
The fate of the visionÂary is to be forÂevÂer outÂside of his or her time. Such was the life of NikoÂla TesÂla, who dreamed the future while his opporÂtunisÂtic rival Thomas EdiÂson seized the moment. Even now the name TesÂla conÂjures seemÂingÂly wildÂly impracÂtiÂcal venÂtures, too advanced, too expenÂsive, or far too eleÂgant in design for mass proÂducÂtion and conÂsumpÂtion. No one betÂter than David Bowie, the pop artist of posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty, could embody TesÂla’s air of magÂisÂteÂrÂiÂal high seriÂousÂness on the screen. And few were betÂter suitÂed than TesÂla himÂself, perÂhaps, to extrapÂoÂlate from his time to ours and see the techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal future clearÂly.
Of course, this image of TesÂla as a lone, heroÂic, and even someÂwhat tragÂic figÂure who fell vicÂtim to EdisÂon’s designs is a bit of a romanÂtic exagÂgerÂaÂtion. As even the ediÂtor of a 1935 feaÂture interÂview piece in the now-defunct LibÂerÂty magÂaÂzine wrote, TesÂla and EdiÂson may have been rivals in the “batÂtle between alterÂnatÂing and direct curÂrent…. OthÂerÂwise the two men were mereÂly oppoÂsites. EdiÂson had a genius for pracÂtiÂcal invenÂtions immeÂdiÂateÂly applicÂaÂble. TesÂla, whose invenÂtions were far ahead of the time, aroused antagÂoÂnisms which delayed the fruition of his ideas for years.” One can in some respects see why TesÂla “aroused antagÂoÂnisms.” He may have been a genius, but he was not a peoÂple perÂson, and some of his views, though maybe charÂacÂterÂisÂtic of the times, are downÂright unsetÂtling.

In the lengthy LibÂerÂty essay, “as told to George Sylvester Viereck” (a poet and Nazi symÂpaÂthizÂer who also interÂviewed Hitler), TesÂla himÂself makes the proÂnounceÂment, “It seems that I have always been ahead of my time.” He then goes on to enuÂmerÂate some of the ways he has been proven right, and conÂfiÂdentÂly lists the charÂacÂterÂisÂtics of the future as he sees it. No one likes a know-it-all, but TesÂla refused to comÂproÂmise or ingraÂtiÂate himÂself, though he sufÂfered for it proÂfesÂsionÂalÂly. And he was, in many casÂes, right. Many of his 1935 preÂdicÂtions in LibÂerÂty are still too far off to meaÂsure, and some of them will seem outÂlandish, or crimÂiÂnal, to us today. But some still seem plauÂsiÂble, and a few advisÂable if we are to make it anothÂer 100 years as a species. TesÂla’s preÂdicÂtions include the folÂlowÂing, which he introÂduces with the disÂclaimer that “foreÂcastÂing is perÂilous. No man can look very far into the future.”
- “BudÂdhism and ChrisÂtianÂiÂty… will be the reliÂgion of the human race in the twenÂty-first cenÂtuÂry.”
- “The year 2100 will see eugenÂics uniÂverÂsalÂly estabÂlished.” TesÂla went on to comÂment, “no one who is not a desirÂable parÂent should be perÂmitÂted to proÂduce progÂeÂny. A cenÂtuÂry from now it will no more occur to a norÂmal perÂson to mate with a perÂson eugeniÂcalÂly unfit than to marÂry a habitÂuÂal crimÂiÂnal.”
- “Hygiene, physÂiÂcal culÂture will be recÂogÂnized branchÂes of eduÂcaÂtion and govÂernÂment. The SecÂreÂtary of Hygiene or PhysÂiÂcal CulÂture will be far more imporÂtant in the cabÂiÂnet of the PresÂiÂdent of the UnitÂed States who holds office in the year 2025 than the SecÂreÂtary of War.” Along with perÂsonÂal hygiene, TesÂla includÂed “polÂluÂtion” as a social ill in need of regÂuÂlaÂtion.
- “I am conÂvinced that withÂin a cenÂtuÂry cofÂfee, tea, and tobacÂco will be no longer in vogue. AlcoÂhol, howÂevÂer, will still be used. It is not a stimÂuÂlant but a verÂiÂtaÂble elixir of life.”
- “There will be enough wheat and wheat prodÂucts to feed the entire world, includÂing the teemÂing milÂlions of ChiÂna and India.” (TesÂla did not foreÂsee the anti-gluten mania of the 21st cenÂtuÂry.)
- “Long before the next cenÂtuÂry dawns, sysÂtemÂatÂic reforÂestaÂtion and the sciÂenÂtifÂic manÂageÂment of natÂurÂal resources will have made an end of all devÂasÂtatÂing droughts, forÂest fires, and floods. The uniÂverÂsal utiÂlizaÂtion of water powÂer and its long-disÂtance transÂmisÂsion will supÂply every houseÂhold with cheap powÂer.” Along with this optiÂmistic preÂdicÂtion, TesÂla foreÂsaw that “the strugÂgle for exisÂtence being lessÂened, there should be develÂopÂment along ideÂal rather than mateÂrÂiÂal lines.”
TesÂla goes on to preÂdict the elimÂiÂnaÂtion of war, “by makÂing every nation, weak or strong, able to defend itself,” after which war chests would be divertÂed to fundÂing eduÂcaÂtion and research. He then describes—in rather fanÂtasÂtiÂcal-soundÂing terms—an appaÂraÂtus that “projects parÂtiÂcles” and transÂmits enerÂgy, enabling not only a revÂoÂluÂtion in defense techÂnolÂoÂgy, but “undreamed of results in teleÂviÂsion.” TesÂla diagÂnoses his time as one in which “we sufÂfer from the derangeÂment of our civÂiÂlizaÂtion because we have not yet comÂpleteÂly adjustÂed ourÂselves to the machine age.” The soluÂtion, he asserts—along with most futurÂists, then and now—“does not lie in destroyÂing but in masÂterÂing the machine.” As an examÂple of such masÂtery, TesÂla describes the future of “automaÂtons” takÂing over human labor and the creÂation of “a thinkÂing machine.”
Matt Novak at the SmithÂsonÂian has anaÂlyzed many of TesÂla’s claims, interÂpretÂing his preÂdicÂtions about “hygiene and physÂiÂcal culÂture” as a foreÂshadÂowÂing of the EPA and disÂcussing TesÂla’s work in robotÂics (“Today,” TesÂla proÂclaimed, “the robot is an acceptÂed fact”). The LibÂerÂty artiÂcle was not the first time TesÂla had made large-scale, pubÂlic preÂdicÂtions about the cenÂtuÂry to come and beyond. In 1926, TesÂla gave an interÂview to ColÂlier’s magÂaÂzine in which he more or less accuÂrateÂly foreÂsaw smartÂphones and wireÂless teleÂphoÂny and comÂputÂing:
When wireÂless is perÂfectÂly applied the whole earth will be conÂvertÂed into a huge brain, which in fact it is…. We shall be able to comÂmuÂniÂcate with one anothÂer instantÂly, irreÂspecÂtive of disÂtance. Not only this, but through teleÂviÂsion and teleÂphoÂny we shall see and hear one anothÂer as perÂfectÂly as though were face to face, despite interÂvenÂing disÂtances of thouÂsands of miles; and the instruÂments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazÂingÂly simÂple comÂpared with our present teleÂphone. A man will be able to carÂry one in his vest pockÂet.
TelÂsa also made some odd preÂdicÂtions about fuel-less pasÂsenÂger flyÂing machines “free from any limÂiÂtaÂtions of the present airÂplanes and diriÂgiÂbles” and spoutÂed more of the scary stuff about eugenÂics that had come to obsess him late in life. AddiÂtionÂalÂly, TesÂla saw changÂing genÂder relaÂtions as the preÂcurÂsor of a comÂing matriÂarchy. This was not a develÂopÂment he charÂacÂterÂized in posÂiÂtive terms. For TesÂla, femÂiÂnism would “end in a new sex order, with the female as supeÂriÂor.” (As Novak notes, TesÂla’s misÂgivÂings about femÂiÂnism have made him a hero to the so-called “men’s rights” moveÂment.) While he fulÂly grantÂed that women could and would match and surÂpass men in every field, he warned that “the acquiÂsiÂtion of new fields of endeavÂor by women, their gradÂual usurpaÂtion of leadÂerÂship, will dull and finalÂly disÂsiÂpate femÂiÂnine senÂsiÂbilÂiÂties, will choke the materÂnal instinct, so that marÂriage and mothÂerÂhood may become abhorÂrent and human civÂiÂlizaÂtion draw closÂer and closÂer to the perÂfect civÂiÂlizaÂtion of the bee.”
It seems to me that a “bee civÂiÂlizaÂtion” would appeal to a eugeniÂcist, except, I supÂpose, TesÂla feared becomÂing a drone. Although he saw the develÂopÂment as inevitable, he still sounds to me like any numÂber of curÂrent politiÂcians who argue that sociÂety should conÂtinÂue to supÂpress and disÂcrimÂiÂnate against women for their own good and the good of “civÂiÂlizaÂtion.” TesÂla may be an outÂsider hero for geek culÂture everyÂwhere, but his social attiÂtudes give me the creeps. While I’ve perÂsonÂalÂly always liked the vision of a world in which robots do most the work and we spend most of our monÂey on eduÂcaÂtion, when it comes to the elimÂiÂnaÂtion of war, I’m less sanÂguine about parÂtiÂcle rays and more symÂpaÂthetÂic to the words of Ivor CutÂler.
Note: An earÂliÂer verÂsion of this post appeared on our site in 2015.
via SmithÂsonÂian/PaleÂoÂfuÂture
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
In 1900, Ladies’ Home JourÂnal PubÂlishÂes 28 PreÂdicÂtions for the Year 2000
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness







