Ever-increasÂing ecoÂnomÂic inequalÂiÂty, rapid techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal change, the creÂation of domÂiÂnant corÂpoÂraÂtions conÂtrolled by a small busiÂness elite, politiÂcians in the pockÂet of big busiÂness leadÂers, and the rise of popÂulism and nativism. These are all feaÂtures of AmerÂiÂcan life in 2025. But our nation has also seen this movie play before, most notably back in the GildÂed Age, which ran from the 1870s through the late 1890s. Above, we have a free two-hour docÂuÂmenÂtary on the GildÂed Age creÂatÂed by PBS. They write:
In the closÂing decades of the nineÂteenth cenÂtuÂry, durÂing what has become known as the GildÂed Age, the popÂuÂlaÂtion of the UnitÂed States douÂbled in the span of a sinÂgle genÂerÂaÂtion. The nation became the world’s leadÂing proÂducÂer of food, coal, oil, and steel, attractÂed vast amounts of forÂeign investÂment, and pushed into marÂkets in Europe and the Far East. As nationÂal wealth expandÂed, two classÂes rose simulÂtaÂneÂousÂly, sepÂaÂratÂed by a gulf of expeÂriÂence and cirÂcumÂstance that was unpreceÂdentÂed in AmerÂiÂcan life. These disÂparÂiÂties sparked pasÂsionÂate and vioÂlent debate over quesÂtions still being asked in our own times: How is wealth best disÂtribÂuted, and by what process? Does govÂernÂment exist to proÂtect priÂvate propÂerÂty or proÂvide balm to the inevitable casuÂalÂties of a churnÂing indusÂtriÂal sysÂtem? Should the govÂernÂment conÂcern itself chiefly with ecoÂnomÂic growth or ecoÂnomÂic jusÂtice? The batÂtles over these quesÂtions were fought in ConÂgress, the courts, the polling place, the workÂplace and the streets. The outÂcome of these disÂputes was both uncerÂtain and momenÂtous, and marked by a pasÂsionÂate vitÂriÂol and levÂel of vioÂlence that would shock the conÂscience of many AmerÂiÂcans today. The GildÂed Age presents a comÂpelling and comÂplex stoÂry of one of the most conÂvulÂsive and transÂforÂmaÂtive eras in AmerÂiÂcan hisÂtoÂry.
To a cerÂtain degree, this docÂuÂmenÂtary will help you make betÂter sense of our own fraught times and perÂhaps feel more optiÂmistic about where we might end up. (It’s worth keepÂing in mind that the disÂrupÂtions of the GildÂed Age evenÂtuÂalÂly gave way to the reforms of the ProÂgresÂsive Era.) What’s more, if you’re watchÂing the excelÂlent HBO series, The GildÂed Age, the film proÂvides hisÂtorÂiÂcal backÂground that will directÂly add to your appreÂciÂaÂtion of the show. You can watch the film online above, or find it in our colÂlecÂtion of Free DocÂuÂmenÂtaries, a subÂset of our colÂlecÂtion 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great ClasÂsics, Indies, Noir, WestÂerns, DocÂuÂmenÂtaries & More.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Read More...
With the tenth anniverÂsary of David Bowie’s death comÂing up earÂly next year, more than a few fans will have their minds on a pilÂgrimÂage to mark the occaÂsion. PerÂhaps with that very time frame in mind, the V&A East StoreÂhouse in LonÂdon has just opened the David Bowie CenÂter. Run by the VicÂtoÂria and Albert MuseÂum, to which Bowie left an archive of about 90,000 of his posÂsesÂsions, this new instiÂtuÂtion will show a few hunÂdred of those artiÂfacts at a time, and even make a range of them availÂable on request to visÂiÂtors. As for what exactÂly is in there, JesÂsiÂca the MuseÂum Guide makes a brief surÂvey of the Bowieana curÂrentÂly on disÂplay in the video above.
Some of the feaÂtured objects, like the suits Bowie wore in his videos for “Life on Mars?” and “Let’s Dance” or the crysÂtal ball he held aloft as Jareth the GobÂlin King in Labyrinth, may well be recÂogÂnizÂable even to casuÂal Bowie appreÂciÂaÂtors. Longer-term fans will sureÂly recÂogÂnize the outÂlandish but eleÂgant KanÂsai YamamoÂto-designed cosÂtumes that visuÂalÂly defined perÂsonÂae like ZigÂgy StarÂdust and Aladdin Sane, the AlexanÂder McQueen-designed Union Jack frock from the covÂer of EarthÂling, and perÂhaps even the metÂal angel wings Bowie donned onstage durÂing the highÂly ambiÂtious but much-deridÂed Glass SpiÂder Tour of the late nineÂteen-eightÂies.
Going deepÂer, there’s also the StyÂloÂphone, a kind of toy elecÂtronÂic instruÂment from the late sixÂties, that Bowie used on “Space OddÂiÂty” (and had to repurÂchase on eBay); the much more proÂfesÂsionÂal-grade EMS suitÂcase synÂtheÂsizÂer givÂen to him by BriÂan Eno, which he used on the “Berlin trilÂoÂgy” albums they made togethÂer; the perÂsonÂal deck of Oblique StrateÂgies, co-creÂatÂed by Eno, that shows signs of intenÂsive use in Bowie’s own creÂative process; his corÂreÂsponÂdence with Let’s Dance proÂducÂer Nile Rodgers (a curaÂtor of the Bowie CenÂter’s curÂrent exhiÂbiÂtion), about their secÂond album Black Tie White Noise; and mateÂriÂals from Omikron: The Nomad Soul, the comÂputÂer game to which he conÂtributed music as well as a digÂiÂtized perÂforÂmance in the late nineties.
The colÂlecÂtion that Bowie donatÂed to the V&A already came careÂfulÂly orgaÂnized and catÂaÂloged, which shows a meticÂuÂlousÂness uncomÂmon to rock stars, and a delibÂerÂateÂness about not just culÂtiÂvatÂing his pubÂlic image at any givÂen culÂturÂal moment, but also activeÂly curatÂing the mateÂriÂals of his own hisÂtorÂiÂcal narÂraÂtive. It seems Bowie always had one eye on the past: his own, of course, but also more disÂtant eras, rich with disÂused aesÂthetÂics to revive and make his own. The othÂer eye he kept on the future, espeÂcialÂly as the interÂnet was growÂing into a culÂturÂal force. The David Bowie CenÂter has his perÂsonÂal notes on the subÂject, which include a refÂerÂence to BowieNet, the interÂnet serÂvice provider he foundÂed around the turn of the milÂlenÂniÂum. BowieNet is now long gone, of course, but Bowie’s legaÂcy — espeÂcialÂly now that it’s been instiÂtuÂtionÂalÂly enshrined and made so accesÂsiÂble to the pubÂlic — will outÂlast us all.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The Art ColÂlecÂtion of David Bowie: An IntroÂducÂtion
The MusiÂcal Career of David Bowie in One Minute … and One ConÂtinÂuÂous Take
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
RigÂorÂousÂly clean-cut, comÂpeÂtent on the acoustic guiÂtar and douÂble bass, and selÂdom dressed in anyÂthing more darÂing than cherÂry-red blazÂers, Tom and Dick SmothÂers looked like the antitheÂsis of nineÂteen-sixÂties rebelÂlion. When they first gained nationÂal recogÂniÂtion with their variÂety show The SmothÂers BrothÂers ComÂeÂdy Hour, they must have come off to many young viewÂers as the kind of act of which their mothÂer — or even grandÂmothÂer — would approve. But the brothÂers’ culÂtiÂvatÂedÂly square, neo-vaudeÂvilÂlian appearÂance was deceivÂing, as CBS would soon find out when the two took every chance to turn their proÂgram into a satirÂiÂcal, relentÂlessÂly authorÂiÂty-chalÂlengÂing, yet someÂhow wholeÂsome showÂcase of the counÂterÂculÂture.
The SmothÂers BrothÂers ComÂeÂdy Hour preÂmiered in FebÂruÂary of 1967, and its first seaÂson “feaÂtured minÂiÂmal conÂtroÂverÂsial conÂtent,” writes Sarah King at U.S. HisÂtoÂry Scene. ThereÂafter, “the show became increasÂingÂly politÂiÂcal. The brothÂers invitÂed activist celebriÂties onto their show, includÂing folk singers Pete Seeger and Joan Baez and singer-actor HarÂry BelaÂfonte.
The show also proÂduced its own politÂiÂcal mateÂrÂiÂal critÂiÂcizÂing the VietÂnam War and the politiÂcians who supÂportÂed it,” not least PresÂiÂdent LynÂdon JohnÂson. BringÂing on Seeger was a darÂing move, givÂen that he’d been blackÂlistÂed from netÂwork teleÂviÂsion for the betÂter part of two decades, though CBS’s cenÂsors made sure to cut out the most politÂiÂcalÂly senÂsiÂtive parts of his act.
Even more so was the brothÂers’ own perÂforÂmance, with George Segal, of Phil Ochs’s “Draft Dodger Rag,” which they endÂed by urgÂing their audiÂence to “make love, not war.” All this can look fairÂly tame by today’s stanÂdards, but it locked the show — which had become top-ratÂed, holdÂing its own in a time slot against the culÂturÂal pheÂnomÂeÂnon that was BonanÂza — into a grudge match with its own netÂwork. Before the third seaÂson, CBS’ highÂer-ups demandÂed that each show be turned in ten days in advance, ostenÂsiÂbly in order to underÂgo review for senÂsiÂtive mateÂrÂiÂal. In one instance, they claimed that the deadÂline hadÂn’t been met and aired a re-run instead, though it may not have been entireÂly irrelÂeÂvant that the intendÂed proÂgram conÂtained a tribÂute by Baez to her then-husÂband, who was being sent to prison for refusÂing to serve in the milÂiÂtary.
CBS did broadÂcast Baez’s perÂforÂmance on a latÂer date, after clipÂping out the refÂerÂence to the speÂcifÂic nature of her husÂband’s offense. A simÂiÂlar strugÂgle took place around the “serÂmonÂettes” delivÂered by David SteinÂberg, one of which you can see in the video above. The irrevÂerÂence toward U.S. forÂeign polÂiÂcy, reliÂgion, and much else besides in these and othÂer segÂments evenÂtuÂalÂly proved too much for the netÂwork, which fired the brothÂers after it had already givÂen the green light to a fourth seaÂson of the ComÂeÂdy Hour. Though they sucÂcessÂfulÂly sued CBS for breach of conÂtract thereÂafter, they nevÂer did regain the same levÂel of teleÂviÂsuÂal promiÂnence they’d once enjoyed, if enjoy be the word. At any rate, the fallÂout of all this conÂtroÂverÂsy firmÂly installed the SmothÂers BrothÂers in the panÂtheon of twenÂtiÂeth-cenÂtuÂry free-speech warÂriors, and their expeÂriÂence reminds us still today that, withÂout the freeÂdom to give offense, there can be no comÂeÂdy worÂthy of the name.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
When The Who (LitÂerÂalÂly) Blew Up The SmothÂers BrothÂers ComÂeÂdy Hour in 1967
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Talk to a clear-headÂed 107-year-old today, and you could expect to hear stoÂries of adoÂlesÂcence in the Great DepresÂsion, or — if you’re lucky — the Jazz Age seen through a child’s eyes. It’s no comÂmon expeÂriÂence to have been formed by the age of radio and live deep into the age of the smartÂphone, but arguably, Michael FitzÂpatrick lived through even greater civÂiÂlizaÂtionÂal transÂforÂmaÂtion. Born in IreÂland in 1858, he sat for the interÂview above 107 years latÂer in 1965, which was broadÂcast on teleÂviÂsion. That device was well on its way to satÂuÂratÂing WestÂern sociÂety at the time, as the autoÂmoÂbile already had, while mankind was takÂing to the skies in jetÂlinÂers and even to the stars in rockÂet ships.
The conÂtrast between the world into which FitzÂpatrick was born and the one in which he evenÂtuÂalÂly found himÂself is made starkÂer by his being a son of the land. A lifeÂlong farmer, he can honÂestÂly reply, when asked to name the biggest change he’s seen, “MachinÂery.”
Not all of his answers come across quite so clearÂly, owing to his thick dialect that must sureÂly have gone extinct by now, even in rurÂal IreÂland. LuckÂiÂly, the video comes with subÂtiÂtles, makÂing it easÂiÂer to underÂstand what he has to say about the advent of the “mowÂing machine” and his memÂoÂries of the Bodyke evicÂtions of the eighÂteen-eightÂies, when mĂŞlĂ©es broke out over a local landÂlord’s attempt to oust his desÂtiÂtute tenÂants.
One can come up with vagueÂly analÂoÂgous events to the Bodyke evicÂtions in the modÂern world, but in essence, they belong to the long stretch of hisÂtoÂry when to be human meant to engage in agriÂculÂture, or to overÂsee it. The IndusÂtriÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion didÂn’t hapÂpen at the same pace everyÂwhere at once, and indeed, FitzÂpatrick lived the first part of his life in an effecÂtiveÂly pre-indusÂtriÂal realÂiÂty, before witÂnessÂing the scarceÂly believÂable process of mechÂaÂnizaÂtion take place all around him. He expeÂriÂenced, in othÂer words, the arrival of the civÂiÂlizaÂtion into which we were all born, and to which we know no alterÂnaÂtive. As for those of us of a cerÂtain age today, we can expect to be asked six or sevÂen decades hence — assumÂing we can go the disÂtance — what life was like with only dial-up interÂnet.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Real InterÂviews with PeoÂple Who Lived in the 1800s
PhilosoÂpher Bertrand RusÂsell Talks About the Time When His GrandÂfaÂther Met Napoleon
A Rare Smile CapÂtured in a 19th CenÂtuÂry PhoÂtoÂgraph
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
We may take it for grantÂed that the earÂliÂest writÂing sysÂtems develÂoped with the SumeÂriÂans around 3400 B.C.E. The archaeÂoÂlogÂiÂcal eviÂdence so far supÂports the theÂoÂry. But it may also be posÂsiÂble that the earÂliÂest writÂing sysÂtems preÂdate 5000-year-old cuneiform tablets by sevÂerÂal thouÂsand years. And what’s more, it may be posÂsiÂble, sugÂgests paleÂoanÂthroÂpolÂoÂgist Genevieve von PetÂzinger, that those preÂhisÂtoric forms of writÂing, which include the earÂliÂest known hashÂtag marks, conÂsistÂed of symÂbols nearÂly as uniÂverÂsal as emoÂji.
The study of symÂbols carved into cave walls all over the world—including penÂniÂforms (feathÂer shapes), clavÂiÂforms (key shapes), and hand stencils—could evenÂtuÂalÂly push us to “abanÂdon the powÂerÂful narÂraÂtive,” writes Frank Jacobs at Big Think, “of hisÂtoÂry as total darkÂness until the SumeÂriÂans flip the switch.” Though the symÂbols may nevÂer be truÂly deciÂpherÂable, their purÂposÂes obscured by thouÂsands of years of sepÂaÂraÂtion in time, they clearÂly show humans “undimÂming the light many milÂlenÂnia earÂliÂer.”
While burÂrowÂing deep underÂground to make cave paintÂings of aniÂmals, earÂly humans as far back as 40,000 years ago also develÂoped a sysÂtem of signs that is remarkÂably conÂsisÂtent across and between conÂtiÂnents. Von PetÂzinger spent years catÂaÂloguÂing these symÂbols in Europe, visÂitÂing “52 caves,” reports New Scientist’s AliÂson George, “in France, Spain, Italy and PorÂtuÂgal. The symÂbols she found ranged from dots, lines, triÂanÂgles, squares and zigzaÂgs to more comÂplex forms like ladÂder shapes, hand stenÂcils, someÂthing called a tecÂtiÂform that looks a bit like a post with a roof, and feathÂer shapes called penÂniÂforms.”

She disÂcovÂered 32 signs found all over the conÂtiÂnent, carved and paintÂed over a very long periÂod of time. “For tens of thouÂsands of years,” Jacobs points out, “our ancesÂtors seem to have been curiÂousÂly conÂsisÂtent with the symÂbols they used.” Von PetÂzinger sees this sysÂtem as a carÂryÂover from modÂern humans’ migraÂtion into Europe from Africa. “This does not look like the start-up phase of a brand-new invenÂtion,” she writes in her book The First Signs: UnlockÂing the mysÂterÂies of the world’s oldÂest symÂbols.
In her TED Talk at the top, von PetÂzinger describes this earÂly sysÂtem of comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion through abstract signs as a preÂcurÂsor to the “globÂal netÂwork of inforÂmaÂtion exchange” in the modÂern world. “We’ve been buildÂing on the menÂtal achieveÂments of those who came before us for so long,” she says, “that it’s easy to forÂget that cerÂtain abilÂiÂties haven’t already existÂed,” long before the forÂmal writÂten records we recÂogÂnize. These symÂbols travÂeled: they aren’t only found in caves, but also etched into deer teeth strung togethÂer in an ancient neckÂlace.
Von PetÂzinger believes, writes George, that “the simÂple shapes repÂreÂsent a funÂdaÂmenÂtal shift in our ancesÂtors’ menÂtal skills,” toward using abstract symÂbols to comÂmuÂniÂcate. Not everyÂone agrees with her. As the BradÂshaw FounÂdaÂtion notes, when it comes to the EuroÂpean symÂbols, emiÂnent preÂhisÂtoÂriÂan Jean Clottes argues “the signs in the caves are always (or nearÂly always) assoÂciÂatÂed with aniÂmal figÂures and thus canÂnot be said to be the first steps toward symÂbolÂism.”
Of course, it’s also posÂsiÂble that both the signs and the aniÂmals were meant to conÂvey ideas just as a writÂten lanÂguage does. So argues MIT linÂguist Cora Lesure and her co-authors in a paper pubÂlished in FronÂtiers in PsyÂcholÂoÂgy last year. Cave art might show earÂly humans “conÂvertÂing acoustic sounds into drawÂings,” notes Sarah Gibbens at NationÂal GeoÂgraphÂic. Lesure says her research “sugÂgests that the cogÂniÂtive mechÂaÂnisms necÂesÂsary for the develÂopÂment of cave and rock art are likeÂly to be analÂoÂgous to those employed in the expresÂsion of the symÂbolÂic thinkÂing required for lanÂguage.”
In othÂer words, under her theÂoÂry, “cave and rock [art] would repÂreÂsent a modalÂiÂty of linÂguisÂtic expresÂsion.” And the symÂbols surÂroundÂing that art might repÂreÂsent an elabÂoÂraÂtion on the theme. The very first sysÂtem of writÂing, shared by earÂly humans all over the world for tens of thouÂsands of years.
Note: An earÂliÂer verÂsion of this post appeared on our site in 2019.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Was a 32,000-Year-Old Cave PaintÂing the EarÂliÂest Form of CinÂeÂma?
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC.
Read More...
The WizÂard of Oz is now showÂing at Las Vegas’ Sphere. Or a verÂsion of it is, at any rate, and not one that meets with the approval of all the picÂture’s countÂless fans. “The beloved 1939 film starÂring Judy GarÂland, wideÂly conÂsidÂered one of the greatÂest HolÂlyÂwood clasÂsics, has been stretched and morÂphed and adaptÂed to fit the enorÂmous dome-shaped venue,” writes the New York Times’ AlisÂsa WilkinÂson. This entailed an extenÂsion “upward and outÂward with the help of A.I. as well as visuÂal effects artists. The cool torÂnaÂdo creÂatÂed by Arnold GilleÂspie for the origÂiÂnal has been tradÂed for someÂthing digÂiÂtal, and evenÂtuÂalÂly you can’t see it at all, because you’re inside the funÂnel. New perÂforÂmances and visÂtas have also been genÂerÂatÂed,” which is “at best quesÂtionÂable” ethÂiÂcalÂly, to say nothÂing of the aesÂthetÂics.
Yet even givÂen the conÂsidÂerÂable modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtions to — and exciÂsions from — the origÂiÂnal film, “most audiÂences will gladÂly overÂlook all of this, wowed by the sheer scale of the specÂtaÂcle.” The WizÂard of Oz has, as has often been said, the kind of “magÂic” that endures through even great defiÂcienÂcies in preÂsenÂtaÂtion.
That qualÂiÂty first became apparÂent in 1956, sevÂenÂteen years after the movie’s release in cinÂeÂmas, when it first aired on teleÂviÂsion. Though the draÂmatÂic tranÂsiÂtion from black-and-white to colÂor would have been lost on most home viewÂers at the time, “45 milÂlion peoÂple tuned in, far more than those who had seen it in theÂaters,” says the narÂraÂtor of the It Was A Sh*t Show video above. AnothÂer broadÂcast, in 1959, did even betÂter, and thereÂafter The WizÂard of Oz became an “annuÂal must-see event” on TV, which evenÂtuÂalÂly made it “the most-watched film in hisÂtoÂry.”
That staÂtus jusÂtiÂfies the movie’s infaÂmousÂly trouÂbled proÂducÂtion, which is the video’s cenÂtral subÂject. From its numerÂous rewrites all the way through to its feeÂble box office perÂforÂmance, The WizÂard of Oz encounÂtered severe difÂfiÂculÂties every step of the way, which gave rise to rumors that conÂtinÂue to haunt it: that an actor died from poiÂson makeÂup, for examÂple, or that one of the munchkins comÂmitÂted suiÂcide in view of the camÂera. While the proÂducÂtion caused no fatalÂiÂties — at least not directÂly — it did come close more than once, to say nothÂing of the psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal toll the comÂbiÂnaÂtion of high ambiÂtion and perÂsisÂtent dysÂfuncÂtion must have takÂen on many, if not most, of its parÂticÂiÂpants. Even hearÂing enuÂmerÂatÂed only its clearÂly docÂuÂmentÂed probÂlems is enough to make one wonÂder how the picÂture was ever comÂpletÂed in the first place. Yet now, 86 years latÂer, its Sphere reinÂterÂpreÂtaÂtion is rakÂing in $2 milÂlion in tickÂet sales per day: an act of wizÂardry if ever there was one.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Watch the EarÂliÂest SurÂvivÂing Filmed VerÂsion of The WizÂard of Oz (1910)
The WizÂard of Oz BroÂken Apart and Put Back TogethÂer in AlphaÂbetÂiÂcal Order
The ComÂplete WizÂard of Oz Series, AvailÂable as Free eBooks and Free Audio Books
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Once you hear Erik Satie’s GymnopĂ©die No. 1, you nevÂer forÂget it. Not that popÂuÂlar culÂture would let you forÂget it: the piece has been, and conÂtinÂues to be, reinÂterÂpretÂed and samÂpled by musiÂcians workÂing in a variÂety of genÂres from pop to elecÂtronÂic to metÂal. In verÂsions that sound close to what Satie would have intendÂed when he comÂposed it in 1888, it’s also been feaÂtured in countÂless films and teleÂviÂsion shows. It’s even heard with some freÂquenÂcy in YouTube videos, though in the case of the one from The Music ProÂfesÂsor above, it’s not just the soundÂtrack, but also the subÂject. Using an annoÂtatÂed score, it explains just what makes the piece so endurÂing and influÂenÂtial.
Upon “a simÂple iambic rhythm with two ambiguÂous major 7th chords,” GymnopĂ©die No. 1 introÂduces a melody that “floats above an ausÂtere proÂcesÂsion of notes,” then “moves down the octave from F# to F#.” With its lack of a clear key, as well as its lack of develÂopÂment and draÂma that the orchesÂtral music of the day would have trained lisÂtenÂers to expect, the piece was “as shockÂing as the dance of naked SparÂtans it was meant to evoke.”
The melody makes its turns, but nevÂer quite arrives at its seemÂing desÂtiÂnaÂtions, going around in cirÂcles instead — before, all of a sudÂden, swervÂing into the “minor and disÂsoÂnant” before endÂing in “proÂfound melanÂcholy.”
Despite music in genÂerÂal havÂing long since assimÂiÂlatÂed the darÂing qualÂiÂties of GymnopĂ©die No. 1, the origÂiÂnal piece still catchÂes our ears — in its subÂtle way — whenÂevÂer it comes on. So, in anothÂer way, do the less recÂogÂnizÂable and more experÂiÂmenÂtal GnossiÂennes with which Satie folÂlowed them up. In the video above, the Music ProÂfesÂsor proÂvides a visuÂal explaÂnaÂtion of GnossiÂenne No. 1, durÂing whose perÂforÂmance “soft disÂsoÂnance hangs in the air” while “a curiÂous melody floats over genÂtle synÂcoÂpaÂtions in the left hand” over just two chords. The score comes with “surÂreÂal comÂments”: “Très luisant,” “Du bout de la penÂsĂ©e,” “PosÂtulez en vous-mĂŞme,” “QuesÂtionez.” Satie is often credÂitÂed with pioÂneerÂing what would become ambiÂent music; could these be proÂto-Oblique StrateÂgies?
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
LisÂten to NevÂer-Before-Heard Works by Erik Satie, PerÂformed 100 Years After His Death
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Ancient Rome nevÂer had an indusÂtriÂal revÂoÂluÂtion. GrantÂed, cerÂtain hisÂtoÂriÂans have objectÂed now and again to that once-setÂtled claim, gesÂturÂing toward large heaps of potÂtery disÂcovÂered in garbage dumps and othÂer such artiÂfacts clearÂly proÂduced in large numÂbers. Still, the fact remains that Ancient Rome nevÂer had an indusÂtriÂal revÂoÂluÂtion of the kind that fired up toward the end of the eighÂteenth cenÂtuÂry, but not due to a comÂplete absence of the relÂeÂvant techÂnolÂoÂgy. As explained in the new Lost in Time video above, Romans had witÂnessed the powÂer of steam harÂnessed back in the first cenÂtuÂry — but they disÂmissed it as a novÂelÂty, eviÂdentÂly unable to see its powÂer to transÂform civÂiÂlizaÂtion.
That’s just one of a variÂety of examÂples of genÂuine high Roman techÂnolÂoÂgy feaÂtured in the video, many or all of which would seem implauÂsiÂble to the averÂage viewÂer if insertÂed into a stoÂry set in ancient Rome.
Take the set of autoÂmatÂic doors installed in a temÂple, trigÂgered by a fire that heats an underÂground water tank, which in turn fills up a pot attached to a cable that — through a sysÂtem of pulÂleys — throws them open. (When the fire cools down, the doors then shut again.) This was the work of the Greek-born invenÂtor Hero of AlexanÂdria, who would bear comÂparÂiÂson in one sense or anothÂer with everyÂone from Rube GoldÂberg to LeonarÂdo da VinÂci.
It was also Hero who came up with that earÂly steam turÂbine, called the aeolipÂile. He came along too late, howÂevÂer, to take credÂit for the “self-healÂing” Roman conÂcrete preÂviÂousÂly much-feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture, the mateÂrÂiÂal of buildÂings like the PanÂtheon, “still the largest unreÂinÂforced conÂcrete dome in the world.” AnothÂer invenÂtion highÂlightÂed in the video comes from AlexanÂdria, but well before Hero’s time, and even before that of the Roman Empire itself: the accuÂrate water clock engiÂneered by CteÂsiÂbius, whose underÂlyÂing design remained influÂenÂtial in the Roman era. Hydraulic powÂer was also used in Roman mills, which made posÂsiÂble comÂplex facÂtoÂry sysÂtems, even in a civÂiÂlizaÂtion that nevÂer reached an indusÂtriÂal revÂoÂluÂtion propÂer. And if a Roman facÂtoÂry workÂer got thirsty at break time, maybe he could drop a coin into one of Hero’s wine vendÂing machines.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
How the Ancient Romans Built Their Roads, the LifeÂlines of Their Vast Empire
The AmazÂing EngiÂneerÂing of Roman Baths
ArchaeÂolÂoÂgists DisÂcovÂer an Ancient Roman Snack Bar in the Ruins of PomÂpeii
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
KarlÂheinz StockÂhausen appears, among many othÂer culÂturÂal figÂures, on the covÂer of Sgt. PepÂper’s LoneÂly Hearts Club Band. His incluÂsion was more than a trendy gesÂture toward the EuroÂpean avant-garde; anyÂone who knows that pathÂbreakÂing elecÂtronÂic comÂposer’s work will notice its influÂence on the album at first lisÂten. Paul McCartÂney himÂself went on record with his notion that assumÂing the alter egos of the title would allow him and his felÂlow BeaÂtÂles to branch out both culÂturÂalÂly and intelÂlecÂtuÂalÂly in their music, incorÂpoÂratÂing pasÂtichÂes of Ravi Shankar, B. B. King, Albert Ayler, the Doors, the Beach Boys, and indeed StockÂhausen, whose Gesang der JĂĽnglinge had already inspired “TomorÂrow NevÂer Knows” on Revolver.
LitÂerÂalÂly “Song of the Youths,” Gesang der JĂĽnglinge was an earÂly work for StockÂhausen, who comÂposed it in 1954, when he was still a PhD stuÂdent in comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions at the UniÂverÂsiÂty of Bonn. Inspired by not just his techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal interÂests but also his devout CatholiÂcism, he decidÂed to creÂate a mass for elecÂtronÂic sounds and voicÂes, with the intent to debut it at Cologne CatheÂdral. (LegÂend has it that he was rebuffed by reliÂgious authorÂiÂties, who insistÂed that loudÂspeakÂers had no place in a house of worÂship, but sources disÂagreed on whether he actuÂalÂly sought their perÂmisÂsion in the first place.)
He drew its words from a pasÂsage of the Old TesÂtaÂment stoÂry of three boys cast into the fire by King NebÂuchadÂnezÂzar for their refusal to worÂship a goldÂen idol and kept unharmed by the praise to God they sang amid the flames.
In StockÂhausen’s high-tech renÂderÂing, the boys are repÂreÂsentÂed by the voice of twelve-year-old Josef ProtschÂka (who would grow up to become an acclaimed vocalÂist in his own right), and the fire by a colÂlage of elecÂtronÂic sounds. Though the comÂposer’s manipÂuÂlaÂtions, part design and part chance, the human and mechanÂiÂcal halves of the piece become one: Protschka’s vocals break apart and reform into fragÂments of lanÂguage nevÂer before heard, and the artiÂfiÂcialÂly genÂerÂatÂed tones bend uncanÂniÂly toward the sound of sung vowÂels. All this, to say nothÂing of its playÂback in five-chanÂnel sound in a time when stereo was still a novÂelÂty, would have soundÂed deeply, even disÂturbingÂly unfaÂmilÂiar to the audiÂence at Gesang der JĂĽnglinge’s preÂmiere — and its impact probÂaÂbly hadÂn’t been much diminÂished by the time of the 2001 perÂforÂmance above. StockÂhouseÂn’s music may have been after the shock of the new, but it also faced the eterÂnal.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Hear KarlÂheinz Stockhausen’s PioÂneerÂing ComÂpoÂsiÂtions for Music BoxÂes
The HisÂtoÂry of ElecÂtronÂic Music in 476 Tracks (1937–2001)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
The world’s most famous organ piece, played on the world’s largest fulÂly funcÂtionÂing pipe organ. That’s what you have above. Here, organÂist Dylan David Shaw perÂforms Bach’s TocÂcaÂta and Fugue in D minor on the famous WanaÂmakÂer organ.
OrigÂiÂnalÂly built for the St. Louis World’s Fair in 1904, the organ endÂed up in PhiladelÂphiÂa’s WanaÂmakÂer’s departÂment store in 1911. More than a cenÂtuÂry latÂer, the organ still resides in the same store. But Macy’s evenÂtuÂalÂly took over Wanamaker’s, and Macy’s now plans to close the store, leavÂing the fate of the organ unknown. Where will the 28,000-pipe organ find a new home? That’s still TBD, someÂthing that’s likeÂly to get resolved in the months to come.
RelatÂed ConÂtent
DownÂload the ComÂplete Organ Works of J.S. Bach for Free
BohemiÂan RhapÂsody Played on the Pipe Organ
Bach’s Most Famous Organ Piece Played on Wine GlassÂes
Read More...