Beneath Kurt Vonnegut’s grim, absurÂdist humor beat the heart of a humanÂist, but not, by any stretch, an optiÂmist. VonÂnegut looked baleÂfulÂly at every project intendÂed to improve the sorÂry state of human affairs. In PlayÂer Piano, for examÂple, he imagÂines a future very much like that enviÂsioned for us by our conÂtemÂpoÂrary techÂnoÂcratÂic elite: nearÂly all work has been autoÂmatÂed and the mass of unemÂployed are givÂen a modÂest stipend for their livÂing and funÂneled into what anthroÂpolÂoÂgist David GraeÂber might call “bullÂshit jobs.”
“FinalÂly,” Ed O’Loughlin writes at The Irish Times, “Vonnegut’s non-tech proÂles rise up against the machines that have perÂverseÂly enslaved them, smashÂing all that they can find. For VonÂnegut, ever the pesÂsimist, this is not a hapÂpy endÂing; the revÂoÂluÂtion runs out of steam, colÂlapsÂes interÂnalÂly, and the remainÂing rebels go hapÂpiÂly to work in the wreckÂage of their strugÂgle, eagerÂly repairÂing the machines that they destroyed themÂselves.” This bleak satire can seem almost upbeat next to the fatalÂism of his most famous novÂel, SlaughÂterÂhouse-Five.
In this book, VonÂnegut uses an alien race called the TralfamadoÂriÂans to illusÂtrate the idea that “all moments—past, present, and future—always have existÂed… always will exist,” as the Mia NacaÂmulÂli-scriptÂed TED-Ed aniÂmaÂtion above explains. The aliens keep the novel’s hero, BilÂly PilÂgrim, in a human zoo, where they patientÂly explain to him the inevitabilÂiÂty of all things, includÂing the bombÂing of DresÂden, an event VonÂnegut perÂsonÂalÂly surÂvived, “only to be sent into the ruins as prison labor,” notes Paul HarÂris at The Guardian, “in order to colÂlect and burn the corpses.”
To say that VonÂnegut, who once worked as a press writer for GenÂerÂal ElecÂtric, was skepÂtiÂcal of sciÂenÂtifÂic plans for manÂagÂing nature, human or othÂerÂwise, would be a major underÂstateÂment. As he watched GE sciÂenÂtists embark on a project for conÂtrolÂling the weathÂer (while the company’s “milÂiÂtary colÂlabÂoÂraÂtors have more aggresÂsive plans in mind”), VonÂnegut began to demand “an answer to one of science’s greatÂest ethÂiÂcal quesÂtions,” writes WNYC: “are sciÂenÂtists responÂsiÂble for the purÂsuit of knowlÂedge alone, or are they also responÂsiÂble for the conÂseÂquences of that knowlÂedge?”
The quesÂtion becomes even more comÂpliÂcatÂed if we accept the premise that the future is foreÂorÂdained, but withÂout the interÂvenÂtion of all-seeÂing aliens, there is no reliÂable way for us to preÂdict it. Vonnegut’s expeÂriÂences at GE formed the basis of his 1963 novÂel Cat’s CraÂdle, in which a milÂiÂtary techÂnolÂoÂgy called Ice-nine ends up freezÂing all of the world’s oceans and bringÂing on catÂaÂclysmic storms. Cat’s CraÂdle’s charÂacÂters surÂvive by adoptÂing a reliÂgion in which they tell themÂselves and othÂers delibÂerÂate lies, and by so doing, invent a kind of meanÂing in the midst of hopeÂlessÂness.
VonÂnegut stressed the imporÂtance of conÂtinÂgency, of “growÂing where you’re plantÂed,” so to speak. The best options for his charÂacÂters involve carÂing for the peoÂple who just hapÂpen to be around. “We are here to help each othÂer through this thing,” he wrote, “whatÂevÂer it is.” That last phrase is not an evaÂsion; the comÂplexÂiÂties of the uniÂverse are too much for humans to grasp, VonÂnegut thought. Our attempts to creÂate staÂble truths and certainties—whether through abstract in-group idenÂtiÂties or grand techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal designs—seem bound to cause expoÂnenÂtialÂly more sufÂferÂing than they solve.
VonÂnegut may have achieved far more acclaim in his lifeÂtime than his conÂtemÂpoÂrary Philip K. Dick, but he felt simÂiÂlarÂly neglectÂed by the “litÂerÂary estabÂlishÂment,” HarÂris writes. “They interÂpretÂed his simÂplisÂtic style, love of sciÂence ficÂtion and MidÂwestÂern valÂues as being beneath seriÂous study.” (See, for examÂple the 1969 New York Times review of SlaughÂterÂhouse-Five.) But perÂhaps even more than the perenÂniÂalÂly relÂeÂvant Dick, Vonnegut’s work speaks to us of our curÂrent predicaÂment, and offers, if not optiÂmism, at least a very limÂitÂed form of hope, in our capacÂiÂty to “help each through this thing,” whatÂevÂer it is.
If you want to fulÂly immerse yourÂself in VonÂnegut’s body of work, the Library of AmerÂiÂca has creÂatÂed a box set that conÂtains all 14 novÂels plus a selecÂtion of the best of his stoÂries.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Kurt VonÂnegut Maps Out the UniÂverÂsal Shapes of Our Favorite StoÂries
Kurt VonÂnegut CreÂates a Report Card for His NovÂels, RankÂing Them From A+ to D
Hear Kurt VonÂnegut Read SlaughÂterÂhouse-Five, Cat’s CraÂdle & OthÂer NovÂels
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness









