How Raphael Became A Master: Watch the Evolution of the Artist Through His Madonna Paintings

No artist became a Renais­sance mas­ter through a sin­gle piece of work, though now, half a mil­len­ni­um lat­er, that may be how most of us iden­ti­fy them. Leonar­do? Painter of the Mona Lisa. Michelan­ge­lo? Painter of the Sis­tine Chapel ceil­ing (or, per­haps, the sculp­tor of the most famous David, depend­ing on your medi­um of choice). Raphael? Painter of The School of Athens, as recent­ly fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture. Raphael paint­ed that mas­ter­work in Vat­i­can City’s Apos­tolic Palace between the years 1509 and 1511, when he was in his mid-twen­ties. Under­stand­ing how he could have attained that lev­el of skill by that age requires exam­in­ing his oth­er work, as Evan Puschak, bet­ter known as the Nerd­writer, does in the new video above.

Specif­i­cal­ly, Puschak exam­ines Raphael’s Madon­nas, a sub­ject to which he returned over and over again through­out the course of his short but pro­duc­tive career. In what seems to have been his first ren­di­tion of Mary and her holy son, Puschak says, “you can see that Raphael has a bet­ter sense of three-dimen­sion­al bod­ies and how to make them feel like they’re part of the space that they’re in” than his father, who’d been a well-regard­ed painter him­self, or even than Piero del­la Francesca, from whom his father learned.

“Yet the paint­ing also suf­fers from “an awk­ward­ness in the arrange­ment of the fig­ures,” as well as a lack of “emo­tion, rela­tion­ships, or any sense of nar­ra­tive” — much like “a thou­sand oth­er Madon­nas that came before.”

Yet Raphael was a quick study, a trait reflect­ed in the devel­op­ment of the many Madon­nas he paint­ed there­after. From Leonar­do he learned tech­niques like sfu­ma­to, the cre­ation of soft tran­si­tions between col­ors; from Michelan­ge­lo, “how to use the human body as an expres­sive tool.” But what most clear­ly emerges is the con­cept con­tem­po­rary the­o­rist Leon Bat­tista Alber­ti called his­to­ria: a nar­ra­tive that plays out even with­in the con­fines of a sta­t­ic image. In Raphael’s cir­cu­lar, abun­dant­ly detailed Alba Madon­na of 1511, Puschak sees the infant Jesus “not so much tak­ing as grab­bing his future and pulling it clos­er” as Mary looks on with emo­tions sub­tly lay­ered into her face. How, exact­ly, Raphael honed his instinct for dra­ma is a ques­tion for art his­to­ri­ans. But would it be too much of a reach to guess that he also learned a thing or two from his time as a stage-set design­er?

Relat­ed con­tent:

Pla­to, Aris­to­tle & Oth­er Greek Philoso­phers in Raphael’s Renais­sance Mas­ter­piece, The School of Athens

Artist Turns Famous Paint­ings, from Raphael to Mon­et to Licht­en­stein, Into Inno­v­a­tive Sound­scapes

Why Leonar­do da Vinci’s Great­est Paint­ing is Not the Mona Lisa

The Evo­lu­tion of The Great Wave off Kana­gawa: See Four Ver­sions That Hoku­sai Paint­ed Over Near­ly 40 Years

14 Self-Por­traits by Pablo Picas­so Show the Evo­lu­tion of His Style: See Self-Por­traits Mov­ing from Ages 15 to 90

The Evo­lu­tion of Kandinsky’s Paint­ing: A Jour­ney from Real­ism to Vibrant Abstrac­tion Over 46 Years

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Empire Without Limit: Watch Mary Beard’s TV Series on Ancient Rome

As the found­ing myth has it, the city of Rome was estab­lished by a man named Romu­lus, one of two orphaned twin broth­ers raised by a she-wolf on the banks of the Tiber riv­er. The leg­end of Romu­lus and Remus, which involves the for­mer’s frat­ri­ci­dal slay­ing of the lat­ter, lends itself to strik­ing imagery, though it also gives forth more ques­tions than answers. “The Latin for wolf, lupa, also means pros­ti­tute,” for exam­ple, “so was it actu­al­ly a pros­ti­tute who came to the res­cue?” So asks his­to­ri­an Mary Beard in Rome: Empire With­out Lim­it, a four-part series you can watch in its entire­ty above.

In a sense, the sto­ry works either way: the mor­tal clash of broth­er against broth­er makes for a recur­ring metaphor­i­cal theme in the long his­to­ry of Rome, but so does the irre­press­ible pow­er of com­merce. Criss­cross­ing the Euro­pean con­ti­nent, Great Britain, the Mediter­ranean, and Africa by car, boat, bicy­cle, sub­way train, and above all on foot, Beard uses the traces of the might­i­est ancient empire to explain how the whole oper­a­tion actu­al­ly worked, and what its day-to-day expe­ri­ence was like for its sub­jects. When it orig­i­nal­ly aired in 2016, Empire With­out Lim­it fol­lowed up her acclaimed book SPQR: A His­to­ry of Ancient Rome, which cov­ers some of the same themes.

Those who’ve fol­lowed Beard’s work in print, on tele­vi­sion, or in oth­er media know that her ver­sion of Roman his­to­ry is hard­ly anoth­er suc­ces­sion of emper­ors and mil­i­tary cam­paigns. While she does devote time to dis­cussing such sig­nal fig­ures as Julius Cae­sar (who def­i­nite­ly did­n’t say “Et tu, Brute?”), Augus­tus, Hadri­an, and Con­stan­tine, she dis­plays equal or greater inter­est in a four-year-old sil­ver min­er in what’s now Spain, say, or an anony­mous young woman the shape of whose skull sug­gests the extent of migra­tion with­in the empire. And just as wor­thy of con­sid­er­a­tion as any par­tic­u­lar Roman cit­i­zen­ship is the con­cept of Roman cit­i­zen­ship itself, which ulti­mate­ly extend­ed across the vastest empire the world had ever known.

All roads lead to Rome, as the say­ing goes, and in the hey­day of the Roman empire, as Beard points out, it was actu­al­ly true. The ancient Romans were the first to build what she calls “a joined-up world,” where get­ting on a path in Rome and fol­low­ing it could get you all the way to places like Spain or Greece. (And also unprece­dent­ed­ly, you could take a glance at mile mark­ers along that road and imme­di­ate­ly “place your­self in the world.”) Roman dom­i­nance may have end­ed long ago, but the parts of the world have con­tin­ued to join up in much the same way since, and indeed, the broad Roman world­view sur­vives. As Beard puts it, “there’s a lit­tle bit of the Romans in the head of every one of us” — espe­cial­ly those of us who think about their empire every day.

Relat­ed con­tent:

The His­to­ry of Ancient Rome in 20 Quick Min­utes: A Primer Nar­rat­ed by Bri­an Cox

A Map Show­ing How the Ancient Romans Envi­sioned the World in 40 AD

How Rome Began: The His­to­ry As Told by Ancient His­to­ri­ans

Is Amer­i­ca Declin­ing Like Ancient Rome?

Do You Think About Ancient Rome Every Day? Then Browse a Wealth of Videos, Maps & Pho­tos That Explore the Roman Empire

Rick Steves’ Europe: Binge Watch 11 Sea­sons of America’s Favorite Trav­el­er Free Online

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Hear the Long-Lost Chants of English Monks, Revived for the First Time in 500 Years

Lis­ten­ing to music, espe­cial­ly live music, can be a reli­gious expe­ri­ence. These days, most of us say that fig­u­ra­tive­ly, but for medieval monks, it was the lit­er­al truth. Every aspect of life in a monastery was meant to get you that much clos­er to God, but espe­cial­ly the times when every­one came togeth­er and sang. For Eng­lish monks accus­tomed to that way of life, it would have come as quite a shock, to say the very least, when Hen­ry VIII ordered the dis­so­lu­tion of the monas­ter­ies between the mid fif­teen-thir­ties and the ear­ly fif­teen-for­ties. Not only were the inhab­i­tants of those refuges sent pack­ing, their sacred music was cast to the wind.

Near­ly half a mil­len­ni­um lat­er, that music is still being recov­ered. As report­ed by the Guardian’s Steven Mor­ris, Uni­ver­si­ty of Exeter his­to­ri­an James Clark found the lat­est exam­ple while research­ing the still-stand­ing Buck­land Abbey in Devon for the Nation­al Trust.

“Only one book — rather bor­ing­ly set­ting out the cus­toms the monks fol­lowed — was known to exist, held in the British Library.” But lo and behold, a few leaves of parch­ment stuck in the back hap­pened to con­tain pieces of ear­ly six­teenth-cen­tu­ry music, or rather chant, with both text and nota­tion, a van­ish­ing­ly rare sort of arti­fact of medieval monas­tic life.

Just this month, for the first time in almost five cen­turies, the music from the “Buck­land book” res­onat­ed with­in the walls of Buck­land Abbey once again. You can hear a clip from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Exeter chapel choir’s per­for­mance just above, which may or may not get across the grim­ness of the orig­i­nal work. “The themes are heavy — the threats from dis­ease and crop fail­ures, not to men­tion pow­er­ful rulers — but the poly­phon­ic style is bright and joy­ful, a con­trast to the sort of mourn­ful chants most asso­ci­at­ed with monks,” writes Mor­ris. For lis­ten­ers here in the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry, these com­po­si­tions offer the addi­tion­al tran­scen­den­tal dimen­sion of aes­thet­ic time trav­el. The only way their redis­cov­ery could be more for­tu­itous is if it had hap­pened in time to ben­e­fit from the nine­teen-nineties Gre­go­ri­an-chant boom.

Relat­ed con­tent:

See the Guidon­ian Hand, the Medieval Sys­tem for Read­ing Music, Get Brought Back to Life

A YouTube Chan­nel Com­plete­ly Devot­ed to Medieval Sacred Music: Hear Gre­go­ri­an Chant, Byzan­tine Chant & More

The Medieval Ban Against the “Devil’s Tri­tone”: Debunk­ing a Great Myth in Music The­o­ry

New Dig­i­tal Archive Will Bring Medieval Chants Back to Life: Project Amra Will Fea­ture 300 Dig­i­tized Man­u­scripts and Many Audio Record­ings

A Beat­box­ing Bud­dhist Monk Cre­ates Music for Med­i­ta­tion

The His­to­ry of Clas­si­cal Music in 1200 Tracks: From Gre­go­ri­an Chant to Górec­ki (100 Hours of Audio)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The 1830s Device That Created the First Animations: The Phenakistiscope

The image just above is an ani­mat­ed GIF, a for­mat by now old­er than most peo­ple on the inter­net. Those of us who were surf­ing the World Wide Web in its ear­li­est years will remem­ber all those lit­tle dig­ging, jack­ham­mer­ing road­work­ers who flanked the per­ma­nent announce­ments that var­i­ous sites — includ­ing, quite pos­si­bly, our own — were “under con­struc­tion.” Charm­ing though they could be at the time, they now look impos­si­bly prim­i­tive com­pared to what we can see on today’s inter­net, where high-res­o­lu­tion fea­ture films stream instan­ta­neous­ly. But tech­no­log­i­cal­ly speak­ing, we can trace it all back to what this par­tic­u­lar ani­mat­ed GIF depicts: the phenakistis­cope.

Invent­ed simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and inde­pen­dent­ly in late 1832 by Bel­gian physi­cist Joseph Plateau and Aus­tri­an geom­e­try pro­fes­sor Simon Stampfer, the phenakistis­cope was a sim­ple wheel-shaped device that could, for the first time in the his­to­ry of tech­nol­o­gy, cre­ate the illu­sion of a smooth­ly mov­ing pic­ture when spun and viewed in a mir­ror: hence the deriva­tion of its name from the Greek phenakisti­cos, “to deceive,” and ops, “eye.”

When it caught on as a com­mer­cial nov­el­ty, it was also mar­ket­ed under names like Phan­tas­mas­cope and Fan­tas­cope, which promised buy­ers a glimpse of horse-rid­ers, twirling dancers, bow­ing aris­to­crats, hop­ping frogs, fly­ing ghouls, and even pro­to-psy­che­del­ic abstract pat­terns, many of which you can see re-ani­mat­ed as GIFs in this Wikipedia gallery.

Even­tu­al­ly, accord­ing to the Pub­lic Domain Review, the phenakistis­cope was “sup­plant­ed in the pop­u­lar imag­i­na­tion: first­ly by the sim­i­lar Zoetrope, and then — via Ead­weard Muy­bridge’s Zooprax­is­cope (which pro­ject­ed the ani­ma­tion) — by film itself.” Muy­bridge, pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture, did pio­neer­ing motion-pho­tog­ra­phy work in the eigh­teen-sev­en­ties that’s now con­sid­ered a pre­cur­sor to cin­e­ma. Under­stand­ing what he was up to is an impor­tant part of under­stand­ing the emer­gence of movies as we know them. But the most instruc­tive expe­ri­ence to start with is mak­ing a phenakistis­cope of your own, instruc­tions for which are avail­able from the George East­man Muse­um and artist Megan Scott on YouTube. The fin­ished prod­uct may not hold any­one’s atten­tion long here in the age of Net­flix, but then, the age of Net­flix would nev­er have arrived had the phenakistis­cope not come first.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Ead­weard Muybridge’s Motion Pho­tog­ra­phy Exper­i­ments from the 1870s Pre­sent­ed in 93 Ani­mat­ed Gifs

How Ani­mat­ed Car­toons Are Made: A Vin­tage Primer Filmed Way Back in 1919

The Trick That Made Ani­ma­tion Real­is­tic: Watch a Short His­to­ry of Roto­scop­ing

Was a 32,000-Year-Old Cave Paint­ing the Ear­li­est Form of Cin­e­ma?

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Watch Momijigari, Japan’s Oldest Surviving Film (1899)

At first, film sim­ply record­ed events: a man walk­ing across a gar­den, work­ers leav­ing a fac­to­ry, a train pulling into a sta­tion. The medi­um soon matured enough to accom­mo­date dra­ma, which for ear­ly film­mak­ers meant sim­ply shoot­ing what amount­ed to stage pro­duc­tions from the per­spec­tive of a view­er in the audi­ence. At that stage, we could say, film still had­n’t evolved past sim­ple doc­u­men­tary pur­pos­es, hav­ing yet to incor­po­rate edit­ing, to say noth­ing of the oth­er qual­i­ties we now regard as char­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly cin­e­mat­ic. This was­n’t a cul­tur­al mat­ter, but a tech­ni­cal one, as evi­denced by Momi­ji­gari, the old­est Japan­ese film in exis­tence.

Shot in 1899, Momi­ji­gari depicts near­ly four min­utes of a kabu­ki play involv­ing Onoe Kiku­gorō V and Ichikawa Dan­jūrō IX, two famous mas­ters of the form at the time. The idea was to pre­serve a record of their pres­ence on stage, no mat­ter how hap­haz­ard­ly or for how short a time, before they shuf­fled off this mor­tal coil.

It cer­tain­ly was­n’t too soon: both men would die in 1903, the year of the film’s first exhi­bi­tion. No fan of West­ern moder­ni­ty, Dan­jūrō had stip­u­lat­ed that it be shown only after his death, but in the event, it was screened for the pub­lic in his place at a per­for­mance at which he was too sick to appear, which extend­ed to a longer run in hon­or of Kiku­gorō’s recent death.

Like its West­ern his­tor­i­cal equiv­a­lents, Momi­ji­gari depicts a the­atri­cal work. The tit­u­lar six­teenth-cen­tu­ry Noh play, also per­formed in kabu­ki and dance-ori­ent­ed shosago­to ver­sions, involves a woman and her ret­inue on an out­ing to do some maple-leaf view­ing (the lit­er­al mean­ing of momi­ji­gari). Like all female kabu­ki roles, these would have been played with­out excep­tion by male actors, who were in any case thought bet­ter able to con­vey fem­i­nin­i­ty onstage. The lady entices a pass­ing war­rior to drink, and when he pass­es out, he’s informed in his dream that she’s actu­al­ly a demon. In the fol­low­ing scene, she reverts to demon form and the two do bat­tle. Pio­neer­ing Japan­ese film­mak­er Shi­ba­ta Tsune­kichi fits a sur­pris­ing amount of this nar­ra­tive into a very brief run­time, which also includes the whol­ly acci­den­tal loss of a fan. Dan­jūrō had insist­ed on shoot­ing out­side, even on a windy day, and one does­n’t sim­ply say no to a kabu­ki mas­ter.

via Metafil­ter

Relat­ed con­tent:

An Intro­duc­tion to Japan­ese Kabu­ki The­atre, Fea­tur­ing 20th-Cen­tu­ry Mas­ters of the Form (1964)

Watch the Old­est Japan­ese Ani­me Film, Jun’ichi Kōuchi’s The Dull Sword (1917)

The Ear­li­est Known Motion Pic­ture, 1888’s Round­hay Gar­den Scene, Restored with Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence

Essen­tial Japan­ese Cin­e­ma: A Jour­ney Through 50 of Japan’s Beau­ti­ful, Often Bizarre Films

Hand-Col­ored 1860s Pho­tographs Reveal the Last Days of Samu­rai Japan

Watch Vin­tage Footage of Tokyo, Cir­ca 1910, Get Brought to Life with Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Franz Kafka’s Anxious Letters to His Fiancée, Read Aloud by Richard Ayoade

It can’t have been easy being Franz Kaf­ka. But then, it can’t have been much eas­i­er being Franz Kafka’s fiancée, as evi­denced by the cor­re­spon­dence read aloud by Richard Ayoade in the new Let­ters Live video above. “It is now 10:30 on Mon­day morn­ing,” he wrote to Felice Bauer on Novem­ber 4, 1912. “I have been wait­ing for a let­ter since 10:30 on Sat­ur­day morn­ing, but again noth­ing has come. I have writ­ten every day but don’t I deserve even a word? One sin­gle word? Even if it were only to say ‘I nev­er want to hear from you again.’ ” This anx­ious, hec­tor­ing tone was not a one-off indul­gence. “Dear­est, what have I done that makes you tor­ment me so?” he plead­ed just over two weeks lat­er.

Kaf­ka and Bauer had been intro­duced three months before. She was a rel­a­tive of Max Brod, Kafka’s friend and even­tu­al lit­er­ary execu­tor, and accord­ing to Kafka’s diaries, made a fair­ly unpre­pos­sess­ing first impres­sion: “Bony, emp­ty face that wore its empti­ness open­ly. Bare throat. A blouse thrown on. Looked very domes­tic in her dress although, as it turned out, she by no means was.”

Yet dur­ing their ensu­ing five-year cor­re­spon­dence, he was moved to write her more than 500 let­ters, some of them sent one day after the oth­er — and more than a few berat­ing her for not writ­ing back quick­ly enough.

This rela­tion­ship twice led to engage­ment, but per­haps unsur­pris­ing­ly, nev­er cul­mi­nat­ed in mar­riage. Nev­er­the­less, Bauer’s rela­tion­ship with Kaf­ka remained impor­tant enough to her that she saved every­thing he wrote to her, which was col­lect­ed and pub­lished in book form as Briefe an Felice (and lat­er, in trans­la­tion, as Let­ters to Felice) in 1967. Per­haps, as bur­den­some as they could no doubt be, Kafka’s let­ters sug­gest­ed to Bauer a cer­tain lit­er­ary skill. (This was, after all, the same peri­od in which he wrote The Meta­mor­pho­sis and “In the Penal Colony,” as well as ear­ly ver­sions of The Tri­al). They also hint at his since-cel­e­brat­ed sense of humor, not least in a con­clud­ing line like “Damn the mail!” — words that, in Ayoad­e’s deliv­ery, draw a round of applause.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Franz Kafka’s Kafkaesque Love Let­ters

Franz Kaf­ka: An Ani­mat­ed Intro­duc­tion to His Lit­er­ary Genius

What Is Kafkaesque?: The Phi­los­o­phy of Franz Kaf­ka

Under­ground Car­toon­ist Robert Crumb Cre­ates an Illus­trat­ed Intro­duc­tion to Franz Kafka’s Life and Work

David Fos­ter Wal­lace Reads Franz Kafka’s Short Sto­ry “A Lit­tle Fable” (and Explains Why Com­e­dy Is Key to Kaf­ka)

Behold the Draw­ings of Franz Kaf­ka (1907–1917)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Origins of Satan: The Evolution of the Devil in Religion

The Dev­il, the Beast, Beelze­bub, Lucifer, Satan: whichev­er name we hap­pen to call him, we know full well who the guy is — or at least, we think we do. In fact, the images and evo­ca­tions of that embod­i­ment of (or per­haps metaphor for) sin, deceit, and temp­ta­tion that many of us have encoun­tered in pop­u­lar cul­ture have lit­tle, if any­thing, to do with Bib­li­cal scrip­ture. Here to explain Satan’s real tex­tu­al ori­gins is Reli­gion for Break­fast cre­ator Andrew Mark Hen­ry, who in the video above goes all the way back to the ancient Israelites and the Hebrew Bible — in which “the notion of a sin­gu­lar, supreme evil enti­ty and oppo­nent to God is com­plete­ly absent.”

Hen­ry men­tions that the Hebrew term śāṭān, which means “adver­sary or accuser,” does appear ear­ly in the Bible, but it “sim­ply refers to human adver­saries.” Only in lat­er texts, like the Book of Job, does the word take on the mean­ing of a “divine job title, kind of like a pros­e­cu­tor” or “legal adver­sary in a divine court.”

We’re still far from the cur­rent Chris­t­ian con­cept of Satan, which may even­tu­al­ly have arisen, accord­ing to some schol­ars, out of cen­turies of cul­tur­al exchange between Chris­tian­i­ty and Zoroas­tri­an­ism. The ancient Mid­dle East­ern reli­gion pro­pos­es a per­fect­ly good divine being Ahu­ra Maz­da “locked in bat­tle with a whol­ly evil being named Angra Mainyu.” This encounter between civ­i­liza­tions would explain some­thing about the emer­gence of the now wide­ly acknowl­edged idea of “a cos­mic strug­gle between good and evil.”

As one ancient text is lay­ered atop anoth­er, “an evil leader of fall­en angels or evil spir­it in gen­er­al becomes a recur­ring char­ac­ter,” and in the New Tes­ta­ment, “the chief adver­sary of God” is called by the name Satan — or by the Greek word diábo­los, which gave us Dev­il and all its relat­ed words. In ref­er­ence to the ori­gins of Satan, the Book of Isa­iah offers the line “How you are fall­en from heav­en, O Day Star, Son of Dawn!” The term “Day Star,” which refers to the plan­et Venus, was ren­dered in the Latin Vul­gate trans­la­tion as Lucifer, which has become anoth­er com­mon name for this ever-more-charged fig­ure. Whether we fear him, con­demn him, deny his exis­tence, or even — depend­ing on our musi­cal gen­res of choice — imag­ine that we wor­ship him, our cul­ture does, in some sense or anoth­er, seem to need him.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Par­adise Lost Explained: How John Mil­ton Wrote His Epic Reli­gious Poem from Satan’s Per­spec­tive

Behold the Codex Gigas (aka “Devil’s Bible”), the Largest Medieval Man­u­script in the World

The Leg­end of How Blues­man Robert John­son Sold His Soul to the Dev­il at the Cross­roads

A Brief His­to­ry of Mak­ing Deals with the Dev­il: Nic­colò Pagani­ni, Robert John­son, Jim­my Page & More

John Cleese Plays the Dev­il, Makes a Spe­cial Appeal for Hell, 1966

Tom Sawyer, Huck Finn & Twain Him­self Meet Satan in the Zany 1985 Clay­ma­tion The Adven­tures of Mark Twain

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Did Paul McCartney Really Die in 1966? How the Biggest Beatles Conspiracy Theory Spread

No pop music can have inspired more scruti­ny than that of the Bea­t­les. Of course, intense and sus­tained atten­tion has been paid to every aspect of the band’s exis­tence — and, in the case of Paul McCart­ney, his pur­port­ed non-exis­tence as well. The the­o­ry that he actu­al­ly died in the nine­teen-six­ties and was there­after secret­ly played by a dou­ble has demon­strat­ed such pop-cul­tur­al stay­ing pow­er that even those who bare­ly know the Bea­t­les’ music make ref­er­ence to it. The phrase “Turn me on, dead man” now floats free of its ori­gin, an act of cre­ative lis­ten­ing applied to “Rev­o­lu­tion 9” played back­wards.

The idea, as explained in the Vinyl Rewind video above, is that “after an argu­ment dur­ing a Bea­t­les record­ing ses­sion on Novem­ber 9th, 1966, Paul McCart­ney sped off in his car, only to be decap­i­tat­ed in an auto acci­dent when he lost con­trol of his vehi­cle. The U.K. secu­ri­ty ser­vice MI5 advised the band to find a replace­ment, for they feared that if the news of Paul’s death got out, mass hys­te­ria would spread among Bea­t­les fans, lead­ing to civ­il unrest and, pos­si­bly, mass sui­cide.” The hunt for a Paul looka­like turned up “a Scot­tish orphan named William Shears Camp­bell, also known as Bil­ly Shears.”

That name will sound famil­iar to even casu­al Bea­t­les lis­ten­ers, announced as it is so promi­nent­ly, and so ear­ly, on Sgt. Pep­per’s Lone­ly Hearts Club Band. The album’s cov­er, too, proved to be a fount of imagery sug­gest­ing that the rumor of Paul’s death, which had been ref­er­enced in an offi­cial Bea­t­les pub­li­ca­tion in 1967 specif­i­cal­ly to dis­pel it, was actu­al­ly true. A cou­ple of years lat­er, a Detroit radio DJ and a Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan stu­dent-jour­nal­ist got the sto­ry into wide cir­cu­la­tion. No one clue — the recur­ring shoe­less­ness of Paul or his imper­son­ator, the death-of-Oswald lines from King Lear incor­po­rat­ed into “I Am the Wal­rus,” the car wreck described in “A Day in the Life,” the license-plate of the VW on Abbey Road’s cov­er  — was dis­pos­i­tive, but even­tu­al­ly, they added up.

They added up if you were express­ly look­ing for evi­dence of Paul’s death and sub­sti­tu­tion: engag­ing in parei­do­lia, in oth­er words, the ten­den­cy to per­ceive mean­ing­ful pat­terns in ran­dom noise, or in this case a range of minor, non-orches­trat­ed details across pieces of media. Giv­en the Bea­t­les’ per­son­al­i­ties, nobody would put it past them to make cheeky hid­den ref­er­ences to exact­ly what they weren’t sup­posed to talk about, but any­one famil­iar with the music busi­ness would also sus­pect that Capi­tol Records had no inter­est in putting a stop to a false rumor that was gen­er­at­ing a prof­it. It’s cer­tain­ly a stretch to imag­ine that some­one who just hap­pens to look like Paul McCart­ney would also be will­ing and able to car­ry on the man’s solo career for decade after decade. But then, the his­to­ry of pop­u­lar music is full of lucky men, and maybe — just maybe — Bil­ly Shears was among the luck­i­est.

Relat­ed con­tent:

How the “Paul McCart­ney is Dead” Hoax Start­ed at an Amer­i­can Col­lege News­pa­per and Went Viral (1969)

Paul McCart­ney Breaks Down His Most Famous Songs and Answers Most-Asked Fan Ques­tions in Two New Videos

The Paul McCart­ney is Dead Con­spir­a­cy The­o­ry, Explained

Paul McCart­ney vs. Bri­an Wil­son: A Rival­ry That Inspired Pet Sounds, Sgt. Pep­per, and Oth­er Clas­sic Albums

Hear The Bea­t­les’ Abbey Road with Only Paul McCartney’s Bass: You Won’t Believe How Good It Sounds

Paul McCart­ney Admits to Drop­ping Acid in a Scrap­py Inter­view with a Pry­ing Reporter (June, 1967)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. His projects include the Sub­stack newslet­ter Books on Cities and the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast