John Waters Makes Handmade Christmas Cards, Says the “Whole Purpose of Life is Christmas”

WatersMugshot

Awk­ward as it feels to receive Christ­mas cards from peo­ple we don’t real­ly know, who among us would turn one down from the one and only John Waters? Then again, the direc­tor of such land­marks in delib­er­ate­ly taste-free cin­e­ma as Pink Flamin­gos and Female Trou­ble would pre­sum­ably delight in inject­ing a lit­tle aes­thet­ic dis­com­fort into our hol­i­day rou­tines. Waters, accord­ing to a New York Times Q&A about his tak­ing on the road “A John Waters Christ­mas,” his “staged mono­logue about all things mer­ry and dark,” has made and sent out his own inim­itable Christ­mas cards for almost fifty years. “I start­ed doing it in high school in 1964,” he explains. “I send out over 2,000 cards by now. Basi­cal­ly, I’m chan­nel­ing Pia Zado­ra, who used to send out the best pricey hol­i­day-relat­ed object to help spread her name and make it last all year.” His 2006 card above bears a gen­uine mugshot from the police depart­ment of Waters’ beloved Bal­ti­more; oth­er images have includ­ed a dra­mat­ic 1940s scene of Christ­mas ruined by a crim­i­nal San­ta, indie-film act­ing icon Steve Busce­mi made up con­vinc­ing­ly as Waters, and Eliz­a­beth Tay­lor shaven-head­ed after brain surgery. One year, he even attached a tree orna­ment con­tain­ing a dead cock­roach.

BuscemiasWaters

“Being a tra­di­tion­al­ist, I’m a rabid suck­er for Christ­mas,” Waters explains in his essay “Why I Love Christ­mas.” “Novem­ber 1 kicks off the jubilee of con­sumerism, and I’m so rid­dled with the hol­i­days sea­son that the mere men­tion of a stock­ing stuffer sex­u­al­ly arous­es me.” Pre­hol­i­day activ­i­ties he con­sid­ers “the fore­play of Christ­mas,” and nat­u­ral­ly, “Christ­mas cards are your first duty and you must send one (with a per­son­al, hand­writ­ten mes­sage) to every sin­gle per­son you ever met, no mat­ter how briefly.” And of course, “you must make your own cards by hand. ‘I don’t have time’ you may whine, but since the whole pur­pose of life is Christ­mas, you’d bet­ter make time, buster.” Waters has also assem­bled his very own Christ­mas album, fea­tur­ing a vari­ety of hol­i­day songs per­formed by Tiny Tim, Stormy Weath­er, and even Alvin and the Chip­munks. The selec­tion below, “First Snow­fall” by the Coc­tails, uses the clas­si­cal­ly kitschy singing saw as a lead:

You may well hear it again if you hap­pen to attend Waters’ own annu­al Christ­mas par­ty in Bal­ti­more, a tra­di­tion he’s kept up for near­ly as long as he’s sent out the cards. “Every­one comes, from the may­or to Pat Sajak to a judge and a well-known crim­i­nal I helped get out of jail,” as he describes it to the Times.” There’s a bar on every floor of the house and a buf­fet table where you’ll see the guy that played the singing anus in Pink Flamin­gos stand­ing next to the gov­er­nor.” For­get the cards; I need an invi­ta­tion.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Grow­ing Up John Waters: The Odd­ball Film­mak­er Cat­a­logues His Many For­ma­tive Rebel­lions (1993)

An Anti, Anti-Smok­ing Announce­ment from John Waters

John Waters: The Point of Con­tem­po­rary Art

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, Asia, film, lit­er­a­ture, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on his brand new Face­book page.

The Art of Making Timelapse Films

Michael Shain­blum released a new time­lapse film this week called “Into the Atmos­phere,” which is his visu­al trib­ute to Cal­i­for­ni­a’s beau­ti­ful deserts, moun­tains and coast­lines. Even if you’ve seen your fair share of time­lapse films before, as I’m sure many of you have, you might be inter­est­ed in this oth­er new­ly-released film called “The Art of The Time­lapse.” Pro­duced by The Cre­ators Project, the short film gives you a glimpse of what goes into mak­ing a time­lapse — the req­ui­site gear, the favor­able light­ing con­di­tions, the ide­al land­scape, and more. Shain­blum is your guide. You can find an archive of his films here.

If you’d like to dig deep­er into the art of mak­ing time­lapse films, we’d rec­om­mend check­ing out The Basics of Time Lapse Pho­tog­ra­phy with Vin­cent Laforet, a four-part video series, on Canon’s edu­ca­tion web site. The first episode appears below.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Picas­so Cre­ate Entire Paint­ings in Mag­nif­i­cent Time-Lapse Film (1956)

53 Years of Nuclear Test­ing in 14 Min­utes: A Time Lapse Film by Japan­ese Artist Isao Hashimo­to

NASA Archive Col­lects Great Time-Lapse Videos of our Plan­et

Le Fla­neur: Time Lapse Video of Paris With­out the Peo­ple

In 1900, Ladies’ Home Journal Publishes 28 Predictions for the Year 2000

Ladies Home Journal Dec 1900 paleofuture paleo-future

At least since that 17th cen­tu­ry archi­tect of the sci­en­tif­ic rev­o­lu­tion, Sir Fran­cis Bacon (who was most­ly right), peo­ple have been mak­ing pre­dic­tions about the tech­nolo­gies and social advance­ments of the future. And since Bacon, sci­en­tists and futur­is­tic writ­ers have been espe­cial­ly in demand dur­ing times of great change and uncer­tain­ty, such as at the turn of the last cen­tu­ry. In 1900, civ­il engi­neer John Elfreth Watkins, Jr. in Ladies’ Home Jour­nal claimed to have sur­veyed “the most learned and con­ser­v­a­tive minds in Amer­i­ca… the wis­est and most care­ful men in our great­est insti­tu­tions of sci­ence and learn­ing.”

Spec­i­fy­ing advances like­ly to occur 100 years thence, “before the dawn of 2001,” Watkins culled 28 pre­dic­tions about such things as trav­el and the trans­mis­sion of infor­ma­tion over great dis­tances, bio­log­i­cal and genet­ic muta­tions, and the domes­tic com­forts of the aver­age con­sumer. Sev­er­al of the pre­dic­tions are very Bacon­ian indeed—as per the strange list at the end of Bacon’s sci­ence fic­tion frag­ment New Atlantis, a text obsessed with alter­ing the appear­ance of the nat­ur­al world for no par­tic­u­lar rea­son oth­er than that it could be done. Watkins’ list includes such pre­dic­tions as “Peas as Large as Beets,” “Black, Blue, and Green Ros­es,” and “Straw­ber­ries as Large as Apples.” Some are Bacon­ian in more sin­is­ter ways, and these are also a bit more accu­rate. Take the below, for exam­ple:

There will be No Wild Ani­mals except in menageries. Rats and mice will have been exter­mi­nat­ed. The horse will have become prac­ti­cal­ly extinct. A few of high breed will be kept by the rich for rac­ing, hunt­ing and exer­cise. The auto­mo­bile will have dri­ven out the horse. Cat­tle and sheep will have no horns. They will be unable to run faster than the fat­tened hog of to-day. A cen­tu­ry ago the wild hog could out­run a horse. Food ani­mals will be bred to expend prac­ti­cal­ly all of their life ener­gy in pro­duc­ing meat, milk, wool and oth­er by-prod­ucts. Horns, bones, mus­cles and lungs will have been neglect­ed.

I would defer to ecol­o­gists and meat indus­try watch­dogs to con­firm my intu­itions, but it does seem that some of this, except­ing the exter­mi­na­tion of ver­min and horns, has come to pass or is very like­ly in regard to sev­er­al species. Anoth­er pre­dic­tion, this one about our own species, is laugh­ably opti­mistic:

Every­body will Walk Ten Miles. Gym­nas­tics will begin in the nurs­ery, where toys and games will be designed to strength­en the mus­cles. Exer­cise will be com­pul­so­ry in the schools. Every school, col­lege and com­mu­ni­ty will have a com­plete gym­na­si­um. All cities will have pub­lic gym­na­si­ums. A man or woman unable to walk ten miles at a stretch will be regard­ed as a weak­ling.

We’re much clos­er to the future of Pixar’s Wall‑E than any­thing resem­bling this sce­nario (unless you live in the world of Cross­fit). Anoth­er pre­dic­tion is both dead on and dead wrong at once. Claim­ing that there will be “from 350,000,000 to 500,000,000 peo­ple in the Amer­i­c­as and its pos­ses­sions by the lapse of anoth­er cen­tu­ry” did in fact turn out to be almost uncan­ni­ly accurate—current esti­mates are some­where around 300,000,000. The “pos­ses­sions” allud­ed to, how­ev­er, dis­play the atti­tude of blithe Mon­roe doc­trine expan­sion­ism that held the nation in its sway at the turn of the cen­tu­ry. The pre­dic­tion goes on to say that most of the “South and Cen­tral Amer­i­can republics would be vot­ed into the Union by their own peo­ple.” A few more of Watkins’ pre­dic­tions, some pre­scient, some pre­pos­ter­ous:

Tele­phones Around the World. Wire­less tele­phone and tele­graph cir­cuits will span the world.

Store Pur­chas­es by Tube. Pneu­mat­ic tubes instead of store wag­ons, will deliv­er pack­ages and bun­dles.

Hot and Cold Air from Spig­ots. Ris­ing ear­ly to build the fur­nace fire will be a task of the old­en times.

Ready-Cooked Meals will be Bought from estab­lish­ments sim­i­lar to our bak­eries of to-day [see the above Wall‑E ref­er­ence]

There will be No C, X, or Q in our every-day alpha­bet. They will be aban­doned because unnec­es­sary.

Aeriel War-Ships and Forts on Wheels. Giant guns will shoot twen­ty-five miles or more, and will hurl any­where with­in such a radius shells explod­ing and destroy­ing whole cities.

How Chil­dren will be Taught. A uni­ver­si­ty edu­ca­tion will be free to every man and woman.

Ah, if only that last one had come true! To read all of Watkins pre­dic­tions in detail, click on the image above for a larg­er, read­able, ver­sion of the full arti­cle.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Isaac Asimov’s 1964 Pre­dic­tions About What the World Will Look 50 Years Lat­er — in 2014

Arthur C. Clarke Pre­dicts the Future in 1964 … And Kind of Nails It

1930s Fash­ion Design­ers Imag­ine How Peo­ple Would Dress in the Year 2000

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Watch Michel Gondry Animate Philosopher, Linguist & Activist Noam Chomsky

As an arts major who doo­dled my way through every required sci­ence course in high school and col­lege, I am deeply grat­i­fied by film­mak­er Michel Gondry’s approach to doc­u­ment­ing the ideas of Noam Chom­sky. Hav­ing filmed about three hours worth of inter­views with the activist, philoso­pher, and father of mod­ern lin­guis­tics in a ster­ile MIT con­fer­ence room, Gondry head­ed back to his charm­ing­ly ana­log Brook­lyn digs to spend three years ani­mat­ing the con­ver­sa­tions. It’s nice to see a film­mak­er of his stature using books to jer­ry-rig his cam­era set up. At one point, he hud­dles on the floor, puz­zling over some sequen­tial draw­ings on 3‑hole punch paper. Seems like the kind of thing most peo­ple in his field would tack­le with an iPad and an assis­tant.

Gondry may have felt intel­lec­tu­al­ly dwarfed by his sub­ject, but there’s a kind of genius afoot in his work too. Describ­ing the stop-motion tech­nique he used for Is the Man Who Is Tall Hap­py?, he told Amy Good­man of Democ­ra­cy Now, “I have a light­box, and I put paper on it, and I ani­mate with Sharpies, col­or Sharpies. And I have a 16-mil­lime­ter cam­era that is set up on a tri­pod and looks down, and I take a pic­ture. I do a draw­ing and take a pic­ture.”

A pret­ty apt summation—watch him in action above—but the curios­i­ty and human­i­ty so evi­dent in such fea­tures as Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind and The Sci­ence of Sleep is a mag­i­cal ingre­di­ent here, too. He attrib­ut­es bio­log­i­cal prop­er­ties to his Sharpie mark­ers, and takes a break from some of Chom­sky’s more com­plex thoughts to ask about his feel­ings when his wife passed away. He does­n’t seem to mind that he might seem a bit of a school­boy in com­par­i­son, one whose tal­ents lie beyond this par­tic­u­lar pro­fes­sor’s scope.

As Chom­sky him­self remarks in the trail­er, below, “Learn­ing comes from ask­ing why do things work like that, why not some oth­er way?”

Is the Man Who Is Tall Hap­py? is avail­able on iTunes.

H/T @kirstinbutler

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Film­mak­er Michel Gondry Presents an Ani­mat­ed Con­ver­sa­tion with Noam Chom­sky

Noam Chom­sky Schools 9/11 Truther; Explains the Sci­ence of Mak­ing Cred­i­ble Claims

Ayun Hal­l­i­day puts her life­long pen­chant for doo­dling to good use in her award-win­ning, hand­writ­ten, illus­trat­ed zine, The East Vil­lage Inky. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

Stephen Fry Profiles Six Russian Writers in the New Documentary Russia’s Open Book

Pushkin, Dos­to­evsky, Gogol, Tol­stoy, Tur­genev, Chekhov… some­one could design a per­son­al­i­ty test around which great 19th cen­tu­ry Russ­ian writ­ers turned read­ers on to that most brood­ing and intense of nation­al lit­er­a­tures. For me it was first Dos­to­evsky, with an oblig­a­tory high school read­ing of Crime and Pun­ish­ment, whose end­ing I hat­ed so much that I had to go on and read The Idiot, The Pos­sessed, Notes From the Under­ground, and near­ly every­thing else to find out what went wrong. And the mis­chie­vous fan­ta­sist Gogol I pre­ferred even to Kaf­ka as a young read­er, so I’d prob­a­bly score high on exis­ten­tial angst and absur­dist ten­den­cies on what­ev­er we’re call­ing our lit­er­ary Mey­ers-Brig­gs.

But we would have to include the 20th cen­tu­ry suc­ces­sors: Solzhen­it­syn, Bul­gakov, Paster­nak. The dis­senters and exposers of Sovi­et cru­el­ty and cor­rup­tion who took on the tra­di­tions of stark, bru­tal real­ism and dark­ly com­ic alle­go­ry. All of these are tra­di­tions that lit­er­ary gad­about Stephen Fry right­ly points out “changed the lit­er­a­ture, and par­tic­u­lar­ly the lit­er­a­ture of the nov­el, the world over.” Yet some­how, after the fall of the Sovi­et Union, it’s a lit­er­a­ture we seemed to stop hear­ing about. How­ev­er, “just because we stopped read­ing,” says Fry as host of the doc­u­men­tary above, Russia’s Open Book: Writ­ing in the Age of Putin, “doesn’t mean the Rus­sians stopped writ­ing.” Pro­duced by Intel­li­gent Tele­vi­sion and Wilton films and pre­mier­ing online today (and on PBS on Decem­ber 28), the film pro­files six new Russ­ian writ­ers most of us haven’t read, but should.

Per­haps a par­tic­u­lar­ly icon­ic fig­ure for the Putin age, we first meet the con­tro­ver­sial and some­what macho nov­el­ist Zakhar Prilepin, whose nos­tal­gia for the Sovi­et past has earned him the ire of lib­er­als. Prilepin freely admits that his hap­py, “won­der­ful,” child­hood explains his sym­pa­thy for the Sovi­et state. Despite these warm psy­cho­log­i­cal ori­gins, lit­er­ary crit­ic Alexan­der Gavrilov calls Prilepin’s first nov­el, 2005’s Patholo­gies, “an aggres­sive ter­ror­ist attack of a book,” for its harsh por­tray­al of the war in Chech­nya. The book draws on Prilepin’s expe­ri­ences as a vet­er­an of two Chechen wars. His sec­ond nov­el, Sankya was short­list­ed for the Russ­ian Book­er and Nation­al Book­seller prizes in 2006, and yet aside from a few short sto­ries, Prilepin’s work has yet to be trans­lat­ed into Eng­lish.

What has fas­ci­nat­ed West­ern­ers about Rus­sia in the past is in part its deep ven­er­a­tion for its writ­ers. In every age—Golden, Sil­ver, or blood red—Russian writ­ers held places of cul­tur­al promi­nence, or infamy. Lenin was a great writer of his­to­ry and polemic. Even Putin soft-ped­als his back­ing for the Syr­i­an regime in a gen­teel open let­ter. To be a rec­og­nized writer in Rus­sia means being a celebri­ty, or as Prilepin says, it’s “a kind of show busi­ness.” Russia’s Open Book nar­ra­tor Juli­et Stephen­son quotes poet Yevge­ny Yev­tushenko: “In Rus­sia, a poet is more than a poet.”

And then we meet con­tem­po­rary Russ­ian “activist, jour­nal­ist, teacher, nov­el­ist, crit­ic, and poet” Dmit­ry Bykov, a dead ringer for an ear­li­er vin­tage of Sat­ur­day Night Live’s Hor­a­tio Sanz. His genial appear­ance hides deeply seri­ous intent. A roman­tic inspired by the vibran­cy of Russia’s polit­i­cal fight for “the dig­ni­ty of all its cit­i­zens,” Bykov tells us “Before I went to the first protest, I’d stopped writ­ing. After­wards, I wrote a whole vol­ume of lyric poet­ry. No pol­i­tics, it’s all ros­es and rhymes.” Bykov’s 2006 Liv­ing Souls—which does exist, abridged, in English—takes up the great Russ­ian tra­di­tion of the polit­i­cal fable. Oth­er writ­ers, like the bold­ly out­spo­ken nov­el­ist (and for­mer geneti­cist) Lud­mi­la Ulit­skaya, are much more ambiva­lent about polit­i­cal engage­ment. “But in some sit­u­a­tions,” says Ulit­skaya, “you can’t remain silent….”

It’s dif­fi­cult per­haps for West­ern­ers to appre­ci­ate the con­tem­po­rary sit­u­a­tions of these new Russ­ian writ­ers, giv­en how lit­tle we seem to under­stand Russia’s inter­nal polit­i­cal state (and giv­en the rel­a­tive absence of a viable U.S. for­eign press ser­vice). After all, it’s no longer an exis­ten­tial neces­si­ty that we know our sworn ene­my, as in the Cold War, nor is Rus­sia treat­ed any longer as Europe’s dis­tin­guished first cousin, as in its Impe­r­i­al 19th cen­tu­ry past. But the writ­ers pro­filed in Russia’s Open Book make us keen­ly aware that the country’s lit­er­ary cul­ture is thriv­ing, and deserv­ing of our atten­tion. To learn more about the mak­ers of the film and the six con­tem­po­rary writ­ers pro­filed, vis­it the Russia’s Open Book web­site. And to expand your appre­ci­a­tion for Russ­ian lit­er­a­ture in gen­er­al, spend some time at the Read Rus­sia 2013 site here, a new ini­tia­tive “to cel­e­brate Russ­ian lit­er­a­ture and Russ­ian book cul­ture.” We also have many Russ­ian clas­sics in our Free eBooks and Audio Books col­lec­tions.

Rus­si­a’s Open Book: Writ­ing in the Age of Putin will be per­ma­nent­ly list­ed in our col­lec­tion of 600 Free Movies Online.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The His­toric Meet­ing Between Dick­ens and Dos­to­evsky Revealed as a Great Lit­er­ary Hoax

George Saun­ders’ Lec­tures on the Russ­ian Greats Brought to Life in Stu­dent Sketch­es

Russ­ian Punk Band, Sen­tenced to Two Years in Prison for Derid­ing Putin, Releas­es New Sin­gle

Free Online Lit­er­a­ture Cours­es

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Orson Welles Records Two Songs with the 1980s Heavy-Metal Band Manowar

Heavy met­al music enjoyed the plea­sures of excess in the 1980s, an era when, if you believe cer­tain biog­ra­phers, writer-actor-auteur Orson Welles did the very same. Though some describe the life of the man who made Cit­i­zen Kane as hav­ing by then fall­en into a final peri­od of great deca­dence, he still man­aged to leave his mark on a num­ber of unusu­al projects. Many of my gen­er­a­tion fond­ly remem­ber his per­for­mance as the man-made plan­et Uni­cron, eater of worlds, in 1986’s Trans­form­ers: The Movie, but those slight­ly old­er may have first encoun­tered Welles’ late work on Bat­tle Hymns, the debut album by sword-and-sor­cery-mind­ed met­al (tech­ni­cal­ly, “epic met­al”) band Manowar, for whose track “Dark Avenger,” below, he pro­vid­ed suit­ably epic nar­ra­tion: “And they placed in his hands a sword made for him called Vengeance, forged in brim­stone and tem­pered by the woe­ful tears of the Unavenged.” Who but Welles (or maybe Christo­pher Lee) could sell a line like that?

Five years lat­er, Manowar would return to the Welles well for their fifth album Fight­ing the World, whose track “Defend­er,” below, fea­tures a posthu­mous appear­ance orig­i­nal­ly record­ed as a demo dur­ing the Bat­tle Hymns ses­sions. Fight­ing the World, inci­den­tal­ly, appeared as the first ever dig­i­tal­ly record­ed and mixed heavy met­al album, an achieve­ment unshy­ly declared on the band’s web site.

There you’ll also learn that Manowar not only includ­ed fan­ta­sy imagery in both their lyrics and on their cov­ers before their col­leagues did, but that they also designed and built their own speak­er cab­i­nets and gui­tars first, record­ed songs in 16 lan­guages first, and col­lab­o­rat­ed with “Ger­many’s best­selling fan­ta­sy author, Wolf­gang Hohlbein” first. They also declare them­selves “the loud­est band in the world (a record they have bro­ken on three sep­a­rate occa­sions),” but give a place of even high­er hon­or on the list to their dis­tinc­tion as “the only band ever to record with Orson Welles” — epic met­al, met­al, or oth­er­wise.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free­dom Riv­er: A Para­ble Nar­rat­ed by Orson Welles

Four­teen-Year-Old Girl’s Blis­ter­ing Heavy Met­al Per­for­mance of Vival­di

A Blue­grass Ver­sion of Metal­li­ca’s Heavy Met­al Hit, “Enter Sand­man”

The Physics of Mosh Pits at Heavy Met­al Con­certs (Explained by Cor­nell Grad Stu­dents)

Orson Welles Reads Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” in a 1977 Exper­i­men­tal Film

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, Asia, film, lit­er­a­ture, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on his brand new Face­book page.

Oxford University Presents the 550-Year-Old Gutenberg Bible in Spectacular, High-Res Detail

The great British empiri­cist Fran­cis Bacon once remarked that Johannes Gutenberg’s print­ing press “changed the whole face and state of the world.” Although Guten­berg did not inde­pen­dent­ly devise the press, he invent­ed a mass-pro­duc­tion process of move­able type and con­coct­ed an oil-based ink which, when com­bined with the wood­en press, rev­o­lu­tion­ized the flow of infor­ma­tion. Books could now be pub­lished in vast quan­ti­ties, at only a frac­tion of the time required pre­vi­ous­ly.

For his first sem­i­nal print­ing, Guten­berg picked the Bible — an obvi­ous choice for a Chris­t­ian, and in ret­ro­spect, per­haps the only book whose his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance rivals that of Gutenberg’s inven­tion. Pro­duced in 1454 or 1455, the few sur­viv­ing copies of Gutenberg’s Bible remain exem­plars of the printer’s fore­thought and crafts­man­ship;  the page dimen­sions, it is believed, were  devised by Guten­berg to echo the gold­en ratio of Greek aes­thet­ics. The first page appears above.

This Tues­day, The Polon­sy Foun­da­tion Dig­i­ti­za­tion Project, which aims to dig­i­tize the col­lec­tions of Oxford’s Bodleian Libraries and the Vatican’s Bib­liote­ca Apos­toli­ca, made a vir­tu­al ver­sion of the Guten­berg Bible avail­able online. Read­ers flu­ent in vul­gate can now put down their dog-eared bibles and enter the infor­ma­tion age with this fright­en­ing­ly high-res­o­lu­tion cov­er-to-cov­er scan of Gutenberg’s orig­i­nal print­ing. In addi­tion to exam­in­ing its fine­ly drawn ini­tials and curlicues, you can also browse oth­er ear­ly bibles, includ­ing a beau­ti­ful­ly col­ored 13th cen­tu­ry Hebrew tome, and the del­i­cate illus­tra­tions with­in a 10th cen­tu­ry Greek vol­ume. We’ve includ­ed two images below:

Bible image 1
Bible image 2
View the first por­tion of the dig­i­tized col­lec­tions here.

via Hyper­al­ler­gic

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture and sci­ence writer. Fol­low him at @iliablinderman.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

See How The Guten­berg Press Worked: Demon­stra­tion Shows the Old­est Func­tion­ing Guten­berg Press in Action

Google Puts The Dead Sea Scrolls Online (in Super High Res­o­lu­tion)

Take First-Class Phi­los­o­phy Lec­tures Any­where with Free Oxford Pod­casts

Dis­cov­er Thomas Jefferson’s Cut-and-Paste Ver­sion of the Bible, and Read the Curi­ous Edi­tion Online

How the King James Bible For­ev­er Changed Eng­lish: 400th Anniver­sary Cel­e­brat­ed with Fun Videos

Alice Munro Talks About the Writing Life in Her Nobel Prize Interview

On Octo­ber 10th, Cana­di­an writer Alice Munro won the Nobel Prize in Lit­er­a­ture. And if you’re not famil­iar with her work, we sug­gest that you spend time read­ing the 18 Free Short Sto­ries we gath­ered in our cel­e­bra­to­ry post.

Tra­di­tion­al­ly, recip­i­ents of the Nobel Prize trav­el to Swe­den to accept the award in mid Decem­ber. But the 82-year-old writer, cit­ing poor health, decid­ed to stay home and forego mak­ing the cus­tom­ary accep­tance speech in Stock­holm. (See past speech­es by Hem­ing­way, Faulkn­er, Stein­beck, V.S. Naipaul and oth­ers here.) Fans of Munro weren’t left emp­ty-hand­ed, how­ev­er. From the com­fort of her daughter’s home in Vic­to­ria, British Colum­bia, Munro sat down for an infor­mal, 30-minute inter­view and talked about many things: how she first began writ­ing and telling sto­ries; how she gained (and lost) con­fi­dence as a writer; how she men­tal­ly maps out her sto­ries; how she has become a dif­fer­ent writer with age; how the writ­ing life for women has changed over the years; and much more. You can watch the com­plete Nobel inter­view above.

via Page-Turn­er

Relat­ed Con­tent:

On His 100th Birth­day, Hear Albert Camus Deliv­er His Nobel Prize Accep­tance Speech (1957)

7 Nobel Speech­es by 7 Great Writ­ers: Hem­ing­way, Faulkn­er, and More

Read 18 Short Sto­ries From Nobel Prize-Win­ning Writer Alice Munro Free Online

Errol Morris Meditates on the Meaning and History of Abraham Lincoln’s Last Photograph

LincolnRetouched

I believe it was Jacques Der­ri­da, though I don’t recall exact­ly where, who said that some of the most reveal­ing text of any work can be found in the foot­notes. In doc­u­men­tar­i­an Errol Mor­ris’ recent pho­to-essay series on Lin­coln for The New York Times, foot­notes, chronolo­gies, snip­pets of inter­view, and end­less­ly recur­sive ref­er­ences con­tin­u­ous­ly intrude on the sto­ries he tells. In this way, the series, called “The Inter­minable, Ever­last­ing Lin­colns,” enacts the ten­sion Mor­ris iden­ti­fies as “the push-pull of his­to­ry,” a con­test between sev­er­al ways of approach­ing the past: “Facts vs. beliefs. Our desire to know the ori­gins of things vs. our desire to rework, to recon­fig­ure the past to suit our own beliefs and predilec­tions. Per­haps noth­ing bet­ter illus­trates this than two rad­i­cal­ly dif­fer­ent pre­dis­po­si­tions to objects—the sto­ry­teller vs. the col­lec­tor.”

The way sto­ry after sto­ry inevitably nests with­in each his­tor­i­cal arti­fact seems to be Mor­ris’ over­ar­ch­ing theme as he charts the his­to­ry of Lin­coln iconog­ra­phy by ref­er­ence to a sin­gle image, a pho­to of Lin­coln by Alexan­der Gard­ner that exists in only one known orig­i­nal print, called O‑118 after col­lec­tor of Lin­coln pho­tog­ra­phy Lloyd Osten­dorf (see the retouched ver­sion above, the orig­i­nal print below). This print, along with 13 oth­ers, was made either four or five days before Lincoln’s assas­si­na­tion.

LincolnCracked

Mor­ris’ fas­ci­na­tion with this pho­to­graph is as var­i­ous­ly moti­vat­ed as the num­ber of dif­fer­ent views he adopts in exam­in­ing its prove­nance, its his­to­ry, and its mean­ing. For one thing, O‑118 is sup­pos­ed­ly the last pho­to­graph tak­en of Lin­coln alive. In 1922, The New York Times pub­lished the orig­i­nal print (above) with text by James Young, who wrote:

Prob­a­bly no oth­er pho­to­graph of Lin­coln con­veys more clear­ly the abid­ing sad­ness of the face. The lines of time and care are deeply etched, and he has the look of a man bor­der­ing upon old age, though he was only 56. Proof that the cam­era was but a few feet away may be found by scruti­ny of the pic­ture…. The print has been untouched, and this pic­ture is an exact like­ness of the Pres­i­dent as he looked in the week of his death.

The photo’s cap­tion also includ­ed infor­ma­tion that Mor­ris makes a great deal of: “The Cracked Neg­a­tive Caused it To Be Dis­card­ed. It Has Only Once Before Been Pub­lished, and Then in a Retouched Form.” For one thing, Mor­ris seems to asso­ciate the pho­to­graph with what Wal­ter Ben­jamin called “aura”; The print, it seems, was the only one Gard­ner was able to make before the cracked neg­a­tive became use­less and mass pro­duc­tion from the source impos­si­ble. Un-retouched, the print shows a “frac­ture cut­ting through the top of Lincoln’s head.” For the sto­ry­teller, writes Mor­ris, “the crack is the begin­ning of a legend—the leg­end of a death fore­told. The crack seems to antic­i­pate the bul­let fired into the back of Lincoln’s head at Ford’s The­ater on Good Fri­day, April 14, 1865.” Using the rhetor­i­cal term for “a fig­ure of antic­i­pa­tion,” a nar­ra­tive fea­ture that fore­shad­ows, fore­tells, or proph­e­sies, Mor­ris calls this “the pro­lep­tic crack.”

His wind­ing nar­ra­tive, replete with the anti­quar­i­an minu­ti­ae of col­lec­tors, moves from the day—February 5, 1865—that Lin­coln and his son Tad walked to Gardner’s stu­dio on 7th Street in Wash­ing­ton, DC for the pho­to ses­sion, through the use of pho­tog­ra­phy as an aid to Lin­coln painters and sculp­tors, to the mean­ing of Lin­coln for such diverse peo­ple as Leo Tol­stoy, Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe, and our cur­rent Pres­i­dent. Mor­ris’ series ranges far and wide, vis­it­ing with his­to­ri­ans and col­lec­tors along the way, and telling many a sto­ry, some freely spec­u­la­tive, some wist­ful, some trag­ic, and all some­how cir­cling back to O‑118. Like much of Mor­ris’ doc­u­men­tary work, it’s an exer­cise in collage—of the meth­ods of the schol­ar, the essay­ist, and the archivist—and like its sub­ject, it’s a frac­tured, but ever­last­ing­ly fas­ci­nat­ing med­i­ta­tion. Fol­low Mor­ris’ entire series below.

Pro­logue: Pre­mo­ni­tions

Part 1: Feb­ru­ary 5, 1865

Part 2: The Pro­lep­tic Crack

Part 3: In the Cau­ca­sus

Relat­ed Con­tent:

New Errol Mor­ris Film Asks Whether We Will Ever Know the Truth About the Kennedy Assas­si­na­tion

The Last Sur­viv­ing Wit­ness of the Lin­coln Assas­si­na­tion

Visu­al­iz­ing Slav­ery: The Map Abra­ham Lin­coln Spent Hours Study­ing Dur­ing the Civ­il War

The Poet­ry of Abra­ham Lin­coln

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Where Do Great Ideas Come From? Neil Gaiman Explains

neil gaiman

Image via Flickr Com­mons

Every cre­ative writer gets asked the ques­tion at least once at a social event with non-writ­ers: “Where do you get your ideas?” To the asker, writ­ing is a dark art, full of mys­ter­ies only the ini­ti­at­ed under­stand. To the writer—as Neil Gaiman tells us in an essay on his web­site—the ques­tion miss­es the point and mis­judges the writer’s task. “Ideas aren’t the hard bit,” he says.

Cre­at­ing believ­able peo­ple who do more or less what you tell them to is much hard­er. And hard­est by far is the process of sim­ply sit­ting down and putting one word after anoth­er to con­struct what­ev­er it is you’re try­ing to build: mak­ing it inter­est­ing, mak­ing it new.

Some­times hard­est of all is the “sim­ply sit­ting down” and writ­ing when there’s noth­ing, no ideas. The work’s still got to get done, after all. Gaiman used to treat the ques­tion face­tious­ly, answer­ing with one of a few wag­gish and “not very fun­ny” pre­pared answers. But peo­ple kept ask­ing, includ­ing the sev­en-year-old class­mates of his daugh­ter, and he decid­ed to tell them the truth, “I make them up, out of my head.” It’s not the answer most want­ed to hear, but it’s the truth. As he inar­guably shows, ideas are like opin­ions: “Everyone’s got an idea for a book, a movie, a sto­ry, a TV series.” And they can come from any­where.

Gaiman, feel­ing that he owed his daughter’s class­mates a thought­ful, detailed answer, respond­ed with the below, which we’ve put into list form.

  • Ideas come from day­dream­ing. “The only dif­fer­ence between writ­ers and oth­er peo­ple,” says Gaiman, “is that we notice when we’re doing it.”
  • Ideas come from ask­ing your­self sim­ple ques­tions, like “What if…?” (“you woke up with wings?… your sis­ter turned into a mouse?.…), “If only…” (“a ghost would do my home­work”) and “I won­der….” (“what she does when she’s alone”), etc…. These ques­tions, in turn, gen­er­ate oth­er ques­tions.
  • Ideas are only start­ing points. You don’t have to fig­ure out the plot. Plots “gen­er­ate them­selves” from “what­ev­er the start­ing point is.”
  • Ideas can be peo­ple (“There’s a boy who wants to know about mag­ic”); places (“There’s a cas­tle at the end of time, which is the only place there is”); images (“A woman, sift­ing in a dark room filled with emp­ty faces.”)
  • Ideas can come from two things “that haven’t come togeth­er before.” (“What would hap­pen if a chair was bit­ten by a were­wolf?)

Grant­ed some of Gaiman’s exam­ples may be more intrigu­ing or fan­tas­tic than what you or I might pro­pose, but any­one can do these exer­cis­es. The idea, how­ev­er, is just the start­ing point. “All fic­tion,” he writes, “is a process of imag­in­ing.” So what comes next? “Well,” says Gaiman, “then you write.” Yes, it is that sim­ple, and that hard.

Tell us, read­ers, do you find any of Gaiman’s idea sources help­ful? Where do you get your ideas?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Rod Ser­ling: Where Do Ideas Come From?

Neil Gaiman Gives Grad­u­ates 10 Essen­tial Tips for Work­ing in the Arts

Writ­ing Tips by Hen­ry Miller, Elmore Leonard, Mar­garet Atwood, Neil Gaiman & George Orwell

Read Neil Gaiman’s Free Short Sto­ries Online

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Ed Wood’s Plan 9 From Outer Space: “The Worst Movie Ever Made,” “The Ultimate Cult Flick,” or Both?

plan-9

I had an ado­les­cent fas­ci­na­tion with Ed Wood. I mean that lit­er­al­ly: I spent a siz­able chunk of my ado­les­cence watch­ing the films of, read­ing about, and even read­ing the books by writer-direc­tor (and occa­sion­al cross-dress­er) Edward D. Wood Jr. What, I asked, could have dri­ven the man to make, and keep on mak­ing, the films that would ulti­mate­ly define the cat­e­go­ry, quite pop­u­lar dur­ing my teen years, of “so bad it’s good” cin­e­ma? None of his numer­ous, all unabashed­ly low-bud­get pic­tures have done more for that form than 1959’s Plan 9 from Out­er Space, a breath­less, near­ly bud­get­less tale in which Wood throws togeth­er aliens, zom­bies, loom­ing nuclear anni­hi­la­tion, and Bela Lugosi. Well, he almost throws in Bela Lugosi: as depict­ed in Tim Bur­ton’s 1994 biopic Ed Wood, he char­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly spliced in exist­ing footage of the by-then deceased icon of hor­ror film, cast his wife’s chi­ro­prac­tor (instruct­ed to hold a cape over his face) as a dou­ble, billed Lugosi as the star, and hoped for the best.

You can watch the fruit of that and oth­er high­ly unortho­dox film­mak­ing efforts on the part of Wood and his faith­ful bunch of long-suf­fer­ing col­lab­o­ra­tors at the top of the post. Just below, we have a clip from Ed Wood, which in large part deals with how its inde­fati­ga­ble pro­tag­o­nist, played by a whole­some­ly gung-ho John­ny Depp, came to make Plan 9 in the first place. This mon­tage recre­ates the shoot­ing of sequences Wood’s fans will have long since burned into their visu­al mem­o­ry: George “The Ani­mal” Steele as Swedish ex-wrestler Tor John­son ris­ing inept­ly from the grave, Bill Mur­ray as would-be trans­sex­u­al Bun­ny Breck­en­ridge affect­less­ly giv­ing his hench­man orders to exe­cute the title plan, a trio of toy fly­ing saucers low­ered on fish­ing wire into a mod­el Hol­ly­wood. In 1980, Michael and Har­ry Medved dubbed Plan 9 “worst movie ever made,” ini­ti­at­ing its ascent from decades of obscu­ri­ty to the sta­tus of, as John Wirt puts it, “the ulti­mate cult flick.” Crit­ics tend to regard Ed Wood as a “good” movie, and Wood’s projects, espe­cial­ly Plan 9, as “bad” movies, yet both enter­tain at very high lev­els indeed, mak­ing us ask an impor­tant ques­tion, anoth­er one I asked myself in the thick of my Wood peri­od: what makes a movie “good” or “bad,” any­way?

Plan 9 from Out­er Space can always be found in our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Tro­ma Enter­tain­ment, the Mak­er of Acclaimed B‑Movies, Puts 150 Free Films on YouTube

Six Ear­ly Short Films By Tim Bur­ton

Tim Bur­ton Shoots Two Music Videos for The Killers

Bela Lugosi Dis­cuss­es His Drug Habit as He Leaves the Hos­pi­tal in 1955

Tim Burton’s The World of Stain­boy: Watch the Com­plete Ani­mat­ed Series

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, Asia, film, lit­er­a­ture, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on his brand new Face­book page.


  • Great Lectures

  • Sign up for Newsletter

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast