This weekÂend, AMC aired episode 7 of Mad Men’s final seaÂson. The show will now take a break, until episodes 8–14 hit the airÂwaves earÂly next year. Before you turn your attenÂtion elseÂwhere, you may want to spend some time with the Paris Review’s big interÂview with Matthew WeinÂer, the creÂator of Mad Men. The interÂview covÂers a lot of ground.
We learn that WeinÂer is a parÂticÂuÂlar fan of John CheevÂer. “[W]ith John CheevÂer, I recÂogÂnized myself in the voice of the narÂraÂtor.” “CheevÂer holds my attenÂtion more than any othÂer writer. He is in every aspect of Mad Men, startÂing with the fact that Don lives in OssinÂing on BulÂlet Park Road.” (Find the Paris Review’s 1976 interÂview with CheevÂer here.)
We also disÂcovÂer that WeinÂer studÂied poetÂry in colÂlege with ChristoÂpher Reeve’s father, Frank Reeve, and there were a couÂple of years when WeinÂer conÂsidÂered T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land “the most interÂestÂing thing in the world.”
Then the conÂverÂsaÂtion turns to Mad Men, where WeinÂer reveals what’s at the heart of the show: “I’ve always said this is a show about becomÂing white. That’s the defÂiÂnÂiÂtion of sucÂcess in America—becoming a WASP. A WASP male.” “Don DrapÂer knows he’s poor, very much in the modÂel of [Lee] IacocÂca or [Sam] WalÂton, who came out of the Great DepresÂsion, out of realÂly humÂble beginÂnings. Or like ConÂrad Hilton, on the show. These men don’t take no for an answer, they build these big busiÂnessÂes, these empires, but realÂly it’s all based on failÂure, inseÂcuÂriÂty, and an idenÂtiÂty modÂeled on some abstract ideÂal of white powÂer.”
Viral video #1: In a new ad for the SciÂence ChanÂnel’s series, Through the WormÂhole, actorMorÂgan FreeÂman uses heliÂum to entice viewÂers into thinkÂing about how physiÂcists are studyÂing gravÂiÂty in places where it acts quite strangeÂly. It’s kind of a crypÂtic mesÂsage, but it grabs your attenÂtion, doesÂn’t it? Through the WormÂhole returns to the airÂwaves, with SeaÂson 5, on June 4th.
Viral Video #2 asks you to imagÂine what hapÂpens when you put the grass in Neil deGrasse Tyson. “EveryÂthing is star stuff. This pizÂza, this cheese, this pepÂperÂoni.” That’s a reboot of CosÂmos that may actuÂalÂly get ratÂings.
We’ve all heard the musiÂcal fruits of audio synÂtheÂsis, espeÂcialÂly if we regÂuÂlarÂly lisÂten to the pop of the 1980s. But how, exactÂly, does a synÂtheÂsizÂer work? Ask a modÂern elecÂtronÂic-music enthuÂsiÂast and the answer may come out too techÂniÂcal, and at too much length, to bear. But pioÂneerÂingÂly techÂnolÂoÂgy-mindÂed singer-songÂwriter Thomas DolÂby, he of “She BlindÂed Me with SciÂence” (though I’ve always preÂfer his more eleÂgiac numÂbers like “AirÂwaves”), can give you a clearÂer, more conÂcise explaÂnaÂtion.
In fact, he gets it simÂple to the point of child-friendÂliÂness — so simÂple that he gives it on a chilÂdren’s teleÂviÂsion proÂgram. The Ghost of FaffnÂer Hall, which ran in late 1989 in EngÂland and AmerÂiÂca, taught lessons about music with a gallery of famous perÂformÂers — BobÂby McFerÂrin, Joni Mitchell, James TayÂlor, Mark Knopfler — in a pupÂpet-rich setÂting. Those pupÂpets, the denizens (livÂing and dead) of the titÂuÂlar FaffnÂer Hall, came built by Jim HenÂson’s CreaÂture Shop, known for their masÂtery of MupÂpet craft.
