Some may find her insufÂferÂable, but most readÂers adore her: the insouÂciant litÂtle pig Olivia—New YorkÂer, art lover, and CaldeÂcott Medal winner—has forÂevÂer embedÂded herÂself in children’s litÂerÂary culÂture as an archeÂtype of childÂhood curiosÂiÂty and self-conÂfiÂdence, espeÂcialÂly in scenes like that of the first book of the series, in which the fearÂless piglet proÂduces her own drip paintÂing on the wall of the family’s Upper East Side apartÂment after puzÂzling over JackÂson Pollock’s work at the MetÂroÂpolÂiÂtan MuseÂum of Art. (Olivia also admires Degas, aspires to the balÂlet, and dreams of being Maria Callas.)
Olivia’s headÂstrong chalÂlenge to PolÂlock is infecÂtious, and enacts a notion comÂmon among amaÂteur viewÂers of Abstract ExpresÂsionÂism—“I could do that.” Her “JackÂson Piglet Wall PaintÂing” feaÂtures in a book that gives chilÂdren their own set of instrucÂtions for makÂing a pseuÂdo-PolÂlock (on paper, of course). As you will see, howÂevÂer, in the video above—a guide for grown-ups who may wish to do the same—Pollock’s process is not so easÂiÂly dupliÂcatÂed, and canÂnot be done on the wall. As the Ed HarÂris-starÂring biopic draÂmaÂtized, PolÂlock made his huge canÂvassÂes on the floor—drawing the lines and gesÂturÂal figÂures in the air rather than on the canÂvas.
In these videos from the MuseÂum of ModÂern Art’s upcomÂing free online course on PostÂwar paintÂing, eduÂcaÂtor and indeÂpenÂdent conÂserÂvaÂtor Corey D’Augustine demonÂstrates that, we can, with some degree of staÂmiÂna and athÂletiÂcism, approxÂiÂmate Pollock’s techÂnique. We canÂnot, howÂevÂer, recreÂate his temÂperaÂment and emoÂtionÂal state. And, as viewÂers of the film based on his life will know, we would not want to. PolÂlock was a vioÂlentÂly abuÂsive, depresÂsive alcoÂholic, and while there may be no necÂesÂsary relaÂtion to creÂativÂiÂty and sufÂferÂing, New York Abstract ExpresÂsionÂists seemed to wrest the intenÂsiÂty of their work from wells of perÂsonÂal pain.
It is no wonÂder that the longest video in D’Augustine’s series covÂers the methÂods of Agnes MarÂtin. The enigÂmatÂic MarÂtin used her work as a disÂciÂpline that took her beyond despair and defeat. Like Gertrude Stein or Samuel BeckÂett, she insistÂed that art, though a form of self-expresÂsion, must emerge imperÂsonÂalÂly, such that the artist “can take no credÂit for its sudÂden appearÂance.” On the othÂer side of failure—she told her audiÂence in a poignant and powÂerÂful 1973 speech called “On the PerÂfecÂtion UnderÂlyÂing Life”—“we still go on withÂout hope or desire or dreams or anyÂthing. Just going on with almost no memÂoÂry of havÂing done anyÂthing.”
The attiÂtude, MarÂtin said, is a disÂciÂpline, the disÂciÂpline of art—one that saw her through a lifeÂlong strugÂgle with schizÂoÂphreÂnia. Inspired by TaoÂism and Zen BudÂdhism, Martin’s “lumiÂnous, silent” paintÂings are studÂies in patience and delibÂerÂaÂtion. We see a very difÂferÂent techÂnique in the gesÂturÂal paintÂing of Willem de KoonÂing—anothÂer Abstract ExpresÂsionÂist with a seriÂous drinkÂing probÂlem. Do these bioÂgraphÂiÂcal issues matÂter? While it may do Martin’s work a disÂserÂvice to reduce it to “the prodÂucts of a perÂson comÂpelled by menÂtal illÂness,” as Zoe PilÂger writes at The IndeÂpenÂdent, de KoonÂing’s evenÂtuÂal sobriÂety led to a “draÂmatÂic shift,” Susan CheevÂer notes, “in the way he saw and paintÂed the world in his last decade or so.”
We need not psyÂcholÂoÂgize the work of any of these artists, includÂing that of the bipoÂlar Mark Rothko, above, to learn from their techÂniques. And yet it remains the case that—even were we to dupliÂcate PolÂlock, MarÂtin, de KoonÂing, or Rothko on canÂvas, we would nevÂer be able to imbue it with their pecuÂliar perÂsonÂalÂiÂties, pains, and moveÂments, with the depth and intenÂsiÂty each artist brought to their work. Great art does not require sufÂferÂing, but many artists have poured their sufÂferÂing into art that only they could make.
But mimÂicÂry is not the goal of MoMA’s class. Instead “In the StuÂdio: PostÂwar Abstract PaintÂing” intends to give stuÂdents “a deepÂer underÂstandÂing of what a stuÂdio pracÂtice means and how ideas develÂop from close lookÂing. They’ll also “gain a senÂsiÂtivÂiÂty to the physÂiÂcal qualÂiÂties of paint,” a key feaÂture of this mateÂrÂiÂal and texÂture-obsessed group, and the course will examÂine the “broadÂer culÂturÂal, intelÂlecÂtuÂal, and hisÂtorÂiÂcal conÂtext about the decades after World War II, when these artists were active.”
The eight-week course covÂers sevÂen artists, includÂing those above and Ad ReinÂhardt, YayÂoi Kusama, and BarÂnett NewÂman. StuÂdents are free to do quizzes and writÂten assignÂments only, or to parÂticÂiÂpate in the optionÂal stuÂdio exerÂcisÂes, proÂvidÂed they have the space and the mateÂriÂals. (For those stuÂdio pracÂtiÂtionÂers, D’Augustine offers brief tutoÂriÂals on tools like the palette knife and mateÂriÂals like stains.) Watch the trailÂer for D’Augustine’s course above. Like the irreÂpressÂible Olivia, stuÂdents will be encourÂaged “to experÂiÂment quite wildÂly” with what they might learn.
“In the StuÂdio: PostÂwar Abstract PaintÂing” has been added to our list, 1,700 Free Online CoursÂes from Top UniÂverÂsiÂties.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
JackÂson PolÂlock 51: Short Film CapÂtures the Painter CreÂatÂing Abstract ExpresÂsionÂist Art
How the CIA SecretÂly FundÂed Abstract ExpresÂsionÂism DurÂing the Cold War
MoMA Puts PolÂlock, Rothko & de KoonÂing on Your iPad
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness