Die Hard is a ChristÂmas movie. That once-conÂtrarÂiÂan catÂeÂgoÂrizaÂtion has increasÂingÂly been acceptÂed over the past couÂple of decades, at least since an ediÂtor with whom I’ve often worked first declared it in a Slate roundup. As a result, John McTierÂnan’s sturÂdy piece of one-buildÂing eightÂies HolÂlyÂwood action may have disÂplaced It’s a WonÂderÂful Life as a holÂiÂday home-video traÂdiÂtion in cerÂtain houseÂholds. But it’s also stoked a broadÂer desire for ever more alterÂnaÂtive ChristÂmas movies with subÂtle, even subÂverÂsive holÂiÂday eleÂments. If you, too, can’t hanÂdle yet anothÂer viewÂing of MirÂaÂcle on 34th Street, A ChristÂmas StoÂry, or Home Alone this year, have a look at the top ten lists comÂpiled in these four videos, which offer a selecÂtion of films beyond — someÂtimes well beyond — the estabÂlished seaÂsonÂal canon.
These selecÂtions come from a variÂety of genÂres, includÂing the superÂhero picÂture: if you haven’t seen BatÂman Returns in a few decades, you may have forÂgotÂten how thorÂoughÂly Tim BurÂton satÂuÂrates it with ChristÂmas imagery, albeit of a kind suitÂed to the dank, menÂacÂing Gotham City. Those who want to crank up the darkÂness furÂther still would do well to put on the CanaÂdiÂan sororÂiÂty-house slashÂer film Black ChristÂmas, which also appears on more than one of these lists.
Joe DanÂte’s YuleÂtide-set GremÂlins conÂtains much highÂer-budÂget specÂtaÂcles of destrucÂtion, albeit comedic ones; the humor of TerÂry Gilliam’s Brazil, anothÂer elabÂoÂrate mid-eightÂies auteur project, runs to the dystopiÂan, a senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty cerÂtainÂly present in the holÂiÂday seaÂson itself, if selÂdom treatÂed with such grotesque vividÂness.
The work of no sinÂgle proÂfesÂsionÂal makes these alterÂnaÂtive ChristÂmas movie lists more often than Shane Black, the writer of Lethal Weapon (with Die Hard, the makÂings of a holÂiÂday douÂble bill if ever there was one) and The Long Kiss GoodÂnight, as well as the writer-direcÂtor of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Iron Man 3, and The Nice Guys. That all of those picÂtures are set at ChristÂmasÂtime makes them feel — no matÂter how heightÂened, fanÂtasÂtiÂcal, or visuÂal effects-satÂuÂratÂed they may be — palÂpaÂbly conÂnectÂed to our own realÂiÂty. It also tends to intenÂsiÂfy the draÂma: as Black remarked in one interÂview, “ChristÂmas repÂreÂsents a litÂtle stutÂter in the march of days, a hush in which we have a chance to assess and retÂroÂspect our lives.” Which hardÂly means, of course, that it can’t be enterÂtainÂing.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Watch SanÂta Claus, the EarÂliÂest Movie About SanÂta in ExisÂtence (1898)
Watch The Insects’ ChristÂmas from 1913: A Stop Motion Film StarÂring a Cast of Dead Bugs
An AniÂmatÂed ChristÂmas Fable by MauÂrice Sendak (1977)
StanÂley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut, the Most TrouÂbling ChristÂmas Film Ever Made
Blue ChristÂmas: A CriÂteÂriÂon Video Essay
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
The youngest movieÂgoÂers today do not, of course, rememÂber a time before visuÂal effects could be creÂatÂed digÂiÂtalÂly. What may give us more pause is that, at this point in cinÂeÂma hisÂtoÂry, most of their parÂents don’t rememÂber it either. ConÂsidÂer the fact that Steven SpielÂberg’s JurasÂsic Park, with its once imposÂsiÂbly realÂisÂtic (and still wholÂly passÂable) CGI dinosaurs, came out 32 years ago. That may put it, we must acknowlÂedge, into the realm of the “clasÂsic,” the kind of picÂture whose enterÂtainÂment valÂue holds up despite — or because of — the qualÂiÂties that fix it in its time. EqualÂly specÂtacÂuÂlar but longer-canÂonÂized clasÂsics pose a greater chalÂlenge to the imagÂiÂnaÂtions of young viewÂers, who can hardÂly guess how they could have been made “before comÂputÂers.”
After seeÂing the notable examÂples proÂvidÂed in the new PriÂmal Space video above, they’ll cerÂtainÂly underÂstand one thing: it wasÂn’t easy. Even a seemÂingÂly simÂple effect like the pen floatÂing loose through the zero-gravÂiÂty cabÂin in 2001: A Space Odyssey required no small degree of ingeÂnuÂity. We might natÂuÂralÂly assume that filmÂmakÂers in 1968 would have accomÂplished it with a couÂple of pieces of Scotch tape and fishÂing line, but that would have resultÂed in unacÂceptÂable tanÂgling probÂlems, to say nothÂing of the trickÂiÂness of ensurÂing, quite litÂerÂalÂly, that the strings didÂn’t show. Instead, KubrickÂ’s team endÂed up attachÂing the pen to a sheet of glass — meticÂuÂlousÂly cleaned, no doubt, to elimÂiÂnate the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂty of streaks — large enough to occuÂpy the entire frame and thus go unnoÂticed by the viewÂer. It was then slowÂly rotatÂed by a crank-turnÂing assisÂtant.
A few difÂferÂent effects from 2001 come in for explaÂnaÂtion throughÂout the course of the video, includÂing the mulÂtiÂple-expoÂsure phoÂtogÂraÂphy that made posÂsiÂble shots of spaceÂcraft passÂing planÂets as well as the psyÂcheÂdelÂic “Star Gate” sequence toward the end. Though some of the devices used in these processÂes were put togethÂer just for the proÂducÂtion, the underÂlyÂing techÂniques had already been evolvÂing for more than 60 years. Indeed, many were pioÂneered by Georges MĂ©liès, preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture for A Trip to the Moon from 1902, the very first sciÂence-ficÂtion film. This video goes behind the scenes of a work from the year before: L’Homme Ă la tĂŞte en caoutchouc, or The Man with the RubÂber Head, in which MĂ©liès manÂaged a shot in which his own craÂniÂum inflates to huge proÂporÂtions withÂout the use of so much as a zoom lens.
OthÂer examÂples, drawn from a range of beloved films from MetropÂoÂlis to Mary PopÂpins, illusÂtrate the invenÂtiveÂness born of sheer techÂniÂcal limÂiÂtaÂtion in the days when filmÂmakÂing was a wholÂly anaÂlog affair. In some casÂes, the effects these proÂducÂtions pulled off with miniaÂtures, prisms, and mirÂrors 60, 80, 100 years ago look as good as anyÂthing HolÂlyÂwood puts on the screen today — or rather betÂter, since the innate physÂiÂcalÂiÂty behind them makes them feel more “real.” PerÂhaps unsurÂprisÂingÂly, this video’s artiÂfiÂcial-intelÂliÂgence course sponÂsor makes refÂerÂence to the endÂless range of visuÂal posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties availÂable to those who masÂter that techÂnolÂoÂgy. And it’s not imposÂsiÂble that we now stand on the cusp of a revÂoÂluÂtion in visuÂal effects for that reaÂson, with at least as much of an upside and downÂside as CGI. If so, we should preÂpare ourÂselves to hear the quesÂtion, from chilÂdren born today, of how anyÂone ever made movies before AI.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
The Art of CreÂatÂing SpeÂcial Effects in Silent Movies: IngeÂnuÂity Before the Age of CGI
How StanÂley Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey: A SevÂen-Part Video Essay
How 2001: A Space Odyssey Became “the HardÂest Film Kubrick Ever Made”
Why Movies Don’t Feel Real AnyÂmore: A Close Look at ChangÂing FilmÂmakÂing TechÂniques
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
If you want to see the Mona Lisa in real life, your first thought may not be to head to the PraÂdo. But accordÂing to a school of thought that has emerged in recent years, the Mona Lisa in Madrid has a greater claim to artisÂtic faithÂfulÂness than the one in Paris. That’s because researchers have disÂcovÂered comÂpelling eviÂdence sugÂgestÂing that what was long conÂsidÂered just anothÂer copy of the most famous paintÂing in the world wasÂn’t made after LeonarÂdo had comÂpletÂed the origÂiÂnal, but conÂcurÂrentÂly with the origÂiÂnal, probÂaÂbly by one of his stuÂdents. Over half a milÂlenÂniÂum, in this view, the Prado’s Mona Lisa has retained the colÂors and details the LouÂvre’s has lost, resultÂing in its preserÂvaÂtion of LeonarÂdo’s intenÂtions today.
