Why Making Accurate World Maps Is Mathematically Impossible

Jorge Luis Borges once wrote of an empire where­in “the Art of Car­tog­ra­phy attained such Per­fec­tion that the map of a sin­gle Province occu­pied the entire­ty of a City, and the map of the Empire, the entire­ty of a Province.” Still unsat­is­fied, “the Car­tog­ra­phers Guilds struck a Map of the Empire whose size was that of the Empire, and which coin­cid­ed point for point with it.” But pos­ter­i­ty, when they lost their ances­tors’ obses­sion for car­tog­ra­phy, judged “that vast Map was Use­less, and not with­out some Piti­less­ness was it, that they deliv­ered it up to the Inclemen­cies of Sun and Win­ters.” With that enor­mous map, in all its sin­gu­lar accu­ra­cy, cast out, small­er, imper­fect ones pre­sum­ably won the day again.

With that well-known sto­ry “On Exac­ti­tude in Sci­ence,” Borges illus­trat­ed the idea that all maps are wrong by imag­in­ing the pre­pos­ter­ous­ness of a tru­ly cor­rect one. The Vox video “Why All World Maps Are Wrong” cov­ers some of the same ter­ri­to­ry, as it were, first illus­trat­ing that idea by slit­ting open an inflat­able globe and try­ing, futile­ly, to get the result­ing plas­tic mess to lie flat.

“That right there is the eter­nal dilem­ma of map­mak­ers,” says the host in voiceover as the strug­gle con­tin­ues onscreen. “The sur­face of a sphere can­not be rep­re­sent­ed as a plane with­out some form of dis­tor­tion.” As a result, all of human­i­ty’s paper maps of the world–which in the task of turn­ing the sur­face of a sphere into a flat plane need to use a tech­nique called “projection”–distort geo­graph­i­cal real­i­ty by def­i­n­i­tion.

The Mer­ca­tor pro­jec­tion has, since its inven­tion by six­teenth-cen­tu­ry Flem­ish car­tog­ra­ph­er Ger­ar­dus Mer­ca­tor, pro­duced the most wide­ly-seen world maps. (If you grew up in Amer­i­ca, you almost cer­tain­ly spent a lot of time star­ing at Mer­ca­tor maps in the class­room.) But we hard­ly live under the lim­i­ta­tions of his day, nor those of the 1940s when Borges imag­ined his land-sized map. In our 21st cen­tu­ry, the satel­lite-based Glob­al Posi­tion­ing Sys­tem has “wiped out the need for paper maps as a means of nav­i­gat­ing both the sea and the sky,” but even so, “most web map­ping tools, like Google Maps, use the Mer­ca­tor” due to its “abil­i­ty to pre­serve shape and angles,” which “makes close-up views of cities more accu­rate.”

On the scale of a City, in more Bor­ge­sian words — and prob­a­bly on the scale of a Province and even the Empire — Mer­ca­tor pro­jec­tion still works just fine. “But the fact remains that there’s no right pro­jec­tion. Car­tog­ra­phers and math­e­mati­cians have cre­at­ed a huge library of avail­able pro­jec­tions, each with a new per­spec­tive on the plan­et, and each use­ful for a dif­fer­ent task.” You can com­pare and con­trast a few of them for your­self here, or take a clos­er look of some of the Mer­ca­tor pro­jec­tion’s size dis­tor­tions (mak­ing Green­land, for exam­ple, look as big as the whole of Africa) here. These chal­lenges and oth­ers have kept the Dis­ci­plines of Geog­ra­phy, unlike in Borges’ world, busy even today.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The His­to­ry of Car­tog­ra­phy, the “Most Ambi­tious Overview of Map Mak­ing Ever,” Now Free Online

New York Pub­lic Library Puts 20,000 Hi-Res Maps Online & Makes Them Free to Down­load and Use

Browse & Down­load 1,198 Free High Res­o­lu­tion Maps of U.S. Nation­al Parks

Down­load 67,000 His­toric Maps (in High Res­o­lu­tion) from the Won­der­ful David Rum­sey Map Col­lec­tion

Free: Nation­al Geo­graph­ic Lets You Down­load Thou­sands of Maps from the Unit­ed States Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

What’s the Fastest Way to Alphabetize Your Bookshelf?

We’ve told you about the great Japan­ese word “tsun­doku,” which describes the act of buy­ing books and let­ting them pile up unread. It’s an affliction–or state of affairs–I’m sure many of you are per­son­al­ly famil­iar with.

Now let’s say you move that huge pile of unread books to a new home. And you’re won­der­ing what’s the quick­est way to get them in alpha­bet­i­cal order. Above, a handy life­hack to save you time.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

“Tsun­doku,” the Japan­ese Word for the New Books That Pile Up on Our Shelves, Should Enter the Eng­lish Lan­guage

800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices

700 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

29 Lists of Recommended Books Created by Well-Known Authors, Artists & Thinkers: Jorge Luis Borges, Patti Smith, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, David Bowie & More

bookshelf_prunksaal_oenb_vienna_at_matl00786ch

Cre­ative Com­mons image of Aus­tri­an Nation­al Library by Matl

At any giv­en moment many of us can rec­om­mend a list of books to read. Books that have imprint­ed on us, named emo­tions we did­n’t know we had, carved trails through our brains. Books that stand as a tes­ta­ment to a life lived as a read­er. We may con­struct lists to pass on to a curi­ous niece, nephew, son, daugh­ter, stu­dent, or appren­tice. “Life is per­plex­ing,” we might say, “com­plex, won­drous, curi­ous, painful, open to unimag­in­able pos­si­bil­i­ties. Read these, then go out and find the books that inspire, soothe, guide, chal­lenge, and enlight­en you.”

Of course, as you know from read­ing this site, we fre­quent­ly bring you many such lists, from famous writ­ers, artists, musi­cians, sci­en­tists, and oth­er titans of their respec­tive fields who have inspired mil­lions of young stu­dents and appren­tices. Today, we have com­piled a mas­ter list of rec­om­mend­ed read­ing lists, from writ­ers like Jorge Luis Borges, musi­cian-poets like Pat­ti Smith, sci­en­tists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson, futur­ists like Stew­art Brand, and many, many more.

In fact, we have two lists from Borges, both pre­dictably lengthy and eccen­tric. The first con­tains 33 books that could start a fic­tion­al Library of Babel, among which we find Jack Lon­don and Her­man Melville along­side occult Eng­lish writer Arthur Machen and Qing Dynasty Chi­nese writer Pu Songling. Borges’ sec­ond list spans 74 titles, and was intend­ed, before his death, to expand to 100. Pat­ti Smith also rec­om­mends Melville in her list, as well as Mikhail Bul­gakov, Louisa May Alcott, and her hero, Arthur Rim­baud. Tyson’s list is short, only 8 titles, and he sug­gests these books not only for the avid read­er but—in answer to a Redditor’s question—for “every sin­gle intel­li­gent per­son on the plan­et.”

And Stew­art Brand? Well, his list of 76 books is one of many such lists (includ­ing anoth­er one from Bri­an Eno) for his Long Now Foundation’s “Man­u­al for Civ­i­liza­tion,” a library meant to inspire and inform the few intel­li­gent peo­ple left on Earth in the event of cat­a­stroph­ic col­lapse.

Find the com­plete list of lists above. 28 in total. In some cas­es, the titles in each post link to online text or audio books freely avail­able online. And, sep­a­rate­ly, you should not miss our list of 74 essen­tial books rec­om­mend­ed by “a group of inter­na­tion­al women writ­ers, artists and cura­tors.”  Please let us know in the com­ments if there are any espe­cial­ly good lists not men­tioned here–ones you think our read­ers would do well to con­sult.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

What Books Could Be Used to Rebuild Civ­i­liza­tion?: Lists by Bri­an Eno, Stew­art Brand, Kevin Kel­ly & Oth­er For­ward-Think­ing Minds

“Tsun­doku,” the Japan­ese Word for the New Books That Pile Up on Our Shelves, Should Enter the Eng­lish Lan­guage

74 Essen­tial Books for Your Per­son­al Library: A List Curat­ed by Female Cre­atives

100 Nov­els All Kids Should Read Before Leav­ing High School

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Man Ray Designs a Supremely Elegant, Geometric Chess Set in 1920–and It Now Gets Re-Issued

Yes­ter­day, Col­in Mar­shall fea­tured Man Ray’s “Sur­re­al­ist Chess­board” from 1934, which paid homage to the lead­ers of the Sur­re­al­ist move­ment. Though artis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant, the chess­board had some prac­ti­cal lim­i­ta­tions. Made up of only 20 squares (as com­pared to the tra­di­tion­al 64), the “Sur­re­al­ist Chess­board” would­n’t let you play an actu­al game of chess.

For that, we need to turn to Man Ray’s chess set fash­ioned in 1924. Made of abstract geo­met­ric forms, this set (on dis­play above, jump to the 3:30 mark to real­ly see it) fea­tured some uncon­ven­tion­al chess pieces: the king is a pyra­mid; the queen, a cone; the cas­tle, a cube; the bish­op, a bot­tle; the knight, the head scroll of a vio­lin; and the pawn, an ele­gant sphere.

We said you could actu­al­ly play chess on this board. And indeed you can. In 2012, the Man Ray Trust autho­rized a new edi­tion of this set, mak­ing it avail­able to chess enthu­si­asts look­ing for a hand­some set. Craft­ed in Ger­many, it’s made of sol­id beech wood.

This chess­board you can obtain.

As for the oth­er mod­ern chess­board Man Ray designed in 1945, it may be out of your league. David Bowie owned one of the few exist­ing copies of that 1945 board, and, ear­li­er this month, it sold for $1.3 mil­lion at a Sothe­by’s auc­tion in Lon­don.

For more infor­ma­tion on Man Ray’s chess­boards, read this short arti­cle from Chess Col­lec­tors Inter­na­tion­al (see page 18). Or see The Imagery of Chess Revis­it­ed, which cov­ers Man Ray’s boards and beyond.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Man Ray Cre­ates a “Sur­re­al­ist Chess­board,” Fea­tur­ing Por­traits of Sur­re­al­ist Icons: Dalí, Bre­ton, Picas­so, Magritte, Miró & Oth­ers (1934)

Man Ray’s Por­traits of Ernest Hem­ing­way, Ezra Pound, Mar­cel Duchamp & Many Oth­er 1920s Icons

Man Ray and the Ciné­ma Pur: Four Sur­re­al­ist Films From the 1920s

Watch Dreams That Mon­ey Can Buy, a Sur­re­al­ist Film by Man Ray, Mar­cel Duchamp, Alexan­der Calder, Fer­nand Léger & Hans Richter

Mar­cel Duchamp, Chess Enthu­si­ast, Cre­at­ed an Art Deco Chess Set That’s Now Avail­able via 3D Print­er

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Blade Runner Gets Re-Created, Shot for Shot, Using Only Microsoft Paint

msp-blade-runner2

Blade Run­ner came out in June 1982. Microsoft­’s Paint came out in Novem­ber 1985. Lit­tle could the design­ers of that rebrand­ed ver­sion of ZSoft­’s PC Paint­brush pack­aged in with Win­dows 1.0 know that the paths of their hum­ble graph­ics appli­ca­tion and that elab­o­rate sci-fi cin­e­mat­ic vision would cross just over 30 years lat­er. Sure­ly nobody involved in either project could have imag­ined the form the inter­sec­tion would take: MSP Blade Run­ner, a fan’s shot-by-shot Tum­blr “remake” (and gen­tle par­o­dy) of the film using only Microsoft Paint, start­ing with the Ladd Com­pa­ny tree logo.

msp-blade-runner

Why make such a thing? “I like the idea of hav­ing a blog but basi­cal­ly feel as if I have very lit­tle to say about things, at least things that are orig­i­nal or inter­est­ing,” cre­ator David Mac­Gowan told Moth­er­board­’s Rachel Pick. “I grav­i­tat­ed to Tum­blr with some idea of just post­ing pic­tures, but still felt I need­ed to be post­ing some­thing I’d actu­al­ly made myself… [Y]ears ago I used to draw real­ly crap­py basic MS Paint pics for a favourite pop group’s fan site, and they always seemed to raise a smile. The idea of doing some­thing else with MS Paint, a kind of cel­e­bra­tion of my not being deterred by lack of artis­tic tal­ent, nev­er real­ly went away.”

msp-blade-runner-3

The mix­ture of tech­no­log­i­cal and aes­thet­ic sen­si­bil­i­ties inher­ent in using a severe­ly out­dat­ed but ever-present dig­i­tal tool to re-cre­ate the endur­ing­ly com­pelling ana­log visu­als of a movie from that same era goes well with the orig­i­nal Blade Run­ner’s project of updat­ing the con­ven­tions of film noir to depict a then-new­ly imag­ined future. Even more fit­ting­ly, a work like MSP Blade Run­ner could only make sense in the 2010s, the very decade the movie tried to envi­sion. Will it go all the way to the shot of Deckard and Rachel’s final exit into the ele­va­tor? “I don’t real­ly think about giv­ing up,” McGowan told Pick. “The idea of actu­al­ly com­plet­ing some­thing I start out to do (for once in my life) is very appeal­ing.” Spo­ken like a 21st-cen­tu­ry man indeed.

msp-blade-runner

You can find every frame paint­ed so far, and every new one to come, here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch an Ani­mat­ed Ver­sion of Rid­ley Scott’s Blade Run­ner Made of 12,597 Water­col­or Paint­ings

What Hap­pens When Blade Run­ner & A Scan­ner Dark­ly Get Remade with an Arti­fi­cial Neur­al Net­work

The Art of Mak­ing Blade Run­ner: See the Orig­i­nal Sketch­book, Sto­ry­boards, On-Set Polaroids & More

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

A Whiskey-Fueled Lin-Manuel Miranda Reimagines Hamilton as a Girl on Drunk History

Back in July of 1804, when Vice Pres­i­dent Aaron Burr fired a fatal round into the abdomen of for­mer Sec­re­tary of the Trea­sury Alexan­der Hamil­ton, I won­der which sce­nario would have seemed more implau­si­ble: that these polit­i­cal rivals would one day be res­ur­rect­ed in the form of a black guy and a Nuy­or­i­can, or as two young women in reveal­ing­ly snug breech­es, above.

Time moves on. These days, your aver­age Hamil­ton-obsessed pre-teen may have trou­ble accept­ing that there was a time—Jan­u­ary 2015, to be exact—when most Amer­i­cans could­n’t say what the guy on the ten dol­lar bill was famous for.

I con­fess, until quite recent­ly, I was far more con­fi­dent in Arrest­ed Devel­op­ments fic­tion­al Bluth fam­i­ly’s exploits than any involv­ing Hamil­ton and Burr. This explains, in part, why I’m so drawn to the cast­ing instincts of Derek Waters’, cre­ator of Drunk His­to­ry

The most recent episode fea­tures Alia Shawkat, one of my favorite Arrest­ed Devel­op­ment play­ers as a sar­don­ic, pot­ty mouthed Hamil­ton.

No wor­ries that Drunk His­to­ry, which bills itself as a “liquored-up nar­ra­tion of our nation’s his­to­ry,” is the lat­est in a long line of John­ny-Come-Latelys, eager­ly bel­ly­ing up to the Hamil­ton trough.

Before Shawkat imbued him with her trade­mark edge, Drunk History’s Hamil­ton exud­ed the befud­dled sweet­ness of Shawkat’s besot­ted Arrest­ed Devel­op­ment cousinMichael Cera, who orig­i­nat­ed the part in a video that gave rise to the series, below.

That one’s far slop­pi­er, and not just in terms of pro­duc­tion val­ues. The inau­gur­al nar­ra­tor, Mark Gagliar­di, was ren­dered a good deal more than three sheets to the wind by the bot­tle of scotch he downed on a sag­ging brown velour couch.

Amer­i­ca would not want to see its cur­rent sweet­heart, Hamilton’s play­wright and orig­i­nal lead­ing man, Lin-Manuel Miran­da in such a con­di­tion.

Where­as Gagliar­di seemed dan­ger­ous­ly close to need­ing the buck­et Waters thought­ful­ly posi­tioned near­by, a whiskey-fuelled Miran­da seems mere­ly the tini­est bit buzzed, sit­ting cross legged in his parent’s liv­ing room, flesh­ing out Hamilton’s sto­ry with bits he didn’t man­age to cram into his Pulitzer Prize-win­ning musi­cal, such as a bewigged Tony Hale (aka Buster Bluth) as James Mon­roe.

On the oth­er hand, he does describe the Reynolds Pam­phlet as “Dick 101” (and failed to recall Face­Tim­ing var­i­ous friends post-record­ing) so…

You’ll need a Com­e­dy Cen­tral sub­scrip­tion to view the com­plete episode online, but Shawkat’s ear­li­er Drunk His­to­ry turn as Grover Cleveland’s “It Girl” wife, Frances, is free for all, here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

“Alexan­der Hamil­ton” Per­formed with Amer­i­can Sign Lan­guage

Alexan­der Hamil­ton: Hip-Hop Hero at the White House Poet­ry Evening

Watch a Wit­ty, Grit­ty, Hard­boiled Retelling of the Famous Aaron Burr-Alexan­der Hamil­ton Duel

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, the­ater mak­er and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine.  Her play Zam­boni Godot is open­ing in New York City in March 2017. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

How Stanley Kubrick Made His Masterpieces: An Introduction to His Obsessive Approach to Filmmaking

As each semes­ter in my film course rolls around, it’s more and more appar­ent how time depletes the pop cul­ture cur­ren­cy of those direc­tors who did not make it into the 21st Cen­tu­ry. A knowl­edge of Stan­ley Kubrick used to be a giv­en, as was the under­stand­ing of what “A Stan­ley Kubrick Film” meant to film fans. Now he is a solu­tion to a weird join-the-dots, as I watch stu­dents who know The Shin­ing as a clas­sic hor­ror film grok sud­den­ly that the same direc­tor made the head­trip 2001: A Space Odyssey. And what’s this Bar­ry Lyn­don film? And this Spar­ta­cus that looks like it’s from a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent time? It can baf­fle a young cineaste, and it baf­fles them in a dif­fer­ent way, I sup­pose, than how Kubrick baf­fled his con­tem­po­raries from film to film. Yes, there’s more of my stu­dents who have seen Dr. Strange than Dr. Strangelove, but the joy of dis­cov­ery is still there, as is the thrill of being in a spe­cial fan club when you do dis­cov­er Kubrick.

For­tu­nate­ly, we are also hav­ing a renais­sance in film cri­tique in the medi­um of video, as fol­low­ers of this site know. Along with Tony Zhou and Evan Puschak, Lewis Bond (aka Chan­nel Criswell) has cre­at­ed some of the most in depth video essays on YouTube. Hav­ing authored overviews of the work of Hayao Miyaza­ki, Yasu­jiro Ozu, Andrei Tarkovsky, Lars von Tri­er, and David Lynch, Bond offers an excel­lent intro­duc­tion above to Kubrick’s oeu­vre.

Not con­tent to use his knowl­edge of Kubrick’s films, Bond vis­it­ed the Kubrick archives in Lon­don, learn­ing first­hand the metic­u­lous way the direc­tor cre­at­ed a film.

“His work eth­ic bor­dered on the obsessed,” he says. “This expe­ri­ence was how I imag­ined it is to see a great painter’s brush­es. It was a way to gain a brief glimpse into the mind of a mas­ter at work.”

Bond makes the case that Kubrick’s atten­tion to detail through all stages of pro­duc­tion, includ­ing edit­ing, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and even attend­ing screen­ings and check­ing the qual­i­ty of the prints, is exact­ly what makes him one of the best direc­tors. Every choice seen in the films, all the way down to the small­est prop, has Kubrick’s DNA on it. It’s no won­der that peo­ple pore over every frame of The Shin­ing, read­ing into it all sorts of mean­ing.

“He changed the way visu­al sto­ries were told,” says Bond, where Kubrick­’s mise en scene and com­po­si­tion both deliv­er the essen­tial nar­ra­tive and the sym­bol­ism under­neath.

Kubrick could only have reached these heights with the com­plete cre­ative con­trol his fame afford­ed him from the 1960s onward. There was time to plan, time and mon­ey to shoot, and time to edit, some­thing directors–before or since–rarely get. And not all direc­tors have the dis­ci­pline to deliv­er when they get such free­dom.

There’s much more in Bond’s essay so check it out. Side note: Lewis Bond’s girl­friend Luiza Lopes (aka Art Regard) also cre­ates video essays on direc­tors like David Cro­nen­berg, Roman Polan­s­ki, and Ing­mar Bergman. Could this be the first ‘celebri­ty cou­ple’ of the video essay era?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Buster Keaton: The Won­der­ful Gags of the Found­ing Father of Visu­al Com­e­dy

The Film­mak­ing Craft of David Finch­er Demys­ti­fied in Two Video Essays

The Geo­met­ric Beau­ty of Aki­ra Kuro­sawa and Wes Anderson’s Films

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts who cur­rent­ly hosts the FunkZone Pod­cast. You can also fol­low him on Twit­ter at @tedmills, read his oth­er arts writ­ing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.

When Ursula K. Le Guin & Philip K. Dick Went to High School Together

pkd-uklg-high-school

Cre­ative com­mons images are by Ras­mus Ler­dorf and Gor­thi­an , via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

When you run a site like this, you learn all kinds of unex­pect­ed things–most of it rich and reward­ing, some of it strange, triv­ial and still nonethe­less intrigu­ing. Dis­cov­er­ing that Adolf Hitler and Lud­wig Wittgen­stein went to the same Aus­tri­an mid­dle school, like­ly at the same time, fits into the lat­ter cat­e­go­ry. And so too does this:

pkd-uklg

On Twit­ter, jazz crit­ic Ted Gioia recent­ly high­light­ed a curi­ous pas­sage from Ursu­la K. Le Guin’s new book, where she men­tions attend­ing high school with anoth­er sem­i­nal fig­ure in sci-fi lit­er­a­ture, Philip K. Dick (Do Androids Dream of Elec­tric Sheep?Total Recall, Minor­i­ty Report, A Scan­ner Dark­ly etc.).

As she sep­a­rate­ly told The Paris Review, Berke­ley High had 5,300 kids dur­ing the 1940s. It was a big high school. And yet “Nobody knew Phil Dick. I have not found one per­son from Berke­ley High who knew him. He was the invis­i­ble class­mate.” Years lat­er, the two authors talked. But nev­er met. PKD always remained some­thing of a ghost.

via @TedGioia

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Ursu­la Le Guin Gives Insight­ful Writ­ing Advice in Her Free Online Work­shop

Hear Inven­tive Sto­ries from Ursu­la LeGuin & J.G. Bal­lard Turned Into CBC Radio Dra­mas

33 Sci-Fi Sto­ries by Philip K. Dick as Free Audio Books & Free eBooks

Hear 6 Clas­sic Philip K. Dick Sto­ries Adapt­ed as Vin­tage Radio Plays

Hear VALIS, an Opera Based on Philip K. Dick’s Meta­phys­i­cal Nov­el

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 5 ) |

Hear 20 Hours of Romantic & Victorian Poetry Read by Ralph Fiennes, Dylan Thomas, James Mason & Many More

john_keats_by_william_hilton

By the time William Wordsworth and Samuel Tay­lor Coleridge pub­lished their Lyri­cal Bal­lads in 1798, poets in Eng­land had long been celebri­ties and arbiters of taste in mat­ters polit­i­cal and lit­er­ary. The sev­en­teenth cen­tu­ry, for exam­ple, became known as the “Age of Dry­den,” for poet and lit­er­ary crit­ic John Dry­den’s tremen­dous influ­ence. John Mil­ton, Alexan­der Pope, Samuel John­son… these were lit­er­ary men whose writ­ing vied with the era’s philoso­phers and advised its nobil­i­ty and heads of state. By the Roman­tic peri­od of Wordsworth and Coleridge, no poet held such a posi­tion of author­i­ty and influ­ence as had those of the pre­vi­ous two cen­turies.

And yet, we might argue that poetry—and the exalt­ed fig­ure of the poet—became even more sacro­sanct and indis­pens­able to British cul­ture through­out the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry; that poets became, as Per­cy Shel­ley wrote in 1821, the “unac­knowl­edged leg­is­la­tors of the world.” Such a hyper­bol­ic state­ment may seem to con­flict with the aims Wordsworth stat­ed for Roman­tic poet­ry in the Lyri­cal Bal­lads’ pref­ace: “fit­ting to met­ri­cal arrange­ment a selec­tion of the real lan­guage of men in a state of vivid sen­sa­tion.” Yet when we think of Roman­tic poet­ry, we rarely think of the “real lan­guage of men.”

The nine­teenth cen­tu­ry saw the ascen­den­cy of the British Empire to its height dur­ing Victoria’s reign. Whether effect or cause of the hubris of the times, both Roman­tic and Vic­to­ri­an poetry—all the way to the end of Alfred Tennyson’s 12-cycle series Idylls of the King in 1885—gave us myth­i­cal epics filled with grandeur of expres­sion and image, and no small amount of bom­bast. Coleridge’s The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (from the Lyri­cal Bal­lads) and strange “Kubla Khan” showed the way. Keats tells an out­sized tale of the Titans’ fall from Olym­pus in Hype­r­i­on. Shel­ley gave us the bleak impe­r­i­al relics of “Ozy­man­dias.”

There were also, of course, the qui­et love and nature poems of Wordsworth, Keats, John Clare, and Wal­ter De La Mare, all won­der­ful­ly rep­re­sen­ta­tive of a Roman­tic pas­toral tra­di­tion reflect­ing a nos­tal­gia for a rapid­ly trans­form­ing Eng­lish coun­try­side. There were the Ori­en­tal­ist poems of exot­ic won­der, and hero­ic poems of mil­i­tary val­or and rev­o­lu­tion. The lat­er nine­teenth cen­tu­ry revealed even more vari­ety as these strains yield­ed to greater spe­cial­iza­tion, and to expand­ed roles for women poets.

Kipling’s colo­nial­ist vers­es reas­sured British sub­jects of their supe­ri­or sta­tus in the scheme of things, and enter­tained them with fables and moral­i­ty plays. Oscar Wilde refined the aes­theti­cism of Keats with a deca­dent eroti­cism. Broth­er and sis­ter Dante Gabriel Ros­set­ti and Christi­na Ros­set­ti took the Roman­tics’ anti­quar­i­an­ism into the ter­ri­to­ry of medieval and Goth­ic revival. Hus­band and wife Robert and Eliz­a­beth Bar­rett Brown­ing looked also to the Mid­dle Ages, and to Italy. Swin­burne and Ten­nyson upheld the tra­di­tion of the epic, imbu­ing it with their own strange pre­oc­cu­pa­tions. Ger­ard Man­ley Hop­kins did things with lan­guage nev­er attempt­ed before.

All of these poets appear in the Spo­ti­fy playlists here, titled “The Roman­tics” and “The Vic­to­ri­ans,” though you’ll notice that these aren’t mutu­al­ly exclu­sive cat­e­gories. Eliz­a­beth Bar­rett Brown­ing appears in both lists. Ten­nyson, per­haps the longest-lived and most famous poet of the age, spans almost the entire cen­tu­ry.  Keats, whose ear­ly trag­ic death con­tributed to his rock star sta­tus with lat­er read­ers, died most assured­ly a Roman­tic. But the terms hard­ly tell us very much by them­selves, mark­ing con­ven­tion­al ways of divid­ing up the lit­er­a­ture of the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry.

What we might notice about the Eng­lish verse of these two peri­ods on the whole is its ten­den­cy toward exag­ger­at­ed, often florid and over­ly for­mal dic­tion and syn­tax, and its sen­ti­men­tal­ism, high seri­ous­ness, and deco­rum. These are qual­i­ties we often learn to asso­ciate with all poet­ry, or learn to think of as insin­cere and pre­ten­tious.  In the near­ly 20 hours of skilled read­ings here—including some by famous names like James Mason, Dylan Thomas, John Giel­gud, Sir Ralph Richard­son, Boris Karloff, and Ralph Fiennes—we hear a great deal of nuance, sub­tle­ty, irony, and beau­ty. Learn­ing to appre­ci­ate the poet­ic voic­es of over a cen­tu­ry past not only requires famil­iar­i­ty with unusu­al idioms and ideas; it also requires tun­ing our ears to very dif­fer­ent kinds of Eng­lish than our own.

Both playlists will be added to our col­lec­tion, 1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Stream Clas­sic Poet­ry Read­ings from Harvard’s Rich Audio Archive: From W.H. Auden to Dylan Thomas

Library of Con­gress Launch­es New Online Poet­ry Archive, Fea­tur­ing 75 Years of Clas­sic Poet­ry Read­ings

Rare 1930s Audio: W.B. Yeats Reads Four of His Poems

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Man Ray Creates a “Surrealist Chessboard,” Featuring Portraits of Surrealist Icons: Dalí, Breton, Picasso, Magritte, Miró & Others (1934)

surrealist-chess-board-1

Like most artists, Emmanuel Rad­nitzky had more than one major inter­est in his life. We who know him as Man Ray usu­al­ly first encounter him through his pho­tog­ra­phy, such as the artist and writer por­traits fea­tured here at Open Cul­ture last year. But Man Ray him­self ulti­mate­ly con­sid­ered paint­ing his main cre­ative field. And, apart from his work, he had chess–or at least his friend and fel­low con­cep­tu­al artist Mar­cel Duchamp had chess. Duchamp seems to have turned Man Ray on to it as well, and they even appear play­ing togeth­er in Rene Clair’s 1924 film Entr’acte.

Ducham­p’s pas­sion for chess ran deep enough that, for a time, he all but aban­doned art to devote him­self to the game. Lat­er he came to the real­iza­tion that “chess was art; art was chess,” hav­ing pur­sued both of those inter­ests at once in the cre­ation of an art deco chess­board. Man Ray, for his part, brought art and chess togeth­er in 1934’s Sur­re­al­ist Chess­board, a mosa­ic of his por­traits of artists asso­ci­at­ed with the Sur­re­al­ist move­ment, includ­ing Sal­vador Dalí, Andre Bre­ton, Pablo Picas­so, René Magritte, Joan Miró, and of course him­self — but with the chess-lov­ing Duchamp nowhere to be seen.

“Sur­re­al­ist exhi­bi­tion group pho­tographs include the fre­quent par­tic­i­pa­tion of Man Ray but rarely Duchamp,” writes Lewis Kachur in aka Mar­cel Duchamp: Med­i­ta­tions on the Iden­ti­ties of an Artist, his non-appear­ance on the Sur­re­al­ist Chess­board being the “most aston­ish­ing” exam­ple. “The struc­ture is the demo­c­ra­t­ic grid for­mat of the chess­board, with each of twen­ty sur­re­al­ists or fel­low trav­el­ers as a head shot against a black or light-col­ored back­ground, alter­nat­ing to sug­gest the black and white squares of the board. Man Ray had a neg­a­tive of an appro­pri­ate pro­file bust of Duchamp (1930), strik­ing for its absence here.”

Kachur imag­ines that Duchamp “chose not to take part,” in keep­ing with his “some­what shad­owy” posi­tion in rela­tion to the Sur­re­al­ists, “on the mar­gins of the move­ment group’s iden­ti­ty.” Or he may sim­ply have want­ed to save his friend the trou­ble of fig­ur­ing out a shape in which to arrange 21 por­traits instead of 20. What­ev­er Duchamp thought of this project that used the chess­board only as visu­al struc­ture, he prob­a­bly pre­ferred the chess set Man Ray designed a decade ear­li­er using his­tor­i­cal­ly inspired pure geo­met­ric forms — and one that he could actu­al­ly play chess with. You can still pur­chase own copy of that chess set today.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Man Ray Designs a Supreme­ly Ele­gant, Geo­met­ric Chess Set in 1920 (and It’s Now Re-Issued for the Rest of Us)

Man Ray’s Por­traits of Ernest Hem­ing­way, Ezra Pound, Mar­cel Duchamp & Many Oth­er 1920s Icons

Man Ray and the Ciné­ma Pur: Four Sur­re­al­ist Films From the 1920s

Watch Dreams That Mon­ey Can Buy, a Sur­re­al­ist Film by Man Ray, Mar­cel Duchamp, Alexan­der Calder, Fer­nand Léger & Hans Richter

Mar­cel Duchamp, Chess Enthu­si­ast, Cre­at­ed an Art Deco Chess Set That’s Now Avail­able via 3D Print­er

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

The Psychology That Leads People to Vote for Extremists & Autocrats: The Theory of Cognitive Closure

There’s a polit­i­cal dis­con­nect in the Unit­ed States. We have two polit­i­cal par­ties, each now liv­ing in its own real­i­ty and work­ing with its own set of facts. The com­mon ground between them? Next to none.

How to explain this dis­con­nect? Maybe the answer lies in the the­o­ry of “cog­ni­tive closure”–a the­o­ry first worked out by social psy­chol­o­gist Arie Kruglan­s­ki back in 1989.

“Peo­ple’s pol­i­tics are dri­ven by their psy­cho­log­i­cal needs,” Kruglan­s­ki explains in the short doc­u­men­tary above. “Peo­ple who are anx­ious because of the uncer­tain­ty that sur­rounds them are going to be attract­ed to mes­sages that offer cer­tain­ty.”

He sips a soda, then con­tin­ues, “The need for clo­sure is the need for cer­tain­ty, to have clear cut knowl­edge. You feel that you need to stop pro­cess­ing too much infor­ma­tion, to stop lis­ten­ing to a vari­ety of view­points, and zero in on what appears to be, to you, the truth.” “The need for clo­sure tricks your mind to believe you have the truth, even though you haven’t exam­ined the evi­dence very care­ful­ly.” And that, unfor­tu­nate­ly, can be very dan­ger­ous.

Kruglan­ski’s the­o­ry could help explain the rise of Nazism in the eco­nom­i­cal­ly-depressed Weimar Ger­many. And it’s per­haps why, across much of our eco­nom­i­cal­ly stag­nat­ing world, we’re see­ing pop­u­la­tions lurch toward extreme ide­olo­gies and auto­crat­ic per­son­al­i­ties. “The divi­sions, the polar­iza­tion, it’s all part of the same psy­cho­log­i­cal syn­drome,” says Kruglan­s­ki.

So what’s the cure? Lis­ten to oth­er points of view. Look at all avail­able infor­ma­tion. And, most of all, be sus­pi­cious of your own sense of right­eous.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Online Psy­chol­o­gy & Neu­ro­science Cours­es

The Pow­er of Con­for­mi­ty: 1962 Episode of Can­did Cam­er­aRe­veals the Strange Psy­chol­o­gy of Rid­ing Ele­va­tors

Free Online Polit­i­cal Sci­ence Cours­es

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 9 ) |


  • Great Lectures

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast
    Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.