In 1958, Mao Zedong launched the Great Leap ForÂward. Eight years latÂer, he announced the beginÂning of the Great ProÂleÂtarÂiÂan CulÂturÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion. Between those two events, of course, came the Great ChiÂnese Famine, and hisÂtoÂriÂans now view all three as being “great” in the same pejoÂraÂtive sense. Though ChairÂman Mao may not have underÂstood the probÂaÂble conÂseÂquences of poliÂcies like agriÂculÂturÂal colÂlecÂtivizaÂtion and ideÂoÂlogÂiÂcal purifiÂcaÂtion, he did underÂstand the imporÂtance of his own image in sellÂing those poliÂcies to the ChiÂnese peoÂple: hence the famous 1966 phoÂto of him swimÂming across the Yangtze RivÂer.
By that point, “the ChiÂnese leader who had led a peasÂant army to vicÂtoÂry in the ChiÂnese CivÂil War and estabÂlished the comÂmuÂnist PeoÂple’s RepubÂlic of ChiÂna in 1949 was getÂting old.” So says ColeÂman LownÂdes in the Vox DarkÂroom video above. Worse, Mao’s Great Leap ForÂward had clearÂly proven calamiÂtous. The ChairÂman “needÂed to find a way to seal his legaÂcy as the face of ChiÂnese comÂmuÂnism and a new revÂoÂluÂtion to lead.” And so he repeatÂed one of his earÂliÂer feats, the swim across the Yangtze he’d takÂen in 1956. Spread far and wide by state media, the shot of Mao in the rivÂer takÂen by his perÂsonÂal phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer illusÂtratÂed reports that he’d swum fifÂteen kiloÂmeÂters in a bit over an hour.
This meant “the 72-year-old would have shatÂtered world speed records,” a claim all in a day’s work for proÂpaÂganÂdists in a dicÂtaÂtorÂship. But those who saw phoÂtoÂgraph wouldÂn’t have forÂgotÂten what hapÂpened the last time he took such a well-pubÂliÂcized dip in the Yangtze. “Experts feared that Mao was on the verge of kickÂing off anothÂer disÂasÂtrous periÂod of turÂmoil in ChiÂna. They were right.” The already-declared Great ProÂleÂtarÂiÂan CulÂturÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion, now wideÂly known as the CulÂturÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion, saw milÂlions of ChiÂnese youth — ostenÂsiÂbly radÂiÂcalÂized by the image of their beloved leader in the flesh — orgaÂnize into “the fanatÂiÂcal Red Guards,” a paraÂmilÂiÂtary force bent on extirÂpatÂing, by any means necÂesÂsary, the “four olds”: old culÂture, old ideÂolÂoÂgy, old cusÂtoms, and old traÂdiÂtions.
As with most attempts to ushÂer in a Year Zero, Mao’s final revÂoÂluÂtion wastÂed litÂtle time becomÂing an engine of chaos. Only his death endÂed “a decade of destrucÂtion that had eleÂvatÂed the leader to god-like levÂels and resultÂed in over one milÂlion peoÂple dead.” The ChiÂnese ComÂmuÂnist’s ParÂty has subÂseÂquentÂly conÂdemned the CulÂturÂal RevÂoÂluÂtion but not the ChairÂman himÂself, and indeed his swim remains an object of yearÂly comÂmemÂoÂraÂtion. “Had Mao died in 1956, his achieveÂments would have been immorÂtal,” once said CCP offiÂcial Chen Yun. “Had he died in 1966, he would still have been a great man but flawed. But he died in 1976. Alas, what can one say?” PerÂhaps that, had the aging Mao drowned in the Yangtze, ChiÂnese hisÂtoÂry might have takÂen a hapÂpiÂer turn.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall, on FaceÂbook, or on InstaÂgram.