Infrared phoÂtogÂraÂphy has even revealed, says the narÂraÂtor of the new InspiÂragÂgio video above, that both paintÂings “share the same changes in the origÂiÂnal sketch. For years, it has been known that LeonarÂdo made small corÂrecÂtions to the shape of the Mona Lisa’s hands, adjustÂments to the line of the eyes, and subÂtle modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtions to the curve of the face,” the very same corÂrecÂtions that were found in the newÂly examÂined copy.
Unlike othÂer copies, the Prado’s verÂsion uses “incredÂiÂbly expenÂsive pigÂments” such as lapis lazuli—imported from Afghanistan—for the sky. This only became eviÂdent durÂing the 2012 restoraÂtion, when the backÂground, long hidÂden under a thick layÂer of black, was finalÂly uncovÂered.

ThereÂafter, the PraÂdo Mona Lisa was exhibÂitÂed alongÂside the Mona Lisa at the LouÂvre in a temÂpoÂrary exhiÂbiÂtion. This gave the pubÂlic the chance to see both how simÂiÂlar they look, and how difÂferÂent. Though undeÂniÂably La GioÂconÂda, the copy doesÂn’t seem quite “right,” in large part because it hasÂn’t deteÂriÂoÂratÂed in the manÂner or to the degree of the origÂiÂnal. LeonarÂdo paintÂed it on a poplar wood panÂel that has givÂen way to countÂless small cracks, and the layÂers of yelÂlow varÂnish added over the cenÂturies have darkÂened to give the whole image a sepia tone. The result, of course, is the texÂture and colÂorÂing we’ve come to assoÂciate with the Mona Lisa by ceaseÂless expoÂsure to her in popÂuÂlar culÂture, even if we’ve nevÂer seen any verÂsion hangÂing in any museÂum. If the Prado’s copy realÂly does reflect LeonarÂdo’s origÂiÂnal artisÂtic choicÂes, we can put at least one hotÂly debatÂed matÂter to rest: the lady realÂly did have eyeÂbrows.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
What Makes Leonardo’s Mona Lisa a Great PaintÂing?: An ExplaÂnaÂtion in 15 MinÂutes
Did LeonarÂdo da VinÂci Paint a First Mona Lisa Before the Mona Lisa?
How Did the Mona Lisa Become the World’s Most Famous PaintÂing?: It’s Not What You Think
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
The AdvenÂtures of Tintin may be a chilÂdren’s comÂic series from mid-twenÂtiÂeth-cenÂtuÂry Europe, but its appeal has long since tranÂscendÂed the boundÂaries of form, culÂture, and genÂerÂaÂtion. In fact, many if not most seriÂousÂly dedÂiÂcatÂed fans of Tintin are in midÂdle age and beyond, and few of them can have avoidÂed ever conÂsidÂerÂing the quesÂtion of his creÂator’s activÂiÂties durÂing the SecÂond World War. Georges Remi, known by the nom de plume HergĂ©, was born to a lowÂer-midÂdle-class famÂiÂly in a BrusÂsels subÂurb in 1907: utterÂly munÂdane beginÂnings, perÂhaps, but ones that would lead to what the apocÂryphal ancient ChiÂnese curse calls interÂestÂing times, even for a young man whose interÂests didÂn’t run far past scoutÂing and drawÂing.
After servÂing in the BelÂgian army, explains hisÂtoÂry YouTuÂber Mark FelÂton in his new video above, Remi was hired by the conÂserÂvÂaÂtive Catholic paper Le Vingtième SièÂcle to draw comics for its chilÂdren’s supÂpleÂment Le Petit Vingtième. It was there that he became HergĂ© and creÂatÂed the boy reporter Tintin, whom the paper’s ediÂtor asked to be sent to a ficÂtionÂalÂized SoviÂet Union in order to expose the evils of the BolÂsheÂviks. PopÂuÂlarÂiÂty came immeÂdiÂateÂly, and built up to the degree that an actor was hired to put his hair into a quiff and “return” by train to an appreÂciaÂtive crowd in BrusÂsels upon the stoÂry’s conÂcluÂsion. There folÂlowed the furÂther advenÂtures of Tintin in the ConÂgo (at the time, a BelÂgian colony) and Tintin in AmerÂiÂca, both of which have since come in for a great deal of critÂiÂcism for their reliance on stereoÂtypes.
Though very much his own artist, HergĂ© at this stage let the polÂiÂtics of Tintin stoÂries be dicÂtatÂed by highÂer-ups. ConÂceived in response to Japan’s invaÂsion of Manchuria, The Blue Lotus, from 1934, did offer him an opporÂtuÂniÂty to increase the realÂism of his art, renÂderÂing the look and feel of ChiÂna as accuÂrateÂly as his research could make posÂsiÂble; he conÂtinÂued to incorÂpoÂrate large amounts of detail from all over the world into The BroÂken Ear, The Black Island, and King Ottokar’s ScepÂtre. Though that last deals with ficÂtionÂal EuroÂpean counÂtries, it also clearÂly satÂiÂrizes the invaÂsive tenÂdenÂcies of Hitler’s GerÂmany — which would come for Hergé’s homeÂland in 1940, shutÂting down Le Petit Vingtième, putting him out of a job, and even reqÂuiÂsiÂtionÂing his home.
EvenÂtuÂalÂly, HergĂ© landÂed on his feet and joined Le Soir, BelÂgium’s largest French-lanÂguage newsÂpaÂper. Though he could pubÂlish Tintin there, the Nazis had turned it into their ideÂoÂlogÂiÂcal mouthÂpiece, a fact that didÂn’t reflect well on HergĂ© after the Allied vicÂtoÂry. He found himÂself blackÂlistÂed and catÂeÂgoÂrized with the thouÂsands of BelÂgian colÂlabÂoÂraÂtors who could receive the death penalÂty or life in prison, but an invesÂtiÂgaÂtion into his case found him to be “a blunÂderÂer rather than a traiÂtor” — shades of P. G. WodeÂhouse makÂing broadÂcasts about the lighter side of internÂment for the Gestapo. His good standÂing as a citÂiÂzen and artist was evenÂtuÂalÂly restored, though even today, his wartime activÂiÂties are occaÂsionÂalÂly called into quesÂtion. Still, he was able to conÂtinÂue Tintin’s advenÂtures until he died in 1983, engagÂing in only the kind of colÂlabÂoÂraÂtion he could do with his staff at StuÂdios HergĂ©.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
HergĂ© Draws Tintin in VinÂtage Footage (and What Explains the Character’s EndurÂing Appeal)
How Andy Warhol and Tintin CreÂator HergĂ© MutuÂalÂly Admired and InfluÂenced One AnothÂer
Comics Inspired by WaitÂing for Godot, FeaÂturÂing Tintin, Roz Chast, and BeavÂis & Butthead
How the Nazis Waged War on ModÂern Art: Inside the “DegenÂerÂate Art” ExhiÂbiÂtion of 1937
The Nazis’ 10 ConÂtrol-Freak Rules for Jazz PerÂformÂers: A Strange List from World War II
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Paul Thomas AnderÂsonÂ’s latÂest film, the loose Thomas PynÂchon adapÂtaÂtion One BatÂtle After AnothÂer, serves up many a memÂoÂrable scene. But for a cerÂtain kind of cinephile, nothÂing — not the terÂrorÂist attacks, not the chasÂes, not the swerves into askew comÂeÂdy — sticks in the mind quite so much as the moment in which LeonarÂdo diCapriÂo’s stoned proÂtagÂoÂnist tunes in to a broadÂcast of Gillo PonÂtecorÂvo’s The BatÂtle of Algiers. First released in 1966 (and curÂrentÂly free to watch on YouTube in cerÂtain regions), that picÂture has now been a mainÂstay of film-studÂies sylÂlabi long enough that one forÂgets just how much it would have starÂtled its earÂliÂest viewÂers, more than a few of whom had no idea whether they were watchÂing a war movie or genÂuine AlgerÂian War newsÂreel footage.
Some of those viewÂers includÂed major filmÂmakÂers, not least StanÂley Kubrick, who latÂer described all films as “false docÂuÂmenÂtaries,” and PonÂtecorÂvo’s work as an espeÂcialÂly impresÂsive examÂple thereÂof. AnthoÂny Frewin, who worked as KubrickÂ’s perÂsonÂal assisÂtant, rememÂbers the direcÂtor telling him that “I couldÂn’t realÂly underÂstand what cinÂeÂma was capaÂble of withÂout seeÂing The BatÂtle of Algiers. He was still enthusÂing about it priÂor to his death.”
The new StuÂdioBinder video at the top of the post also includes tesÂtiÂmoÂniÂals from a host of othÂer auteurs includÂing WernÂer HerÂzog, Steven SoderÂbergh, OlivÂer Stone, AlfonÂso CuarĂłn, Spike Lee, Mira Nair, and ChristoÂpher Nolan.
Kathryn Bigelow — who, as the direcÂtor of picÂtures like The Hurt LockÂer and Zero Dark ThirÂty, knows someÂthing about spinÂning recent milÂiÂtary conÂflicts into comÂpelling, realÂisÂtic thrillers — pulled The BatÂtle of Algiers from the shelves on her visÂit to the CriÂteÂriÂon ColÂlecÂtion’s closÂet. She calls it “probÂaÂbly my favorite movie of all time,” adding that “the metronome of tenÂsion is almost insufÂferÂable, but I say that as a comÂpliÂment.” A young Roger Ebert, in his conÂtemÂpoÂrary review of the film, warned that it “may be a deepÂer film expeÂriÂence than many audiÂences can withÂstand: too cynÂiÂcal, too true, too cruÂel and too heartÂbreakÂing. It is about the AlgerÂian war, but those not interÂestÂed in AlgeÂria may subÂstiÂtute anothÂer war.”
Such a “uniÂverÂsal frame of refÂerÂence” is also comÂmon to the othÂer highÂlights of the ItalÂian neoÂreÂalÂist moveÂment, which also include RoberÂto Rossellini’s Rome, Open City, VitÂtoÂrio De Sica’s BicyÂcle Thieves, and LuchiÂno VisÂconÂti’s The Earth TremÂbles, with their stark black-and-white cinÂeÂmatogÂraÂphy, their real, often still war-torn locaÂtions, and their mostÂly non-proÂfesÂsionÂal actors. Despite their venÂerÂaÂbilÂiÂty, these films can remind even us twenÂty-first-cenÂtuÂry viewÂers who feel as if we’ve seen it all just how much cinÂeÂmatÂic potenÂtial remains untapped. As Paul Thomas AnderÂson puts it, “It’s always a good idea to watch The BatÂtle of Algiers again, just as a cinÂeÂmatÂic exerÂcise to get you excitÂed” — no alterÂation of conÂsciousÂness required beforeÂhand.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
StanÂley Kubrick’s List of Top 10 Films: The First and Only List He Ever CreÂatÂed
Fear and Desire: StanÂley Kubrick’s First and Least-Seen FeaÂture Film (1953)
How PostÂwar ItalÂian CinÂeÂma CreÂatÂed La Dolce Vita and Then the Paparazzi
AniÂmatÂed IntroÂducÂtions to Edward Said’s GroundÂbreakÂing Book OriÂenÂtalÂism
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
If you’ve seen a David Byrne conÂcert in recent years, you know that he perÂforms with a large ensemÂble of musiÂcians, each carÂryÂing their own instruÂments across the stage, all while movÂing in intriÂcateÂly choreÂoÂgraphed patÂterns. On his curÂrent tour, Byrne and his band stopped by NPR’s stuÂdio and played a very difÂferÂent kind of show—a show tightÂly squeezed behind NPR’s Tiny Desk. As you will see above, they perÂformed two songs (“EveryÂbody Laughs” and “Don’t Be Like That”) from Byrne’s new album, along with two TalkÂing Heads favorites, “(NothÂing But) FlowÂers” and “Life DurÂing Wartime.” Enjoy!
RelatÂed ConÂtent
A Behind-the-Scenes Tour of NPR’s Tiny Desk ConÂcert
224 Books About Music in David Byrne’s PerÂsonÂal Library
Read More...
While not every Open CulÂture readÂer dreams of movÂing to Japan and becomÂing a woodÂblock printÂmakÂer, it’s a safe bet that at least a few of you enterÂtain just such a fanÂtaÂsy from time to time. David Bull, a British-Born CanaÂdiÂan who got his first expoÂsure to the art of ukiyo‑e in his late twenÂties, actuÂalÂly did it. Though he’s been livÂing in Japan and steadiÂly purÂsuÂing his art there since 1986, only in recent years has he become known around the world. That’s thanks to his YouTube chanÂnel, which we’ve feaÂtured here sevÂerÂal times before. In the video above, one of his most popÂuÂlar, he lets his viewÂers expeÂriÂence printÂmakÂing from his point of view, seeÂing what he sees and even hearÂing what he hears.
Though Bull norÂmalÂly focusÂes on the earÂly stage carvÂing images into the blocks, here he spends about an hour on the final printÂing phase, going through a batch of eight sheets. As even a few minÂutes’ viewÂing reveals, this is a labor-intenÂsive and thorÂoughÂly anaÂlog process.
That impresÂsion will be heightÂened if you wear headÂphones, since, as Bull explains, he shot the video while wearÂing in-ear microÂphones that record the sounds of the job just as he hears them. This parÂticÂuÂlar aspect of the proÂducÂtion required him to rise conÂsidÂerÂably earÂliÂer than usuÂal, in order to avoid the conÂsidÂerÂable dayÂtime noise on the streets of Tokyo right outÂside his workÂshop — and thus to more fulÂly satÂisÂfy the large ASMR crowd.
The term ASMR, or “Autonomous SenÂsoÂry MeridÂiÂan Response,” refers to a set of pleasÂing senÂsaÂtions trigÂgered by cerÂtain kinds of sound, often those proÂduced by soft-spoÂken indiÂvidÂuÂals like Bull or the kind of repetÂiÂtive, methodÂiÂcal tool work he does. Chances are, many if not most of the almost 950,000 views this video has racked up so far have come from ASMR enthuÂsiÂasts less interÂestÂed in JapanÂese woodÂblock printÂing per se than in the genÂerÂal aesÂthetÂic expeÂriÂence of watchÂing and lisÂtenÂing to JapanÂese woodÂblock printÂing — at least at first. We all know how life can go: one day you’re checkÂing out YouTube, just lookÂing to relax, and the next you’re ensconced in Asakusa, havÂing wholÂly devotÂed yourÂself to a three-and-a-half-milÂlenÂniÂum-year-old traÂdiÂtionÂal art form.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Enter a DigÂiÂtal Archive of 213,000+ BeauÂtiÂful JapanÂese WoodÂblock Prints
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
As hard as it may be to believe, some of us have nevÂer seen a movie belongÂing to the MarÂvel CinÂeÂmatÂic UniÂverse. If you’re one of those uniniÂtiÂatÂed, none of the countÂless clips incorÂpoÂratÂed into the Like StoÂries of Old video essay above will tempt you to get iniÂtiÂatÂed. Nor will the laments aired by host Tom van der LinÂden, who, despite once enjoyÂing the MCU himÂself, evenÂtuÂalÂly came to wonÂder why keepÂing up with its releasÂes had begun to feel less like a thrill than a chore. As if their CGI-laden sound and fury weren’t tryÂing enough, there’s also “the conÂstant quipÂping, the annoyÂing self-awareÂness, the fact that everyÂthing has to be a franÂchise now.”
Van der LinÂden labels a cenÂtral facÂtor in the decline of the MCU “stoÂryÂtelling entropy.” ClasÂsic films, you may have noticed, conÂcenÂtrate pracÂtiÂcalÂly all the enerÂgy in every facet of their proÂducÂtion toward the expresÂsion of speÂcifÂic themes, stoÂries, and charÂacÂters; at their best, their every line, gesÂture, cut, and invenÂtion repÂreÂsents the tip of an artisÂtic iceÂberg. Take, to use a popÂuÂlar examÂple, the lightsaber introÂduced in Star Wars, which Van der LinÂden calls “not just a weapon, but a metaphor” that “symÂbolÂiÂcalÂly comÂmuÂniÂcates a lot about the phiÂlosÂoÂphy of its wieldÂer, and about the largÂer world that it exists in,” conÂdensÂing “a mulÂtiÂtude of meanÂings and ideas into a simÂple, sinÂguÂlar object.”
It does so in the first two or three movies, at any rate. In the decades since, as the Star Wars uniÂverse has grown ever vaster, more comÂplex, and conÂcepÂtuÂalÂly unwieldy, so the proÂlifÂerÂaÂtion and modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion of the once-marÂvelous lightsaber has turned it into someÂthing munÂdane, even banal. So it goes with stoÂryÂtelling entropy, a pheÂnomÂeÂnon that afflicts every narÂraÂtive franÂchise comÂmerÂcialÂly comÂpelled to grow withÂout end. That process of expanÂsion evenÂtuÂalÂly turns even the most capÂtiÂvatÂing origÂiÂnal mateÂriÂals difÂfuse and uninÂvolvÂing to all but the hardÂest-core fans — by which point it has usuÂalÂly become obviÂous that creÂators themÂselves have long since lost their own pasÂsion for the stoÂries.
Most MCU viewÂers will admit that it has proÂduced missÂes as well as hits. But MarÂvelizaÂtion, as Van der LinÂden calls it, has also inspired othÂer, imiÂtaÂtive corÂpoÂrate franÂchisÂes to pump out globÂalÂly marÂketable conÂtent fierceÂly proÂtectÂed by intelÂlecÂtuÂal propÂerÂty lawyers — and has even drained the interÂest out of realms of film and teleÂviÂsion that have nothÂing to do with superÂheroes, swords, or sci-fi. HolÂlyÂwood has always been about the botÂtom line, of course, but only in recent decades have marÂket satÂuÂraÂtion, cross-platÂform stratÂeÂgy, and maxÂiÂmum crossover potenÂtial come to domÂiÂnate its priÂorÂiÂties so comÂpleteÂly. From the MCU or othÂerÂwise, a MarÂvelized movie is one that, at botÂtom, has no pressÂing need to be made — and that we, ultiÂmateÂly, feel no pressÂing need to see.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Why Movies Don’t Feel Real AnyÂmore: A Close Look at ChangÂing FilmÂmakÂing TechÂniques
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
Whether or not we believe that the cards of the tarot have superÂnatÂurÂal powÂers, we all think of them priÂmarÂiÂly as tools for divÂinaÂtion. It might seem as if they’ve played that culÂturÂal role since time immemoÂrÂiÂal, but in fact, that parÂticÂuÂlar use only goes back to the eighÂteenth cenÂtuÂry. They were, at first, playÂing cards, used for a game known as tarocÂchi in RenaisÂsance Italy. That was the origÂiÂnal purÂpose of the oldÂest tarot cards in posÂsesÂsion of the VicÂtoÂria and Albert MuseÂum, which you can see unboxed by curaÂtor Ruth HibÂbard in the video above. ThroughÂout its fifÂteen minÂutes, HibÂbard and two colÂleagues also “unbox” five othÂer decks proÂduced across the half-milÂlenÂniÂum of tarot hisÂtoÂry.
These include the earÂly eighÂteenth-cenÂtuÂry MinchiÂate Deck, whose name refers to a slightÂly more comÂplex FloÂrenÂtine card game that evolved alongÂside tarot. The word itself posÂsiÂbly origÂiÂnates from the term sminchiare, “to play your highÂest card” (though in SicilÂian dialect today, it has a rather difÂferÂent meanÂing).
LatÂer, cirÂca 1807, comes Le Petit OraÂcle des Dames, “the petite oraÂcle of women,” the earÂliÂest deck in the video expressÂly proÂduced for carÂtomanÂcy, or preÂdicÂtion of the future through cards — albeit only as a form of light enterÂtainÂment for gathÂerÂings of ladies. A decade or two latÂer, out came the luxÂuÂriÂous TarocÂco SoprafiÂno, which bears lavÂish illusÂtraÂtions made with copÂper-plate engravÂing and colÂored stenÂcilÂing.
The V&A also has an earÂly twenÂtiÂeth-cenÂtuÂry tarot deck with rich, liveÂly art creÂatÂed by the occultist Pamela ColÂman-Smith, whose work has preÂviÂousÂly been feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture. “What makes these cards so great is that they’re just so rich with mytholÂoÂgy and symÂbolÂoÂgy and mulÂtiÂlayÂered meanÂing,” says curaÂtor BeckÂie BillingÂham, “allowÂing you to read the cards in many difÂferÂent ways.” That’s even true of the much more theÂmatÂiÂcalÂly delibÂerÂate deck that folÂlows, an examÂple from the earÂly two-thouÂsands that brings into our digÂiÂtal cenÂtuÂry the misÂsion of tarot art to “reveal clanÂdesÂtine knowlÂedge and the hidÂden powÂers at work in the world.” ComÂputÂers, drones, Aldous HuxÂley, world wars, the World Wide Web: perÂhaps these cards let us see our future, but they cerÂtainÂly give us a clear view on our present.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Meet the ForÂgotÂten Female Artist Behind the World’s Most PopÂuÂlar Tarot Deck (1909)
Behold the Sola-BusÂca Tarot Deck, the EarÂliÂest ComÂplete Set of Tarot Cards (1490)
AleÂjanÂdro JodorÂowsky Explains How Tarot Cards Can Give You CreÂative InspiÂraÂtion
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...
From the mighty Maya civÂiÂlizaÂtion, which domÂiÂnatÂed MesoamerÂiÂca for more than three and a half milÂlenÂnia, we have exactÂly four books. Only one of them preÂdates the arrival of SpanÂish conÂquisÂtaÂdors in the sixÂteenth cenÂtuÂry: the CĂłdice Maya de MĂ©xÂiÂco, or Maya Codex of MexÂiÂco, which was creÂatÂed between 1021 and 1152. Though incomÂplete, and hardÂly in good shape othÂerÂwise, its artÂwork — colÂored in places with preÂcious mateÂriÂals — vividÂly evokes an ancient worldÂview now all but lost. In the video above from the GetÂty MuseÂum and SmarthisÂtoÂry, art hisÂtoÂriÂans Andrew TurnÂer and LauÂren KilÂroy-Ewbank tell us what we’re lookÂing at when we behold the remains of this sacred Mayan book, the oldÂest ever found in the AmerÂiÂcÂas.
“This book has a conÂtroÂverÂsial hisÂtoÂry,” says TurnÂer. “It was long conÂsidÂered to be a fake due to the strange cirÂcumÂstances in which it surÂfaced.” After its disÂcovÂery in a priÂvate colÂlecÂtion in MexÂiÂco City in the nineÂteen-sixÂties, it was rumored to have been lootÂed from a cave in ChiÂaÂpas.
At first proÂnounced a fake by experts, due to its lack of resemÂblance to the othÂer extant Mayan texts, it was only verÂiÂfied as the genÂuine artiÂcle in 2018. For a non-speÂcialÂist, the quesÂtion remains: what is the CĂłdice about? Its purÂpose, as KilÂroy-Ewbank puts it, is astroÂnomÂiÂcal, relayÂing as it does “inforÂmaÂtion about the cycle of the planÂet Venus” — which, as TurnÂer adds, “was conÂsidÂered a danÂgerÂous planÂet” by the Mayans.

The CĂłdice conÂtains records of Venus’ 584-day cycle over the course of 140 years, tesÂtiÂfyÂing to the scrutiÂny Mayan astronomers gave to its comÂpliÂcatÂed patÂtern of risÂing and falling. They thus manÂaged to deterÂmine — as many ancient civÂiÂlizaÂtions did not — that it was both the MornÂing Star and the Evening Star, although they seem to have been more interÂestÂed in what its moveÂments revealed about the intenÂtions of the deities they saw as conÂtrolÂling it, and thus the likeÂliÂhood of events like war or famine. Those gods weren’t benevÂoÂlent: one page shows “a frightÂful skeleÂtal deity that has a blunt knife stickÂing out of his nasal cavÂiÂty,” holdÂing “a giant jagged blade up” with one hand and “the hair of a capÂtive whose head he’s freshÂly sevÂered” with the othÂer. That’s hardÂly the sort of image that comes to our modÂern minds when we gaze up at the night sky, but then, we don’t see things like the Mayans did.
via Aeon
RelatÂed conÂtent:
A 400-Year-Old Ring that Unfolds to Track the MoveÂments of the HeavÂens
The Ancient AstronÂoÂmy of StoneÂhenge DecodÂed
How the Ancient Mayans Used ChocoÂlate as MonÂey
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on the social netÂwork forÂmerÂly known as TwitÂter at @colinmarshall.
Read More...