DolÂby’s illusÂtraÂtion of a synÂtheÂsizÂer’s operÂaÂtion involves an unusuÂal work of MupÂpetry: a fly in a matchÂbox. “A synÂtheÂsizÂer conÂsists of two things,” he says, “an oscilÂlaÂtor and a filÂter. The oscilÂlaÂtor conÂtrols the pitch of the sound, and the filÂter conÂtrols the tone.” Out, then, comes the box and its slightÂly unwillÂing (MupÂpet) inhabÂiÂtant. “I want you to imagÂine the fly is an oscilÂlaÂtor, and this box is a filÂter.” DolÂby shakes the box, repÂreÂsentÂing elecÂtriÂcal curÂrent through an oscilÂlaÂtor, which makes the frightÂened fly buzz. “The hardÂer I shake the box, the highÂer the pitch!” To demonÂstrate filÂtraÂtion, he opens and closÂes the matchÂbox, harshenÂing the flyÂ’s wail (until, indeed, it turns into a cry of “Help!”). If you’d like to hear DolÂby talk more about the interÂsecÂtion of his art and his techÂnolÂoÂgy at a highÂer, albeit MupÂpetÂless levÂel, have a lisÂten to his appearÂance last year on the Nerdist podÂcast. He long ago, in anothÂer conÂtext, statÂed his goal of teachÂing peoÂple that synÂtheÂsizÂers “don’t have to sound like a crate of moriÂbund wasps” — an interÂestÂing thing to accomÂplish with a matchÂbox and a superÂinÂtelÂliÂgent fly.
Burgess MeredÂith and Zero MosÂtel, both tryÂing to salÂvage careers after being blackÂlistÂed in the McCarthy periÂod, starred as Vladimir and Estragon, in WNTA-TV’s Play of the Week series’ no-frills proÂducÂtion. In conÂtrast to the recent BroadÂway revival starÂring grizÂzled, grubÂby knights of the realm, Ian McKÂellen and Patrick StewÂart, MeredÂith and MosÂtel make a pretÂty harmless—and apparÂentÂly unharmed—team. Vladimir’s prostate trouÂble was scrubbed from the shootÂing script, along with some 40 minÂutes of the stage verÂsion, five years after its disÂasÂtrous AmerÂiÂcan preÂmiere.
Alan SchneiÂder, who directÂed that proÂducÂtion, returned to helm the Play of the Week, along with origÂiÂnal AmerÂiÂcan cast memÂbers Kurt KasznÂer and Alvin Epstein, reprisÂing their supÂportÂing turns as PozÂzo and Lucky. SchneiÂder appears to have had his hands full with the always-largÂer-than-life MosÂtel who chews plenÂty of scenery in addiÂtion to his carÂrot.
For his part, MosÂtel statÂed that he “wished to be re-blackÂlistÂed” if that would keep him from ever havÂing to work with that direcÂtor again.
Despite the tenÂsion, he and MeredÂith achieve a winÂsome LauÂrel and Hardy-like rapÂport as they plod up and down a paintÂed road with choreÂoÂgraphed aimÂlessÂness.
It’s still a bit hard for me to imagÂine AmerÂiÂcan teleÂviÂsion audiÂences tunÂing-in in numÂbers sufÂfiÂcient to jusÂtiÂfy the effort.
To be fair, there were a lot fewÂer chanÂnels then. Play of the Week was a high brow project servÂing up seriÂous theÂatriÂcal work on the small screen. The first episode was Judith AnderÂsonÂ’s Medea. ComÂpared to that, or ShakeÂspeare, or Ibsen, a prostate-free Godot might be passed off as teleÂvised enterÂtainÂment the whole famÂiÂly could tolÂerÂate for an hour and forty-nine minÂutes.
If you’re up for it, the entire proÂducÂtion is yours for the viewÂing below.
Ayun HalÂlÂiÂday is the author of sevÂen books, and Chief PriÂmaÂtolÂoÂgist of the award-winÂning East VilÂlage Inky zine. FolÂlow her @AyunHalliday
DebutÂing in 1989, MTV’s Unplugged promised to cure the culture’s slick 80s hangÂover with acoustic guiÂtars and earnest, cofÂfee-shop intiÂmaÂcy from the 90s biggest stars (MariÂah Carey) and a select few clasÂsic giants (McCartÂney, ClapÂton, Dylan, a reformed Kiss). In a series docÂuÂmentÂing some iconÂic last or near-last performances—from 10,000 ManiÂacs, Alice in Chains—perÂhaps the most iconÂic was the NovemÂber, 1993 appearÂance of NirÂvana (below), whose trouÂbled singer/guitarist overÂdosed just weeks into the band’s 1994 EuroÂpean tour, then took his life in April of that year. For chilÂdren of the decade, Nirvana’s Unplugged appearÂance, though hard to watch in hindÂsight, perÂhaps defines the 90s more than any othÂer TV moment. And yet, writes Andrew WalÂlace ChamÂings in The Atlantic, “it’s worth conÂsidÂerÂing the perÂforÂmance as a work of music, not mytholÂoÂgy. Because as music, it’s incredÂiÂble.”
You want intiÂmaÂcy? “Parts of the NirÂvana set,” writes ChamÂings, “feel so perÂsonÂal it’s awkÂward.” Cobain is cranky in between-song banÂter, hunched over his guiÂtar in his puke green thrift-store cardiÂgan, snapÂping at his bandÂmates and the audiÂence. His perÂforÂmances are intense and eerie, parÂticÂuÂlarÂly his covÂer of Lead Belly’s “Where Did You Sleep Last Night,” the last song of the evening, which Neil Young described as “unearthÂly, like a wereÂwolf.” The band nevÂer hid behind a pre-fabÂriÂcatÂed mysÂtique, but their acoustic set highÂlights just how emoÂtionÂalÂly investÂed Cobain was in music—his own and othÂers. Joined by Germs (and latÂer Foo Fighers) guiÂtarist Pat Smear, they mostÂly eschewed the hits, and played covÂers by Cobain’s favorite bands: Meat PupÂpets, Bowie, The VaseÂlines. You want even more intiÂmaÂcy? Watch the Unplugged rehearsal sesÂsions at the top of the post.
Where the teleÂvised Unplugged episode has the loose, inforÂmal vibe of band pracÂtice with an audiÂence, this rehearsal footage is more of a soundÂcheck, but with some truÂly beauÂtiÂful perÂforÂmances. Cobain tweaks techÂniÂcal details and gets snipÂpy with the engiÂneer. AccordÂing to sevÂerÂal peoÂple involved, the rehearsal sesÂsions were espeÂcialÂly difÂfiÂcult, with Cobain sufÂferÂing from withÂdrawÂal and genÂerÂalÂly nerÂvous and unhapÂpy, almost bailÂing on the show at the last minute. Cobain biogÂraÂphÂer Charles Cross quotes one observÂer as sayÂing “There was no jokÂing, no smiles, no fun comÂing from him.” Cobain’s request that the stuÂdio be decÂoÂratÂed with black canÂdles and stargazÂer lilies promptÂed the proÂducÂer to ask, “You mean like a funerÂal?” “ExactÂly,” he said, “like a funerÂal.” But it’s the band’s insisÂtence that the show be taiÂlored to their anti-rock star perÂsonÂalÂiÂty that makes the perÂforÂmances so memÂoÂrable. “We’d seen the othÂer Unpluggeds and didn’t like many of them,” recalled Dave Grohl, “because most bands would treat them like rock shows… except with acoustic guiÂtars.” Nirvana’s Unplugged was someÂthing entireÂly difÂferÂent. A teleÂvised swan song that was also, in Chaming’s words, “the pretÂtiÂest noise the band has ever made.”
Like many in the HonÂeyÂcomb Kids genÂerÂaÂtion, I didÂn’t propÂerÂly appreÂciÂate chilÂdren’s teleÂviÂsion icon GumÂby until Eddie MurÂphy parÂoÂdied him on SatÂurÂday Night Live. This sparked a revival. WatchÂing GumÂby episodes in the comÂpaÂny of othÂer merÂry young adults reframed my preÂviÂousÂly held view of him as a relÂic from a time when TV was borÂing. Turns out that GumÂby and his equine sideÂkick Pokey were actuÂalÂly pretÂty funÂny, weird-in-a-good-way, and far more soulÂful than the witÂless flat aniÂmaÂtion jamÂming the airÂwaves of my 70s childÂhood.
I decidÂed to take the kids, gamÂbling that they might respond to GumÂby as I did now, not the way I did when I was their age. Their screen time was pretÂty limÂitÂed back then, and as a result, they’d avidÂly watch just about anyÂthing.
The first video we encounÂtered was GumÂbaÂsia, the experÂiÂmenÂtal, charÂacÂter-free, stop motion riff above that Clokey made as a stuÂdent at USC. It was proÂduced in 1953 and released in 1955.
Not exactÂly what I’d been primÂing the chilÂdren to expect on the subÂway ride over.
“That’s GumÂby?” they cried in disÂmay. “That cube?”
No. But those morÂphÂing cubes and squigÂgles did give birth to an empire, after proÂducÂer and presÂiÂdent of the Motion PicÂture ProÂducÂers AssoÂciÂaÂtion, Sam Engel, offered to bankroll a pilot, declarÂing GumÂbaÂsia the most excitÂing film he’d ever seen in his life. Clokey was teachÂing EngÂlish at the HarÂvard MilÂiÂtary AcadÂeÂmy. Engel’s sole wish was to improve the qualÂiÂty of chilÂdren’s teleÂviÂsion proÂgramÂming. He asked Clokey if he could “make litÂtle clay figÂures out of that clay and aniÂmate them.”
Clokey did just that, with Engel bankrolling the pilot, “GumÂby on the Moon.” The proÂducÂer was so pleased with the result, he refused to take a cut when GumÂby was givÂen a sevÂen year conÂtract at NBC.
ImagÂine a CinÂderelÂla stoÂry like that hapÂpenÂing today!
If this small morsel of GumÂby hisÂtoÂry leaves you cravÂing more, book your flight for the inauÂgurÂal GumÂby Fest in GlenÂdoÂra, CalÂiÂforÂnia, where GumÂby grew to matuÂriÂty in “an unasÂsumÂing indusÂtriÂal buildÂing.”
ExperÂiÂmenÂtal elecÂtronÂic musiÂcian and invenÂtor Bruce Haack’s comÂpoÂsiÂtions expandÂed many a young conÂsciousÂness, and taught kids to dance, move, medÂiÂtate, and to be endÂlessÂly curiÂous about the techÂnolÂoÂgy of sound. All of this makes him the perÂfect guest for Fred Rogers, who despite his totalÂly square demeanor loved bringÂing his audiÂence unusuÂal artists of all kinds. In the clips above and below from the first, 1968 seaÂson of Mr. Roger’s NeighÂborÂhood, Haack introÂduces Rogers and a group of youngÂsters to the “musiÂcal comÂputÂer,” a homeÂmade anaÂlog synÂtheÂsizÂer of his own invention—one of many he creÂatÂed from houseÂhold items, most of which inteÂgratÂed human touch and moveÂment into their conÂtrols, as you’ll see above. In both clips, Haack and longÂtime colÂlabÂoÂraÂtor Esther NelÂson sing and play charmÂing songs as NelÂson leads them in varÂiÂous moveÂment exerÂcisÂes. (The remainÂder of the secÂond video mostÂly feaÂtures Mr. Roger’s cat.)
Although he’s seen a revival among elecÂtronÂic musiÂcians and DJs, Haack became best known in his career as a comÂposÂer of children’s music, and for good reaÂson. His 1962 debut kid’s record Dance, Sing & LisÂten is an absolute clasÂsic of the genre, comÂbinÂing a dizzyÂing range of musiÂcal styles—country, clasÂsiÂcal, pop, medieval, and experÂiÂmenÂtal electronic—with far-out spoÂken word from Haack and NelÂson. They folÂlowed this up with two more iterÂaÂtions of Dance, Sing & LisÂten, then The Way Out Record for ChilÂdren, The ElecÂtronÂic Record for ChilÂdren, the amazÂing Dance to the Music, and sevÂerÂal more, all them weirdÂer and more wonÂderÂful than maybe anyÂthing you’ve ever heard. (Don’t believe me? Take a lisÂten to “Soul TransÂportaÂtion,” “EIO (New MacÂDonÂald),” or the absoluteÂly enchantÂiÂng “Saint Basil,” with its Doors‑y organ outÂro.)
A psyÂcheÂdelÂic genius, Haack also made grown-up acid rock in the form of 1970’s The ElecÂtric Lucifer, which is a bit like if Andrew Lloyd WebÂber and Tim Rice had writÂten Jesus Christ SuperÂstar on heavy dosÂes of LSD and banks of anaÂlog synÂtheÂsizÂers.
While HaackÂ’s Mr. Rogers appearÂance may not have seemed like much at the time, in hindÂsight this is a fasÂciÂnatÂing docÂuÂment of an artist who’s been called “The King of TechÂno” for his forÂward-lookÂing sounds meetÂing the cutÂting edge in children’s proÂgramÂming. It’s a tesÂtaÂment to how much the counÂterÂculÂture influÂenced earÂly childÂhood eduÂcaÂtion. Many of the proÂgresÂsive eduÂcaÂtionÂal experÂiÂments of the sixÂties have since become hisÂtorÂiÂcal curiosiÂties, replaced by insipid corÂpoÂrate merÂchanÂdisÂing. What Haack and NelÂson’s musiÂcal approach tells me is that we’d do well to revisÂit the eduÂcaÂtionÂal cliÂmate of that day and take a few lessons from its freeform experÂiÂmenÂtaÂtion and openÂness. I’ll cerÂtainÂly be playÂing these records for my daughÂter.
Carl Sagan, the turtleÂneck-sportÂing astroÂphysiÂcist from CorÂnell, was the greatÂest comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtor of sciÂence of his genÂerÂaÂtion. Not only did he pubÂlish hunÂdreds of sciÂenÂtifÂic papers and was instruÂmenÂtal in putting togethÂer that goldÂen record on the VoyÂager spaceÂcrafts but he also wrote twenÂty critÂiÂcalÂly praised best sellÂers on sciÂence, appeared regÂuÂlarÂly on the Tonight Show, and even had a catch phrase — “bilÂlions and bilÂlions.” But Sagan is perÂhaps best known for his landÂmark 1980 series CosÂmos: A PerÂsonÂal VoyÂage(watch it here). He took viewÂers through a tour of the uniÂverse, showÂing them things from the mind-bogÂgling big to the infinÂiÂtesÂiÂmalÂly small and everyÂthing in between. The show proved to be a huge hit; close to a half-bilÂlion peoÂple tuned in worldÂwide.
Even before the reboot of CosÂmos preÂmiered on FOX in March, Neil deGrasse Tyson — who hosts the show — was already seen as Sagan’s sucÂcesÂsor. Not only does he serve as the direcÂtor of the HayÂden PlanÂeÂtarÂiÂum in New York City and was instruÂmenÂtal in kickÂing PluÂto out of the brothÂerÂhood of planÂets, but he also authored numerÂous books, appears regÂuÂlarÂly on The DaiÂly Show, and freÂquentÂly hosts AMAs on RedÂdit. He’s also one of AmerÂiÂca’s most vocal defendÂers of sciÂence at a time, unlike Sagan’s heyÂday, when CreÂationÂism, cliÂmate change denial, and anti-vacÂciÂnaÂtion hysÂteÂria seem to be makÂing inroads in our culÂture.
AnyÂone who saw Tyson’s heart felt tribÂute to Sagan at the beginÂning of the first episode of CosÂmos knows that Sagan’s influÂence on his younger counÂterÂpart extendÂed much furÂther than his media appearÂances. It was perÂsonÂal. In 1975, Sagan, who was already famous at that time, was so impressed by Tyson’s colÂlege appliÂcaÂtion that he perÂsonÂalÂly reached out to him, hopÂing to conÂvince the high school stuÂdent to attend CorÂnell. He even offered to perÂsonÂalÂly show Tyson around his lab.
You can read Sagan’s letÂter, datÂed NovemÂber 12, 1975, below.
Dear Neil:
Thanks for your letÂter and most interÂestÂing resume. I was espeÂcialÂly glad to see that, for a career in astronÂoÂmy, you intend to do your underÂgradÂuÂate work in physics. In this way, you will acquire the essenÂtial tools for a wide range of subÂseÂquent astroÂnomÂiÂcal endeavÂors.
I would guess from your resume that your interÂests in astronÂoÂmy are sufÂfiÂcientÂly deep and your mathÂeÂmatÂiÂcal and physÂiÂcal backÂground sufÂfiÂcientÂly strong that we could probÂaÂbly engage you in real astroÂnomÂiÂcal research durÂing your underÂgradÂuÂate career here, if the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty interÂests you. For examÂple, we hope to be bringÂing back to IthaÂca in late calÂenÂdar year 1976 an enorÂmous array of Viking data on Mars both from the orbiters and from the lanÂders.
I would be delightÂed to meet with you when you visÂit IthaÂca. Please try and give as much advance notice of the date as you can because my travÂel schedÂule is quite hecÂtic right now and I realÂly would like to be in IthaÂca when you drop by.
With all good wishÂes,
Carl Sagan
Tyson was deeply moved by Sagan’s kindÂness and sinÂcerÂiÂty. He did venÂture out to IthaÂca from the Bronx on a snowy afterÂnoon. As Tyson recalled years latÂer, “I thought to myself, who am I? I’m just some high school kid.” In the end, Sagan’s perÂsonÂal plea wasn’t quite enough to conÂvince young Tyson to attend his school. As you can read in his response below, datÂed April 30, 1976, Tyson decidÂed to go to HarÂvard.
Dear Prof. Sagan
Thank you for your offer conÂcernÂing the Viking MisÂsions. After long thought and deciÂsion makÂing I have choÂsen to attend HarÂvard UniÂverÂsiÂty this SepÂtemÂber. I chose it not simÂply because of its “valuÂable” name but because they have a largÂer astronÂoÂmy departÂment in addiÂtion to the SmithÂsonÂian AstroÂphysÂiÂcal ObserÂvaÂtoÂry, so while I am majorÂing in physics I will have more surÂroundÂing me in the way of on-going research in astronÂoÂmy.
I want to say that I did enjoy meetÂing you and I am very grateÂful for your hosÂpiÂtalÂiÂty and the time you spent with me while at CorÂnell. I will throughÂout my underÂgradÂuÂate years keep you informed on any noteÂworÂthy news conÂcernÂing astronÂoÂmy-relatÂed work that I’m involved in. I do plan to apply again for the Viking InternÂship next sumÂmer.
Thanks again
Neil D. Tyson
You can see Tyson talk about his afterÂnoon with Sagan. 40 years latÂer, he still seems incredÂuÂlous that it hapÂpened.
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.