HieronyÂmus Bosch’s masÂterÂpiece of grotesÂquerie, The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights, conÂtains a young God, Adam and Eve, overÂsized fruits and musiÂcal instruÂments, owls, torÂtured sinÂners, someÂthing called a “tree man” whose body conÂtains an entire tavÂern, a defeÂcatÂing avian devÂil eatÂing a human being, and “frolÂickÂing, oblivÂiÂous figÂures engaged in all sorts of carÂnal pleaÂsures,” as art hisÂtoÂriÂan Beth HarÂris puts it in the new SmarthisÂtoÂry video above. ThroughÂout its fifÂteen minÂutes, she and her colÂleague Steven ZuckÂer explain as much as posÂsiÂble of this jam-packed tripÂtych — not that even a lifeÂtime would be long enough to underÂstand it fulÂly.
“Bosch conÂfounds our abilÂiÂty to even talk about what we see,” says HarÂris. “His imagÂiÂnaÂtion has run wild. He’s just inventÂed so many things here that we could nevÂer even have thought about in our wildest imagÂiÂnaÂtions.” ZuckÂer cites one art-hisÂtoÂry theÂoÂry that this tripÂtych repÂreÂsents Bosch’s attempt to “eleÂvate the visuÂal arts to the levÂel of creÂativÂiÂty that was perÂmitÂted in litÂerÂaÂture.”
Even in Bosch’s late fifÂteenth and earÂly sixÂteenth cenÂturies, writÂers had an enviÂably free hand in choosÂing and preÂsentÂing their subÂject matÂter; because the directÂly repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive form of paintÂing, by conÂtrast, “had always been at the serÂvice of reliÂgion, it was inherÂentÂly more conÂserÂvÂaÂtive.”
It’s entireÂly posÂsiÂble — and othÂer analyÂses preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured here at Open CulÂture have argued it – that Bosch, too, was workÂing at the serÂvice of reliÂgion. But it could also be that The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights, in its vast midÂdle panÂel, tells “an alterÂnate stoÂry,” as ZuckÂer puts it. “What if the tempÂtaÂtion had not takÂen place? What if Adam and Eve had remained innoÂcent, and had popÂuÂlatÂed the world? And so, is it posÂsiÂble that what we’re seeÂing is that realÂiÂty, played out in Bosch’s imagÂiÂnaÂtion?” Not that such a vision would have readÂiÂly been acceptÂed in the artist’s own time and place — nor that his intenÂtions alone could lead us to a comÂplete interÂpreÂtaÂtion of his work. As any novÂelÂist knows, someÂtimes your charÂacÂters simÂply take over, and it could hardÂly have been withÂin even Bosch’s powÂers to deny the desires of a cast so teemÂing and bizarre.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
The MeanÂing of HieronyÂmus Bosch’s The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights Explained
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.

