Johannes (or Jan) VerÂmeer’s tranÂquil domesÂtic scenes draw largÂer crowds than nearÂly any othÂer EuroÂpean painter; he, like RemÂbrandt, is synÂonyÂmous with the phrase “Dutch MasÂter.” But for much of its exisÂtence, his work lay in near-obscuÂriÂty. After his death, some of his most-renowned paintÂings passed through the hands of patrons and colÂlecÂtors for next to nothÂing. In 1881, for examÂple, Girl with a Pearl EarÂring sold for two guilders, thirÂty cents, or about $26.
While othÂer VerÂmeer masÂterÂpieces lanÂguished, one paintÂing nevÂer lost its valÂue. The MilkÂmaid – “probÂaÂbly purÂchased from the artist by his Delft patron Pieter van RuiÂjven,” who owned twenÂty-one of the artist’s works, notes the Met — was described at its 1696 aucÂtion as “excepÂtionÂalÂly good.” It fetched the secÂond highÂest price of VerÂmeer’s works (next to View of Delft). In 1719, “The famous milkÂmaid, by VerÂmeer of Delft” (described as “artÂful”) began its jourÂney through a series of sigÂnifÂiÂcant AmsÂterÂdam colÂlecÂtions.
The MilkÂmaid evenÂtuÂalÂly landÂed in the hands of “one of the great woman colÂlecÂtors of Dutch art, LucreÂtia JohanÂna van WinÂter,” who marÂried into the wealthy Six famÂiÂly of art colÂlecÂtors. FinalÂly, in 1908, the RijksmuÂseÂum purÂchased the paintÂing from her sons with help from the Dutch govÂernÂment. The MilkÂmaid, that is to say, has remained part of the culÂturÂal herÂitage of the NetherÂlands from its beginÂnings. In the Great Art Explained video above, you can learn what makes this earÂly work, paintÂed between 1657–58, so speÂcial.
The Baroque art that preÂcedÂed VerÂmeer’s genÂerÂaÂtion “came from conÂflict,” nameÂly the reliÂgious wars of the RefÂorÂmaÂtion and Counter-RefÂorÂmaÂtion. “The art being proÂduced in Catholic counÂtries had become a powÂerÂful tool of proÂpaÂganÂda, charÂacÂterÂized by a heightÂened sense of draÂma, moveÂment and theÂatriÂcalÂiÂty that had nevÂer been seen before.” We see the draÂmatÂic tranÂsiÂtion in Dutch art in the moveÂment from Peter Paul Rubens to VerÂmeer, as “simÂple domesÂtic inteÂriÂors of midÂdle-class life” became domÂiÂnant: “secÂuÂlar works that conÂtain stoÂries of real human relaÂtionÂships.” Those works arose in a CalvinÂist culÂture that banned reliÂgious imagery and stressed “simÂplicÂiÂty in both worÂship and decÂoÂraÂtive style.”
The Dutch break with Catholic traÂdiÂtion meant a total reinÂvenÂtion of Dutch art; thus came the realÂist traÂdiÂtion, proÂduced not for the church but the wealthy merÂchant class, with VerÂmeer as one of its earÂly masÂters because of his near-phoÂtoÂgraphÂic renÂderÂing of natÂurÂal light and natÂuÂralÂisÂtic comÂpoÂsiÂtion. VerÂmeer epitÂoÂmized the new Dutch art, despite the fact that he was a Catholic conÂvert through marÂriage. After his marÂriage, he spent his life “in the same town, the same house, slowÂly proÂducÂing paintÂings in the same room… at a rate of two or three a year.” His outÂput, perÂhaps 60 paintÂings — 36 of which surÂvive — pales in comÂparÂiÂson to that of his peers. But of all the artists proÂducÂing domesÂtic scenes, “there were none quite like VerÂmeer.”
These scenes hardÂly seem radÂiÂcal to viewÂers today. They are prized for everyÂthing they are not — they are not Rubens: wild, fleshy, pasÂsionÂate, lasÂcivÂiÂous, exuÂberÂant… but that does not mean they are devoid of erotiÂcism. There are obviÂous sigÂniÂfiers, such as a tile showÂing Cupid “branÂdishÂing his bow.” (RemindÂing us of a once-hidÂden Cupid in anothÂer famous VerÂmeer.) There are signs much less obviÂous to us, such as the foot warmer, employed to “freÂquentÂly sugÂgest femÂiÂnine desire in Dutch genre paintÂings,” the Met writes. And then there is the resemÂblance of VerÂmeer’s “milkÂmaid” — with her downÂcast eyes, white bonÂnet, and yelÂlow blouse — to a figÂure in The ProÂcuress, paintÂed the year preÂviÂous, a work comÂposed almost entireÂly of leers and gropes (and said to feaÂture the only self-porÂtrait of the artist himÂself.)
VerÂmeer’s MilkÂmaid “exudes a very earthy appeal,” a qualÂiÂty that comes through not only in its sexÂuÂal underÂtones but also in its ideÂal depicÂtion of Dutch “domesÂtic virtue.” Both are sugÂgestÂed at once by the pitchÂer and the milk, comÂmon symÂbols of female sexÂuÂalÂiÂty. But it is a paintÂing that tranÂscends the genre, which often enough shaped itself for the gaze of male employÂers in a sociÂety that “acknowlÂedged and acceptÂed that maids engaged in love affairs with their masÂters,” GiorÂdana GoretÂti writes,” with conÂsent or withÂout it.” The “earthÂiÂness” of VerÂmeer’s midÂdle-class domesÂtic paintÂings — perÂhaps most proÂfoundÂly in The MilkÂmaid as you’ll learn above — comes from a triÂumph of painterÂly techÂnique and perÂspecÂtive, creÂatÂing scenes so seemÂingÂly real that they resist objecÂtiÂfiÂcaÂtion.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
A Restored VerÂmeer PaintÂing Reveals a PorÂtrait of a Cupid HidÂden for Over 350 Years
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness









