurÂal areas, who had nevÂer looked into a book until they went to school. They had to be taught to read in the first grade, and we were impaÂtient with them for havÂing to catch up. We ignored them.
And it wasÂn’t until we were grown, some of us, that we disÂcovÂered what had befallÂen the chilÂdren of our African-AmerÂiÂcan serÂvants. In some of their schools, pupils learned to read three-to-one — three chilÂdren to one book, which was more than likeÂly a cast-off primer from a white gramÂmar school. We selÂdom saw them until, oldÂer, they came to work for us.
Now, 75 years latÂer in an abunÂdant sociÂety where peoÂple have lapÂtops, cell phones, iPods, and minds like empÂty rooms, I still plod along with books. Instant inforÂmaÂtion is not for me. I preÂfer to search library stacks because when I work to learn someÂthing, I rememÂber it.
And, Oprah, can you imagÂine curlÂing up in bed to read a comÂputÂer? WeepÂing for Anna KarenÂiÂna and being terÂriÂfied by HanÂniÂbal Lecter, enterÂing the heart of darkÂness with MisÂtah Kurtz, havÂing HoldÂen Caulfield ring you up — some things should hapÂpen on soft pages, not cold metÂal.
The vilÂlage of my childÂhood is gone, with it most of the book colÂlecÂtors, includÂing the dodgy one who swapped his comÂplete set of SeckÂatary HawkinsÂes for a shotÂgun and kept it until it was retrieved by an irate parÂent.
Now we are three in numÂber and live hunÂdreds of miles away from each othÂer. We still keep in touch by teleÂphone conÂverÂsaÂtions of recurÂrent theme: “What is your name again?” folÂlowed by “What are you readÂing?” We don’t always rememÂber.
Much love,
HarpÂer
via LetÂters of Note
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
William FaulknÂer Reads His Nobel Prize Speech
DownÂload 20 PopÂuÂlar High School Books AvailÂable as Free eBooks & Audio Books
The Books You Think Every IntelÂliÂgent PerÂson Should Read: Crime and PunÂishÂment, Moby-Dick & Beyond (Many Free Online)
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness