When I was a child, my father, enchantÂed by the notion that I might someÂday proÂvide live piano accomÂpaÂniÂment to his evening cockÂtails, signed me up for lessons with a mild-manÂnered widÂow who—if memÂoÂry serves—charged 50¢ an hour.
Had I only been forced to pracÂtice more regÂuÂlarÂly, I’d have no trouÂble rememÂberÂing the exact price of these lessons. My memÂoÂry would be a supremeÂly robust thing of beauÂty. DitÂto my math skills, my cogÂniÂtive funcÂtion, my abilÂiÂty to mulÂtiÂtask.
Instead, my dad evenÂtuÂalÂly conÂcedÂed that I was not cut out to be a musiÂcian (or a balÂleÂriÂna, or a tenÂnis whiz…) and Mrs. Arnold was out a pupil.
Would that I stuck with it beyond my haltÂing verÂsions of “The EnterÂtainÂer” and “FĂĽr Elise.” AccordÂing to the TED-Ed video above, playÂing an instruÂment is one of the very best things you can do for your brain. TalÂent doesÂn’t matÂter in this conÂtext, just ongoÂing pracÂtice.
NeuÂroÂsciÂenÂtists using fMRI (FuncÂtionÂal MagÂnetÂic ResÂoÂnance ImagÂing) and PET (Positron EmisÂsion TomogÂraÂphy) techÂnolÂoÂgy to monÂiÂtor the brain activÂiÂty of subÂjects lisÂtenÂing to music saw engageÂment in many areas, but when the subÂjects tradÂed in headÂphones for actuÂal instruÂments, this activÂiÂty morÂphed into a grand fireÂworks disÂplay.
(The aniÂmatÂed explaÂnaÂtion of the interÂplay between varÂiÂous musiÂcalÂly engaged areas of the brain sugÂgests the New York City subÂway map, a metaphor I find more apt.)
This masÂsive full brain workÂout is availÂable to anyÂone willÂing to put in the time with an instruÂment. ReadÂing the score, figÂurÂing out timÂing and finÂgerÂing, and pourÂing one’s soul into creÂative interÂpreÂtaÂtion results in an interofÂfice cereÂbral comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion that strengthÂens the corÂpus calosÂsum and execÂuÂtive funcÂtion.
Though to bring up the specter of anothÂer stereoÂtype, stay away from the hard stuff, guys…don’t fry those beauÂtiÂful minds.
If you’d like to know more about the sciÂenÂtifÂic impliÂcaÂtions of music lessons, WBUR’s series “Brain MatÂters” has a good overview here. And good luck breakÂing the good news to your chilÂdren.
For the last three decades my right ankle has been the site of a deeply botched tatÂtoo. It was supÂposed to be a yin yang, but with every passÂing year, it looks more and more like a canÂcerÂous mole. The drunkÂen VietÂnam Vet who adminÂisÂtered it bareÂly glanced at the design takÂing shape on my once virÂgin skin as he chatÂted with a pal. I was too intimÂiÂdatÂed to say, “Um…is it just me or are you fillÂing in the white cirÂcle?” (I conÂvinced myself that he knew what he was doing, and the ink would recede as it healed. NeedÂless to say…)
My pathetÂic, litÂtle yin-ya’ is an embarÂrassÂment in an era of intriÂcate four-colÂor sleeves and souped up rockÂaÂbilÂly gorÂgeousÂness, but I conÂfess, I’ve grown fond of it. The fact that I have an out-of-balÂance symÂbol for balÂance perÂmaÂnentÂly engraved onto my body is far more approÂpriÂate than the poorÂly grasped flash art could have been. It’ll be with me til the day I die.
I feel forÂtuÂnate to have develÂoped tenÂder feelÂings for my bush league modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion. ClauÂdia AguirÂre’s TED-Ed lesÂson “What Makes TatÂtoos PerÂmaÂnent,” above, does not make an easy case for removal.
In the words of your grandÂma, don’t embellÂish your birthÂday suit with any old junk.
Choose wiseÂly! If you’re veerÂing toward a TasÂmanÂian devÂil or a rose, do yourÂself a favor and browse the MuseÂum of Online MuseÂums. Feel a kinÂship with anyÂthing there? Good! Once you’ve figÂured out how to best feaÂture it on your hide, take AguirÂre’s anatoÂmy-based quiz. See if it’s true that you’ll be barred from burÂial in a JewÂish cemeÂtery. Your tatÂtoo artist will likeÂly be impressed that you cared enough to do some research. Watch a couÂple of episodes of the SmithÂsoÂniÂan’s TatÂtoo Odysseyfor good meaÂsure.
Then lay in a tube of PrepaÂraÂtion H, and preÂpare to love whatÂevÂer you wind up with. It’s a lot easÂiÂer than the pain of regret.
AccordÂing to HarÂvard MedÂical School’s AdmisÂsions departÂment, “to study medÂiÂcine at HarÂvard is to preÂpare to play a leadÂing role” in the “quest to improve the human conÂdiÂtion.”
It might also preÂpare you to play a giant spleen, as Richard Ngo, Class of 2016, does in this video for the HarÂvard MedÂical School and HarÂvard School of DenÂtal MedÂiÂcine’s 107th AnnuÂal SecÂond Year Show.
In this anatomÂiÂcal homage to “The Fox,” NorÂweÂgian comÂeÂdy duo Ylvis’ delibÂerÂateÂly bizarre hit, the CrimÂsonites demonÂstrate a pretÂty straightÂforÂward grasp of their studÂies:
Their parÂents, parÂticÂuÂlarÂly the hard workÂing immiÂgrant ones, must have been so relieved to learn that music videos are a fallÂback should the docÂtor thing not work out.
Though why wouldÂn’t it? Secret male uterus? VesÂtiÂgial fin? PosÂsiÂbly a backÂup tongue?
They may be guessÂes, but they’re eduÂcatÂed guessÂes!
“If by some mirÂaÂcle some prophet could describe the future exactÂly as it was going to take place, his preÂdicÂtions would sound so absurd, so far-fetched that everyÂone would laugh him to scorn.”
That was Sir Arthur C. Clarke, sciÂence ficÂtion author best known for 2001: A Space Odyssey, describÂing the inherÂent folÂly of preÂdictÂing the future in a 1964 BBC docÂuÂmenÂtary. Of course, he then goes on to do exactÂly that – with remarkÂable, unnervÂing accuÂraÂcy. Part one of the docÂuÂmenÂtary is above. Part two is below.
The piece opens with a generÂic narÂraÂtion that describes a dioÂraÂma of future sociÂety at the GM pavilÂion at the 1964 World Fair. PerÂhaps because it was a more innoÂcent time or maybe because it was sponÂsored by an automakÂer, this vision of the future is touchÂingÂly oblivÂiÂous to anyÂthing relatÂed to cliÂmate change. Machines with laser guns will clear junÂgles in hours flat and peoÂple will live in domed comÂmuÂniÂties on the ice caps. (Ice caps in the future. HilarÂiÂous.)
Then the reedy, bespecÂtaÂcled author appears and starts to describe how he thinks the world in fifty years (i.e. 2014) will look. And this is where the movie starts to feel uncanÂny. He talks about how the advanceÂment of tranÂsisÂtors and satelÂlites will radÂiÂcalÂly alter our underÂstandÂing of physÂiÂcal space.
These things will make posÂsiÂble a world in which we can be in instant conÂtact wherÂevÂer we may be. Where we can conÂtact our friends anyÂwhere on earth, even if we don’t know their actuÂal physÂiÂcal locaÂtion. It will be posÂsiÂble in that age, posÂsiÂbly 50 years from now, for a man to conÂduct his busiÂness from TahiÂti or Bali just as well as he could from LonÂdon.
For the record, I’m writÂing this post in a cofÂfee shop in Los AngeÂles, hunÂdreds of miles from the masÂsive Open CulÂture headÂquarÂters in Palo Alto, but I could just as easÂiÂly be writÂing this on a beach in Sri LanÂka or a hotel room in Dubrovnik. Clarke sounds here less like some pie-in-the-sky futurÂist than an aspiÂraÂtional lifestyle guru like Tim FerÂris.
Clarke then describes how medÂiÂcine might change. “One day, we might have brain surÂgeons in EdinÂburgh operÂatÂing on patients in New Zealand.” The long-disÂtance virÂtuÂal surgery first was pioÂneered back in 2001 and it conÂtinÂues to improve as interÂnet speeds increase.
And he preÂdicts that at some point sciÂence will invent a “repliÂcatÂing device” that would creÂate an exact copy of anyÂthing. That sounds an awful lot like a 3D printÂer. Clarke warns that this invenÂtion might cause masÂsive sociÂetal disÂrupÂtion. “ConÂfrontÂed by such a device, our present sociÂety would probÂaÂbly sink into a kind of glutÂtoÂnous barÂbarism. Since everyÂone would want unlimÂitÂed quanÂtiÂties of everyÂthing.” In othÂer words, 3D printÂers might turn the world into Black FriÂday at WalÂmart.
Some of his othÂer ideas are just weird. Clarke proÂposÂes to tame and train armies of chimÂpanzees to cook, clean and do society’s grunt work. “We can cerÂtainÂly solve our serÂvant probÂlem with the help of the monÂkey kingÂdom. “ PlanÂet of the Apes wouldn’t come out for anothÂer four years so Clarke could be forÂgivÂen for not realÂizÂing that that is one terÂriÂble idea. On the othÂer hand, it’s hard to see how hirÂing monÂkeys could posÂsiÂbly make the cusÂtomer serÂvice at Time WarnÂer Cable any worse than it already is.
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow.
On April 26, 1986, the numÂber 4 reacÂtor at the CherÂnobyl nuclear powÂer plant blew up in what is now Ukraine. The site spewed a cloud of radioacÂtive mateÂrÂiÂal that spread over much of Europe. The area immeÂdiÂateÂly around CherÂnobyl received more than 400 times the radiÂaÂtion as HiroshiÂma and won’t be safeÂly inhabÂitÂable for about 20,000 years. The govÂernÂment set up a 1,000 square mile excluÂsion zone around the site. While short visÂits to the zone are posÂsiÂble withÂout too much danÂger, livÂing there is not advisÂable. CanÂcer is a real probÂlem for the couÂple hunÂdred elderÂly stalÂwarts who still make the zone their home.
WithÂin the zone, nature has takÂen its own course, disÂmanÂtling the SoviÂet-era bruÂtalÂist tenÂeÂments of the surÂroundÂing abanÂdoned cities and turnÂing it into what at first blush looks more and more like a prelapÂsarÂiÂan Eden. The truth proves to be more comÂpliÂcatÂed.
Dr. TimÂoÂthy Mousseau, a biolÂoÂgist from the UniÂverÂsiÂty of South CarÂoliÂna, has been examÂinÂing the wildlife around CherÂnobyl for fifÂteen years. He’s disÂcovÂered that the radiÂaÂtion that has been bathing the area for almost 30 years is changÂing nature. As you can see in the New York Times Op-Doc video above, birds are develÂopÂing tumors, bugs have abnorÂmal spots and spiÂder webs seem much more freeform than usuÂal. Get more on the stoÂry over at the Times.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletÂter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bunÂdled in one email, each day.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow.
Carl Sagan, the turtleÂneck-sportÂing astroÂphysiÂcist from CorÂnell, was the greatÂest comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtor of sciÂence of his genÂerÂaÂtion. Not only did he pubÂlish hunÂdreds of sciÂenÂtifÂic papers and was instruÂmenÂtal in putting togethÂer that goldÂen record on the VoyÂager spaceÂcrafts but he also wrote twenÂty critÂiÂcalÂly praised best sellÂers on sciÂence, appeared regÂuÂlarÂly on the Tonight Show, and even had a catch phrase — “bilÂlions and bilÂlions.” But Sagan is perÂhaps best known for his landÂmark 1980 series CosÂmos: A PerÂsonÂal VoyÂage(watch it here). He took viewÂers through a tour of the uniÂverse, showÂing them things from the mind-bogÂgling big to the infinÂiÂtesÂiÂmalÂly small and everyÂthing in between. The show proved to be a huge hit; close to a half-bilÂlion peoÂple tuned in worldÂwide.
Even before the reboot of CosÂmos preÂmiered on FOX in March, Neil deGrasse Tyson — who hosts the show — was already seen as Sagan’s sucÂcesÂsor. Not only does he serve as the direcÂtor of the HayÂden PlanÂeÂtarÂiÂum in New York City and was instruÂmenÂtal in kickÂing PluÂto out of the brothÂerÂhood of planÂets, but he also authored numerÂous books, appears regÂuÂlarÂly on The DaiÂly Show, and freÂquentÂly hosts AMAs on RedÂdit. He’s also one of AmerÂiÂca’s most vocal defendÂers of sciÂence at a time, unlike Sagan’s heyÂday, when CreÂationÂism, cliÂmate change denial, and anti-vacÂciÂnaÂtion hysÂteÂria seem to be makÂing inroads in our culÂture.
AnyÂone who saw Tyson’s heart felt tribÂute to Sagan at the beginÂning of the first episode of CosÂmos knows that Sagan’s influÂence on his younger counÂterÂpart extendÂed much furÂther than his media appearÂances. It was perÂsonÂal. In 1975, Sagan, who was already famous at that time, was so impressed by Tyson’s colÂlege appliÂcaÂtion that he perÂsonÂalÂly reached out to him, hopÂing to conÂvince the high school stuÂdent to attend CorÂnell. He even offered to perÂsonÂalÂly show Tyson around his lab.
You can read Sagan’s letÂter, datÂed NovemÂber 12, 1975, below.
Dear Neil:
Thanks for your letÂter and most interÂestÂing resume. I was espeÂcialÂly glad to see that, for a career in astronÂoÂmy, you intend to do your underÂgradÂuÂate work in physics. In this way, you will acquire the essenÂtial tools for a wide range of subÂseÂquent astroÂnomÂiÂcal endeavÂors.
I would guess from your resume that your interÂests in astronÂoÂmy are sufÂfiÂcientÂly deep and your mathÂeÂmatÂiÂcal and physÂiÂcal backÂground sufÂfiÂcientÂly strong that we could probÂaÂbly engage you in real astroÂnomÂiÂcal research durÂing your underÂgradÂuÂate career here, if the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty interÂests you. For examÂple, we hope to be bringÂing back to IthaÂca in late calÂenÂdar year 1976 an enorÂmous array of Viking data on Mars both from the orbiters and from the lanÂders.
I would be delightÂed to meet with you when you visÂit IthaÂca. Please try and give as much advance notice of the date as you can because my travÂel schedÂule is quite hecÂtic right now and I realÂly would like to be in IthaÂca when you drop by.
With all good wishÂes,
Carl Sagan
Tyson was deeply moved by Sagan’s kindÂness and sinÂcerÂiÂty. He did venÂture out to IthaÂca from the Bronx on a snowy afterÂnoon. As Tyson recalled years latÂer, “I thought to myself, who am I? I’m just some high school kid.” In the end, Sagan’s perÂsonÂal plea wasn’t quite enough to conÂvince young Tyson to attend his school. As you can read in his response below, datÂed April 30, 1976, Tyson decidÂed to go to HarÂvard.
Dear Prof. Sagan
Thank you for your offer conÂcernÂing the Viking MisÂsions. After long thought and deciÂsion makÂing I have choÂsen to attend HarÂvard UniÂverÂsiÂty this SepÂtemÂber. I chose it not simÂply because of its “valuÂable” name but because they have a largÂer astronÂoÂmy departÂment in addiÂtion to the SmithÂsonÂian AstroÂphysÂiÂcal ObserÂvaÂtoÂry, so while I am majorÂing in physics I will have more surÂroundÂing me in the way of on-going research in astronÂoÂmy.
I want to say that I did enjoy meetÂing you and I am very grateÂful for your hosÂpiÂtalÂiÂty and the time you spent with me while at CorÂnell. I will throughÂout my underÂgradÂuÂate years keep you informed on any noteÂworÂthy news conÂcernÂing astronÂoÂmy-relatÂed work that I’m involved in. I do plan to apply again for the Viking InternÂship next sumÂmer.
Thanks again
Neil D. Tyson
You can see Tyson talk about his afterÂnoon with Sagan. 40 years latÂer, he still seems incredÂuÂlous that it hapÂpened.
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow.
If you’re a regÂuÂlar OC readÂer, you’re familÂiar with John Green, the bestÂselling author who has proÂduced a series of eduÂcaÂtionÂal videos — most notably, A Crash Course in World HisÂtoÂry, A Crash Course on LitÂerÂaÂture, and the new PBS video series, The Art AssignÂment. John often proÂduces videos with his brothÂer Hank — a musiÂcian, bioÂchemist and vlogÂger — who put his talÂents togethÂer to proÂduce this new song, “I F***ing Love SciÂence.” Be warned, the verÂsion above is uncenÂsored. As are the lyrics, found below the jump. A clean, tame, cenÂsored verÂsion of the song can be found here.
A few months ago, we feaÂtured the increasÂingÂly abstract porÂtraits drawn by an artist after periÂodÂic dosÂes of LSD. It hapÂpened in the late 1950s, a time when you might well imagÂine such an activÂiÂty going down in, say, a bohemiÂan quarÂter of New York, but also a time when halÂluÂcinoÂgenic drugs rode a wave of popÂuÂlarÂiÂty among legitÂiÂmate sciÂenÂtists. Those ostenÂsiÂbly straight-laced researchers (someÂtimes fundÂed by CIA monÂey) had a fasÂciÂnaÂtion not with the takÂing of halÂluÂcinoÂgenic drugs — not necÂesÂsarÂiÂly, anyÂway — but with what, exactÂly, these halÂluÂcinoÂgenic drugs did to those who do take them. ParÂticÂuÂlarÂly artists drawÂing porÂtraits. Those porÂtraits drawn on LSD came out under the close watch of UniÂverÂsiÂty of CalÂiÂforÂnia, Irvine psyÂchiÂaÂtrist Oscar Janiger. Above, you can watch the fruit of anothÂer, much more verÂbal 1950s experÂiÂment conÂductÂed just down the coast by the UniÂverÂsiÂty of SouthÂern CalÂiÂforÂniÂa’s Nicholas A. BerÂcel, M.D.: “SchizÂoÂphrenic ModÂel PsyÂchosis Induced by LSD 25.”
Here we also have an artist examÂined: this time, a Los AngeÂles painter named Bill. As Bill floats through his altered state, BerÂcel asks him to describe, in as rigÂorÂous detail as posÂsiÂble, his perÂcepÂtions of objects in the room, of items of food and drink brought in, and of their interÂacÂtions themÂselves. This 24-minute film of the four-hour process, puncÂtuÂatÂed by elecÂtroenÂcephaloÂgraphÂic scans, comes as a proÂducÂtion of SanÂdoz, the Swiss pharÂmaÂceuÂtiÂcal comÂpaÂny who origÂiÂnalÂly isoÂlatÂed LSD and who apparÂentÂly had an interÂest in bringÂing a form of it to marÂket. (One proÂposed pharÂmaÂcoÂlogÂiÂcal desÂigÂnaÂtion: “PhanÂtastium.”) Though that didÂn’t hapÂpen, the HunÂgarÂiÂan-born BerÂcel went on throughÂout his long career to conÂduct more research of the kind that ultiÂmateÂly earned him a legaÂcy as a pioÂneer in neuÂroÂphysÂiÂolÂoÂgy. He also, when not in the lab, wrote over a dozen novÂels and film treatÂments. ClearÂly he had an impresÂsive creÂative streak, whether or not he ever perÂsonÂalÂly had his doors of perÂcepÂtion opened by the subÂstances his subÂjects like Bill so enjoyed.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.