Search Results for "college"

James Joyce: An Animated Introduction to His Life and Literary Works

So maybe you didn’t take a class on James Joyce’s Ulysses in col­lege with a wiz­ened pro­fes­sor from Dublin who explained in excru­ci­at­ing detail, week after week, why the famed mod­ernist writer is the great­est nov­el­ist that ever lived and also some kind of sec­u­lar sage and con­duit of the col­lec­tive genius of human­i­ty. Maybe your encounter with Joyce began and end­ed with a few sto­ries from Dublin­ers or with the thin­ly veiled mem­oir, A Por­trait of an Artist as a Young Man. In that case, you may won­der why he inspires such cult-like devo­tion, even to the point of hav­ing his own hol­i­day, Blooms­day, in which, Jonathan Gold­man writes, “aca­d­e­mics and pro­fes­sion­als min­gle with obses­sives and cranks”—many of either camp-dressed in peri­od garb, quot­ing Ulysses from mem­o­ry, and re-enact­ing major scenes from the nov­el.

If you don’t know Joyce at all, or haven’t read Ulysses, there’s no time like the present to dis­cov­er why you should. In his short School of Life ani­mat­ed video above, Alain de Bot­ton lays out just a few of the rea­sons for the Joyce-wor­ship, includ­ing the writer’s “devo­tion to some cru­cial themes” like “the idea of the grandeur of ordi­nary life” and “his deter­mi­na­tion to por­tray what actu­al­ly goes on through our heads moment by moment, what we now know, part­ly thanks to him, as the ‘stream-of-con­scious­ness.’” That phrase did not orig­i­nate with Joyce, how­ev­er, but with William James in the 1890s and his descrip­tion of the col­lec­tive char­ac­ter­is­tics of “per­son­al con­scious­ness.”

But since Joyce’s lit­er­ary use of inte­ri­or mono­logues that mim­ic the ran­dom asso­ci­a­tions of thought, we use “stream-of-con­scious­ness” to mean “the pre­sen­ta­tion of thoughts and sense impres­sions in a life­like fash­ion.” The “life­like­ness” of Joyce’s approach explains its appeal to so broad a range of read­ers, and its influ­ence upon so many writ­ers. Ulysses may prin­ci­pal­ly be a nov­el about Dublin, as are all of Joyce’s books, but it also retells the epic sto­ry of the Odyssey, a “pin­na­cle of high cul­ture,” Bot­ton pro­nounces, through the worka­day mean­der­ings, rou­tines, and dis­trac­tions of ordi­nary, undis­tin­guished peo­ple.

Ancient lit­er­a­ture like Homer gives us great men of action—archetypes ruled by fate—and the Vic­to­ri­an nov­el Joyce replaced offers extremes of aris­toc­ra­cy and des­ti­tu­tion. In Ulysses, shop­keep­ers, bar­tenders, seam­stress­es, stu­dents, and adver­tis­ing men become three-dimen­sion­al, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly real actors in a his­tor­i­cal dra­ma, sim­ply by being who they are. Ulysses’ pro­tag­o­nist, Leopold Bloom, is “very unlike a tra­di­tion­al hero, but he is rep­re­sen­ta­tive of our aver­age, unim­pres­sive, frag­ile, but still rather like­able every­day selves.”

The novel’s cat­a­logue of Bloom’s thoughts and actions over the course of an unex­cep­tion­al day com­mu­ni­cate to us that “the appar­ent­ly lit­tle things that hap­pen in dai­ly life… aren’t real­ly lit­tle things at all. If we look at them through the right lens, they are revealed as beau­ti­ful, seri­ous, deep and fas­ci­nat­ing. Our own lives are just as fas­ci­nat­ing as those of the tra­di­tion­al heroes.” We must also note, how­ev­er, that Ulysses makes huge demands on its read­er. As one ear­ly review­er of the nov­el wrote, “few intu­itive, sen­si­tive vision­ar­ies may under­stand and com­pre­hend ‘Ulysses’… with­out going through a course of train­ing or instruc­tion.” Like Dante’s Divine Com­e­dy, which great­ly influ­enced Joyce, Ulysses is laden with local and his­tor­i­cal ref­er­ences, poet­ic allu­sions, and arcane philo­soph­i­cal and the­o­log­i­cal debates… one may need a Vir­gil to fin­ish the tour.

If we’re spec­u­lat­ing about Joyce’s inten­tions in giv­ing us ordi­nary char­ac­ters through extra­or­di­nary lit­er­ary means, they may have been less didac­tic than ped­a­gog­i­cal. Yes, we can see our ordi­nary selves—the shape and form of our “per­son­al consciousness”—looking back at us from Ulysses’ pages. To use a cur­rent buzz­word, Joyce was a “mas­ter of lit­er­ary mind­ful­ness.” We must become bet­ter, more patient and dili­gent read­ers to appre­ci­ate the epic scope of human inte­ri­or­i­ty in his best known nov­el. In that regard, Joyce teach­es us not only to think of our­selves as heroes, but also to move through our seem­ing­ly banal mod­ern envi­ron­ment with the same lev­el of curios­i­ty, excite­ment, and awe that moves us through the world of Odysseus. They are ulti­mate­ly, he sug­gests, the same world.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Very First Reviews of James Joyce’s Ulysses: “A Work of High Genius” (1922)

James Joyce’s Dublin Cap­tured in Vin­tage Pho­tos from 1897 to 1904

Carl Jung Writes a Review of Joyce’s Ulysses and Mails It To The Author (1932)

Free Online Lit­er­a­ture Cours­es

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

Malcolm Gladwell Asks Hard Questions about Money & Meritocracy in American Higher Education: Stream 3 Episodes of His New Podcast

gladwell education

Image by Kris Krüg, via Flickr Com­mons

Mal­colm Gladwell’s Revi­sion­ist His­to­ry pod­cast kicked off this sum­mer and in his very first episode, he took on the ques­tion of how women have bro­ken into male-dom­i­nat­ed fields, and the many rea­sons that so often hasn’t hap­pened. Hav­ing set this tone, Glad­well asks in a more recent inquiry—a three-part series span­ning Episodes 4 through 7—a sim­i­lar ques­tion about what we might call mer­i­toc­ra­cy in edu­ca­tion, a val­ue fun­da­men­tal to lib­er­al democ­ra­cy, how­ev­er that’s inter­pret­ed. As Glad­well puts it in “Car­los Doesn’t Remem­ber,” “This is what civ­i­lized soci­eties are sup­posed to do: to pro­vide oppor­tu­ni­ties for peo­ple to make the most of their abil­i­ty. So that if you’re born poor, you can move up. If you work hard, you can improve your life.”

Over some sen­ti­men­tal, home­spun orches­tra­tion, Glad­well points out that Amer­i­cans have told our­selves that this is our birthright, “that every kid can become pres­i­dent.” We have seen our­selves this way despite the fact that at the country’s ori­gin, high­er offices were sole­ly the prop­er­ty of prop­er­tied men, a small minor­i­ty even then. Lest we for­get, for all their good inten­tions, Ben Franklin’s Poor Richard’s Almanack and lat­er col­lec­tion, “The Way to Wealth,” were writ­ten as satires, “relent­less­ly scathing social and polit­i­cal com­men­tary,” writes Jill Lep­ore, that mock wish­ful think­ing and exag­ger­at­ed ambi­tion even as they offer help­ful hints for orga­nized, dili­gent liv­ing. Amer­i­cans, the more cyn­i­cal of us might think, have always believed impos­si­ble things, and the myth of mer­i­toc­ra­cy is one of them.

But Glad­well, skim­ming past the cul­tur­al his­to­ry, wants to gen­uine­ly ask the ques­tion, “is it true? Is the sys­tem geared to serve the poor smart kid, or the rich smart kid?” Apart from our beliefs and polit­i­cal ide­olo­gies, what can we real­ly say about what he calls, in eco­nom­ics terms, “the rate of cap­i­tal­iza­tion” in the U.S.? This num­ber, Glad­well explains, mea­sures “the per­cent­age of peo­ple in any group who are able to reach their poten­tial.” Bet­ter than “its GDP, or its growth rate, or its per-capi­ta income,” a society’s cap­i­tal­iza­tion rate, he says, allows us to judge “how suc­cess­ful and just” a coun­try is—and in the case of the U.S. in par­tic­u­lar, how much it lives up to its ideals.

The first episode in the series (Episode 4 of the pod­cast, stream it above) intro­duces us to Gladwell’s first sub­ject, Car­los, a very bright high school stu­dent in Los Ange­les, and Eric Eis­ner, a retired enter­tain­ment lawyer who devotes his time to scout­ing out tal­ent­ed kids from low income fam­i­lies and help­ing them get into pri­vate schools. Eis­ner did exact­ly that for Car­los, find­ing him a place in an upscale pri­vate Brent­wood school in the fifth grade. Ear­ly in Gladwell’s inter­view with Car­los, the ques­tion of what James Heck­man at Boston Review iden­ti­fies as the “non-cog­ni­tive char­ac­ter­is­tics” that inhib­it social suc­cess comes up. These are as often “phys­i­cal and men­tal health” and the soft skills of social inter­ac­tion as they are access to some­thing as seem­ing­ly mun­dane as a pair of ten­nis shoes that fit.

Car­los, a “real­ly, real­ly gift­ed kid,” Glad­well reit­er­ates, can­not make it into and through the com­pli­cat­ed social sys­tem of pri­vate school with­out Eis­ner, who bought him new ten­nis shoes, and who pro­vides oth­er mate­r­i­al and social forms of sup­port for the stu­dents he men­tors. Stu­dents like Car­los, Glad­well argues, need not only men­tors, but patrons in the mold of an ancient Roman patri­cian: “not just any advo­cate: a high-pow­ered guy with lots of con­nec­tions, who can get you in and watch over you.” The key to class mobil­i­ty, in oth­er words, lies with the arbi­trary noblesse oblige of those who have already made it, gen­er­al­ly with some con­sid­er­able advan­tages of their own. The remain­der of the episode explores the obvi­ous and non-obvi­ous prob­lems with this mod­ern-day patron­age sys­tem.

In “Food Fight,” the next part of the mini-series on “cap­i­tal­iza­tion,” Glad­well and his col­leagues open the door on the world of pres­ti­gious lib­er­al arts col­leges’ din­ing ser­vices, start­ing at Bow­doin Col­lege in Maine, a place where the food ser­vices are “in a whole dif­fer­ent class.” Bowdoin’s excel­lent food, Glad­well argues, rep­re­sents a “moral prob­lem.” To help us under­stand, he makes a direct com­par­i­son with Bowdoin’s elite com­peti­tor, Vas­sar Col­lege, whose stu­dent din­ing is more in line with what most of us expe­ri­enced at col­lege; in one student’s under­stat­ed phrase, there’s “room for improve­ment.” What the food com­par­i­son illus­trates is this: when many elite insti­tu­tions dou­bled their finan­cial aid bud­gets a decade or so ago to increase enroll­ment of low-income stu­dents, oth­er bud­get lines, so Vassar’s pres­i­dent claims, took such a hit that food, facil­i­ties, and oth­er ser­vices suf­fered.

Vassar’s cur­rent pres­i­dent trans­formed the stu­dent body from pri­mar­i­ly full-tuition-pay­ing stu­dents to pri­mar­i­ly stu­dents “who pay very lit­tle.” The egal­i­tar­i­an move means the col­lege must lean too heav­i­ly on its endow­ment and on the pay­ing stu­dents. Glad­well doesn’t delve into what we’ve also been hear­ing about for at least the last decade: as insti­tu­tions like Vas­sar accept and fund increas­ing num­bers of low-income stu­dents, oth­er schools charged legal­ly with pro­vid­ing for the pub­lic good, like the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia sys­tem, have raised tuition to lev­els unaf­ford­able to thou­sands of prospec­tive stu­dents.

Col­leges across the coun­try may have raised tuition rates to their cur­rent astro­nom­i­cal lev­els in part to bet­ter fund poor­er appli­cants, but they have also faced stiff crit­i­cism for spend­ing huge amounts on ath­let­ics, build­ing projects, and exor­bi­tant admin­is­tra­tive salaries. The food com­par­i­son presents us with an either/or sce­nario, but the moral prob­lem inhab­its a much gray­er real­i­ty than Glad­well acknowl­edges. Like­wise, in the sto­ry of Car­los, we come to under­stand why smart kids from poor neigh­bor­hoods face so many imped­i­ments once they arrive at elite insti­tu­tions. But we don’t hear about why so many poor kids fail to achieve at all due to what what Heck­man calls “the prin­ci­ple source of inequal­i­ty today”—children born into pover­ty begin life at a severe dis­ad­van­tage from the very start, lead­ing to social divi­sions of the “skilled and unskilled” even in ear­ly child­hood.

We do get a broad­er pic­ture in the final episode in the series, “My Lit­tle Hun­dred Mil­lions,” in which Glad­well looks into anoth­er moral prob­lem: In the sto­ry of Hen­ry Rowan, who in the ear­ly ‘90s donat­ed $100 mil­lion to a tiny uni­ver­si­ty in New Jer­sey, we see a stark con­trast to the way most phil­an­thropists oper­ate, almost as a rule mak­ing their gen­er­ous gifts to elite, already wealthy schools like Har­vard, Stan­ford, and Yale. This sys­tem of phil­an­thropy per­pet­u­ates inequal­i­ty in high­er edu­ca­tion and keeps elite insti­tu­tions elite, even as—in places like Vassar—it gives them the reserve cap­i­tal they need to fund low­er-income stu­dents. Like any com­plex insti­tu­tion­al sys­tem with a long, tan­gled his­to­ry of exclu­sion and priv­i­lege, high­er edu­ca­tion in the U.S. offers us a very good mod­el for study­ing inequal­i­ty.

To hear Glad­well’s full assess­ment of mer­i­toc­ra­cy or “cap­i­tal­iza­tion,” you’ll need to lis­ten to the full series as it builds on each exam­ple to make its larg­er point. Each episode’s web­page also includes links to ref­er­ence doc­u­ments and fea­tured books so that you can con­tin­ue the inves­ti­ga­tion on your own, cor­rect­ing for the podcast’s blind spots and bias­es. What Gladwell’s series does well, as do many of his pop soci­o­log­i­cal best­sellers, is give us con­crete exam­ples that run up against many of our abstract pre­con­cep­tions. It’s an inter­est­ing approach—structuring an extend­ed look at excep­tion­al­ism and its prob­lems around three excep­tion­al cas­es. But it is these cas­es, with all their com­pli­ca­tions and com­plex­i­ty, that often get lost in over-gen­er­al­ized dis­cus­sions about high­er edu­ca­tion and the myths and real­i­ties of social mobil­i­ty.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mal­colm Glad­well Has Launched a New Pod­cast, Revi­sion­ist His­to­ry: Hear the First Episode

Mal­colm Glad­well: Tax­es Were High and Life Was Just Fine

Mal­colm Glad­well: What We Can Learn from Spaghet­ti Sauce

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

The Philosophy of Bruce Lee Gets Explored in a New Podcast

BL_Podcast_website_banner_v1

Years ago, we fea­tured a won­der­ful clip show­ing Bruce Lee, only 24 years old, audi­tion­ing for a part in the 1960s TV show, “The Green Hor­net.” In the clip, Lee puts on a remark­able dis­play of his mar­tial arts skills, all while explain­ing the phi­los­o­phy that guides his moves. The actor, who stud­ied phi­los­o­phy in col­lege, looks at the cam­era and explains the rela­tion­ship between kung fu and a glass of water. He says: “water is the soft­est sub­stance in the world,… but yet it can pen­e­trate the hard­est rock or any­thing, gran­ite, you name it. So, every kung fu man is try­ing to do that,… to be soft like water, and flex­i­ble and adapt itself to the oppo­nent.”

That’s a good prompt to tell you about the brand new pod­cast that explores the phi­los­o­phy of Bruce Lee, who died in 1973. Launched by his daugh­ter Shan­non Lee, each episode promis­es to “dig deep into Bruce’s phi­los­o­phy to pro­vide guid­ance and action on cul­ti­vat­ing your truest self.” As the pod­cast moves along, it will help you find wis­dom in Lee’s pro­nounce­ments, like: “Emp­ty your mind, be form­less, shape­less like water. Now you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup, you put water into a bot­tle, it becomes the bot­tle, you put it in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.” By now, you’re start­ing to see, Lee had a thing for water.

You can get the pod­cast via iTunes and Stitch­er. Below, stream one of the first episodes that delves into his phi­los­o­phy.

Relat­ed Con­tent

Bruce Lee Audi­tions for The Green Hor­net (1964)

Watch 10-Year-Old Bruce Lee in His First Star­ring Role (1950)

Bruce Lee’s Only Sur­viv­ing TV Inter­view, 1971: Lost and Now Found

Kung Fu & Mar­tial Arts Movies Online

Read More...

Stream a Massive Collection of Indie, Noise Industrial Mixtapes from the 80s and 90s

Tapesplice

They’ll nev­er be worth as much as the alleged box of first edi­tion Super­man comics left in my father’s room when he shipped out to sea, alleged­ly giv­en to the dump by his moth­er, though she for­ev­er denied it; but those over­stuffed box­es full of cheap mix­tapes from the late 80s and 90s in my clos­et have to be worth some­thing, right? If only to the inter­net… the Inter­net Archive, a more spe­cif­ic place, and yes, it’s the one that hosts the Way­back Machine, pre­serv­er of web­pages no one updates or, real­ly, vis­its any­more.

But this is not a sad sto­ry about what hap­pened to Web 1.0! But a hap­py one about where your mix­tapes will go, because they are need­ed. Just as a recent gen­er­a­tion decid­ed to bypass the six­ties and go back to the sources of Hen­drix and CSNY so future hip­sters of today ignore oughties retreads and return to the world just before the inter­net. They go full anti­quar­i­an with it, with authen­tic peri­od cos­tumes and peri­od-era equip­ment, which means they often sound ter­ri­ble. They need cas­settes to get it right.

Psychomania

The cas­sette has already made its way back in a big way, rein­tro­duc­ing the sound of ear­ly syn­th­pop, indus­tri­al music, DIY indie rock, and a genre called “tape exper­i­men­ta­tion” that encom­pass­es any­thing from avant-garde musique con­crète to the lat­est pro­duc­tion of spliced togeth­er cas­sette tape. The sound of decay­ing tape—a soup of hiss and muf­fled, warped, out-of-tune copies of songs—birthed dark, sludgy met­al and per­fect­ly cap­tured the sound­tracks of hor­ror movies. And, imper­fect­ly, the sound of every­thing else. These were “the days when the audio cas­sette was the stan­dard method of music shar­ing… gen­er­al­ly the mid-eight­ies through ear­ly-nineties,” points out The Noise-Arch Archive, which hosts just such a col­lec­tion, on just such a (dig­i­tized) medi­um. 30 gigs of tape hiss.

One needs a reli­able guide like, say, Tom Waits, to under­stand how weird depres­sion-era music was. This archive makes sig­nif­i­cant head­way in con­vey­ing the same infor­ma­tion about the Bush (the first) and Clin­ton (the first) years. One need only lis­ten to Church of the Tapes­lice / Time­s­plice at the top, as much as that’s pos­si­ble, to get a fla­vor of how. It’s a mélange of Frank Zap­pa-like sound col­lage, Res­i­dents-like sar­don­ic absur­di­ty, Devo-like black humor, and free-form-the-DJ-is-real­ly-stoned-lev­el goofi­ness you’ve heard at least once late night on your col­lege radio sta­tion. But they aren’t all this off-putting, and they aren’t all this approach­able either.

EPSON scanner image

Psy­cho­ma­nia, fur­ther up, lives up to its name. It opens inno­cent­ly enough, with some sort of non­de­script­ly trib­al dit­ty, lilt­ing, if unset­tling. Then the mix shifts into full gial­lo mode, the loud, pun­ish­ing synths and descend­ing har­monies of doom that com­prise the scores of “Spaghet­ti Slash­ers.” Expect the obscure of the obscure in every tape in this col­lec­tion. “Much of this mate­r­i­al defies cat­e­go­ry,” Noise-Arch advis­es, “and has there­fore not been giv­en one.” Much of it sounds like some­thing you might rec­og­nize, only a few uncan­ny removes from your point of ref­er­ence.

The col­lec­tion above—its bare­ly leg­i­ble cov­er describes a com­pi­la­tion from “Fetus Pro­duc­tions” in Australia—opens with some real­ly off-kil­ter elec­tro-lounge music and pro­gress­es into a full-on syn­th­pop opera. None of this music, obvi­ous­ly, should be missed. Nor the music stored in impor­tant archives cur­rent­ly occu­py­ing my clos­et. I’ll nev­er sell it. Because who wants a bunch of worn-out crap­py plas­tic tapes? It’s what’s on them that we need to pre­serve. Even the hard-to-love slack­er non­sense of I Was a Teenage Com­mu­nist (The Secret Con­fes­sions of Oliv­er North).  Enter The Noise-Arch Archive here.

Teenage Ollie North

via Elec­tron­ic Beats

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hear the Great Mix­tapes Richard Lin­klater Cre­at­ed to Psych Up the Actors in Dazed and Con­fused and Every­body Wants Some!!

Atten­tion K‑Mart Shop­pers: Hear 90 Hours of Back­ground Music & Ads from the Retail Giant’s 1980s and 90s Hey­day

A Mas­sive 800-Track Playlist of 90s Indie & Alter­na­tive Music, in Chrono­log­i­cal Order

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

The Digital Transgender Archive Features Books, Magazines & Photos Telling the History of Transgender Culture

draq q combo

Trans­gen­der issues have entered the pub­lic con­ver­sa­tion in a big way. To those with­out much direct con­nec­tion to them, they might all seem to have come up sud­den­ly, with lit­tle prece­dent, with­in the past few years. But most phe­nom­e­na that seem to have achieved instant promi­nence have a rich, if long-hid­den, his­to­ry behind them. In this case, you can now dis­cov­er a great deal of the his­to­ry at the new Dig­i­tal Trans­gen­der Archive, an “inter­na­tion­al col­lab­o­ra­tion among more than twen­ty col­leges, uni­ver­si­ties, non­prof­it orga­ni­za­tions, and pri­vate col­lec­tions” aim­ing to cre­ate “a gen­er­a­tive point of entry into the fas­ci­nat­ing and expan­sive world of trans his­to­ry.”

OC Transgender Archive 2

Hyper­al­ler­gic’s Claire Voon has more on the site’s ori­gins, includ­ing words from the pro­jec­t’s leader, Col­lege of the Holy Cross Eng­lish pro­fes­sor K.J Raw­son. Its impe­tus came from the prob­lem that “a lot of trans-relat­ed mate­ri­als were held in dis­si­pat­ed col­lec­tions, and it wasn’t real­ly clear who had what, why they had it, how it relat­ed to oth­er col­lec­tions, and how it was acces­si­ble to researchers.” The Dig­i­tal Trans­gen­der Archive replaces some of the unnec­es­sary ardu­ous­ness under which those researchers used to labor, pro­vid­ing them with a sim­ple search box or, an abil­i­ty to browse by col­lec­tioninsti­tu­tiongeo­graph­ic loca­tion, genre, or top­ic.

OC Transgender Archive 3

Ranked by the num­ber of the items in the archive, that top­ic list gives a vivid overview of the sorts of social prac­tices and cat­e­gories best rep­re­sent­ed there: cross­dressers and cross­dress­ing rank first and sec­ond, respec­tive­ly, fol­lowed by the rest of a top-twen­ty, includ­ing drag queens, pho­tog­ra­phy, activists, and actors.

OC Transgender Archive 1

Giv­en the impor­tance of the visu­al to trans­gen­der cul­ture, it should come as no sur­prise that the Dig­i­tal Trans­gen­der Archive’s grow­ing col­lec­tion of doc­u­ments, pho­tographs, peri­od­i­cals, and “ephemera,” orga­nized all togeth­er for the first time, offers plen­ty of strik­ing mate­r­i­al to look at — as well as to intro­duce the his­to­ry of a world about which few could open­ly com­mu­ni­cate before now.

via Hyper­al­ler­gic

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Judy!: 1993 Judith But­ler Fanzine Gives Us An Irrev­er­ent Punk-Rock Take on the Post-Struc­tural­ist Gen­der The­o­rist

Down­load 834 Rad­i­cal Zines From a Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Online Archive: Glob­al­iza­tion, Punk Music, the Indus­tri­al Prison Com­plex & More

Allen Gins­berg Talks About Com­ing Out to His Fam­i­ly & Fel­low Poets on 1978 Radio Show (NSFW)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Read More...

Watch “Traffic Stop,” an Emmy-Nominated, Animated Film About a Traffic Stop Gone Horribly Wrong

As the Black Lives Mat­ter move­ment has come to occu­py a greater swath of America’s atten­tion span, a con­ver­sa­tion has arisen around the pit­falls of ally­ship, a term that lends itself to dis­cus­sions of gen­der and dis­abil­i­ty, as well as race.

Sim­ply put, the self-pro­claimed allies are mem­bers of a more priv­i­leged major­i­ty, eager to lend sup­port through word and deed.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, their enthu­si­asm often turns them into micro­phone hogs in what activist Princess Har­mo­ny Rodriguez has referred to as “ally the­ater.”

A num­ber of would-be allies con­fuse humil­i­ty with the seek­ing of brown­ie points. If they real­ly got it, those at the cen­ter of the move­ment say, they would not expect mem­bers of the minor­i­ty to rearrange their to-do lists to bring them up to speed on what it’s like to be a per­son of col­or (or a trans­gen­dered per­son or a dis­abled per­son).

Would-be allies are there­fore advised to step out of the spot­light, stuff a sock in it, and edu­cate them­selves, by work­ing to find exist­ing essays and nar­ra­tives, authored by those with whom they would be in sol­i­dar­i­ty.

Human nature ensures that tem­pers will flare and hurt feel­ings will be aired. The hor­ri­fy­ing social ill that gave rise to the movement—the shoot­ing of unarmed black men by those charged with pro­tect­ing the whole of the public—is elbowed off­stage, so that a phe­nom­e­non such as ally­ship can be the num­ber one top­ic of debate on col­lege cam­pus­es, web­sites, and social media.

“Traf­fic Stop,” above, pro­vides a rare moment of racial accord, stem­ming from yet anoth­er ghast­ly tale of police bru­tal­i­ty.

The short ani­ma­tion was born of a con­ver­sa­tion record­ed by Alex Lan­dau and Pat­sy Hath­away in a Sto­ryCorps booth, a mas­sive oral his­to­ry project designed to attract a wide diver­si­ty of par­tic­i­pants.

Lan­dau is African-Amer­i­can.

His adop­tive moth­er, Hath­away, is white.

Those who would clas­si­fy adopt­ing a child of anoth­er race as “ally­ship” must con­cede that, if so, it is cer­tain­ly of no casu­al stripe.

The events of Jan­u­ary 15, 2009, when Den­ver police stopped the 19-year-old Lan­dau and a white friend for mak­ing an ille­gal left turn, caused Hath­away to rethink the col­or­blind world­view she had espoused while rais­ing her son.

“I thought that love would con­quer all and skin col­or real­ly did­n’t mat­ter,” Hath­away tells Lan­dau. “I had to learn the real­ly hard way when they almost killed you.”

Had the attack hap­pened a few years lat­er, Landau’s friend might have man­aged to doc­u­ment the pro­ceed­ings with a cell phone, despite the hand­cuffs that were placed on him after a bag of mar­i­jua­na was found in his pock­et.

Instead, this ani­ma­tion, and the gris­ly graph­ic pho­to that fol­lows of Landau’s face pri­or to receiv­ing 45 stitch­es, will have to suf­fice. His rec­ol­lec­tion of the laugh­ter and racial epi­thets direct­ed his way as he lay bleed­ing on the ground are stom­ach-churn­ers, too.

Like his moth­er, Landau’s child­hood per­cep­tion of an all-inclu­sive, benev­o­lent world was shat­tered. They mourned it togeth­er when they were reunit­ed in the emer­gency room on the night of the ill-fat­ed traf­fic stop.

Look and lis­ten.

Then, if you are ready to wade into thornier ter­ri­to­ry, read the hun­dreds of com­ments view­ers have post­ed on youtube.

Ulti­mate­ly, the City of Den­ver award­ed Lan­dau a $795,000 set­tle­ment, while the Den­ver Police Depart­ment, cit­ing a lack of evi­dence, cleared all three offi­cers of mis­con­duct. Fol­low up arti­cles from 2011 and 2013 are avail­able here and here.

Traf­fic Stop was ani­mat­ed by  Gina Kamentsky & Julie Zam­marchi (read an inter­view with them here). It was recent­ly nom­i­nat­ed for an Emmy award last week.

via West­word

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Read Online Key Doc­u­ments from the Fer­gu­son Grand Jury: Wit­ness Tes­ti­mo­ny, Foren­sic Evi­dence & More

‘Tired of Giv­ing In’: The Arrest Report, Mug Shot and Fin­ger­prints of Rosa Parks (Decem­ber 1, 1955)

Pep­per Spray­ing Peace­ful Pro­tes­tors Con­tin­ues; This Time at UC Davis

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

Read More...

What Are the Most Stolen Books? Bookstore Lists Feature Works by Murakami, Bukowski, Burroughs, Vonnegut, Kerouac & Palahniuk

most-stolen-books

In 1971, Abbie Hoff­man pub­lished his coun­ter­cul­tur­al how-to/”hip Boy Scout hand­book,” Steal This Book. Since then, mil­lions of peo­ple have queued up to pay for it. Did they mis­read the very clear instruc­tion in the title? Or did most of Hoffman’s read­ers think of it as anoth­er Yip­pie hoax, not to be tak­en any more seri­ous­ly than Piga­sus, the 145-pound pig Hoff­man and his mer­ry band of pranksters nom­i­nat­ed for pres­i­dent in 1968? Seems to me Hoff­man was dead seri­ous about the pig, and about his call for shoplift­ing, or “inven­to­ry shrink.”

Nev­er­the­less, mil­lions of peo­ple have need­ed no unam­bigu­ous prod­ding from the Andy Kauf­man of polit­i­cal the­ater to steal mil­lions of oth­er books from shops world­wide, to the detri­ment of pub­lish­ers and book­sellers and the edi­fi­ca­tion of penu­ri­ous read­ers. The books most stolen from book­stores hap­pen to also be those that might best appeal to the kind of rad­i­cal anar­cho-hip­pies Hoff­man addressed, includ­ing Jack Kerouac’s On the Road and any­thing by Bukows­ki and Bur­roughs.

Also high on the list is Haru­ki Murakami’s The Wind-Up Bird Chron­i­cle, not a nov­el we nec­es­sar­i­ly asso­ciate with dump­ster-divers and box­car-hop­pers, but one of many Murakamis book thieves have tak­en to lift­ing nonethe­less. Kurt Von­negut ranks high­ly, includ­ing his very pop­u­lar Cat’s Cra­dle and Break­fast of Cham­pi­ons. Oth­er favorite authors include hyper-mas­cu­line seers of soci­etal deca­dence, Chuck Palah­niuk and Brett Eas­t­on Ellis.

How do we know this? One source is sim­ply an image, above, tweet­ed out by Vintage/Anchor Books—a pho­to of a “Most Stolen Books” shelf at an unnamed book­store. We might assume whichev­er store it is has all the evi­dence it needs from a con­sis­tent­ly shrink­ing inven­to­ry of these titles. And anoth­er major book­store con­firms much of the anony­mous shelf above.

Melis­sa MacAulay at The Edit­ing Com­pa­ny blog writes that dur­ing a part-time gig at Cana­di­an giant Indi­go books, Palahniuk’s Fight Club end­ed up behind the counter. Read­ers look­ing for a copy instead found “a small sign direct­ing you to ‘please ask for assis­tance.’” In addi­tion to Palah­niuk, Indigo’s big three most stolen authors are Muraka­mi, Kurt Von­negut, and Bukows­ki, who tops out as the “reign­ing king of ‘Shoplift Lit.’”

In yet anoth­er “Most Stolen” list, blog­ger Can­dice Huber—inspired by Markus Zusak’s 2013 nov­el The Book Thiefunder­took her own infor­mal research and came up with sim­i­lar results, with Bukows­ki and Bur­roughs in the top spot and Ker­ouac at num­ber two. “All of the books list­ed,” notes Kot­tke, “are by men and most by ‘man­ly’ men” (what­ev­er that means). See her list, with com­men­tary, below.

Any­thing by Charles Bukows­ki or William S. Bur­roughs. Book sell­ers tend to keep books by these authors behind the counter because they get swiped so often.

On the Road by Jack Ker­ouac. If you notice a theme here, Bukows­ki, Bur­roughs, and Ker­ouac books all share, shall I put it blunt­ly, con­tent of sex and drugs. It seems that those most like­ly to com­mit a reck­less act (steal­ing) are also inter­est­ed in read­ing about reck­less acts.

Graph­ic Nov­els. The major­i­ty of book thieves are young, white males, and this is what they read.

The Great Gats­by by F. Scott Fitzger­ald. Which was actu­al­ly one of the most com­mon­ly stolen books long before the movie came out.

Var­i­ous Selec­tions from Ernest Hem­ing­way, includ­ing A Move­able Feast and The Sun Also Ris­es.

Naked and Me Talk Pret­ty One Day by David Sedaris. David Sedaris? Real­ly?

The New York Tril­o­gy by Paul Auster. I wouldn’t have thought this was the stuff of the five-fin­ger dis­count.

Steal this Book did not crack the top sev­en, though it did receive hon­or­able men­tion, along with Hunter S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Jef­frey Eugenides’ The Vir­gin Sui­cides, Paulo Coelho’s The Alchemist, and “any­thing by Mar­tin Amis.” Hav­ing been a poor col­lege stu­dent myself once (not that I lift­ed my books!), and hav­ing taught many a cash-strapped under­grad, I’d assume a good num­ber of the miss­ing Fitzger­alds and Hem­ing­ways left book­stores in the hands of thieves bear­ing syl­labi.

A 2009 Guardian list gives us an entire­ly dif­fer­ent image of British book thieves with a pen­chant for box­er Lenny McLean’s mem­oirs, Yolan­da Celbridge’s “mod­ern S&M clas­sic” The Tam­ing of Tru­di, com­ic books Tintin and Aster­ix, Banksy’s cof­fee table book Wall and Piece, and Har­ry Pot­ter. Hoff­man comes in at num­ber six.

When it comes to books stolen from libraries, on the oth­er hand, Huber points out this dynam­ic: “library theft leans more toward the prac­ti­cal than the pop­u­lar, where­as book­store theft leans toward the pop­u­lar.” The top sev­en here include expen­sive art books, The Bible, The Guin­ness Book of World Records, textbooks/reference books/exam prep books, and, nat­u­ral­ly, books on uni­ver­si­ty read­ing lists. Also, Sports Illus­trat­ed Swim­suit Edi­tion and “oth­er racy books/magazines”—many stolen, per­haps, to avoid the embar­rass­ment of pry­ing librar­i­an eyes.

We do not assume that you, dear upstand­ing read­er, have ever stolen a book, or any­thing else. And yet, did you find any­thing on these lists sur­pris­ing? (I thought Hen­ry Miller might make the cut.…) What books would you expect to see stolen often that didn’t appear? What about a list of “most bor­rowed” (and maybe nev­er returned) books from friends/acquaintances/family/roommates? Let us know your thoughts below.

via Vintage/Anchor/Kot­tke

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The 20 Most Influ­en­tial Aca­d­e­m­ic Books of All Time: No Spoil­ers

28 Impor­tant Philoso­phers List the Books That Influ­enced Them Most Dur­ing Their Col­lege Days

The 10 Great­est Books Ever, Accord­ing to 125 Top Authors (Down­load Them for Free)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

Walt Whitman Gives Advice to Aspiring Young Writers: “Don’t Write Poetry” & Other Practical Tips (1888)

whitman advice

Some of the best, most suc­cinct writ­ing advice I ever received came from the great John McPhee, via one of his for­mer stu­dents: “Writ­ing is pay­ing atten­tion.” What do you see, hear, taste, etc.? Ques­tions of style, syn­tax, and punc­tu­a­tion come lat­er. Obsess over them before you’ve learned to pay atten­tion, and you’ll have noth­ing of inter­est to write about. And in order to notice what you’re notic­ing, you’ve got to record it; so keep a note­book with you at all times to jot down over­heard expres­sions, thrilling sights and insights, dra­mat­ic chance encoun­ters… hoard­ing mate­r­i­al, all the time.

Amongst the tidal wave of advice you’ll encounter when you first begin to write—much of it con­tra­dic­to­ry and some of lit­tle prac­ti­cal benefit—you’d have a hard time find­ing any­one who dis­agrees with McPhee. Not even Walt Whit­man, who embraced con­trari­ness and con­tra­dic­tion like no oth­er Amer­i­can writer, thus becom­ing all the more an hon­est reflec­tion of the nation. Few writ­ers spent more time notic­ing than Whit­man, who seem­ing­ly record­ed every­thing he saw and heard on his trav­els. “I heard what the talk­ers were talk­ing,” he pro­claimed, “I per­ceive after all so many utter­ing tongues.” Whitman—as a project called Har­vardX Neu­ro­science dubs him—was a “poet of per­cep­tion.”

But he was also a hard-head­ed real­ist with a bent toward the util­i­tar­i­an and a scrap­py resource­ful­ness that made him an artis­tic sur­vivor. Whit­man con­tained mul­ti­tudes, not only in his poet­ry but in his writ­ing advice. When edi­tors of The Sig­nal, news­pa­per of The Col­lege of New Jer­sey, asked the poet in 1888 to advise young schol­ars on the “lit­er­ary life,” he oblig­ed, giv­ing the paper a brief inter­view in which the “gray-haired, hand­some, aged poet of Cam­den” prof­fered the fol­low­ing (con­densed in list form below):

1. Whack away at every­thing per­tain­ing to lit­er­ary life—mechanical part as well as the rest. Learn to set type, learn to work at the ‘case’, learn to be a prac­ti­cal print­er, and what­ev­er you do learn con­den­sa­tion.

2. To young lit­er­a­teurs I want to give three bits of advice: First, don’t write poet­ry; sec­ond dit­to; third dit­to. You may be sur­prised to hear me say so, but there is no par­tic­u­lar need of poet­ic expres­sion. We are util­i­tar­i­an, and the cur­rent can­not be stopped.

3. It is a good plan for every young man or woman hav­ing lit­er­ary aspi­ra­tions to car­ry a pen­cil and a piece of paper and con­stant­ly jot down strik­ing events in dai­ly life. They thus acquire a vast fund of infor­ma­tion. One of the best things you know is habit. Again, the best of read­ing is not so much in the infor­ma­tion it con­veys as the thoughts it sug­gests. Remem­ber this above all. There is no roy­al road to learn­ing.

Whit­man’s advice con­tains sound, prac­ti­cal tips on what we might today call “pro­fes­sion­al­iza­tion.” Should we take his admon­ish­ment against writ­ing poet­ry seri­ous­ly? Why not? For a good por­tion of his life, Whit­man earned a liv­ing “whack­ing away,” as he liked to say often, at more util­i­tar­i­an forms of writ­ing, from reportage to an advice col­umn. Whit­man took seri­ous­ly his role as a voice of work­ing peo­ple and per­haps saw this inter­view as an occa­sion to address them.

Whit­man’s “seething rejec­tion of poet­ry,” writes Nicole Kukaws­ki in the Walt Whit­man Quar­ter­ly Review, should not sur­prise us; it is “sim­ply part of his attack on con­ven­tion­al­i­ty in all respects… poet­ry can nev­er be ‘utilitarian’—in no way can it reach the mass­es for their ben­e­fit.” Unlike our day, poet­ry was ubiq­ui­tous in late nine­teenth cen­tu­ry Amer­i­ca, part of an entrenched, high­ly con­ven­tion­al polite dis­course. Who knows, maybe a Whit­man of the ear­ly 21st cen­tu­ry would feel very dif­fer­ent­ly on this point. Sure­ly we could use a great deal more “poet­ic expres­sion” these days.

Whit­man’s final piece of advice accords ful­ly with John McPhee’s—and sev­er­al hun­dred oth­er writ­ers and teach­ers. But in Whit­man’s esti­ma­tion, notic­ing, and acquir­ing “a vast fund of infor­ma­tion,” was not only essen­tial to the lit­er­ary life but also key to pur­su­ing an “indi­vid­u­al­is­tic,” real-world self-edu­ca­tion. “One sub­ject about which Whit­man did not con­tra­dict him­self,” writes Kukaws­ki, “was his con­sis­tent belief that the schol­ar should learn by encoun­ter­ing life instead of read­ing books alone.” There may be no bet­ter exem­plar of that phi­los­o­phy in Amer­i­can let­ters than Walt Whit­man him­self.

via Austin Kleon

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Walt Whitman’s Unearthed Health Man­u­al, “Man­ly Health & Train­ing,” Urges Read­ers to Stand (Don’t Sit!) and Eat Plen­ty of Meat (1858)

Walt Whitman’s Poem “A Noise­less Patient Spi­der” Brought to Life in Three Ani­ma­tions

Watch “The Poet­ry of Per­cep­tion”: Har­vard Ani­mates Walt Whit­man, Emi­ly Dick­in­son & William Car­los Williams

Iggy Pop Reads Walt Whit­man in Col­lab­o­ra­tions With Elec­tron­ic Artists Alva Noto and Tar­wa­ter

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

Stream 15 Hours of the John Peel Sessions: 255 Tracks by Syd Barrett, David Bowie, Siouxsie and the Banshees & Other Artists

For fans of what came to be called “alter­na­tive music,” the dis­cov­ery of new artists and bands felt like a gen­uine adven­ture before the inter­net irrev­o­ca­bly changed music con­sump­tion. A few offi­cial venues act­ed as guides—magazines like Trouser Press and NMEshows like 120 Min­utes, MTV’s late-night show­case of post-punk, new wave, indus­tri­al, etc. Word of mouth, local zines, col­lege radio, mix­tape gifts, and the pur­loined con­tents of old­er broth­ers and sis­ters’ record col­lec­tions went a long way. Many of us had access to inde­pen­dent record stores that stocked all sorts of under­ground odd­i­ties, often run by obses­sive know-it-alls like High Fideli­ty’s Rob Gor­don.

Ven­tur­ing into that world could be an intim­i­dat­ing expe­ri­ence. But one depend­able mark­er of qual­i­ty hard­ly ever let young seek­ers down: the name of BBC DJ and cura­tor extra­or­di­naire John Peel. Peel’s influ­ence on the musi­cal trends of the last forty years is incal­cu­la­ble, and impos­si­ble to sum­ma­rize in brief. (Learn about his lega­cy at this BBC trib­ute page.) From 1967 to his death in 2004, he record­ed up and com­ing and under­ground bands in inti­mate ses­sions at BBC stu­dios, and many of these clas­sic record­ings came out on his Strange Fruit label.

No mat­ter the band, no mat­ter the genre, the mys­te­ri­ous gray cov­er of a Peel Ses­sions release always promised some­thing worth fork­ing over one’s hard-earned lawn­mow­ing mon­ey to hear. Peel broad­cast and record­ed Nir­vana before “Smells Like Teen Spir­it” hit the main­stream; intro­duced his lis­ten­ers to now-leg­ends like Joy Divi­sion, The Smiths, and The Spe­cials; gave Bowie his first break before his Zig­gy Star­dust fame; and played Bob Mar­ley before Catch a Fire made him world famous.

These ses­sions and many more have been lov­ing­ly com­piled in one Spo­ti­fy playlist by Sebastien Van­blaere. If you have nos­tal­gic mem­o­ries of putting on a Peel Ses­sions record or cas­sette and hav­ing your mind blown by music the likes of which you’d nev­er heard before, you may find your favorites here. My per­son­al touch­stone is Siouxsie and the Ban­shees’ Peel Ses­sion record­ings, which to this day I pre­fer to their still excel­lent stu­dio releas­es (hear “Love in a Void” at the top). Some­thing about the way those focused live ses­sions were record­ed, and the imme­di­a­cy of their raw, unclut­tered mix­es, make them feel very per­son­al, like a con­cert in your liv­ing room.

While I asso­ciate Peel’s name main­ly with the post-punk niche of my youth, his eclec­tic tastes spanned the gamut. Before he gave the Ramones, The Damned, and oth­er punk bands their first major play in the mid-sev­en­ties, Peel cham­pi­oned the psy­che­del­ic space­rock of Pink Floyd, the dron­ing krautrock of Neu!, and the uncat­e­go­riz­able weird­ness of Cap­tain Beef­heart; “he was among the first (and only) DJs any­where,” writes the Hous­ton Press, “to broad­cast reg­gae, punk, hard­core, grind­core, grime and dub­step music over the radio.”

Peel’s rel­e­vance nev­er waned because his inter­est in find­ing, broad­cast­ing, and record­ing new music nev­er did either, but the playlist here most­ly rep­re­sents his pre-1990 favs, and sticks close­ly to rock, punk, new wave, and folk. See this page for a full list­ing of every John Peel ses­sion, from 1967 to three posthu­mous releas­es in 2004. And for a sense of the incred­i­ble breadth and eclec­tic inclu­sive­ness of Peel’s musi­cal tastes, vis­it the John Peel Archive, an online project cat­a­logu­ing every sin­gle record in Peel’s col­lec­tion. They’re cur­rent­ly up to 2679 of over 100,000 records total.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The 120 Min­utes Archive Com­piles Clips & Playlists from 956 Episodes of MTV’s Alter­na­tive Music Show (1986–2013)

Revis­it the Radio Ses­sions and Record Col­lec­tion of Ground­break­ing BBC DJ John Peel

Prof. Iggy Pop Deliv­ers the BBC’s 2014 John Peel Lec­ture on “Free Music in a Cap­i­tal­ist Soci­ety”

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Read More...

32 Animated Videos by Wireless Philosophy Teach You the Essentials of Critical Thinking

Do you know some­one whose argu­ments con­sist of bald­ly spe­cious rea­son­ing, hope­less­ly con­fused cat­e­gories, arch­i­pel­a­gos of log­i­cal fal­lac­i­es but­tressed by sea­walls of cog­ni­tive bias­es? Sure­ly you do. Per­haps such a per­son would wel­come some instruc­tion on the prop­er­ties of crit­i­cal think­ing and argu­men­ta­tion? Not like­ly? Well, just in case, you may wish to send them over to this series of Wire­less Phi­los­o­phy (or “WiPhi”) videos by phi­los­o­phy instruc­tor Geoff Pynn of North­ern Illi­nois Uni­ver­si­ty and doc­tor­al stu­dents Kel­ley Schiff­man of Yale, Paul Henne of Duke, and sev­er­al oth­er phi­los­o­phy and psy­chol­o­gy grad­u­ates.

What is crit­i­cal think­ing? “Crit­i­cal think­ing,” says Pynn, “is about mak­ing sure that you have good rea­sons for your beliefs.” Now, there’s quite a bit more to it than that, as the var­i­ous instruc­tors explain over the course of 32 short lessons (watch them all at the bot­tom of the post), but Pynn’s intro­duc­to­ry video above lays out the foun­da­tion. Good rea­sons log­i­cal­ly sup­port the beliefs or con­clu­sions one adopts—from degrees of prob­a­bil­i­ty to absolute cer­tain­ty (a rare con­di­tion indeed). The sense of “good” here, Pynn spec­i­fies, does not relate to moral good­ness, but to log­i­cal coher­ence and truth val­ue. Though many ethi­cists and philoso­phers would dis­agree, he notes that it isn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly “moral­ly wrong or evil or wicked” to believe some­thing on the basis of bad rea­sons. But in order to think ratio­nal­ly, we need to dis­tin­guish “good” rea­sons from “bad” ones.

“A good rea­son for a belief,” Pynn says, “is one that makes it prob­a­ble. That is, it’s one that makes the belief like­ly to be true. The very best rea­sons for a belief make it cer­tain. They guar­an­tee it.” In his next two videos, above and below, he dis­cuss­es these two class­es of argument—one relat­ing to cer­tain­ty, the oth­er prob­a­bil­i­ty. The first class, deduc­tive argu­ments, occur in the clas­sic, Aris­totelian form of the syl­lo­gism, and they should guar­an­tee their con­clu­sions, mean­ing that “it’s impos­si­ble for the premis­es to be true while the con­clu­sion is false” (pro­vid­ed the form of the argu­ment itself is cor­rect). In such an instance, we say the argu­ment is “valid,” a tech­ni­cal philo­soph­i­cal term that rough­ly cor­re­sponds to what we mean by a “good, cogent, or rea­son­able” argu­ment. Some prop­er­ties of deduc­tive rea­son­ing—valid­i­ty, truth, and sound­ness—receive their own explana­to­ry videos lat­er in the series.

In abduc­tive argu­ments (or what are also called “induc­tive argu­ments”), above, we rea­son infor­mal­ly to the best, most prob­a­ble expla­na­tion. In these kinds of argu­ments, the premis­es do not guar­an­tee the con­clu­sion, and the argu­ments are not bound in rigid for­mal syl­lo­gisms. Rather, we must make a leap—or an inference—to what seems like the most like­ly con­clu­sion giv­en the rea­son­ing and evi­dence. Find­ing addi­tion­al evi­dence, or find­ing that some of our evi­dence or rea­son­ing is incor­rect or must be rethought, should force us to reassess the like­li­hood of our con­clu­sion and make new infer­ences. Most sci­en­tif­ic expla­na­tions rely on abduc­tive rea­son­ing, which is why they are sub­ject to retrac­tion or revi­sion. New evidence—or new under­stand­ings of the evidence—often requires new con­clu­sions.

As for under­stand­ing probability—the like­li­hood that rea­sons pro­vide suf­fi­cient jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for infer­ring par­tic­u­lar conclusions—well… this is where we often get into trou­ble, falling vic­tim to all sorts of fal­lac­i­es. And when it comes to inter­pret­ing evi­dence, we’re prey to a num­ber of psy­cho­log­i­cal bias­es that pre­vent us from mak­ing fair assess­ments. WiPhi brings pre­vi­ous video series to bear on these prob­lems of argu­men­ta­tion, one on For­mal and Infor­mal Fal­lac­i­es and anoth­er on Cog­ni­tive Bias­es.

Courera - Earn your Degree Online

When it comes to a gen­er­al the­o­ry of prob­a­bil­i­ty itself, we would all ben­e­fit from some under­stand­ing of what’s called Bayes’ The­o­rem, named for the 18th cen­tu­ry sta­tis­ti­cian and philoso­pher Thomas Bayes. Bayes’ The­o­rem can seem for­bid­ding, but its wide appli­ca­tion across a range of dis­ci­plines speaks to its impor­tance. “Some philoso­phers,” says CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dent Ian Olasov in his video les­son above, “even think it’s the key to under­stand­ing what it means to think ratio­nal­ly.”

Bayesian rea­son­ing, infor­mal log­ic, sound, valid, and true argu­ments… all of these modes of crit­i­cal think­ing help us make sense of the tan­gles of infor­ma­tion we find our­selves caught up in dai­ly. Though some of our less ratio­nal­ly-inclined acquain­tances may not be recep­tive to good intro­duc­to­ry lessons like these, it’s worth the effort to pass them along. And while we’re at it, we can sharp­en our own rea­son­ing skills and learn quite a bit about where we go right and where we go wrong as crit­i­cal thinkers in Wire­less Philosophy’s thor­ough, high qual­i­ty series of video lessons.

Find more help­ful resources in the Relat­eds below.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Down­load 130 Free Phi­los­o­phy Cours­es: Tools for Think­ing About Life, Death & Every­thing Between

Carl Sagan Presents His “Baloney Detec­tion Kit”: 8 Tools for Skep­ti­cal Think­ing

How to Spot Bull­shit: A Primer by Prince­ton Philoso­pher Har­ry Frank­furt

Michael Shermer’s Baloney Detec­tion Kit: What to Ask Before Believ­ing

Daniel Den­nett Presents Sev­en Tools For Crit­i­cal Think­ing

“Call­ing Bull­shit”: See the Syl­labus for a Col­lege Course Designed to Iden­ti­fy & Com­bat Bull­shit

Oxford’s Free Course Crit­i­cal Rea­son­ing For Begin­ners Will Teach You to Think Like a Philoso­pher

1,700 Free Online Cours­es from Top Uni­ver­si­ties

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

 

Read More...

Quantcast