For SigÂmund Freud, a joke was nevÂer just a joke, but a winÂdow into the unconÂscious, laughÂter an anxÂious sympÂtom of recogÂniÂtion that someÂthing lost has resurÂfaced, disÂtortÂed into humor. For SlovenÂian psyÂchoÂanÂaÂlytÂic philosoÂpher Slavoj Ĺ˝iĹľek, jokes funcÂtion simÂiÂlarÂly. And yet, in keepÂing with his comÂmitÂment to leftÂist polÂiÂtics, he uses jokes not to expose the hidÂden terÂrain of indiÂvidÂual psyÂches but “to evoke binds of hisÂtorÂiÂcal cirÂcumÂstances hard to indiÂcate by othÂer means.” So writes KenÂneth BakÂer in a brief SFGate review of the recent Ĺ˝iĹľek’s Jokes, a book-length comÂpiÂlaÂtion of Ĺ˝iĹľekisms pubÂlished by MIT Press. BakÂer also points out a definÂing feaÂture of Ĺ˝iĹľek’s humor: “Many of Ĺ˝iĹľek’s jokes preÂserve or even ampliÂfy the vulÂgarÂiÂty of their demotÂic or pop culÂturÂal oriÂgins.” Take the NSFW joke he tells above at the expense of a MonÂteneÂgrin friend. Ĺ˝iĹľek explains the joke as part of his maybe dubiÂous stratÂeÂgy of counÂterÂing racism with “proÂgresÂsive racism” or the “solÂiÂdarÂiÂty” of “shared obscenity”—the use of potenÂtialÂly uncomÂfortÂable ethÂnic humor to expose uncomÂfortÂable politÂiÂcal truths that get repressed or papered over by politeÂness.
Some of Ĺ˝iĹľek’s humor is more trigÂger-warnÂing worÂthy, such as his retelling of this old SoviÂet disÂsiÂdent joke or this “very dirty joke” he reportÂedÂly heard from a PalesÂtinÂian ChrisÂtÂian acquainÂtance. On the othÂer hand, some of his “dirty jokes” replace vulÂgarÂiÂty with theÂoÂry. For examÂple, Ĺ˝iĹľek likes to tell a “truÂly obscene” verÂsion of the famousÂly filthy joke “The ArisÂtoÂcrats,” which you’ll know if you’ve seen, or only read about, the film of the same name. And yet in his take, instead of a series of increasÂingÂly disÂgustÂing acts, the famÂiÂly perÂforms “a short course in Hegelian thought, debatÂing the true meanÂing of the negÂaÂtivÂiÂty, of subÂlaÂtion, of absolute knowÂing, etc.” This is perÂhaps an examÂple of what BakÂer refers to as Ĺ˝iĹľekian jokes that are “bafÂfling to readÂers not conÂverÂsant with the gnarly dialecÂtics of his thought, which does not lend itself easÂiÂly to samÂpling.” Be that as it may, much of Ĺ˝iĹľek’s humor works withÂout the theÂoÂretÂiÂcal conÂtext, and some of it is even tame enough for water coolÂer interÂludes. Below are four examÂples of “safe” jokes, culled from webÂsite CritÂiÂcal Theory’s list of “The 10 Best Ĺ˝iĹľek Jokes to Get You Through Finals” (which itself culls from Ĺ˝iĹľek’s Jokes). “Some of the jokes [in Ĺ˝iĹľek’s book] proÂvide hilarÂiÂous insights into Hegelian dialecÂtics, LacanÂian psyÂchoÂanalyÂsis or ideÂolÂoÂgy,” writes CritÂiÂcal TheÂoÂry, “OthÂers are just funÂny, and most are someÂwhat offensive—a charÂacÂterÂisÂtic Ĺ˝iĹľek admitÂtedÂly doesn’t care to corÂrect.”
#1 There is an old Jewish joke, loved by Derrida…
about a group of Jews in a synÂaÂgogue pubÂlicly admitÂting their nulÂliÂty in the eyes of God. First, a rabÂbi stands up and says: “O God, I know I am worthÂless. I am nothÂing!” After he has finÂished, a rich busiÂnessÂman stands up and says, beatÂing himÂself on the chest: “O God, I am also worthÂless, obsessed with mateÂrÂiÂal wealth. I am nothÂing!” After this specÂtaÂcle, a poor ordiÂnary Jew also stands up and also proÂclaims: “O God, I am nothÂing.” The rich busiÂnessÂman kicks the rabÂbi and whisÂpers in his ear with scorn: “What insoÂlence! Who is that guy who dares to claim that he is nothÂing too!”
#4 When the Turkish Communist writer Panait Istrati visited the Soviet Union in the mid- 1930s, the time of the big purges…
and show triÂals, a SoviÂet apolÂoÂgist tryÂing to conÂvince him about the need for vioÂlence against the eneÂmies evoked the proverb “You can’t make an omelet withÂout breakÂing eggs,” to which Istrati terseÂly replied: “All right. I can see the broÂken eggs. Where’s this omelet of yours?”
We should say the same about the ausÂterÂiÂty meaÂsures imposed by IMF: the Greeks would have the full right to say, “OK, we are breakÂing our eggs for all of Europe, but where’s the omelet you are promisÂing us?”
#7 This also makes meaningless the Christian joke…
accordÂing to which, when, in John 8:1–11, Christ says to those who want to stone the woman takÂen in adulÂtery, “Let him who is withÂout sin among you be the first to throw a stone!” he is immeÂdiÂateÂly hit by a stone, and then shouts back: “MothÂer! I asked you to stay at home!”
#8 In an old joke from the defunct German Democratic Republic,…
a GerÂman workÂer gets a job in Siberia; aware of how all mail will be read by cenÂsors, he tells his friends: “Let’s estabÂlish a code: if a letÂter you will get from me is writÂten in ordiÂnary blue ink, it is true; if it is writÂten in red ink, it is false.” After a month, his friends get the first letÂter, writÂten in blue ink: “EveryÂthing is wonÂderÂful here: stores are full, food is abunÂdant, apartÂments are large and propÂerÂly heatÂed, movie theÂaters show films from the West, there are many beauÂtiÂful girls ready for an affair—the only thing unavailÂable is red ink.”
And is this not our sitÂuÂaÂtion till now? We have all the freeÂdoms one wants—the only thing missÂing is the “red ink”: we “feel free” because we lack the very lanÂguage to articÂuÂlate our unfreeÂdom. What this lack of red ink means is that, today, all the main terms we use to desÂigÂnate the present conÂflict —“war on terÂror,” “democÂraÂcy and freeÂdom,” “human rights,” etc.—are false terms, mysÂtiÂfyÂing our perÂcepÂtion of the sitÂuÂaÂtion instead of allowÂing us to think it. The task today is to give the proÂtestÂers red ink.
For more of Slavoj Ĺ˝iĹľek’s witÂtiÂcism, vulÂgarÂiÂty, and humorÂous criÂtiques of ideÂoÂlogÂiÂcal forÂmaÂtions, politÂiÂcal hisÂtoÂry, and Hegelian and LacanÂian thought, pick up a copy of Ĺ˝iĹľek’s Jokes, and see this Youtube comÂpiÂlaÂtion of the politÂiÂcalÂly incorÂrect leftÂist philosopher’s humor caught on tape.
via CritÂiÂcal TheÂoÂry
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Slavoj Ĺ˝iĹľek: What FullÂfils You CreÂativeÂly Isn’t What Makes You HapÂpy
Ĺ˝iĹľek!: 2005 DocÂuÂmenÂtary Reveals the “AcaÂdÂeÂmÂic Rock Star” and “MonÂster” of a Man
In His LatÂest Film, Slavoj Ĺ˝iĹľek Claims “The Only Way to Be an AtheÂist is Through ChrisÂtianÂiÂty”
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness.