ChatÂGÂPT, the sysÂtem that underÂstands natÂurÂal lanÂguage and responds in kind, has caused a senÂsaÂtion since its launch less than three months ago. If you’ve tried it out, you’ll sureÂly have wonÂdered what it will soon revÂoÂluÂtionÂize — or, as the case may be, what it will destroy. Among ChatÂGÂPÂT’s first vicÂtims, holds one now-comÂmon view, will be a form of writÂing that genÂerÂaÂtions have grown up pracÂticÂing throughÂout their eduÂcaÂtion. “The essay, in parÂticÂuÂlar the underÂgradÂuÂate essay, has been the cenÂter of humanÂisÂtic pedÂaÂgogy for genÂerÂaÂtions,” writes Stephen Marche in The Atlantic. “It is the way we teach chilÂdren how to research, think, and write. That entire traÂdiÂtion is about to be disÂruptÂed from the ground up.”
If ChatÂGÂPT becomes able instanÂtaÂneousÂly to whip up a plauÂsiÂble-soundÂing acaÂdÂeÂmÂic essay on any givÂen topÂic, what future could there be for the acaÂdÂeÂmÂic essay itself? The host of YouTube chanÂnel EduKÂitchen puts more or less that very quesÂtion to Noam ChomÂsky — a thinker who can be relied upon for views on eduÂcaÂtion — in the new interÂview above. “For years there have been proÂgrams that have helped proÂfesÂsors detect plaÂgiaÂrized essays,” ChomÂsky says. “Now it’s going to be more difÂfiÂcult, because it’s easÂiÂer to plaÂgiaÂrize. But that’s about the only conÂtriÂbuÂtion to eduÂcaÂtion that I can think of.” He does admit that ChatÂGÂPT-style sysÂtems “may have some valÂue for someÂthing,” but “it’s not obviÂous what.”
As the relÂeÂvant techÂnolÂoÂgy now stands, ChomÂsky sees the use of ChatÂGÂPT as “basiÂcalÂly high-tech plaÂgiaÂrism” and “a way of avoidÂing learnÂing.” He likens its rise to that of the smartÂphone: many stuÂdents “sit there havÂing a chat with someÂbody on their iPhone. One way to deal with that is to ban iPhones; anothÂer way to do it is to make the class interÂestÂing.” That stuÂdents instincÂtiveÂly employ high techÂnolÂoÂgy to avoid learnÂing is “a sign that the eduÂcaÂtionÂal sysÂtem is failÂing.” If it “has no appeal to stuÂdents, doesÂn’t interÂest them, doesÂn’t chalÂlenge them, doesÂn’t make them want to learn, they’ll find ways out,” just as he himÂself did when he borÂrowed a friend’s notes to pass a dull colÂlege chemÂistry class withÂout attendÂing it back in 1945.
After spendÂing most of his career teachÂing at MIT, ChomÂsky retired in 2002 to become a full-time pubÂlic intelÂlecÂtuÂal. The UniÂverÂsiÂty of HousÂton’s Robert ZaretÂsky, who still teachÂes, recentÂly offered his own, grimÂmer take on ChatÂGÂPT and eduÂcaÂtion. “The colÂlege essay died years ago,” he argues. “It’s a mug’s game in which a stuÂdent sends me an elecÂtronÂic file that, when open, spills out a jumÂble of words that the sender proÂpounds to be a finÂished paper” — to which, preÂsumÂably, the outÂput of a machine-learnÂing sysÂtem would actuÂalÂly be far preferÂable. Most techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal “disÂrupÂtions” leave both posÂiÂtive and negÂaÂtive effects in their wake. If the colÂlege essay is indeed unsalÂvageÂable, perÂhaps ChatÂGÂPT will finalÂly bring about its replaceÂment with someÂthing more interÂestÂing.
Update: ChomÂsky has co-authored an op-ed in The New York Times called “The False Promise of ChatÂGÂPT”. Find it here.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Noam ChomÂsky Explains Where ArtiÂfiÂcial IntelÂliÂgence Went Wrong
Noam ChomÂsky Defines What It Means to Be a TruÂly EduÂcatÂed PerÂson
Noam ChomÂsky Spells Out the PurÂpose of EduÂcaÂtion
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.

















